Featured Trades: (COAL VS. NATURAL GAS),
(BTU), (RTP), (ACI), (CHK), (BNR)

2) Peabody Energy (BTU) Takes a Hatchet to the Natural Gas Industry. After my year in the White House Press Corps, I vowed never to return, and took a really long shower, hoping to scrub every last spec of prejudice, self interest, and institutionalized corruption off of my battered carcass. But sometimes I see some maneuvering that is so unprincipled, crooked, and against the national interest that I am unable to restrain my fingers from the keyboard. For shorthand, let's call them lies.

I'm talking about the absolutely merciless hatchet job the coal producers are inflicting on the natural gas industry. Coal today accounts for 50% of America's 3.7 trillion kilowatts in annual power production. That's a lot of vested interest. Chesapeake Energy's (CHK) Aubrey McClendon says correctly that if we just shut down aging conventional power plants that are over 35 years old, and replace them with modern gas fired plants, the US would achieve one third of its ambitious 2020 carbon reduction goals. The share of relatively clean burning natural gas of the national power load would pop up from the current 23% to 50%. Even the Sierra Club's Carl Pope says this is the fastest and cheapest way to make a serious dent in greenhouse gas emissions.

So what do we get? The press has recently been flooded with exaggerated or untrue reports of widespread well poisonings and forest destruction caused by the fracting processes that was used to recently discover a new 100 year supply of ultra cheap CH4. While the coal industry has had 200 years to build a formidable lobby in Washington, the gas industry is a neophyte, their only public champions being McClendon and T. Boone Pickens.

But memories in Washington are long, and Obama & Co. recall all too clearly that this was the pair that financed the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth that torpedoed Democrat John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign. What goes around, comes around.

Whose hands are dripping with blood here? Peabody Energy (BTU),? which ripped 200 million short tons of the black stuff out of the ground in 2008, followed by Rio Tinto (RTP) at 140 million tons, and Arch Coal (ARCH) with 134 million tons, poured millions of dollars into Washington to lavishly finance lobbyists. Their mission is to render toothless Cap & Trade legislation, block subsidies for natural gas which both parties seem to agree on, dilute environmental legislation, and promote the myth that the whole global warming thing is nothing more than a leftist hoax, thus keeping hands off King Coal.

Senators and congressmen from the top three coal producing states have been the eager facilitators: Wyoming at 467 million short tons in 2008 (Thanks Dick Cheney!), West Virginia at 157 million tons, and Pennsylvania at 65 million tons. That dinosaur of a union, the United Mine Workers, is another guilty party. You might even blame Warren Buffet's Burlington Northern (BNR), which earns 70% of its revenues from shipping coal across the country for export to China. This is the wellspring for the money that is financing all those conservative initiatives, energy related, or not.

This will be unhappy news for the 23,000 the American Lung Association expects coal emissions to kill this year. How many will clean burning natural gas bump off? None. Can't the coal industry be happy selling everything they rip out of the ground to China? If you are lacking an ounce of conscience and are willing to turn a blind eye to where your trading profits come from, then use the current sell off in all hard assets to pick up (BTU), (RTP), and (ACI). China's demand for our coal remains insatiable, and domestic demand isn't about to go up in smoke overnight either. You can always donate your profits to the Sierra Club. After all, I recommended Russia, why not King Coal.

There! I've had my say. Now I'm going to go have another long shower.

It's a Long Way to Washington

Featured Trades: (SOUTH KOREA), (EWY)
(FXI)
South Korea iShares ETF
iShares FTSE Xinhua China 25

1) Why Your Next Car May be a Hyundai. I have been banging on about South Korea (EWY) for some time now as the 'K' that should be in the acronym 'BRICK', the country that has successfully carved out a niche between the rock and the hard place, China and Japan. So when the recent Vice Minister of Finance for the ROK, Byongwon Bahk, passed through town, I leapt at the opportunity to have dinner.

