Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 10, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SCRAPING THE BOTTOM OF THE TECH BARREL WITH UBER)
(UBER), (LYFT), (FB), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (NFLX), (AAPL), (MSFT)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 10, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SCRAPING THE BOTTOM OF THE TECH BARREL WITH UBER)
(UBER), (LYFT), (FB), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (NFLX), (AAPL), (MSFT)
The coronavirus and the resulting effects from it have had the single most sway on tech companies since the 2001 tech bust.
Marginal tech companies or even quasi-fraudulent ones have been exposed for what they are, while the secondary effects from the virus have supercharged the behemoths of the industry.
The stock market has no earnings growth in the past 5 years without the earnings from Microsoft (MSFT), Facebook (FB), Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), and Netflix (NFLX). That means that without the Republican corporate tax cut, there has been negative earnings growth in the past five years.
One of those tech companies at the bottom of the barrel has been chauffeur service company Uber (UBER) and their latest earnings report is a glaring indictment of a shoddy business model that operates in a gray area.
The only reason this stock is at $33 is because of the piles of easy money printed by the central bank.
Uber needs all the help they can get, and shares are still trading 20% below the IPO price.
Competitor chauffeur service Lyft (LYFT) is doing even worse registering a 50% decline since the IPO.
Let’s do a little snooping around to see why these companies are doing so poorly and why you shouldn’t even think about investing in these companies long-term.
No matter how you dice it up, Uber’s core business, the one where they refuse to properly compensate their drivers, had a disaster of a quarter with gross ride volumes down 73% year-over-year.
Before we go any further with this one, I would like to point out yes, other areas of the business grew substantially, the problem is that the “other” part of the business is only 30% of total revenue.
Therefore, when 70% of your business that relies on pure volume to scale out crashes by 73%, it doesn’t really matter what else is in the report.
The only sensible idea now is capturing a snapshot of the silver linings, of which there were a few.
Delivery volumes through Uber Eats were up 49%, but the problem here is that first, it’s not profitable per delivery and second, it’s still a small part of the business.
Uber acquired Postmates who is another loss-making delivery service and the idea behind this is to achieve significant cost savings by scaling out these powerful assets.
The problem here is that it is essentially throwing good money on top of bad money because it’s proven that deliveries don’t make money per ride and that won’t change in the near future.
CEO of Uber Dara Khosrowshahi is on record saying Uber will become “profitable on an adjusted earnings basis before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization before the end of the year.”
This is almost like saying we won’t lose as much money as before and ironically, Dara Khosrowshahi has withdrawn this statement as the ride-sharing model has been repudiated by the consumer during the coronavirus.
Nowhere in the earnings report is the explanation of how Dara Khosrowshahi plans to attract people to share a car ride with a stranger during a global pandemic.
He didn’t share a solution because there isn’t one, hence the 73% decline in ride volumes.
If we assume this company is semi-fraudulent, then the silver lining would be that ride volumes didn’t decline by 100%.
That is where we are now with U.S. corporate companies such as the airlines that fired their employees but have subsidized them to stick around even though there is no work.
Instead of re-imagining itself through bankruptcies, the Fed has encouraged many marginal companies by breathing life into their finances through cheap loans.
This gives failing firms a last chance to enrich management with the capital and “cash out” before they hand the business off to someone who will essentially plan to do the same.
I will say that traders might have a trade or two in this one, because it’s hard to imagine Uber posting another 73% loss in ride volume and a dead cat bounce trade could be in the cards.
Long term investors should steer clear of this one and allow Uber to struggle on its own and just maybe in 5 or 10 years, it might just be “profitable on an adjusted earnings basis before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization before the end of the year.”
With so many high-quality tech companies and even one that is about to add super growth elements like TikTok into its portfolio, there are so many superior names to deploy capital in the tech ecosphere.
Either you must be galvanized by a gambler’s mentality to invest in Uber, or losing money is something that is habitual in your routine.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 5, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MICROSOFT GOES FROM STRENGTH TO STRENGTH)
(MSFT), (GOOGL), (FB), (AMZN)
Microsoft (MSFT) is on the cusp of becoming the best tech company in America and that is the reward they get for staying out of the data privacy quagmire that the other tech titans find themselves in.
A TikTok acquisition would offer a major platform to rival Facebook and Google-owned YouTube and will revamp its image with young people.
TikTok itself will grow into a $300 billion company in the next 5-7 years just by itself.
This purchase is a massive blow to Facebook (FB) and Google’s (GOOGL) prospects as their once-fortified duopoly morphs into a 4-way race between Microsoft, Amazon (AMZN), Google, and Facebook (FB).
This would make up for all the prior missteps with Nokia’s handset business and Skype.
