Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 23, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HOW NETFLIX CAN DOUBLE AGAIN),
(NFLX), (AMZN), (IQ), (ORCL), (MU), (AMAT), (CRUS), (QRVO), (IFNNY), (NVDA), (JD), (BABA), (MSFT)
Posts
The first batch of earnings numbers are trickling in, and on the whole, so far so good.
A spectacular earnings season will further cement tech's position at the vanguard of the greatest bull market in history.
The bull case for technology revolves around two figures indicating "RISK ON" or "RISK OFF".
The first set of numbers from Netflix (NFLX) emanated sheer perfection.
Netflix has gambled on its international audience to drive its growth and unceasing creation of premium content to reach these lofty targets set forth.
It worked.
Consensus was that domestic subscription growth had peaked, and Netflix would have to lean on overseas expansion to beat earnings estimates.
American subscription growth knocked it out of the ballpark, beating expectations by 480,000 subscriptions. The street expected only 1.48 million new adds. The 1.96 million shows the American online streamer is resilient, and the migration toward cord-cutting is happening faster than initially thought.
International adds were pristine, beating the 5.02 million estimates by 440,000 million new subscribers.
Content is king as Netflix has proved time and time again (we notice that here at Mad Hedge Fund Trader, too). Netflix plans to fork out about 700 original series in 2018.
By 2023, Netflix could grow its subscriber base to close to 400 million. The potential for international advancement is immense considering foreign companies are playing catch-up and cannot compete with the level of Netflix's content.
The earnings report coincided with Netflix announcing a forceful push into Europe, doubling its allocated content-related investments to $1 billion.
All of Netflix's estimates take into consideration that it is shut out of the Chinese market. Ironically, the Netflix of China, named iQIYI (IQ), just recently went public on the Nasdaq.
Amazon Web Services (AWS), the cloud-arm of Amazon (AMZN), revenue numbers are the other numbers that are near and dear to the pulsating heartbeat of the bull market.
Jeff Bezos, Amazon's CEO, penned a letter to shareholders that Amazon prime subscribers blew past the 100 million mark.
The positive foreshadowing augurs nicely for Amazon to surprise to the upside when it reports earnings next week on April 26.
Expect more of the same from cloud companies that are overperforming.
The few glitches in tech are minor. It is mindful to stay on the right side of the tracks and not venture into marginal names that haven't proved themselves.
For instance, Oracle (ORCL) had a good, not great, earnings report but shares still cratered after CEO Safra Catz dissatisfied analysts with weak cloud forecasts of just 19%-23% growth.
The street was looking for cloud guidance over 24%. Oracle is still being punished for its legacy tech segments.
The chip sector got pummeled after several chip manufacturers announced weak supply order from Apple.
This is hardly a surprise with Apple slightly missing iPhone estimates last quarter by 1%.
Chip stocks such as Lam Research (LRCX), Micron (MU), and Applied Materials (AMAT) look like affordable bargains. They should be seriously considered after share prices stabilize buttressed by support levels.
The outsized problem is that hardware suppliers have headline risks because of large cap tech's preference toward vertically integrating.
Along with price efficiencies, vertically integration aids design aspects and streamline product production time horizons.
This is not the end of chips.
Consumers need the silicon to generate and extract all the data coming to market.
Particularly, Apple (AAPL) went over its skis trying to push expensive smartphones to a saturated market when all the rip-roaring growth is at the low end of the market.
Apple still managed to sell more than 77 million iPhones, but the trade war rhetoric will deter Chinese consumers from purchasing American tech products. Until now, Apple has counted on China as its best growth prospect. The administration had other ideas.
Any noteworthy Apple supplier has gotten punched in the nose, but crucially, investors must stay out of the SMALLER chip players that rely on narrow revenue sources to keep them afloat.
Bigger chip companies can withstand the shedding of a few revenue sources but not Cirrus Logic (CRUS).
(CRUS) shares have been beaten mercilessly the past year sliding from $68 to a horrifying $37.74 today.
(CRUS) produces audio amplifier chips used in iPhone devices, and weak iPhone X guidance is the cue to bail out of this name.
The company extracts more than 75% of its revenues by selling audio chips used in iPhone devices. Ouch!
