(BAC) Archives

Here Comes the Rolling Top

The S&P 500 is now at 1,564, and most strategist forecasts for the end of 2013 hover around 1,550-1,600, plus or minus some spare change. So the next nine months are going to be incredibly boring. Or they won?t.

Even in a bull market, one expects to see pullbacks of at least one third of the recent gain. Apply that logic towards the 224 points the (SPX) has tacked on since the November low, and that adds up to a 74 point, or a 4.7% correction down to 1,490.

There is massive liquidity in the system, many individuals and institutions are underweight, and interest rates are still at incredibly low levels. It also appears that every foreign financial disaster results in more money getting sent to the US for safety.

Usually, the (SPX) never rises more than 9% above the 200 day moving average without hitting a correction. This year is different. I can?t remember the last time the index spent this much time at that level without a pullback.

We are therefore likely to see a rolling type market top that unfolds over the next several months. That is in contrast to a spike top, which you can spot on a chart without your glasses from 20 feet away. These tops can be devilishly difficult to trade, with the limits defined more by time than price.

If you want to see what such a rolling top looks like, take a peak at the chart for my old friend, Dr. Copper, that great prognosticator of future economic activity. He put in such a rolling top during the first eight months of 2011, and has been trying to recover ever since, to no avail.

This no doubt reflects the slowing economy and the building copper inventories in China, where the red metal is widely used as a monetary instrument. China, in effect, is on a copper standard. It is rare to see the (SPX) going up and copper dropping like, well, a bar of copper.

While the broader indexes are likely to deliver a rolling top, that is not the case with individual sectors and stocks. That means you can use these individual spikes to assist in your timing of the overall market. You need to watch the market leaders like a hawk, such as the financials and the transports. If Bank of America (BAC) and United Continental Group (UAL), suddenly crash and burn, you can bet the rest of the market won?t be far behind. This is one of the reasons why I have these two names in my model-trading portfolio, on which you should maintain your laser focus.

The consumer discretionary and retail sectors are two additional pathfinder sectors that are the most economically sensitive in the market, which also make great canaries in the coalmine. As long as consumers are packing MacDonald?s (MCD), Home Depot (HD), and Target (TGT), or burning up their Comcast (CMCSA) broadband connections buying stuff from Amazon (AMZN), you won?t see appreciable market weakness. Earnings disappointments at these businesses, which could start in three weeks, are another great precursor of market trouble.

Finally, there is another class of stocks that may lead the charge on the downside, and that is small caps. Look at the chart below for the ETF for the Russell 2000 (IWM). Small companies are always hardest hit in any slowdown because they are more highly leveraged and have less access to external financing, like bank loans and equity floatations. I made a bundle last year shorting the (IWM) into the ?Sell in May? market meltdown, and plan to do so again this year.

Of course, timing is everything, and I?ll tell you what worries me the most. The overdependence of this bull market on the largess of the Federal Reserve cannot be underestimated. Any hint that quantitative easing is about to join the dustbin of history will take the market with it.

The conventional wisdom is that our esteemed central bank won?t embark on this path until year-end. What if it surprises us with a June tightening? The bull market would die of an instant heart attack. What would trigger this? A blowout monthly nonfarm payroll number approaching 300,000, which would quickly take the headline unemployment rate close to the Fed?s publicly announced 6.5% target. With the economy perhaps growing at a 3% rate this quarter, such a development might be only a handful of Friday?s away.

So how is the genius, aggressive hedge fund trader going to deal with these opaque markets? Bet that the market is going to stay in a broad range for a few more months. We aren?t going to the moon, nor are we going to crash. We are more likely to die of ice than fire. That?s what the volatility markets (VIX) are telling us.

There are several ways to play this kind of market. If you have a plain vanilla stock portfolio, you should be executing ?buy writes? against your existing holdings to take in extra premium income. With the bull move five months old, call options are trading at historically rich levels. This low risk, high return strategy involves selling short call options against existing stock positions. If your stock gets called away, you just say ?thank you very much? and buy it back on the way down.

For the more aggressive, you can add naked short sales of deep out of the money calls one month out. You don?t get rich with a strategy like this, but you earn a living.

You might also buy some deep out-of-the-money index puts for pennies. They are now trading near the cheapest prices in history. One market hiccup, and these things double very quickly.

Hmmm. Doesn?t Look Like Ben Bernanke

March 26, 2013/by Mad Hedge Fund Trader

The Bull Case for Bank of America

Newsletter

I?ll give you the quick and dirty argument behind buying Bank of America. For the past four years, the main argument for avoiding this stock like the plague was the hidden book of bad home loans it was hiding on its back bookshelf, thought to be in the tens of billions of dollars. This is why the shares spent most of the last half decade trading at a pitiful 50% of its book value. Nobody believed what management was representing as its true value.

