?People are investing with a rear view mirror. Last year, you had people legitimately scared out of the market. Unfortunately, you are losing a generation of investors at a time when they ought to be thinking about buying high quality stocks.? said Hersh Cohen of Clearbridge Advisors.
Global Market Comments
December 5, 2016
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MARKET OUTLOOK FOR THE WEEK OF DECEMBER 5th),
(THE AMERICAN ONSHORING TREND IS ACCELERATING),
(GE), (TSLA)
General Electric Company (GE)
Tesla Motors, Inc. (TSLA)
I am willing to make a bet with you.
In four years, the unemployment rate will be much higher than the 4.6% reported today by the Department of Labor which is the lowest number in a decade.
The jobless rate may decline more initially thanks to deficit financed government reflationary programs.
However, the US will fall into a deep recession within the next three years, triggered by high inflation, rocketing interest rates, and a strong US dollar.
And while growth will rise next year and in the following year, it will be posting negative numbers by 2020. The overall net growth in the economy over the full four years will probably come in at zero.
And where will the job losses be the greatest? In the industrial rust belt states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Indiana.
So, there is your new investment strategy.
Rape, pillage, and plunder now, but don?t forget to find a chair when the music stops playing. The big money will be made on the short side down the road.
You may have been a long-term investor until now. From here on, you have to trade or die.
Yes, my Golden Age scenario for the 2020s is still intact. But the demographic wave that will drive it doesn?t start for five more years.
The November Nonfarm Payroll Report came in dead on expectations at 178,000. The U-6 long-term structural unemployment rate also hit an eight-year low at 9.3%.
Hourly earnings fell by 0.1%.
Professional and business services jumped by 63,000, health care by 28,000, and construction by 19,000. Retail jobs declined by 8,000.
The ongoing seven-year economic recovery continues.
Of course, by the time you read this, the outcome of the Italian elections on Sunday will be known.
The country is voting on constitutional reform which may grant more power to their lower parliamentary house. Heaven knows they need it. Italy has seen 63 governments since 1945.
If reform fails, Prime Minster Matteo Renzi will resign and the Euro (FXE) will crash. If it wins, the Euro and European stock markets will rally, especially the banks.
With one of the most difficult markets in history in the rear view mirror, a lot of traders will start to wind down their activities early this year.
The stock market has gone about as far as it can on the few hints of economic policy we have received so far from the future Trump administration.
Investors won?t be able to make any major moves until they get their capital allocations and sector weightings for the New Year. So the Trump bump has pretty much run its course.
The only event to trade off of for the rest of 2016 will be the Federal Reserve meeting on December 13-14. Will it be a 25 basis point snugging now, or will Janet go for the full 50 basis points?
I expect markets to trade in narrow ranges until then.
As for the coming week?s data releases:
Monday, December 5th at 9:45 AM EST, we get the PMI Services Index.
On Tuesday, December 6th at 10:00 AM EST, we get a new update on October Factory Orders.
On Wednesday, December 7th at 10:00 EST, the Labor Department?s October JOLTS report is released, showing us the changes in job openings. This is a deep lagging report so I don?t pay it much attention.
At 10:30 AM the EIA Petroleum Status Report will give us updated inventory numbers. Will oil peak out here? Or does it have a few more dollars to run?
Thursday, December 8th, we learn the Weekly Jobless Claims at 8:30 AM EST.
On Friday, December 9th, we learn December Consumer Sentiment which will almost certainly show an uptick, now that the presidential election is over.
Keep in mind that virtually all economic indicators will be useless for the next two months, because they will only reflect spending and investment conditions prior to the November 8th presidential election and will be for a world that no longer exists.
?Treat everyone you meet with professionalism and respect, but also have a plan to kill them.? said my friend, former Marine Corps General James ?Mad Dog? Mattis, the newly appointed Defense Secretary.
Global Market Comments
December 2, 2016
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(DECEMBER 7TH LIVE GLOBAL STRATEGY WEBINAR),
(TRUMP?S BIG DILEMMAS),
(SPY), (TLT),
(TESTIMONIAL)
SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond (TLT)
The financial markets think President-elect Donald Trump is in fact two different people.
I?ll use my baseball analogies here.
The stock market thinks he is Babe Ruth, the Home Run King of the 1920s. Stocks (SPY) have blasted through to new all time highs almost every day since he has been elected, with some shares up a heady 35%.