Last quarter saw horrific performance, stomaching a 7.7% decline in revenues due to tepid demand for smartphones in Q4 2017.
Cirrus Logic provided an underwhelming outlook, and it is not the only one to be beaten into submission behind the woodshed.
Apple has signaled to its suppliers that it will view production in a different way.
Imagination Technologies, a U.K. company, was informed that its graphic chips are not needed after 2018.
Dialog Semiconductor, another U.K.- based operation, shared the same destiny, as its power management chip was cut out of the production process, sacrificing 74% of revenue.
To top it all off, Apple just announced it plans to manufacture its own MicroLED screens in Silicon Valley, expunging its alliance with Samsung, Sharp, and LG, which traditionally yield smartphone screens for Apple. And Apple plans to make its own chips, phasing out Intel's chips in Apple's MacBook by 2020.
Qorvo (QRVO), Apple's radio frequency chips manufacturer, also can be painted with the same brush.
Apple was responsible for 34% of the company's total revenues in 2017.
Weak iPhone guidance set off a chain reaction, and the trembles were most felt at the bottom feeder group.
Put Infineon Technologies (IFNNY) in the same egg basket as Qorvo and Cirrus Logic. This company installs its cellular basebands in iPhones.
FANG has split into two.
Netflix and Amazon continue producing sublime earnings reports, and Apple and Facebook have hit a relative wall.
It will be interesting if the government's harsh rhetoric toward Amazon amounts to anything.
One domino that could fall is Amazon's lukewarm relationship with the US Postal Service.
Logistics is something the Chinese Amazon's JD.com (JD) and Alibaba (BABA) have successfully adopted. Look for Amazon to do the same.
However, I will say it is unfair that most tech companies are measured against Netflix and Amazon, even for Apple, which earned almost $50 billion in profits in 2017.
It is insane that companies tied to a company that prints money are reprimanded by the market.
But that highlights investors' pedantic fascination with pandemic growth, cloud, and big data.
Making money is irrelevant today. Investors should be laser-like focused on the best growth in tech such as Amazon, Netflix, Lam Research, Nvidia (NVDA), and Microsoft (MSFT), which know how to deliver the perfect cocktail of results that delight investors.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"$500? Fully subsidized? With a plan? That is the most expensive phone in the world. And it doesn't appeal to business customers because it doesn't have a keyboard. Which makes it not a very good email machine." - said former CEO of Microsoft Steve Ballmer on the introduction of the first iPhone.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 19, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HOW ROKU IS WINNING THE STREAMING WARS),
(ROKU), (FB), (AMZN), (NFLX), (GOOGL), (BBY), (DIS)
The whole digital ad industry dodged a bullet.
Facebook (FB) CEO Mark Zuckerberg's wizardry on Capitol Hill will stave off the data regulation hyenas for the time being.
One company in particular is perfectly placed to reap the benefits.
The Facebook of online streaming - Roku (ROKU).
Roku is a cluster of in-house, manufactured, online streaming devices offering OTT (over-the-top) content in the form of channels on its proprietary platform.
The company has two foundational drivers propelling business - selling hardware devices and selling digital ads.
It pays dividends to be entrenched at the intersection of two monumental generational trends of cord cutters' mass migration to online streaming, and the disruption of the digital ad revolution that is shaking up traditional media giants.
The percentage of American homes paying for an online streaming service ripped higher to 55% of households, which is up from 49% the previous year.
This $2.1 billion per month spend on streaming service is specifically as a result of access to premium content at an affordable price relative to traditional cable bundles.
Roku is a microcosm of the healthy climate for quality technology stocks in 2018.
It is among countless other firms that leverage large-scale data or cloud tools to capture profits.
Roku is best of breed of smart TV platforms and is in the early stages of robust growth.
This year will be the first year Roku's ad revenue surpasses hardware sales, indicating strong platform growth.
Roku pinpointed building account user growth, top-line gross revenue, and enhancing the platform capabilities as ways to move the business forward.
This year will also be the first year Roku posts an overall profit.
Active accounts grew 44% YOY to 19.3 million.
Roku offers consumers a cheap point of entry selling its Roku express box for only $29.99.
Its device is even free with a two-month purchase of Sling TV, which is the best online substitute to a legacy cable package. It has two sets of unique bundles available, charging $20 per month and $40 per month.