The wrenching, soul searching rebuilding and re-regulation of the financial system the US is suffering now, South Korea went through during the Asian financial crisis in 1998. That meant Korean banks entered the recent meltdown with less leverage, better balance sheets, and a healthier consumer loan book than its American counterparts. These institutions have non performing loan ratios to kill for.

The happy dividend was a classic 'V' shaped recovery last year, it's GDP hand springing in a matter of months from a -5% rate to a +5.75% in a quarters, according to the IMF. That enabled the KOSPI, the main Korean stock index, to outperform China's, bringing in a 57% return in 2009--no mean feat. An export led recovery boosted the current account surplus, suddenly transforming the Won into a hard currency.

This stellar performance gained Korea membership into the exclusive G-20 club of industrial nations. Korea is now pursuing a clever export strategy by climbing up the value chain from below and getting American and European consumers to replace more expensive Japanese and German cars with KIA's and Hyundai's, which deliver the same quality for half the price.

South Korea has become a de facto indirect China play, as the country now ships 25% of its exports there, bumping the US from the number one spot, which now only takes 11% of exports. Upwardly mobile Chinese consumers clamor for Samsung and Hyundai products.

I was blown away when I heard that Korea Electric Power won the contract to build four giant 1.4 megawatt electric power plants in the United Arab Emirates for $20.4 billion. The announcement was a thumb in the eye for the deserving French, whose EPR 1600MW reactor was thought to be the hands down winner. No doubt some old fashioned incentives were in play, but the harsh reality is that the KEPCO bid was thought to undercut competitors by as much as 50%. My only regret about this deal is that I will no longer be able to fly my Cessna down a long uninterrupted stretch of the Emirates coast, a restricted area almost certainly about to pop up on? my navigation chart. Last time I checked, those planes didn't carry anti missile countermeasures.

The deal speaks volumes about the direction the global economy is taking. In one fell swoop, South Korea leveraged its low labor cost to take a great leap up the international value chain, using what is basically a simple technology. What is a nuclear power plant, but a fancy way to boil water? Bottom line: South Korea takes a quantum leap ahead in the race for global competitiveness, while the US falls further back into the dust.

There are challenges longer term. Korea has to win the race to develop a service economy, while its elephantine neighbors are still over reliant on manufacturing. Think medical tourism a la Bangkok and New Delhi. It also has the world's lowest birth rate, which at 1.19, is far below the replacement rate of 2.2. Seoul is the easiest major city in the world to flag a taxi, drivers outnumbering New York by 7:1 on a per capita basis, as this is a traditional parking palace for the unemployed.? As I know you are all astute followers of demography, you'll immediately grasp that fewer babies today mean a dearth of consumers in 20 years. There is also the small issue of the psychotic megalomaniac who lives next door with the starving million man army.

Use this global correction to accumulate the South Korea ETF (EWY). And those who don't see this as a life or death contest for economic survival that we can no longer take for granted, better get their heads out of the sand.

The only downside of the dinner for me was that after gulping down huge quantities of garlic soaked kimchee, my social life was put on an indefinite hold.

The Only Unknown for South Korea

Featured Trades: (COMMODITY OVERVIEW),
(FCX), (VALE), (RIG), (JOY), (CCJ), (FSLR), (UNG), (USO), (MOO), (DBA), (MOS), (MON), (AGU), (POT), (PHO), (FIW)

2) Don't Buy Anything That Can Be Created With a Printing Press. I just want to take a moment to provide the long term view of commodities. This is my favorite asset class for the next decade, as investors increasingly catch on to the secular move out of paper assets into hard ones. Don't buy anything that can be manufactured with a printing press.

Focus instead on assets that are in short supply, are enjoying an exponential growth in demand, and take five years to bring new supply online. The Malthusian argument on population growth also applies to commodities; hyperbolic demand inevitably overwhelms linear supply growth. Consumers want to buy stuff tomorrow, but many commodities take up to a decade to bring new production online.