Throw a sustainable recovery in the real estate market into the mix, and that excuse goes out the window. Rising property values means better quality collateral for the bank and more credible asset value representations. This will encourage equity investors to pay up to book value, 60% higher than price to book of 63%, and possibly more. That gets you at least to $20/share right there.

Do any search on (BAC), and a vast outpouring of contentions litigation, regulatory transgressions, and fines will pour out. Wherever there has been trouble in the financial system for the past decade, Bank of America was there, and up to its neck. The key point is that these are all in the past, settled, and accounted for in the future earnings stream.

Some of the acquisitions that (BAC) made during the crash were horrendous in their timing. It never missed an opportunity to overpay. The $2 billion Countrywide Financial acquisition stands out for its stupidity, which ate up masses of management time. Merrill Lynch at $50 billion? You must be joking. At that price, I have a pretty orange bridge here in San Francisco I?d like to sell them, as well. This was when a charitable valuation for the old raging bull would have been zero. Add 130% to the Dow average and it is a different story. The booming stock market has enabled Merrill?s profits to surge, and (BAC) could probably flip it here for a tidy profit.

After winding down positions in financials for five years, many long-term institutional investors are now running generational lows in this unloved sector. Return to market weightings could take years. Sure, we have already covered some serious ground with (BAC), from $5 to $12.75. I think the stock could make it up to $20 this year, and $30 eventually. Trend reversals like this go on for years. Looks like Warren Buffet got the bottom at $5, again!

Finally, (BAC), along with the entire banking industry, is perfectly positioned to profit from rising interest rates. Steep yield curves are where banks traditionally make their bread and butter, through borrowing short and lending long. The collapse of the Treasury bond market (TLT) may not be imminent, but it is coming. Think of (BAC) as an undated put on Treasury market.

This particular option spread, the $11-$12 in April is attractive because the upper strike matches the old upside breakout level on the charts. This should provide ample support during the inevitable correction. The April expiration is only 22 trading days away.

March 21, 2013/by Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Why I?m Covering My Bank Short

Diary

I am going to use the weakness in Bank of America shares today to cover my short position through selling my existing position in the (BAC) May, 2012 $7 puts at $0.24 cents or best. There is such minimal volatility in the market these days that when a little bit comes along, you have to grab it with both hands.

The poor performance of these puts illustrates well the general malaise of the market. Despite catching a five cent drop in the share price, the value of these April puts fell from 40 cents to 24 cents. This is what happens when option time decay is added in with falling market volatility. This is why many option strategies are failing to work now.

When I recognized that this could become a prolonged problem, I responded with a rash of short volatility positions which have proved highly profitable. These include running deep in the money bull call spreads in Microsoft (MSFT) and Apple (AAPL), and naked sales of deep out of the money Apple calls.

I could have sold the (BAC) puts twice over the last 19 days for a profit as high as 30%. I held on both times hoping that the long overdue downward momentum would develop. That never materialized. The shares only made it down to $7.66, well short of my $7 target. The lesson here is that in these market conditions you have to keep your time frames as short as possible. Taking the money and running is the winning approach.

There are other reasons to punt on this position. The February non-farm payroll that comes out this Friday is expected to be good, possibly over 200,000. That could trigger another rally in (BAC) shares. Weekly jobless claims are at new lows for this cycle.

New housing sales are also showing a glimmer of life. Any good news on real estate is also positive for banks, no matter how ephemeral it might be, because it suggests that their bad loan portfolios may recover a bit. So it is better to sit on the sidelines on this one and take advantage of better entry points that may come along higher up.

March 5, 2012/by DougD

The Looking Glass Market

Diary

If you feel like this market has sucked you down a rabbit hole, you have plenty of company.

I have never seen such a profusion of contrary cross market indicators. Traders are running up shares prices while companies are cutting earnings forecasts. Economists are raising GDP forecasts as rising energy prices are taking them the opposite direction. Natural gas is crashing as oil spikes up.

The bond market has gone catatonic, with billions pouring into bond mutual funds to keep them on life support. Dr. Copper, that great leading indicator of global economic activity, has gone to sleep, with investors pouring money into the entire spectrum of risk assets. An increasing share of the buying in equity markets is focusing on a single stock, Apple (AAPL), the world?s largest company.

They say the market climbs a wall of worry. This one is climbing the Great Wall of China. You have to assume that the people buying stocks here are doing so only for the very long term, Warren Buffet style, and are willing to look past any declines we may see this summer. They don?t care if the market drops 5%, 20% (my pick), or 50%.