This could be described as the "crown jewel" snapped up at a discount.
This is essentially an asset with 100 million users, massive momentum, engagement, advertising revenue, and something they could cross-sell into the broader Microsoft base.
The treasure trove of data is what makes this deal a can’t-miss proposition.
Think about Microsoft in building software and hardware projects, and not just Xbox. For the first time, it would have proprietary data on a level that they can understand consumer behavior and not just with their enterprise customers.
Data privacy is Microsoft’s biggest selling point to the Trump administration which is concerned about TikTok’s ties to the Chinese government.
TikTok, which is currently owned by a Chinese company, has come under scrutiny and investigation in the U.S. over allegations it is supplying user data to Beijing, a charge that company officials have denied, but have no way to prove that they don’t bend to the whims of the Chinese Communist Party.
This episode follows on the heels of the U.S. effectively banning Chinese telecom giant Huawei in the U.S.
TikTok represents the dual threat of destroying America's edge in technological dominance.
TikTok has become the fastest-growth social platform in history and its inception as a Chinese technology threatens the U.S. reputation.
What specific data is TikTok able to aggregate from U.S. users?
Personal location, app usage, behavioral trends, thematic trends, and economic indicators.
This personal data could be used to take advantage of the American population through military or economic means.
India was first to ban TikTok and didn’t allow a sale of the Indian data to a local firm. They didn’t want money flowing back into Chinese hands.
China is notorious for the mishandling of data and most of the data is resold infinitely inside of mainland China.
How will Microsoft earn dollars from TikTok?
Digital ads.
TikTok would boost Microsoft’s share of the U.S. digital display ad market.
This year, eMarketer predicts Microsoft to hold just 1.5% of that market, slightly ahead of Snapchat but well behind Facebook’s 42% and Google’s 10.4%.
That is about to change.
Just how popular is TikTok?
TikTok is a disruptive force in social media and video.
In the second quarter, TikTok had 30% penetration of U.S. respondents 18 and older in a survey of 2,500 U.S. consumers.
Among respondents 18 to 24, TikTok's popularity is even greater, at about 42%, versus 65% for Facebook, 78% for Instagram and 63% for Snapchat.
Along with this, Microsoft finally gets the “cool factor” they have been missing for generations.
What are the chances of Microsoft buying TikTok?
I would put it at 85%-90%.
ByteDance needs to seal a deal or they leave the table with zilch and at the same time kicked out of America.
The company, a massive social media player in China, is valued at about $100 billion, half of which is due to TikTok.
The deadline gives Microsoft the added effect of increased negotiating leverage and it will be interesting to see what concessions they get from TikTok.
No other major tech company has been given the green light to make the deal and Microsoft has plenty of cash available to make this deal happen.
The deal could be especially beneficial for Microsoft because the TikTok business in the U.S. is valued in the $40-billion range but could eventually reach $300 billion if they nurture it properly.
I would be shocked if Microsoft flubs this golden opportunity to add a trophy asset to put in their trophy cabinet.
CEO Satya Nadella is too shrewd to let this once-in-a-lifetime chance to cement Microsoft as the top dog go to waste.
I was highly bullish on Microsoft before this news, and I can easily say now that this is not only the best American tech company but the best company overall in the world.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 31, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(BIG TECH IS UNSTOPPABLE)
(FB), (AAPL), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (MSFT)
The big loser at the Congress hearing grilling the top 4 CEOs in big tech was by far and away the U.S. government.
The U.S. government accused big tech of operating as illegal monopolies and big tech’s answer was largely indifference, betting that the government is too disjointed to actually hit them with some venom.
The only member of congress who was on point with her questions was Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal, who used internal Facebook documents to show data theft artist Mark Zuckerberg suppressing competition when he purchased Instagram in 2012.
Jayapal then cornered Amazon (AMZN) CEO Jeff Bezos into a corner, peppering him with questions about Amazon’s 3rd party data handling.
There has been a long-lasting campaign against Amazon in regard to them using internal data to hijack 3rd party sellers’ products deemed successful by recreating them as in-house products and catapulting their in-house branded products to the top of the Amazon search results.
The success of Congress stopped at Jayapal, as the rest of the motley crew appeared so out of touch with what real tech issues exist that it felt they were unfit to ask questions.
Playing into their inefficient display was the fact that they chose a time delegated for antitrust issues to complain about anti-conservative bias in social media, which is a separate issue entirely.
These arguments were armed with zero data to back up the claims, and gave the tech leaders an easy way out by just grandstanding about the issue.
The biggest winner was the company that was not invited to the session – Microsoft (MSFT).
They were the only tech company over $1 trillion that wasn’t in attendance, and for good reason.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has been able to position the company as a trust-first cloud enterprise and refuse to traverse into that gray area where conflicting interests exist.