The bond market thinks he is the worst strike out king in history, not even worthy of a little league slot. US Treasury bonds have collapsed in the past three weeks.
Never mind that these two market trends are diametrically opposed to each other. In the real world, sharply rising interest rates bring stocks market crashes, not booms.
So which Donald Trump are we going to get?
And here is what even Donald Trump almost certainly doesn?t know: How is he going to deal with two huge dilemmas?
I?ll start with dilemma number one.
A key part of Trump?s economic program is for the US government to borrow up to $1 trillion to spend on infrastructure. Who is America?s largest lender?
China, which over the past decade has purchased nearly half of the US Treasury bonds issued. The Middle Kingdom now owns just short of $1 trillion in American government bonds.
Do countries embroiled in trade wars with us lend us money?
No, they don?t.
So for Trump to finance his expansion he needs to cozy up to the Chinese.
My bet is that he will slap some token punitive import duties on a few selective items, like President Obama did with Chinese tires and chicken feet and declare victory. These will be little more than photo ops.
The remaining bilateral trade between the US and China will continue as it has done for years.
That totaled an enormous $416 billion during the first nine months of 2016, $337 billion in Chinese exports to the US (we love those iPhones!), and $79 billion in US exports to China (they love those Buicks and Boeings!).
The Chinese already know this which is why they laughed throughout the presidential campaign, not taking any threats of trade wars seriously.
When forced to chose between a boom and a trade war, the former will win every time, as Trump is about to find out.
As for dilemma number two, it is far more perplexing. The mere prospect of Trump?s economic program has triggered one of the sharpest selloffs in bond market history.
This is why a double short position in US Treasury bonds (TLT), (TBT), has been quite profitably at the core of my trading book since November 8th.
What happens when governments cut taxes and increase spending? Deficits and interest rates explode, crowding private borrowers out of the market (i.e. you and me).
This fuels a stronger US dollar (UUP) which, with higher rates, will act as a major drag on the economy.
It gets worse.
You are not the only one who has been feasting on ultra low interest rates for the past seven years. So has the US government.
Take overnight rates from 25 basis points now to as much as 6% in three years, and the cost of the debt service of the federal government soars.
That takes it very quickly up from $23 billion for fiscal 2017 to as high as $100 billion a year by 2020. That will negate a significant portion of Trump's economic stimulus.
Of course, the other guaranteed outcome of these policies is the return of high inflation. This will prompt the Federal Reserve to greatly accelerate their pace of interest rates hikes.
So how do we trade around all of this?
I believe that it will be totally ?RISK ON? for the next several months, as the optimists and permabulls run the table. Then, reality will set in, once congress decides how much The Donald really gets to spend.
Remember, the majority of congressmen cut their teeth on fighting deficit spending. The budget deficit is about to balloon from $400 billion to $1.50 trillion.
That?s when we find out what kind of negotiator Trump really is.
I went through all of this with President Ronald Reagan 35 years ago and guess what happened? He promised to cut taxes, increase defense spending, and balance the budget.
He certainly cut taxes and increased defense spending in a big way. But the national debt rose 400%, from $1 trillion to $4 trillion. We are STILL paying for it.
The bottom line here is that the deficits ALWAYS win!
One thing you can say about Donald Trump, for sure, is that he will be God?s gift to traders.
Asset prices around the world are already trading at levels undreamed of only a few weeks ago.
BUY STOCKS AND THE US DOLLAR AND SELL SHORT BONDS OF EVERY FLAVOR. IT DOESN?T GET MORE CLEAR THAN THIS.
Just keep discipline and wait for the right entry points. But then that?s my job.
And we are now only three weeks into trends that could have another three years to run.
Trump is God?s gift to financial newsletters for that matter, as we will have plenty to write about and explain going forward.
My BS detector has been refined for 50 years now, and it is about to get a serious workout for your benefit.
Which Trump Will We Get?
Dear MHFT,
I've just completed my third year trading under your guidance. I'm intensely interested in events that move markets and I find your knowledge to be quite insightful. 2016 was a breakout year for me as I made $382,000 on a trading account that started the year with $700,000. Keep sharing your wisdom!
Steve
Basel, Switzerland
Global Market Comments
December 1, 2016
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HAS THE WORLD HIT ?PEAK DIAMONDS??),
(NILE), (AAL.L),
(THE NEW COLD WAR),
(TESTIMONIAL)
Blue Nile, Inc. (NILE)
Anglo American (AAL.L)
Is the world running out of diamonds?