In my new year Annual Asset Class Review I thought that markets might peak in January. I lied. Thanks to a global quantitative easing program, it is increasingly looking like 2012 will be another ?sell in May and go away? year, the fourth in a row. You might as well book that Mediterranean super yacht, the beach house in the Hamptons, or the bucolic chalet in Switzerland now to beat the rush.

Another ?looking glass? element this year is the extent that last year?s dogs became this year?s divas. Just look no further than Bank of America (BAC), which did a 67% swan dive in 2011, but has soared a blistering 51% this year. This is a stock with a PE multiple of 812 and more investigations underway than Al Capone every saw.

It goes without saying then that those who did terrible in 2011 are looking like stars today. Look no further than hedge fund titan John Paulson, whose flagship fund was down 50% at the low last year, thanks to a big bet on financials. This year it appears his super star status is restored. Other funds that made big bets last year on European stocks and sovereign bonds have been similarly revived. If MF Global had only lasted two more months, John Corzine would be looking like a genius today, instead of a goat.

When I realized that this could be a ?dogs of the Dow? year with a turbocharger, I quickly reviewed by own money losing trades in 2011. That prompted be to rush out but puts on the Japanese yen, which doubled in short order, and haven?t looked back since. Now you really have to ask the question, will my other 2011 losers perform similar turnarounds? What?s at the top of the list? The (TBT), my bet that long term Treasury bonds would go down, which inflicted my biggest hickey last year.

By the way, I?m kind of liking the volatility ETF (VXX) here. If the markets keep going up forever you might lose 10%. If they don?t, you will make a quick 30%, and 100% if volatilities return to the highs seen in October. The cost of carry is modest, there is no time decay as with options, and there is no contango. In fact, near month volatility is trading at half the levels of long term volatility. That is the kind of risk/reward ratio that I am constantly looking for.

February 29, 2012/by DougD

My Favorite Stock to Short

Diary

Troubled Bank of America (BAC) certainly earned its title as the premier Dog of the Dow last year. It managed an appalling 58% decline in 2011, the worst of any of the 30 Index stocks. It only managed to stay above the crucial $5 level by a hair?s breadth, below which many pension funds are barred from owning shares.

Since the beginning of this year, it has been the best performer, soaring 48% from $5.60 to $8.30. Will this eye-popping turnaround continue?

I think it is more likely that the enormous Lake Tahoe outside my window freezes into a gigantic mango smoothie.? Its credentials as a ?zombie? bank are as good as ever, and it will continue to play a leading role in the horror story our financial system has become.

(BAC) has become the poster boy for ?too big to manage?. The bank is still, by many measures, the largest in the US, with $2.3 trillion in assets, 288,000 employees, 5,900 branches, and 18,000 ATM?s. One out of two Americans are said to have an account at the North Carolina based institution. The $84 billion market cap company earned a penny a share last year, giving a price earnings multiple of a mind blowing 802.

The problem is that the company is so gargantuan that by the time information filters up to the top, it has become old, irrelevant, or even dangerous. It seems to want to plunge into every ?flavor of the day? strategy, which is always fatal for any organization that turns with the speed of a supertanker.

It plunged into proprietary trading in the early 2000?s, despite a woeful lack of talent to execute. Its 2007 purchase of Countrywide for $2 billion saddled it with a loan book so toxic that it still may not survive. It paid $50 billion for Merrill Lynch, when, if the positions were marked to market, it would have been worth only $1 or less.

Bank of America is a deer that can?t stay out of the headlights. Any online search about the company reveals a litany of problems, including mortgage fraud, robo signing, SEC sanctions and fines, municipal bond fraud, an ill-fated $5 debit card fee, and litigation up the wazoo. Oh, to be their outside counsel. Kaching!

The company recently announced disappointing earnings driven by falling revenues and rising costs. Their financial statement offered a panoply of special items, with prominent distressed assets sales used to cover losses. It is literally eating its seed corn to keep from starving to death. (BAC) attempted to pay a dividend in 2011, but that was nixed by the Federal Reserve due to its TARP obligations.

The size of the market that can meet their rising credit standards is shrinking dramatically, thanks to a 30 year long squeeze on the middle class. They might as well be a buggy whip manufacturer. The cost of regulation is skyrocketing. This is why I went on national TV last May and pounded the table to get viewers to sell it short at $13.50.

Despite the whopping great rally in the share price, they are trading at a big discount to book value, meaning that investors think the bank is still carrying large, unrealized loan losses on its books. Now Moody?s has threatened to downgrade the bank?s credit rating a couple of notches, which would increase its borrowing costs substantially. They are truly caught between a rock and a hard place.