Once the Roku home screen populates, users can choose content through a la carte streaming options.
There is no monthly fee to operate Roku, and the device is used primarily by millennials.
More than 60% of 18- to 29-year-olds watch TV from online streaming, according to a Pew survey.
The quality and easy-to-use interface aids user navigation across the ecosystem.
It's the most convenient avenue to subscribe to multiple online streaming services all on one platform. It entices finicky users with extra mobility - those who love to jump around to different services based on particular upcoming content loaded up in the pipeline.
Many of these services offer no contract, cancel-anytime models that millennials love rather than the "old-school" rigid rules of cable providers that mostly charge a cancellation penalty of $300.
It is shocking how far traditional media fell behind the curve, but they are in rapid catch-up mode now.
Remember that content is king, and the overall boost in content quality has really shaken Hollywood executives to their core.
The golden age of streaming continues unabated with a Netflix 2018 annual content budget of $8 billion.
Roku does not create original content and it desires no skin in the game.
Content is expensive, and Roku would rather become the best place to host it.
Netflix's 2017 total revenue was a staggering $11.69 billion in 2017, and content costs will easily surpass 50% of total revenue in 2018. Overnight, it has become one of the biggest players in Hollywood, as its presence at the Emmy Awards amply demonstrates.
Exorbitant content costs are the new normal in 2018, and Spotify has reason to moan about the cost of content being 79% of total revenue.
Heightened content costs are the main reason why firms relying on content creation lose money each year.
However, as the overall pie grows, there is room for the tide to lift all boats. Being the premier platform to host premium content is why Roku's business model is eerily similar to Facebook's hyper-targeting ad model.
They make money the same way.
The incessant demand for online streaming functionality and smart TV operating systems show no signs of waning with Amazon (AMZN) announcing a new partnership with frenemy Best Buy (BBY) to produce smart TVs with Best Buy's in-house TV brand Insignia.
This is the first time Best Buy has been afforded a direct route to Amazon customers.
Disney (DIS) is turning around its legacy company into an online streaming behemoth announcing its first foray into online streaming with ESPN+.
Disney has tripled down on online streaming, acquiring New York-based BAMTech in late 2017, a company focused on developing streaming technology and made famous by its production of pro baseball's MLB TV.
BAMTech exudes pure quality. Anyone who has used MLB TV streaming service understands the great end-product it offers consumers.
The outstanding success with MLB TV attracted new online streaming converts to BAMTech to execute the transition to online streaming, including the WWE, Fox Sports, PlayStation Vue, and Hulu.
HBO went to BAMTech in 2014, after botching its attempt at creating a reliable stand-alone streaming service.
Disney's BAMTech-produced online streaming service will come to market in 2019, and will certainly be available on Roku TV.
Expect new blockbuster hits to debut on this new streaming service, such as new versions of Star Wars.
It is the perfect stock to mutate into an online streaming service because it possesses amazing content especially through ESPN.
The announcement of ESPN+ levitated Roku shares by 10% because investors understand this is the first baby step to shifting more of its content online.
This was on top of the announcement that Stephen A. Cohen's Point72 Asset Management had acquired a 5.1% stake in Roku for about $14 billion.
Furthermore, every major streaming service that enters Roku's system is worth an extra 5% to 10% bump in share price because of the wave of eyeballs and digital ads that grow Roku's coffers.
It is certain that 2018 and 2019 will sway more cord cutters to adopt Roku TV as this cohort approaches 70 million in 2018 on its way to 80 million in 2019.
The critical growth lever is its digital ad business as it hopes to take home a slice of this $70 billion per year business that is 75% controlled by Alphabet (GOOGL) and Facebook.
Roku has made great strides with half of Ad Age's top 200 advertisers already on the Roku interface.
Roku is taking the playbook right out from under Facebook's nose, piling funds into further enhancing its ad-tech division.
The blood, sweat, and tears shed is showing up in the financials with ARPU (Average Revenue per User) rocketing by 48% YOY, and more than 65% of this gap up is attributed to digital ad revenue.
Total revenue was up 29% YOY to $513 million, and platform revenue grew 129% in Q4 2017 to $85.4 million.
It is estimated that ad revenue will surpass $300 million in 2018, up from around $200 million in 2017.