Of course, we're already eight years into what is probably a 20 year secular bull market for commodities and these things are no longer as cheap as they once were. Copper at 85 cents a pound? Oil at $8 a barrel. You could have bought all you wanted 10-12 years ago at these prices, which are distant memories today. There is no doubt the hot money is here in size, so bring on the volatility. You are going to have to allow these things to breathe.

Ultimately this is a demographic play that cashes in on rising standards of living in the biggest and highest growth emerging markets. Some one billion people are expected to join the middle class over the next decade, and 2 billion by 2050. All of them are going to want to buy 'things' made out of natural resources.

You can start with the traditional base commodities of copper and iron ore. The derivative equity plays here are Freeport McMoRan (FCX) and Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (VALE).

Add the energies of oil, coal, uranium, and the equities Transocean (RIG), ExxonMobile (XOM), Occidebtal Petroleum (OXY), Joy Global (JOY), and Cameco (CCJ). Crude (USO) has in fact become the new global de facto currency (along with gold), and probably $30 of the current $75.50 price reflects monetary demand, on top of $45.50 worth of actual demand from consumers. That will help it spike over $100 sometime in the next year.

Don't forget alternative energy, which will see stocks dragged up by the impending spike in energy prices. My favorite here is First Solar (FSLR). Skip natural gas (UNG), because the discovery of a new 100 year supply from fracting and horizontal drilling in shale formations is going to overhang this subsector for a long time.

The food commodities are probably among the cheapest resources around, with corn, wheat, and soybeans coming off the back of bumper crops in 2009 that absolutely killed prices. But growing emerging market appetites for more and better food will send demand soaring, just as the benefits of the 'green revolution' peter out. These can be played through the futures or the ETF's (MOO) and (DBA), and the stocks Mosaic (MOS), Monsanto (MON), Potash (POT), and Agrium (AGU).

Through an unconventional commodity play, the impending shortage of water will make the energy crisis look like a cake walk. Who will need new fresh water supplies the most? China. You can participate in this most liquid of assets with the ETF's (PHO) and (FIW).

The Hard Stuff is in Your Future

Featured Trades: (FRONTIER MARKETS), (GXG), (FRN), (FFD), (TFMAX)
Claymore/BNI Mellon Frontier Markets ETF
Global X Interbolsa FTSE Columbia ETF

2) Hedge Fund Managers Head For the Frontier. No, they are not donning a Stetson, cowboy boots, and a six gun to fight Indians in the Wild West, where I live. Their never ending reach for yield is taking them beyond junk bonds and high dividend stocks to small, sub-emerging markets so far off the radar that many don't even have stock indexes. Checked your weighting in the Ivory Coast lately? How about Sri Lanka, Tanzania, or Kuwait? I think not.

So far this year, frontier funds have taken in $1.1 billion in new investment, compared to the previous record of $443 million in 2007. Many of these markets are extremely cheap using conventional valuation metrics. They boast rock solid balance sheets, ironically because many never rated high enough to borrow in public markets.

In exchange for higher returns, managers are accepting higher risk, which in these places may involve the odd expropriation, government overthrow, insurrection, revolution, and terrorism.? They also don't have much liquidity to offer. They are definitely your 'Roach Motel' market; you can check in but you can't check out. Where markets exist, there are frequently heavy weightings in single sectors, like banks.

Expect a lot of volatility. The MSCI Frontier Markets Index plunged 55% in 2008, compared to 32% for the S&P 500. You can't buy these stocks online, and opening local brokerage accounts often involves wading through a morass of tedious capital and foreign exchange regulations. How many Dong (Vietnam) do you want to keep on your position sheet?

Claymore offers an ETF (FRN), while mutual fund alternatives are available through Morgan Stanley (FFD) and Templeton (TFMAX). Some countries, like Columbia (GXG) already have dedicated ETF's and have been among the best performing markets of 2010. I have written about frontier markets in the past (click here for 'Frontier Markets Beckon') and similar investment themes like the N-11 (click here for 'Goodbye BRIC's, Hello N-11'). Expect to hear a lot more from these quiet back waters of the global capital markets.

I'm Lookin' for a Few Good Longs, Pilgrim