In the rollercoaster world of pharmaceutical stocks, 2023 has been like riding the Cyclone at Coney Island – thrilling for some, nauseating for others.
Take Pfizer (PFE), for instance. It’s seen its stock take a nosedive by 43.4%. That’s the kind of drop that makes you check if your wallet’s still there. Then there’s Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), trailing behind with a 16.4% decline. Not as dramatic, but still enough to make your stomach lurch.
Meanwhile, there’s Eli Lilly (LLY), playing the hero as it rockets up by an extraordinary 66.8%, thanks to its new weight-loss drugs. At this point, investors are practically throwing ticker-tape parades.
However, even with Eli Lilly’s star performance, the S&P 500 Pharmaceuticals index still shows a downturn of 2.3%.
Now, as we've seen earnings reports trickle in, a trend has started to stick out: positive results aren’t shielding drugmakers from a sell-off. Look at Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY), both hovering near their 52-week lows.
Still, investors are giving the biotechnology and healthcare stocks the side-eye for several reasons.
The new Medicare drug-price negotiation program is like a strict parent setting a curfew – it’s potentially restricting pricing power for certain medications. Plus, as interest rates climb, the allure of high dividend yields is diminishing faster than my motivation to hit the gym.
In this skeptical market, however, there are some optimistic investors who are digging through the bargain bin, hoping to strike gold.
Enter Viatris (VTRS), trading at just 3.3 times earnings and boasting a 5.1% dividend yield. It sounds promising, but only a few brave souls are recommending a buy.
Basically, this situation with Viatris is pretty much like finding a designer shirt at a discount store – sure, it’s cheap, but will it fall apart after two washes? Let’s take a closer look.
Viatris’s backstory is a bit of a soap opera. Born from the merger of Mylan and Pfizer's Upjohn unit, it carries the baggage of Mylan's EpiPen pricing scandal.
Since rebranding, Viatris has been trying to find its footing. Despite a shiny new business plan, which involves selling off assets for a potential $9 billion, investor confidence remains shaky at best.
Notably, its decision to exit the biosimilars market, where heavy hitters like Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) and AbbVie (ABBV) play ball, has been seen as a bold move. Considering the potential of that market, it felt like leaving a high-stakes poker game just when the chips were starting to stack up. And with CVS Health (CVS) eyeing this lucrative space, Viatris might find itself wishing it had stayed at the table.
These past months, investors have been capturing this drama through a meme – comparing 'adjusted Ebitda' to 'free cash flow' with images of Jennifer Aniston and Iggy Pop. It’s a cheeky way of saying that Viatris’s financial projections might be wearing rose-colored glasses.
Looking ahead, Viatris is aiming for $2.3 billion in free cash flow next year, buoyed by recent sales. But the big question is: can it turn these assets into growth, or will it continue its high-wire act?
Reviewing its recent moves and their effects on the market, the Viatris saga has turned into a cautionary tale for investors in the pharma world – it’s a reminder that sometimes the threat of a nosedive is as real as the thrill of a skyrocket.
So, what’s the takeaway for those of us with skin in the game?
It seems wise to keep our eyes peeled and not jump on any bandwagons too hastily. Viatris, amidst its strategic transformations and market challenges, is worth watching with a careful eye. While its cash flow looks steady through 2027, thanks to planned asset sales, the long-term picture is as clear as mud.
As we navigate the unpredictable waves of the pharmaceutical market this year, let’s remember – it’s not just about holding on for the ride. It’s about knowing when to get on, when to get off, and maybe, just maybe, when to enjoy the view from the sidelines with some popcorn in hand. I say hold off from buying Viatris shares at the moment.