Roku expects total revenue to grow 32% in 2018, approaching $700 million.
Profit margins are thriving under the platform segment, pumping out a stellar 74.6% in gross margin.
Roku does not make money on the hardware. Its push into ad distribution will ramp up as its digital ad revenue beelines toward an expected $700 million windfall by 2020.
Roku has a fantastic growth trajectory relative to other tech companies. Heightened volatility will make sell-offs hard to swallow but give fabulous entry points into a budding business.
The fertile path of international user adoption has barely scratched the surface. However, Netflix's successful foray abroad will inject confidence that Roku will have no problem expanding to greener pastures overseas as domestic account growth is always first to mature.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"AI is one of the most important things humanity is working on. It is more profound than electricity or fire." - said Google CEO Sundar Pichai
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 18, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY YOU SHOULD STILL BE BUYING FACEBOOK ON THIS DIP),
(FB), (GOOGL), (AMZN), (NFLX)
He did just enough.
He did 5% enough, but it should have been 10%.
That was the performance of the highly controversial data company Facebook (FB) in the wake of Mark Zuckerberg's (the aforementioned "he") testimony in front of politicians who failed to correctly pronounce his name let alone understand his business model.
But Zuckerberg did well.
Well enough that investors approved in droves.
Facebook shares tanked after the Cambridge Analytica scandal was disclosed, and the stock traded 16% below its February high.
The FANG stocks lost more than $200 billion in market value at one point when the headlines went viral.
Amazon (AMZN) and Netflix (NFLX) accounted for more than 30% of the S&P 500's 2018 gains in February, and their contribution has dipped to about 24% as of early April.
The leadership burden for large-cap tech is a resilient pillar propping up the equity market.
Let's get this straight - there has been no regulation as of yet but this moves forward any regulation that eventually was going to happen.
However, it could be a highly diluted version of any worst-case scenarios of which one could think.
The big question: Will earnings and guidance be sideswiped because of higher data costs?
And how many of the 2.2 billion MAU (Monthly Active Users) permanently deleted their Facebook accounts?
Facebook profile removals surged to 4,000 to 5,000 the first few days after the news hit and decreased to 2,000 per day in late March. The numbers further subsided to 1,000 at the start of April.
Deletions around the political testimony were clocking in between 1,000 to 2,000 per day.
To put this into perspective, the extirpation of accounts was only about 30% of the Snapchat rebellion where users quit in hoards because of a sub-optimal design refresh.
The media has done its best to sensationalize events and avoid the fact that hyper-targeting ad models has been around for years and has been used by various companies.
Facebook is not the only one.
Bottom line, there has been no material damage to user volume, and the testimony will empower tech because of Washington's botched question session.
Most of Facebook's profits come from less than 10% of user accounts.
Facebook is a one-trick pony with 98% of profits coming from ad revenue.
To add granularity, the bulk of revenue derives from developed nations mainly from North America, which make up more than 50%, and Europe at about 30% of total revenue.
Falling user engagement from the developed English speaking world would be a canary in the coal mine.
I am not talking about a few thousand profile deletions. However, a mass removal of 50,000 profiles or 100,000 profiles per day would throw Mark Zuckerberg into a tizzy.
If Facebook can convince users to stick around then Mark Zuckerberg is the ultimate winner.
With all the fearmongering, some facts get swept under the carpet. And it could be the case that many users are fine with Facebook possessing large swaths of their personal data.
In reality, users might prefer Facebook to Washington when it comes to possessing their personal information.
The performance of politicians lined up to interrogate Mark Zuckerberg was an unmitigated disaster for the political elite.
It is clear there is a competency issue with politicians. The generation bias has given us a fleet of politicians who have almost zero grasp of technology and its pervasive use in America's economy.
Many politicians showed a weak grasp of Facebook's profit engine.
Some politicians were more focused on Facebook's diversity policy than the real issue at hand.
Let's not forget Zuckerberg also controls 60% of voting rights through his accumulation of Facebook Class B shares and has an iron grip on any direction where the company traverses.
Any meaningful regulation costs will be passed onto the advertisers as a cost of doing business.
This is the key lever investors don't fully understand.
Facebook currently uses an auction-based system for ad pricing but could easily slip in stand-alone regulatory fees to compensate the extra costs.