They are living proof that tech companies don’t need to swindle personal data to grow revenue, which is why I keep putting on call spreads in this brilliant company.
Microsoft is in great strategic position to expand their business, and the same cannot be said for Facebook because unlike Microsoft, Facebook produces nothing of meaningful substance.
This was evident as Congress picked on Zuckerberg’s company the most, even catching him in a bold face lie.
The most convenient line of reasoning for these tech companies doing what they do was the “American-first” playbook.
Highlighting China’s rise as tech competitor, fearmongering that China could one day be at the top of the tech pyramid but actually just demonstrating another way of avoiding the real issues.
Watching this discussion made me realize that these tech companies have reached a level of power that supersedes the government.
Politicians are only invested in short-term interest and protecting their tenure in government. Bezos, Zuckerberg, Cook, and Pichai can play the long game.
This is exactly why investors pour capital into these 4 stocks plus Microsoft.
Apple earns over $55 billion in profits annually on $260 billion of revenue.
Amazon makes up 40% of U.S. online sales.
Facebook (FB) has 2.6 billion users which is 34% of the world’s population.
Lastly, 90% of internet searches are done through Google (GOOGL) search.
The real question should be: when will these companies hit the $2 trillion mark?
And even if Congress could conjure up some meaningful regulation against these 4, they certainly have the resources to navigate around it, especially when half of Congress still doesn’t understand what they actually do.
As it stands, these data empires are left to go their merry way and Congress is failing to protect individual user data on an epic scale.
To put the cherry on top, I would argue that the coronavirus has done big tech’s dirty work wiping out many businesses while big tech gets stronger.
I am bullish big tech.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 27, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(IS BIG TECH JUST A FLASH IN THE PAN?),
(MSFT), (AMZN), (AAPL), (GOOGL), (FB)
Today’s tech newsletter might be the most important one you will ever read.
It’s my job to distill exactly what is going on in tech and disburse this information in a way that readers can take advantage of it in real-time.
The tech market is all about striking when the soil is fertile.
The five largest stocks in the S&P 500, Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOGL), and Facebook (FB) have accrued a combined valuation that surpasses the valuations of the stocks at the bottom 350 of the index.
This means that if you weren’t in tech the past few years, chances are that your portfolio significantly underperformed the broader market.
Even in August 2018, many active managers could have thrown in the towel and said the late economic cycle was way too frothy for their taste and time to take profits.
Little did they know that betting against the best growth industry in the last 2 generations would equate to self-firing themselves, because to replicate the same type of performance would have meant staying in tech through the coronavirus scare.
Many in the trading community would even go as far as to say to wait for the bear market, then big tech would get hammered first and deepest because of their lofty valuations.
These tech companies were in for a rude awakening and shares had to consolidate, right?
Well, anyone who doesn’t live under a rock is seeing the exact opposite play out with Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple valued above $1 trillion and still soaring as we speak.
This goes to show that betting against something because they are “too expensive” or “too cheap” is a fool’s game.
Just take oil for instance, that many retail investors bought because they came to the conclusion that oil could never go below zero.
Then playing oil through an ETF with massive contango meant that the index is likely to go down even if the price of oil is up.
Not only do investors bear insanely high risk in these trading vehicles, but also a systemic risk of oil ETFs blowing up.
Oil is cheap, and it can get cheaper, while tech is expensive and can get a lot more expensive.
Until there are structural changes, there is no point to bet on a sudden reversal out of thin air.
The “reversion to the mean” trade can blow up in your face if used irresponsibly.
Betting against things that an individual perceives as unsustainable and secretly hoping that they cannot continue to go on is probably the worst strategy that I have ever heard of in my life.
The reality is that these things are sustainable, and tech shares will keep moving higher uninterrupted until they don’t.
"Until they don’t" would mean meaningful structural damage to big tech’s business model, which I do not see one iota in today’s business climate.
In fact, these companies just keep going from strength to strength.
Active managers are the ones who set market prices and they help the momentum accelerate in tech with full knowledge that if they miss out, there is likely no other solution to hit yearend targets.
What active manager doesn’t want their year-end bonus?
Even analyze the value investors who, in a normal world, would not even consider tech companies because they avoid the traditional “growth” profile.
Funnily enough, these “value” investors have Microsoft in their portfolios now, even though it is not close to a value stock.
So what has Microsoft accomplished recently?
CEO of Microsoft Satya Nadella has rebuilt a company Microsoft that is now equal in value to The Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index, the share index of the 100 companies listed on the London Stock Exchange with the highest market capitalization.
That’s right, one American company is just as valuable as the top 100 public companies in England.