No, it?s worse.
The world is running out of diamond demand.
That is the only conclusion one can reach when looking at the chart below for polished diamonds for the past four years showing a 25% decline.
The diamond industry now produces 125 million carats a year, well down from 187 million ten years ago.
This is clearly not your father?s diamond market.
In the old days, you could rely on this highly concentrated form of carbon to appreciate an average of 5% a year over the long term.
Just for fun, I recently appraised the diamond I purchased for my late wife which I bought from a Hasidic Jew in an alley off of Manhattan?s West 47th street. He kept his inventory hidden in an envelope in his sock.
How times have changed!
The two-carat, VVS1, round cut, yellow diamond that I paid $3,000 for in 1977, would fetch $39,800 today. Great trade!
However, now the rock solid investment thesis that underlay diamonds for so long is now turning to sand.
The problem is the millennial generation which fails to see the value in the sparkly rocks seen by previous generations. Their discretionary spending instead goes into the latest electronic device, game, or Tesla.
Indeed, there is far more competition for the luxury dollar than in the past.
A luxury ?glamping? safari in an African game reserve can easily set you back $30,000, the cost of an investment grade two carat diamond ring today. So will the private jet to get you there.
Kids this age are still about ten years away from when income, family formation, and spending patterns start to favor diamonds.
That leaves the current Gen Xers to support the market. However, there are only 65 million of them, compared to 85 million Millennials. Hence the softness in prices.
In 2015, global sales of diamond jewelry fell by 2% to $79 billion, the first decline in six years. Sales of rough diamonds plunged by 30% as dealers cut inventories in a soft market.
Structural changes in the industry are also having an impact.
DeBeers had a 90% world market share during the 1980s, and spent massively on advertising its product, some $200 million a year.
Now they account for only 31%, and the advertising spend has similarly withered.
Another problem is that the buyers of the very large diamonds in the Middle East have seen oil income shrink beyond imagination.
Industry analysts were shocked when the Lucara Diamond, at 1,109 carats, the largest discovered in 100 years, failed to sell at auction in June.
Government anti-corruption efforts in China have had a similar drag.
And let's face it. The diamond industry has not exactly been at the cutting edge of technology.
Stodgy marketing strategies enabled Internet start-ups like Blue Nile (NILE) to come out of nowhere and seize an important part of the retail trade. (NILE) recently announced blockbuster sales that took its stock up an eye popping 35% in a single day.
In 2011, Anglo American took control of the Oppenheimer family owned DeBeers for $5.1 billion.
Another problem can be found in the middle tier of the diamond market, the so called ?sightholders.? These are the dealers, cutters, and retailers largely based in Antwerp, Belgium (great moules mariniere there by the way).
Since the 2008 financial crisis, banks have withdrawn loans from the industry, citing secrecy and the lack of transparency. This has lead to a wave of bankruptcies of small firms and the consolidation of the rest.
Industry veterans are still optimistic about the future.
The US accounts for about half the world market, so the new frugality will be a challenge. Perhaps Trump inspired inflation will jolt this market back to life.
As standards of living steadily rise in China and India, and more western social practices are adopted, so should diamond consumption.
This could also be the greatest Millennial play of all time. If the past is any guide, Millennials DO eventually adopt their parents' spending patterns.
They just do it much later than we did, another possible outcome of the financial crisis.
To avoid a week on the sofa, you might even think about buying next year?s Valentine?s surprise early, like NOW.
The 1,109 Carat Lucara Diamond
As a new subscriber of just under two months, I thought I'd check in with you.
I am really enjoying your service. I look forward to your daily diaries for their wit and wisdom. I don't miss a webinar. I very much appreciate that you take the time to answer questions by e-mail.
You are helping cure me of bad habits like being unable to cut losses or take profits, being wedded to positions, and investing through ideology rather than intelligence (such as the idea that gold is always a safe haven, oil is running out and can only go up, etc.).
And you're clearly a big-hearted guy with much wisdom both in and out of the market.
I'm looking forward to trading more successfully in the New Year with your help. You've clearly helped a lot of people and I'm looking forward to being one of them.
Wishing you the happiest of holidays up the hill in Tahoe,
Jonathan
Camptonville, CA
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.