The industries move from CPC (cost per click) to CPM (cost per impression) including duopoly playmate Alphabet (GOOGL) is a great strategy to pad profits.
The only real incurred cost to Facebook is the in-house DevOps team responsible for platform enhancement.
Facebook tried to experiment in 2016 by charging Facebook-owned smartphone messaging service WhatsApp users a $1 per year fee to use the messaging service.
It has done the groundwork to roll out a mass paid service.
Facebook later decided against this move as many users of WhatsApp are from undeveloped countries with no access to credit card payment services.
Zuckerberg is awkward. However, he has come a long way since his hoody days, even using smoke and mirrors to wriggle out of probing questions.
Half the "grilling" he received in Washington was met with the same vanilla answer saying that his team will get back to them.
The peak of evasiveness was Zuckerberg's response to a question about the willingness to change the business model in the interest of protecting individual privacy.
Zuckerberg stated he was "not sure what that means."
The hammering in Facebook shares was overdone.
It is obvious Washington is no match for large cap tech.
Facebook's upside trajectory has been sacrificed in the short term, but one could argue regulation was on the way - regardless of this data breach.
Regulation is a natural progression for an industry with almost no meaningful regulation.
Therefore, a little regulation for tech does not mean the end of tech.
Facebook is not going out of business. Not anytime soon.
Facebook earned revenue of $27.64 billion in 2016, on the back of $40.65 billion in 2017.
Facebook does not need to be "fixed" - it just needs a few bandages in place before it goes back onto the field.
These bandages will damage operating margins that are currently at 57% in Q4 2017, but their long-term fundamentals are still intact.
The wall of worry is unfounded and ad engagement is still solid.
Facebook is in store for record bottom- and top-line numbers when earnings come out. Ad revenue numbers and the guidance will be the key metric to digest.
Investors might want Zuckerberg to kitchen sink the quarter because most of the bad news is already priced into the stock and might as well dig out all the skeletons in the closet.
Regulation is positive for Facebook because Facebook and the rest of the FANGs are in the best position to confront the regulations. The worst case scenario is finding a backdoor way to navigate through the new rules just as the backdoor way of profiting through ad distribution.
The headline hysteria makes it seem like Facebook is about to go under and file Chapter 11.
The bar has been set so low for upcoming earnings that any reasonable guidance will be seen as a victory.
Advertisers have no choice but to pay for Facebook ads if they want to grow business - that has not changed.
Facebook is growing so fast that the CEO could not name the competition when he was asked at the hearing.
There is a huge short squeeze setting up for the next earnings report due out on April 25, 2018.
Lastly, WhatsApp recently surpassed 1.5 billion MAU with users sending more than 60 billion messages every day.
Remember that Mark Zuckerberg purchased WhatsApp when it had around 500 million MAU back in February 2014.
This service hasn't even started to monetize yet and was a genius piece of business for $19.3 billion in 2014.
The valuation is at least double to triple the price of purchase now but seemed ludicrously expensive when Facebook snapped it up at the time.
Facebook has bottomed out, and the added bonus is it is quite insulated from all the tariff chaos whipsawing the equity markets.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"I'm on the Facebook board now. Little did they know that I thought Facebook was really stupid when I first heard about it back in 2005."- said founder and CEO of Netflix Reed Hastings
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 17, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY THE CLOUD IS WHERE TRADING DREAMS COME TRUE),
(ZS), (ZUO), (SPOT), (DBX), (AMZN), (CSCO), (CRM)
Dreams don't often come true - but they do frequently these days.
Highly disruptive transformative companies on the verge of redefining the status quo give investors a golden chance to get in before the stock goes parabolic.
Traditional business models are all ripe for reinvention.
The first phase of reformulation in big data was inventing the cloud as a business.
Amazon (AMZN) and its Amazon Web Services (AWS) division pioneered this foundational model, and its share price is the obvious ballistic winner.
The second phase of cloud ingenuity is trickling in as we speak in the form of companies that focus on functionality, performance, and maintenance on the cloud platform.
This is a big break away from the pure accumulation side of stashing raw data in servers.
However, derivations of this type of application are limitless.
Swiftly identifying these applied cloud companies is crucial for investors to stay ahead of the game and participate in the next gap up of tech growth.
The markets' reaction to Spotify's (SPOT) and Dropbox's (DBX) hugely successful IPOs was head-turning.
Both companies finished the first day of trading firmly well above their respective, original opening prices -- or for Spotify, the opening reference price.
The pent-up momentum for anything "Cloud" has its merits, and these two shining stars will give other ambitious cloud firms the impetus to go public.
If Spotify and Dropbox laid an egg, momentum would have screeched to a juddering halt, and companies such as Pivotal Software would reanalyze the idea of soon going public.
Now it's a no-brainer proposition.
There are more than 40 more public cloud companies that are valued at more than a $1 billion, and more are in the pipeline.
To understand the full magnitude of the situation, evaluating recent IPO performance is a useful barometer of health in the tech industry.
The first company Zscaler (ZS) is an enterprise company focused on cloud security that closed 106% above its opening price when it went public this past March 16.
It opened up at $16 a share and finished the day at $33.
Zscaler CEO, Jay Chaudhry, audaciously rebuffed two offers leading up to the March 16 IPO. Both offers were more than $2 billion, and both were looking to acquire Zscaler at a discount.
The decision to forego these offers was a prudent move considering (ZS)s current market cap is around $3.3 billion and rising.
One of the companies vying for (ZS) was Cisco Systems (CSCO), which is also in the cloud security business. Cisco is looking to add another appendage to its offerings with the cash hoard it just repatriated from abroad.
Cisco has been willing to dip into its cash hoard by buying San Francisco-based AppDynamics for $3.7 billion in 2017, which specializes in managing the performance of apps across the cloud platform and inside the data center.
Cloud security is critical for outside companies to feel comfortable implementing universal cloud technology.
Storing sensitive data online in a storage server is also a risk and difficult to migrate back once on the cloud.
Without solid security to protect data, data-heavy companies will hesitate to vault up their data in a public place and could remain old-school with external data locations storing all of a firm's secrets.
However, this traditional approach is not sustainable. There is just too much generated data in 2018.
Cybersecurity has expeditiously evolved because hackers have become greatly sophisticated. Plus, they are getting a lot of free PR.
Data center and in-house applications secured operations by managing access and using an industrial strength firewall.
This was the old security model.
Security became ineffective as companies started using cloud platforms, meaning many users accessed applications outside of corporate networks and on various devices.
The archaic "moat" method to security has died a quick death, as organizations have toiled to ziplock end points that offer hackers premium entry points into the system.
Zscaler combats the danger with a new breed of security. The platform works to control network traffic without crashing or stalling applications.
As cloud migration accelerates, the demand for cloud security will be robust.
Another point of cloud monetization falls within payments.
Tech billing has evolved past the linear models that credit and debit in simplistic fashion.
SaaS (Software as a Service), the hot payment model, has gone ballistic in every segment of the cloud and even has been adopted by legacy companies for legacy products.
Instead of billing once for full ownership, companies offer an annual subscription fee to annually lease the product.
However, reoccurring payments blew up the analog accounting models that couldn't adjust and cannot record this type of revenue stream 10 to 20 years out.
Zuora (ZUO) CEO Tien Tzuo understood the obstacles years ago when he worked for Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce (CRM), during the early stages in the 90s.
Cherry-picked after graduating from Stanford's MBA program, he made a great impression at Salesforce and parlayed it into CMO (Chief Marketing Officer) where he built the product management and marketing organization from scratch.
More importantly, Tzuo built Salesforce's original billing system and pioneered the underlying system for SaaS.
It was in his nine years at Salesforce that Tzuo diagnosed what Salesforce and the general industry were lacking in the billing system.
His response was creating a company to seal up these technical deficits.
Other second derivative cloud plays are popping up, focusing on just one smidgeon of the business such as analytics or Red Hat's container management cloud service.
SaaS payment model has become the standard, and legacy accounting programs are too far behind to capture the benefits.
Zuora allows tech companies to seamlessly integrate and automate SaaS billing into their businesses.
Tzuo's last official job at Salesforce was Chief Strategy Officer before handing in his two-week notice. Benioff, his former boss, was impressed by Tzuo's vision, and is one of the seed investors for Zuora.
These smaller niche cloud plays are mouthwateringly attractive to the bigger firms that desire additional optionality and functionality such as MuleSoft, integration software connecting applications, data and devices.
MuleSoft was bought by Salesforce for $6.5 billion to fill a gap in the business. Cloud security is another area in which it is looking to acquire more talent and products.
If you believe SaaS is a payment model here to stay, which it is, then Zuora is a must-buy stock, even after the 42% melt up on the first day of trading.
The stock opened at $14 and finished at $20.
One of the next cloud IPOs of 2018 is DocuSign, a company that provides electronic signature technology on the cloud and is used by 90% of Fortune 500 companies.
The company was worth more than $3 billion in a round of 2015 funding and is worth substantially more today.
These smaller cloud plays valued around $2 billion to $3 billion are a great entry point into the cloud story because of the growth trajectory. They will be worth double or triple their valuation in years to come.
It's a safe bet that Microsoft and Amazon will continue to push the envelope as the No. 1 and No. 2 leaders of the industry. However, these big cloud platforms always are improving by diverting large sums of money for reinvestment.
The easiest way to improve is by buying companies such as Zuora and Zscaler.
In short, cloud companies are in demand although there is a shortage of quality cloud companies.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"The great thing about fact-based decisions is that they overrule the hierarchy." - said Amazon founder and CEO, Jeff Bezos
Global Market Comments
April 13, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ANNOUNCING THE MAD HEDGE LAKE TAHOE, NEVADA, CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 26-27, 2018),
(APRIL 11 GLOBAL STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(TLT), (TBT), (GOOGL), (MU), (LRCX), (NVDA) (IBM),
(GLD), (AMZN), (MSFT), (XOM), (SPY), (QQQ)
Below please find subscribers' Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader April Global Strategy Webinar with my guest co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader.
As usual, every asset class long and short was covered. You are certainly an inquisitive lot, and keep those questions coming!
Q: Many of your April positions are now profitable. Is there any reason to close out before expiration?
A: No one ever got fired for taking a profit. If you feel like you have enough in hand - like 50% of the maximum potential profit in the position, which we do have in more than half of our current positions - go ahead and take it.
I'll probably run all of our April expirations into expiration day because they are very deep in the money. Also, because of the higher volatility and because of higher implied volatility on individual stock options, you're being paid a lot more to run these into expiration than you ever have been before, so that is another benefit.
Of course, one good reason to take profits now is to roll into another position, and when we find them, that may be exactly what we do.
Q: What do you think will be the impact of the US hitting Syria with missiles?
A: Initially, probably a 3-, 4-, or 500-point drop, and then a very rapid recovery. While the Russians have threatened to shoot down our missiles, in actual fact they can't hit the broad side of a barn. When Russians fired their cruise missiles at Syrian targets, half of them landed in Iran.
At the end of the day, it doesn't really impact the US economy, but you will see a big move in gold, which we're already starting to see, and which is why we're long in gold - as a hedge against all our other positions against this kind of geopolitical event.
Q: Will 2018 be a bull market or a bear market?
A: We are still in a bull market, but we may see only half the returns of last year - in other words we'll get a 10% profit in stocks this year instead of a 20% profit, which means it has to rise 12% from here to hit that 10% up by year-end.
Q: What is your take on the ProShares Ultra Short 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund (TBT)?
A: I am a big buyer here. I think that interest rates (TLT) are going to move down sharply for the rest of the year. The (TBT) here, in the mid $30s, is a great entry point - I would be buying it right now.
Q: How do you expect Google (GOOGL) to trade when the spread is so wide?
A: It will go up. Google is probably the best-quality technology company in the market, after Facebook (FB). We'll get some money moving out of Facebook into Google for exactly that reason; Google is Facebook without the political risk, the regulatory risk, and the security risks.
Q: Are any positions still a buy now?
A: All of them are buys now. But, do not chase the market on any conditions whatsoever. The market has an endless supply of sudden shocks coming out of Washington, which will give you that down-400-points-day. That is the day you jump in and buy. When you're buying on a 400-down-day, the risk reward is much better than buying on a 400-point up day.
Q: What is "sell in May and go away?"
A: It means take profits in all your positions in May when markets start to face historical headwinds for six months and either A) Wait for another major crash in the market (at the very least we'll get another test of the bottom of the recent range), or B) Just stay away completely; go spend all the money you made in the first half of 2018.
Q: Paul Ryan (the Republican Speaker of the House) resigned today; is he setting up for a presidential run against Trump in 2020?
A: I would say yes. Paul Ryan has been on the short list of presidential candidates for a long time. And Ryan may also be looking to leave Washington before the new Robert Mueller situation gets really unpleasant.
Q: What reaction do you expect if Trump resigns or is impeached?
A: I have Watergate to look back to; the stock market sold off 45% going into the Nixon resignation. It's a different world now, and there were a lot more things going wrong with the US economy in 1975 than there are now, like oil shocks, Vietnam, race riots, and recessions.
I would expect to get a decline, much less than that - maybe only a couple 1,000 points (or 10% or so), and then a strong Snapback Rally after that. We, in effect, have been discounting a Trump impeachment ever since he got in office. Thus far, the market has ignored it; now it's ignoring it a lot less.
Q: Thoughts on Micron Technology (MU), Lam Research (LRCX), and Nvidia (NVDA)?
A: It's all the same story: a UBS analyst who had never covered the chip sector before initiated coverage and issued a negative report on Micron Technology, which triggered a 10% sell-off in Micron, and 5% drops in every other chip company.
He took down maybe 20 different stocks based on the argument that the historically volatile chip cycle is ending now, and prices will fall through the end of the year. I think UBS is completely wrong, that the chip cycle has another 6 to 12 months to go before prices weaken.
All the research we've done through the Mad Hedge Technology Letter shows that UBS is entirely off base and that prices still remain quite strong. The chip shortage still lives! That makes the entire chip sector a buy here.
Q: Can Trump bring an antitrust action against Amazon?
A: No, no chance whatsoever. It is all political bluff. If you look at any definition of antitrust, is the consumer being harmed by Amazon (AMZN)?
Absolutely not - if they're getting the lowest prices and they're getting products delivered to their door for free, the consumer is not being harmed by lower prices.
Second is market share; normally, antitrust cases are brought when market shares get up to 70 or 80%. That's what we had with Microsoft (MSFT) in the 1990s and IBM (IBM) in the 1980s. The largest share Amazon has in any single market is 4%, so no there is basis whatsoever.
By the way, no president has ever attacked a private company on a daily basis for personal reasons like this one. Thank the president for giving us a great entry point for a stock that has basically gone up every day for two years. It's a rare opportunity.
Q: How will the trade war end?
A: I think the model for the China trade war is the US steel tariffs, where we announced tariffs against the entire world, and then exempted 75% of the world, declaring victory. That's exactly what's going to happen with China: We'll announce massive tariffs, do nothing for a while, and then negotiate modest token tariffs within a few areas. The US will declare victory, and the stock market rallies 2,000 points. That's why I have been adding risk almost every day for the last two weeks.
Q: Would you be buying ExonMobil (XOM) here, hoping for an oil breakout?
A: No, I think it's much more likely that oil is peaking out here, especially given the slowing economic data and a huge onslaught in supply from US fracking. We're getting big increases now in fracking numbers - that is very bad for prices a couple of months out. The only reason oil is this high is because Iran-sponsored Houthi rebels have been firing missiles at Saudi Arabia, which are completely harmless. In the old days, this would have caused oil to spike $50.
Q: Would you be selling stock into the rally (SPY), (QQQ)?
A: Not yet. I think the market has more to go on the upside, but you can still expect a lot of inter-day volatility depending on what comes out of Washington.
Q: Do you ever use stops on your option spreads?
A: I use mental stops. They don't take stop losses on call spreads and put spreads, and if they did they would absolutely take you to the cleaners. These are positions you never want to execute on market orders, which is what stop losses do. You always want to be working the middle of the spread. So, I use my mental stop. And when we do send out stop loss trade alerts, that's exactly where they're coming from.
Q: Will the Middle East uncertainty raise the price of oil?
A: Yes, if the Cold War with Iran turns hot, you could expect oil to go up $10 or $20 dollars higher, fairly quickly, regardless of what the fundamentals are. It's tough to be blowing up oil supplies as a great push on oil prices. But that's a big "if."
Hello from the Italian Riviera!