Even more hilarious, Jeff Bezos’s wealth is greater than the entire European country of Hungary.
Yes, the one south of Poland that serves goulash as the national cuisine.
An even broader view of tech would give us an even more stunning snapshot of the success showing that the Top 5 tech stocks are now worth more than the entire developed stock market outside the U.S. such as Europe, Canada, Japan, Hong Kong combined.
Then take into consideration that these companies are on the cusp of penetrating high margin industries like medicine and healthcare which will translate into another golden decade of accelerating revenue and elevated profits relative to the rest of the S&P index.
The U.S. is a place where unfettered capitalism is promoted and implemented, and tech’s outperformance manifests itself by pouncing on the winner-takes-all mentality.
Americans like winners and the rules are no different in corporate America.
These 5 tech names have contributed over 20% of the gains in the past month and until they falter, there will be no tech sell-off.
Global Market Comments
July 22, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MY NEWLY UPDATED LONG-TERM PORTFOLIO),
(PFE), (BMY), (AMGN), (CELG), (CRSP), (FB), (PYPL), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (AMZN), (SQ), (JPM), (BAC), (BABA), (EEM), (FXA), (FCX), (GLD)
I am really happy with the performance of the Mad Hedge Long Term Portfolio since the last update on October 17, 2019. In fact, not only did we nail the best sectors to go heavily overweight, we completely dodged the bullets in the worst-performing ones, especially in energy.
For new subscribers, the Mad Hedge Long Term Portfolio is a “buy and forget” portfolio of stocks and ETFs. If trading is not your thing, these are the investments you can make, and then not touch until you start drawing down your retirement funds at age 70 ½.
For some of you, that is not for another 50 years. For others, it was yesterday.
There is only one thing you need to do now and that is to rebalance. Buy or sell what you need to reweight every position to its appropriate 5% or 10% weighting. Rebalancing is one of the only free lunches out there and always adds performance over time. You should follow the rules assiduously.
Despite the seismic changes that have taken place in the global economy over the past nine months, I only need to make minor changes to the portfolio, which I have highlighted in red.
To download the entire portfolio in an excel spreadsheet, please go to www.madhedgefundtrader.com , log in, go to “My Account”, then “Global Trading Dispatch”, then click on the “Long Term Portfolio” button.
My 5% holding in Biogen (BIIB) was taken over by Bristol Myers (BMY) at a hefty premium at an all-time high, so I’ll take the win. I am replacing it with Covid-19 vaccine frontrunner Bristol Myers (BMY) itself.
I am also taking out healthcare provider Cigna (CI), whose profits have been hammered by the pandemic. A future Biden administration might also move to a national healthcare system that will cap profits. I am replacing it with another Covid-19 vaccine leader Pfizer (PFE).
My 30% weighting in technology remains the same. Even though these stocks are 30% more expensive than they were three years ago, I believe they will lead the charge into the 2020s. It’s where the big growth is. These have doubled or more over the past nine months.
I am sticking with a 10% weighting in banking. Thanks to trillions in stimulus loans, they are now the most government-subsidized sector of the economy. I also believe that massive bond issuance by the US Treasury will deliver a sharply steepening yield curve, another pro bank development.
With my 10% international exposure, I am taking out a 5% weight in slow-growth Japan and replacing it with Chinese Internet giant Alibaba (BABA). The US will most likely dial back its vociferous anti-Chinese stance next year and (BABA) will soar.
I am executing another switch in my foreign currency exposure, taking out a long in the Japanese yen (FXY) and a short in the Euro (EUO) and substituting in a double long in the Australian dollar (FXA).
Australia will be a leveraged beneficiary of a recovery in the global economy, both through a recovery on commodity prices and gold which has already started, and the post-pandemic return of Chinese tourism and investment. I argue that the Aussie will eventually make it to parity with the US dollar, or 1:1.
I’m quite happy with my 10% holding in gold (GLD), which should move to new all-time highs imminently….and then go ballistic.
As for energy, I will keep my weighting at zero, no matter how cheap it has gotten. Never confuse “gone down a lot” with “cheap”. I think the bankruptcies have only just started and will stretch on for a decade. Thanks to hyper-accelerating technology, the adoption of electric cars, and less movement overall in the new economy, energy is about to become free.
My ten-year assumption for the US and the global economy remains the same.
When we come out the other side of this, we will be perfectly poised to launch into my new American Golden Age, or the next Roaring Twenties. With interest rates still at zero, oil cheap, there will be no reason not to. The Dow Average will rise by 400% or more in the coming decade. The American coming out the other side of the pandemic will be far more efficient and profitable than the old.
I hope you find this useful and I’ll be sending out another update in six months so you can rebalance once again.
Stay healthy.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
OKLearn moreWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds: