Global Market Comments
June 25, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE MARKET OUTLOOK FOR THE WEEK AHEAD, OR IS THIS A 1999 REPLAY?),
(AAPL), (FB), (NFLX), (AMZN), (GE), (WBT),
(JOIN ME ON THE QUEEN MARY 2 FOR MY JULY 11, 2018 SEMINAR AT SEA),
(JUNE 20 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(SQ), (PANW), (FEYE), (FB), (LRCX), (BABA), (MOMO), (IQ), (BIDU), (AMD), (MSFT), (EDIT), (NTLA), Bitcoin, (FXE), (SPY), (SPX)
Below please find subscribers' Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader June 20 Global Strategy Webinar with my guest and co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader.
As usual, every asset class long and short was covered. You are certainly an inquisitive lot, and keep those questions coming!
Q: What are your thoughts on Square (SQ) as a credit spread or buyout proposition?
A: I love Square long term, and I think there's another double in it. They were a takeover target, but now the stock's getting so expensive it may not be worth it. So, Square is a buy. However, look for a summer sell-off to get into a new position.
Q: The FANGs feel a little bubbly here; will they pull back on a market dip?
A: Yes, my entire portfolio of FANG options is designed to expire on the July 20th expiration. In fact, I may even come out before then as we reach the maximum profit point on these option call spreads. Then look for a summer meltdown to get back in. The FANGs could double from here. If I am wrong they will just continue to go straight up.
Q: Palo Alto Networks (PANW) has a new CEO; are you concerned?
A: Absolutely not, I love Palo Alto networks, as well as the (FEYE) FireEye. It's just a question of getting in at the right price. It's one of the many ballistic stocks in Tech this year that we've been recommending for a long time. Hacking an online theft is never going to go out of style.
Q: Is it time to sell Facebook (FB)?
A: Yes, if you're a trader. No, if you're a long-term investor. There's another double in it. You're going to have natural profit taking on all of these Techs for the short-term, and possibly for the summer, because they've just had enormous runs. If you aren't in the FANGs this year, you basically don't have any performance because almost all of the rest of the market has gone down.
Q: What are your thoughts on Lam Research (LRCX)?
A: The whole chip sector has had two big sell-offs this year because of their China exposure and the trade wars. Expect more to come. China gets 80% of their chips from the U.S. This is normal at the end of a 10-year bull market. It's also normal when a sector transitions from highly cyclical to secular, which is what's happening in the chip sector. Twice the volatility gets you twice the returns.
Q: Would you stay away from Chinese stocks like Alibaba (BABA), Momo Inc.(MOMO), IQ (IQ), and Baidu (BIDU)?
A: I have stayed away because of the trade war fears, and it was the completely wrong thing to do, because they've gone up as much as our Tech stocks, except for the last week. So yes, I would be buying dips on these big Chinese Tech stocks, because they are drinking the same Kool Aid as our Techs, and it's working.
Q: I hear that short selling of volatility is coming back; is that a good thing?
A: Actually, it is a good thing, because it creates buyers on these dips when you had no short sellers left. The entire industry got wiped out in February creating $8 billion in losses. There was no one left to cover those shorts and support the market. Of course, the result was we got a lower low down here because of that. It's always better to have a two-way market to get a real price. Now professionals are sneaking back in on the short side, which is as it should be. This should never have been a retail product.
Q: Why are international markets so disconnected from the U.S.? Many Asian markets are down heavily while the U.S. are up.
A: The U.S. stock market benefits from a rising dollar and rising interest rates, whereas international markets suffer. When you have weak currencies in the emerging markets, people sell their stocks to avoid the currency hit, and that takes the emerging markets down massively. A lot of emerging market companies have their debts denominated in U.S. dollars, so they get killed by a strong greenback. Also, the emerging markets make a lot of money selling goods into China, so when the Chinese economy gets attacked by the U.S. and growth slows, it has the byproduct of attacking all our other allies in Southeast Asia.
Q: Is it a good idea to sell everything for the summer and just de-risk for my portfolio?
A: That's what I'm doing. Summer trading is usually horrible, and now we're going into the summer at close to a high for the year, with a terrible political backdrop and possible economic growth peaking right here. So, yes, it's a good time to sit back, count your money, and maybe even spend some of it on a European vacation.
Q: When do you think the yield curve will invert?
A: In a year, and that is typically when you get a peaking of economic growth and the stock market.
Q: Is the Fed's faster-than-expected desire to raise rates good for equities, or will investors likely sell this news as quantitative tightening continues?
A: Short-term they will buy the market on rising rates, they always do at the early part of an interest rate rising cycle. They sell stocks when you get to the middle or the end of a rate rising cycle.
Q: Do you think large Tech stocks are expensive here?
A: No, I think the Large-Cap Tech stocks can potentially double here. It can take another year to year and a half to do it, and if they don't do it in this cycle they will certainly do it in the next one, after the next recession in the 2020s. So, long term you want to think FANG, FANG, FANG, TECH, TECH, TECH. You really shouldn't have anything else in the long term, except for maybe Biotech, where you can now get in at a multiyear low.
Q: Can I buy a chip company like Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), or should I buy a cloud company, like Microsoft (MSFT)?
A: I would go with the Cloud company. The innovation there is incredible. Cloud is growing like the Internet itself was growing on its own in 1995, and with chip stocks like (AMD), you're going to get much higher volatility, but more gain. So, pick your poison. But I would go with the Cloud plays.
Q: Can we watch the recorded version of this webinar later?
A: Yes, we post the webinar on our website a couple hours later, if you're a paid subscriber.
Q: What about the CRISPR stocks?
A: They are a screaming buy right now, buy Editas Medicine (EDIT) and Intellia Therapeutics (NTLA) on the dip. The paper that triggered the sell-off saying that CRISPR causes cancer is complete BS.
Q: Only 30 million in Bitcoin was stolen in South Korea so will that still have an impact?
A: Yes, but there have been countless other hacks this year and the total loss is well over $500 million. In addition, Bitcoin is now down 70% from its December top so not all is well in cryptocurrency land.
Q: Should we expect any Trade Alerts before August 8?
A: Yes, some of my best trades have been done while only vacation. I once sold short the Euro (FXE) from the back of a camel in Morocco. Another time, I bought the S&P 500 (SPY) while hanging from a cliff face on the Matterhorn. Both of those made good money.
Q: Will the S&P 500 reach new highs before the end of the year?
A: Yes, once you get the election out of the way, that removes a huge amount of uncertainty from the market. If we could end our trade war before then, I think you're looking at another 10-15% in gains from this level by the end of the year. That takes you to an (SPX) of 3,100 by the end of 2018, which was my January 1 prediction.
Q: What does all the heavy mergers and acquisition activity mean for the market?
A: It means fewer stocks are left to trade. Stock shortages leads to higher prices, always, so it is a big market positive this year
Good Luck and Good Trading.
John Thomas
CEO and Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 20, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(GOOGLE'S GRAND CHINA PLAY),
(BABA), (JD), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (BIDU), (AMZN), (NFLX)
There is light at the end of the tunnel.
A glimmer of hope is better than nothing.
Stolen IP was yesterday's story.
The administration's attempts to stick China with the bill is a waste of time.
The stock market is forward-looking and that is what I focus on when writing the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
American tech companies want to turn over this bitter page of history and construct a fruitful future.
Ironically, it could be no other than American large tech companies that solves this trade misunderstanding by embracing Chinese tech instead of dragging them through the embers of political chaos.
That is what this groundbreaking partnership between Alphabet (GOOGL) and China's second largest e-commerce company JD.com (JD) is telling us.
If American and Chinese tech agree to fuse together through different M&A activity, strategic partnerships, and engineering projects, slapping penalties on your own interests would be without basis.
Albeit gone are the yesteryears of complete ownership on the other's turf, a medium ground could be found to satisfy both parties.
Alphabet's $550 million investment will give it 27 million shares of JD.com Class A shares equating to a 1% stake in JD.com.
JD.com products will now be hawked on Google Shopping, a platform giving users a chance to compare different price points from various sellers.
JD.com's fresh links with Silicon Valley's original powerhouse is timely because its business-to-consumer retail sales have slightly dipped in form from 27% last year to an underwhelming 25% in the first quarter of 2018.
Alibaba (BABA), the Amazon of China, is the 800-pound gorilla in the room and has a stranglehold on this market, carving out a robust 60% of sales from business to consumer retail.
Chinese companies have never worried about foreign companies seizing market share in China because they know the rigid operating environment mixed with "cultural" barriers will lead to a rapid demise.
Chinese firms are channeling their distress toward local competitors that understand the market as well as they do and number in the 100s in any one industry.
This is also a huge bet on the Chinese consumer who has put the world economy on its back creating the lions' share of global growth for the past 10 years.
Do not bet against China and the Chinese consumer.
Alphabet is taking this sentiment to the bank by integrating part of a premium Chinese tech firm into its own top line performance.
This investment would not happen if Alphabet believed the trade war could turn draconian cannibalizing each other's profit engines.
Alphabet has obviously been reading the tea leaves from the Mad Hedge Technology Letter as I identified China's huge competitive advantage in Southeast Asia and the huge potential for Chinese companies that migrate there.
The pivot toward Southeast Asia was the deal clincher for Alphabet and rightly so.
Alphabet has also invested in opening an A.I. (artificial intelligence) lab in Beijing showing its determination to extract a piece of the pie from China and ensuring their brand power is maintained in the Middle Kingdom.
Google search has been shut down on mainland China since 2010. Therefore, Alphabet needs to find alternative ways to benefit from the Chinese consumer and increase its presence.
The writing on the wall was when Baidu (BIDU) came to the fore with its own Chinese version of Google search.
Opportunities on the mainland have been scarce ever since the appearance of Baidu.
Apple (AAPL) has been the premier role model in China successfully juggling the complexities of the Chinese market. A big part of its staying power is offering local Chinese jobs.
Not just a few jobs, but millions.
As of April 2017, an Apple press release stated, "Apple has created and supported 4.8 million jobs in China" which is almost three times more than in America.
Apple deploys much of its supply chain around the mainland and taking down Apple in a trade war would strip millions of Chinese jobs in one fell swoop.
Not only that, Apple has deeply invested in data centers located in China and opened research centers in Shanghai and Suzhou.
Foxconn, a company responsible for assembling iPhones in mainland China, employs 1.2 million alone.
Alphabet would be smart to follow in the same footsteps, effectively, morphing into a hybrid Chinese company employing locals in droves and allowing millions of Chinese to earn their crust of bread through local factories.
Let me be clear: This would not hurt its business back at home.
It is also wrong to say that China is saturating because the 6.8% annual growth rate in China is a firm vote of confidence for Chinese discretionary spenders.
However, instead of competing head to head under the scrutiny of Chinese regulators, it is much more sensical to copy SoftBank's Masayoshi Son's lead when he invested $25 million in Jack Ma's Alibaba in 1999.
SoftBank's 1999 investment is now valued at more than $30 billion as of the current share price today.
Yahoo later joined the party in 2005, investing $1 billion into Alibaba and that stake is worth many times over.
Instead of fighting through cultural norms and fighting against the throes of an exotic business environment, paying for a stake and leaving its nose out of it has shown to be demonstrably effective.
Partnerships complicate the relationship, but if management can lock down each side's commitment to the very T, collaboration could spur even more innovation benefiting both countries and bottom lines.
China has draconian Internet controls put in place. American tech companies aren't up to snuff with cultural maneuverability to navigate through these shark-infested waters.
Better to pay for a stake and pick up the check after the market close.
Another winner in this deal is tech valuations, which has been the Cinderella story of 2018.
Although American tech companies will probably never be able to own 100% of a Chinese BAT. However, allowing these types of investments to go ahead is certainly bullish for equities.
Tech is still the sector lifting the heavy weight stateside and promoting innovation through collaboration will do a great deal to win the hearts and minds of Chinese people, companies and government.
As much as China hates the stain to its image of this nebulous trade war, it still deeply respects and admires large-cap American tech companies.
Chinese Millennials particularly have a deep love affair with Tesla's Elon Musk. They are captivated by his braggadocio, which they find appealingly exotic and captivatingly un-Chinese.
Through this partnership, JD.com will learn heaps about cutting-edge ad-tech and is guaranteed to apply the know-how to its home user base. In return, Alphabet will get deep insights of how JD.com controls the entire logistical experience and how a Chinese tech behemoth operates its supply chain.
The nuggets of information pocketed will help Alphabet compete more with Amazon back at home.
This is a win-win proposition.
Adding even more cream on top, enhanced brand awareness by joining together with Google could catapult JD.com into the shop window of America's consciousness.
Up until today, JD.com is hardly known about in the West except for specialists that avidly follow technology like the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
I reiterate my stance of not buying into Chinese tech companies, and readers would be better served buying Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), and Netflix. (NFLX)
It makes no sense to trade stocks mired in the heart of a trade war.
As much as I love Alibaba as a company, it has been trading in a range because of the whipsawing headlines released in the press.
However, I can stand from afar and admire how the Chinese BATs have advanced in such a short amount of time.
If American tech and Chinese tech merge to the point of unrecognizability, consolidation could create a super tech power comprising of mixed Chinese and American interests.
Instead of bickering at each other, other solutions look to be more compelling.
The world's economy needs a healthy Chinese economy and vibrant Chinese consumer.
If the Chinese economy ever fell off a cliff, you can kiss this nine-year equity bull market goodbye, and the Mad Hedge Technology Letter would turn extremely bearish in a blink of an eye.
Therefore, America has a large stake in not alienating the Mandarins to the point of disgust.
I am still bullish on equities, but vigilance is the name of the game for short-term traders.
Package Delivery!
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"My belief is that one plus one equals three. The pie gets larger, working together," Apple CEO Tim Cook said about its operations in mainland China and working with the Chinese Communist government.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 18, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE BATS),
(BIDU), (BABA), (AMZN), (AAPL), (MGI), (NVDA), (AMD), (GOOGL), (FB)
The Chinese BATs (Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent) are China's response to the American FANG group.
It's one of few sectors outperforming the vigorous American tech sector, and valuations have soared in the past year.
Former English teacher Jack Ma founded the Amazon (AMZN) of China named Alibaba in April 1999, which has grown to become one of the biggest websites on the Internet.
This company even has a massive cloud division that acts in the same way as Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Alibaba also has Alipay on its roster, the fintech and digital payments subsidiary of Alibaba.
Baidu, led by Robin Li, is the de-facto Google search of China and is entirely tailored for the Chinese market without English language support.
Tencent, created by Ma Huateng, has an assortment of businesses from social media, instant messaging, online gaming, and digital payments.
Tencent's WeChat platform is the lynchpin acting as the gateway to the robust Tencent eco-system.
The BATs have heavily invested in autonomous vehicle technology set to roll out in the coming years.
These companies are some of the biggest venture capitalists in the world throwing around capital like Masayoshi Son's SoftBank.
Alibaba has seen its share price rocket from $135 in June 2017 to $206.
Baidu has also seen huge gyrations in its share price elevating from $174 in June 2017 to $270.
Tencent, public on the Hong Kong Hang Seng Index, has gone from $273 HKD (Hong Kong dollars) to $412 HKD.
And this is all just the beginning!
An economy growing a stable 6.5% per year with companies able to scale to a mind-boggling 1.3 billion people is something of which to take notice.
China hopes to wean itself from its industrial heritage betting the ranch on a rapidly expanding tech sector.
Does this put China on a collision course steamrolling toward the American FANGs?
Highly possible but not yet.
Even though the BATs modus operandi has been to follow in the footsteps of the FANG's business model, they do not directly compete.
Ant Financial, the fintech arm of Alibaba, was blocked from purchasing MoneyGram International (MGI), effectively, closing any doors leading to the lucrative American digital payments industry.
This also meant curtains for WeChat, the multi-functional app that half of the Chinese use as a digital wallet, in the digital payments space.
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has made it crystal clear that BAT's capital will be scrutinized more than ever before because of China's open policy of transferring Western technology expertise to the mainland for the purpose of leading the world in technology.
China cannot have its cake and eat it.
The first stumbling block is that the American market does not suit the BAT's FANG business model with Chinese characteristics.
For example, the only other market Baidu search operates in is Brazil.
It has leveraged itself to the Chinese consumer whose purchasing power has spiked from its burgeoning middle class.
Another headwind is the lack of innovation caused by a rigid education system punishing freedom of thought in favor of rote memorization.
Innovation is American tech's bread and butter and investors pay up for this ingenuity that cannot be found elsewhere in the world.
This is also the reason why the BATs need to buy American technology and not the other way around.
Original concepts such as Uber and Airbnb were made in America first and Didi Chuxing and Tujia are rip-offs of these American companies.
The list is endless.
The BATs understand they cannot go head to head with American talent, but that does not mean they won't win out in the end.
To make matters worse, global tech talents do not want to work in China if they are reliant on America to develop something and copy it.
Why not just go work in Silicon Valley for a higher salary?
This was highlighted when the only tech talent to cross over to the other side quit in a blaze of glory.
Hugo Barra was poached from Alphabet in 2013, where he worked as vice present for the Android mobile operating system.
He was installed as the vice president of international development for smartphone maker Xiaomi, the Apple (AAPL) of China.
Barra suddenly threw in the towel at Xiaomi in 2017, offering a harsh critique stating, "What I've realized is that the last few years of living in such a singular environment have taken a huge toll on my life and started affecting my health."
Not exactly the stamp of approval the Mandarins were looking for.
In turn, China has focused its effort on recruiting Chinese-Americans who understand the working environment better and have roots or even family on the mainland.
The dire tech talent shortage is worse in China than Silicon Valley because Chinese tech companies have zero access to non-Chinese talent.
Even with a reverse in immigration policies by the administration, America continues to be the holy grail of tech jobs.
That is why you see hoards of Chinese, Indians, Russians, and every other country's best and brightest waiting in line to make the move.
Taiwanese American CEOs lead some of Silicon Valley's best companies such as the CEO for Nvidia (NVDA), Jensen Huang, and the CEO of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Dr. Lisa Su.
Only 1% of Baidu's revenues is extracted from American soil underscoring the BAT's China-first business model. Tencent isn't much better at 5%, and Alibaba heads the list at 11%.
Compare these statistics with Alphabet (GOOGL) making 53% and Facebook (FB) earning 56% of revenue from international sales.
Amazon is still very much an American business but 32% of revenue comes from international sales.
The bulk of this revenue is mainly from Europe where American large-cap tech companies are staunch mainstays.
China has focused on building out its business in Southeast Asia instead.
Those governments are cozy with Beijing and are willing to relinquish some sovereign influence to develop its poor digital infrastructure.
The nail in the coffin for potential BAT companies doing business in America is the total lack of data protection in China.
If you think what Facebook is doing doesn't make you sleep at night, the BATs are running riot with personal data in China.
Expect multiple attempts of hackers breaking into your email while your phone number is constantly harassed by spam messages and robo-calls galore.
This is a normal day in the life of a Chinese national and they are used to it.
China understands they are not ready to eclipse the juggernaut that is Silicon Valley.
The BATs are biding their time organically growing by investing into American tech firms helping their overall products and services.
The past five years have seen a gorge of American investment amounting to 95 deals totaling $27.6 billion.
However, this smash-and-grab investment party is effectively over because CFIUS has clamped down on exporting local technology.
Consequently, the BATs will continue to focus on what they know best - the Chinese market.
Southeast Asia is also ripe to become the next stomping ground for the BATs. Expect them to dominate in this region for years to come.
The runway is long in domestic China. The 6.5% annual growth is entirely biased toward these three companies to prolong their hearty growth trajectories.
The communist party even has a seat on the board at each of these companies highlighting another area of conflict if these companies dive head into the American market.
Let's just say corporate governance in China is a shell of what it is in America.
One day there could be an all-out battle for tech supremacy, but these Chinese companies would need some assurances they would likely come out on top.
That is hardly the case yet and they make way too much money by copying Silicon Valley.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"The leader of the market today may not necessarily be the leader tomorrow," - said Tencent founder and CEO Ma Huateng.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 13, 2018
Fiat Lux
SPECIAL ACRONYM ISSUE
Featured Trade:
(FB), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (NFLX), (BABA), (BIDU), (TWTR), (SNAP), (INTC), (QCOM), (VZ), (T), (S)
The tech industry is infatuated with acronyms.
The two-, three- and four-letter acronyms of yore have been spruced up by a new wave of contemporary terms.
There are a lot more of them now and readers will need to absorb the meaning of each term to avoid our content seeming like a Grecian dialect.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter will break down the relevant terminology that applies to the current tech sector.
This will aid readers in their pursuit of financial satisfaction.
FANG: Facebook (FB), Amazon (AMZN), Netflix (NFLX), and Google (now Alphabet) (GOOGL)
Jim Cramer, the host of CNBC's Mad Money, coined this term as this quartet became such a force to reckon with, that they deserved their own grouping. Financial commentators and analysts often refer to the FANGs that ultimately represent the developments and destiny of large cap tech. Apple is sometimes grouped in this bundle with analysts adding a second A inside the acronym.
AWS - Amazon Web Services
The cloud arm of Amazon is its cash cow. Amazon invented this business out of thin air in 2006. It offers the ability for Amazon to operate its e-commerce division close to cost by plowing profits from its thriving cloud arm. AWS is the backbone to the whole Amazon operation. Without it, Jeff Bezos would need to rethink another genius business model because current and future success hinges on this one subsidiary. AWS is the market leader in the cloud industry, carving out 33% of the total market. Microsoft is the runner-up and saw its market share surge from 10% to 13% in the latest quarter.
GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation
Europe has been a stickler concerning individual data protection, and the American companies running riot with Europeans personal data has reached its climax. On May 25, 2018, new European regulations were implemented to give the user more control of handing out their personal data. Penalties for non-compliance are steep. Companies risk being fined up to 20 million Euros or 4% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is larger. Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg now has a reason to behave like an angel. The least regulated industry in the world is finally experiencing the bitter regulation pill most industries have felt for centuries.
SaaS - Software as a Service
A software distribution model licensing software on a subscription basis. Instead of installing many of these software programs, many of them are available through the Internet on the cloud. Most subscriptions work on an annual basis, and this recurring revenue model has carved out additional income from companies that were used to paying a one-off fee for software. This model has been highly successful. Even former legacy companies have deployed this business model to critical acclaim.
AI - Artificial Intelligence
An area of computer science that strives to deploy human intelligence into machine simulation. The four main tasks it carries out are speech recognition, learning, planning, and problem solving. A.I. has been identified as a cutting-edge tool to fuse with technology products boosting the underlying performance creating massive profits for the participants. This phenomenon is controversial with the prophecy that robots might advance rapidly and turn on their inventors. As each day passes, A.I. is starting to infiltrate deeper into our daily lives, and humans are becoming entirely reliant on their positive functions to carry out daily tasks.
IoT - Internet of Things
Internet connectivity with things. This network will connect billions and billions of devices together. Your bathtub, thermostat, and razor will be armed with sensors and processors that reroute the performance data back to the manufacturer. Deploying the data, engineers will be able to enhance products with even more precision and high quality serving the end customer needs. 5G testing is ongoing in select American cities and new hyper-fast Internet speeds will make mass adoption of IoT products a reality.
5G - 5th generation wireless system
This is the successor to 4G and is poised to increase wireless Internet speeds up to 20 gigabits per second. Some of the traits will be low latency, high mobility, and will be able to accommodate high connection density. This technology is crucial to the development of the next generation of groundbreaking technology such as autonomous cars that need a faster Internet speed to run elaborate software. The war to develop this technology with the Chinese has turned into a heated standoff. China is stubbornly bent on becoming the global leader of technology in the future, and the communist government views 5G as the keys to the Ferrari. U.S. companies Verizon (VZ), AT&T (T) and Sprint (S) plan to roll out 5G in 2019. Other key companies are Huawei, Intel (INTC), Samsung, Nokia, Ericsson and Qualcomm (QCOM).
BAT - Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent
This trio is the Middle Kingdom's answer to America's FANG. The nine-year domestic bull market has been led by large-cap tech, at the same time China's economy has been fueled by Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent. Baidu and Alibaba are tradable through American depositary receipts (ADR). Tencent is public on Hong Kong's Hang Seng stock exchange, the third largest stock market in Asia. These companies are all a mix and mash of functionality that covers the same broad spectrum of the FANGs. They are the best companies in China and are on the cusp of every single cutting-edge technology from A.I. to autonomous vehicles. The Mad Hedge Technology Letter does not recommend these stocks to our subscribers because the Chinese government is on a nationalistic mission to delist Alibaba and Baidu from America and bring them back home. Initially, Alibaba wanted to list on the Hang Seng Hong Kong stock exchange, but draconian rules applied to dual-listing made the company flee to America.
NIMBY - Not In My Back Yard
Local opposition to proposed development in local areas. Although not a pure tech term, the epicenter of the NIMBY movement is smack dab in the middle of the San Francisco Bay Area where all the premium tech jobs are located. Local opposition has made it grueling for any developers to build.
What's more, the expensive cost of land has made any new building a tough proposition. This explains the 10-year drought where San Francisco experienced not a single new hotel built. The dearth of housing has caused San Francisco housing prices to skyrocket to a medium price of $1.61 million as of March 2018. Exorbitant housing prices have triggered a mass migration of Californians fleeing the Bay Area in droves. The shocking aftereffects have put highly paid Millennial tech workers spending the bulk of their salary on housing or living in dilapidated shacks. The extreme conditions we are now seeing are forcing schools around the Bay Area to close in unison as young families cannot afford to stay. Tech companies have become public enemy No. 1 in the Bay Area as locals are desperate to maintain their current lifestyle but are finding it more difficult by the day.
MAU - Monthly Active Users
Favored by social media companies to measure growth trajectories. This is how Twitter (TWTR) analyzes the health of its user numbers delivering a narrative to potential investors by hyping up user growth. If investors value this metric, this allows companies to focus on driving growth at the expense of burning cash. Thus, emerging social media companies such as Snapchat (SNAP) run huge loss-making operations for the promise of future profits after scaling.
ARPU - Average Revenue Per User
Favored by maturing social media companies, particularly Facebook, which has already grown global usership to 2.2 billion. Once the emerging hypergrowth phase comes to an end, social media companies focus on extracting more income per user through targeted ads. Facebook and Alphabet have the best ad tech divisions in all of Silicon Valley. The business model has made Facebook an inordinate amount of money as advertiser's flock to this de-facto marketplace paying more for effective ads whose price is set at an auction. It's a vicious cycle that attracts more traditional advertisers because it is the only method of selling to Millennials who are addicted to social media platforms. Cord-cutting is accelerating this trend forcing advertisers to co-exist with the Mark Zuckerberg model.
There are many more acronyms in the tech world that need explaining and that is exactly what I will do. The Mad Hedge Technology Letter will be back with another slew of technical terms to help subscribers understand the tech universe.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"You can worry about the competition... or you can focus on what's ahead of you and drive fast," said Square and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 23, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY THE BIG DEAL OVER ZTE?),
(MU), (QCOM), (INTC), (AAPL), (SWKS), (TXN), (BIDU), (BABA)
Here's the conundrum.
Beyond cutting-edge technology, there's nothing that China WANTS OR NEEDS to buy from the U.S. China's largest imports are in energy and foodstuffs, both globally traded commodities.
China is playing the long game because it can.
Earlier this year, China altered its constitution to remove term limits and any obstacle that would hinder Chairman Xi to serve indefinitely.
If it's two, four, eight or 10 years, no problem, China will wait it out.
As it stands, China is enjoying the status quo, which is a robust economic trajectory of 6.7% economic growth YOY and at that rate will leapfrog America as the biggest economy in the world by 2030.
China does not need handouts.
It already has its mooncake and is eating it.
The Chinese are also betting that Donald Trump fades away with the passage of time, possibly soon, and that a vastly different administration will enter the fray with an entirely different strategy.
The indefinite "hold" pattern is a polite way to say we surrender.
ZTE Corporation is a Chinese telecommunications equipment manufacturer and low-end smartphone maker based in Shenzhen, China.
This seemingly innocuous company is ground zero for the U.S. vs China trade practice dispute.
The U.S. Department of Commerce banned American tech companies from selling components to ZTE for seven years, crippling its supply chain after violating sanctions against Iran and North Korea.
ZTE uses about 30% of American components to produce its smorgasbord of telecom equipment and down-market cell phones.
What most people do not know is that ZTE is the fourth most prevalent smartphone in America, only behind Apple, Samsung, and LG, commanding a 12.2% market share, and its phones require an array of American made silicon parts.
In 2017, the company shipped more than 20 million phones to the United States.
The ruling effectively put ZTE out of business because the lack of components shelved production.
Low-end smartphones account for almost one-third of total revenue.
ZTE could very well have survived with a direct hit to its consumer phone business, but the decision to ban components made the telecom equipment division inoperable.
This segment accounts for a heavy 58.2% of revenue. Therefore, disrupting ZTE's supply chain would effectively take down more than 91% of its business for a company that employs 75,000 employees in over 160 countries.
Upon news of ZTE's imminent demise, the administration made a U-turn on its initial decision stating "too many jobs in China lost."
The reversal made America look bad.
It shows that America is being dictated to and not the other way around.
When did it become the responsibility of the American administration to fill Chinese jobs for a company that is a threat to national security?
The Chinese refused to continue talks with the visiting delegation until the ZTE situation was addressed.
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and company were able to "continue" the talks then were politely shown the door.
Bending the rules for ZTE should have never been a prerequisite for talks, stressing the lack of firepower in the administration's holster.
However, stranding the delegation in Chinese hotel rooms for days waiting in limbo, without offering an audience, would have caused even more humiliation and anguish for the administration.
China is not interested in buying much from America, but one thing it needs -- and needs in droves -- are chips.
Long term, this ZTE ban is great for China.
I believe China will use this episode to rile up the nationalistic rhetoric and make it a point to wean itself from American chips.
However, for the time being, American chips are the most valuable import America can offer China, and that won't change for the foreseeable future.
The numbers back me up.
Micron (MU) earns more than $10 billion in revenue from China, which makes up over 51% of its total revenue.
Qualcomm (QCOM), mainly through its lucrative licensing division, makes more than $14.5 billion from its Chinese revenue, which comprises over 65% of revenue.
Texas Instruments (TXN) earns more than 44% of revenue from China, and almost a quarter of Intel's (INTC) revenue is derived from its China operations.
The biggest name embedded in China is Apple (AAPL), which earned almost $45 billion in sales last year. Its China revenue is three times larger than any other American company.
In less than a decade, China has caught up.
China now has adequate local smartphone substitutes through Huawei, Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi phones.
Skyworks Solutions (SWKS), a chip company reliant on iPhone contracts, is most levered toward the Chinese market capturing almost 83% of revenue from China.
You would think these chips would be the first on the chopping block in a trade war. However, you are wrong.
China needs all the chips it can get because there is no alternative.
Stopping the inflow of chips is another way of stopping China from doing business and developing technology.
The Chinese economy has been led by the powerful BATs of Baidu (BIDU), Tencent, and Alibaba (BABA) occupying the same prominent role the American FANGs hold in the American economy.
They are not interested in digging their own grave.
To execute the 2025 plan to become the world leaders in advanced technology, they need chips that power all modern electronic devices.
The most likely scenario is that China maintains development using American chips for the time being and slowly pivots to the Korean chip sector, which is vulnerable to Chinese political pressure.
Remember that South Koreans have two of the three biggest chip companies in the world in Samsung and SK Hynix. China has used economic coercion to get what it wants from Korea in the past or to prove a point.
Korean multinational companies, shortly after the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) installation on the Korean peninsula, were penalized by the Chinese government shutting down mainland Korean stores, temporarily banning Chinese tourism in South Korea, and blocking K-pop stars from performing in the lucrative Chinese market.
The Chinese communist government can turn the screws when it wants and how it wants.
Therefore, the next battleground for tech could migrate to South Korean chip companies as China is on a mission to suck up as much high-grade tech ingenuity as possible while it can.
China has some easy targets to whack down if the administration forces it into a corner with a knife to its throat.
Non-tech companies are ripe for massacre because they do not produce chips.
Companies such as Procter & Gamble, Starbucks, McDonald's, and Nike could be replaced by a Chinese imitation in a jiffy.
Apple is the 800-pound gorilla in the room.
An attack on Apple would hyper-accelerate tension between two leaders to the highest it's ever been and would be the straw that breaks the camel's back.
Technology has transformed the world.
Technology also has been adopted by nations as a critical component to national security.
Nothing has changed fundamentally, and nothing will.
China will become the biggest economy in the world by 2030.
China will kick the proverbial can down the road because it can. It never has to cooperate with America again.
Contrary to expectations, American chip companies are untouchable, and investors won't see Micron suddenly losing half its revenue over this trade war.
Until China can produce higher quality chips, it will lap up as much of Uncle Sam's chips until it can force transfer the chip technology from the Koreans.
American chip companies can breathe a sigh of relief.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"If we go to work at 8 a.m. and go home at 5 p.m., this is not a high-tech company and Alibaba will never be successful. If we have that kind of 8-to-5 spirit, then we should just go and do something else." - said Alibaba founder and executive chairman Jack Ma.