I am not one of these glum guys who think that Bank of America will go bankrupt. That was a 2008 story. Don?t worry, your deposits are safe. It is far more likely to get broken up. First on the block will be Merrill Lynch, which is worth more today than in the dark days of four years ago. Think of it as (BAC)?s General Motors. Management is also making noises about withdrawing from Texas and other major markets.

There may be a time for a true national bank in the US, but that time is not now. Not when they play at being hedge funds on the side without the slightest idea of how to do so, and then blow up with your money inside, requiring taxpayer assistance. But there is a trade here for the nimble.

This is the really interesting part. Bank of America has become the favorite whipping boy of the high frequency traders. Because of them, its shares frequently accounted for 10% or more of NYSE volume last year. They have increased the volatility of these shares dramatically.? As a result, (BAC) is one of the highest beta large caps in the market.

What does this mean for the average punter working behind a PC (or Mac) at home? That a rapid 50% jump in shares is likely to be followed by a sudden 25% plunge. At this level, it has become the classic ?heads you win, tails I win 5X? situation if positioned appropriately.

The algorithms are lurking out there just waiting to pounce on this pitiful stock like a hungry leopard. Take a look at the chart below, and the setup is as clear as day. Despite an (SPX) that ground up to new highs nearly every day last week, (BAC) stock has begun rolling over like the Bismarck. Get a serious ?RISK OFF? day in global assets, and this thing could dive like a kamikaze.

No surprise then that (BAC) has become my favorite stock to sell short.

February 22, 2012/by DougD

Use Apple Timing to Short Bank of America Stock

Diary

There is a method to my madness.

It?s all about Apple (AAPL). A disproportionate share of the market volume has been pouring into Apple shares for the past two weeks. The higher it went, the more people wanted to buy. Just in the past week, the company has tacked on a staggering $75 billion in market capitalization. The action in the call options has been absolutely explosive.

The focus of the US stock market distilled down to not just a single sector, but a single stock. This kind of concentrated price action is a classic indicator of a market top. When Apple rolls over, the rest of the market will follow it down. Apple has pulled this off while virtually every other asset class is showing their own topping formations, including most other stocks, the euro, the yen, copper, gold, silver, and even the ags.

When I started my February 15 webinar at 12:00 noon EST, Apple was going gangbusters, up $15 to $525. By the time I finished, it had plunged $15, suggesting the short term top is in for the sizzling, innovative company. A rumor swept the market that Apple?s weighting in the NASDAQ would be diluted once again, which would be highly negative for the share price.

So am I going to sell short Apple stock? Heavens no! I love Steve Jobs? creation. I still think it will hit my long term target of $1,000 sooner than later. In fact, I just bought a new solid state MacBook Pro with all the specs maxed out and I am picking up my IPhone 4s on Friday.

Instead, I am going to use Apple as the signal for my cross market timing, and then short a stock I hate, Bank of America (BAC). This is one of the top performing stocks of 2012, soaring some 50%, in six weeks. Despite that move, it is still trading at a huge discount to book, meaning that traders think the company is lying through its teeth about the true extent of its loan losses.? Its shares are beating Apple by an almost 2:1 ratio this year, which has jumped only 28%. How perverse is that? The two companies are almost mirror images of each other. Think future versus past, booming versus broke, good versus evil, $525 versus $8.

The best run hedge funds use this type of cross market signaling all the time. I saw it constantly on the trading floor of Morgan Stanley. It is a great way to capture laggards and move into the highest beta names when a market reversal is imminent.

When I am in a selling mood, I want to sell the most expensive stock in the market that has had the most blistering recent gains. That describes (BAC) to a tee, which is nowhere near solving its structural problems and still has a declining real estate market to deal with.

I chose to buy puts on (BAC) instead of the (SPY) because you always get much greater volatility in individual names than an index has a whole. Look at (BAC)?s performance this year. A 7% rise in the (SPY) brought a 50% gain in (BAC). That kind of volatility works on the downside too. A single stock will outperform a basket every time. That?s how you maximize your bang per buck on the put options.

Check Out Bank Of America?s New Logo

February 15, 2012/by DougD

What?s Up With Gold?

Diary

Have you ever held a basketball underwater in a swimming pool and let go? It flies to the upside and pops you in the nose. That is exactly what gold is doing now. After the barbarous relic peaked at $1,922 on August 24, it traded like an absolute pig, giving up 20% in a matter of weeks. I managed to coin it with a couple of quick in and out trades in (GLD) puts, some doubling over a weekend. So much for the ?safe asset? theory.

You can thank hedge fund titan, John Paulsen, for the action. John gained international notoriety when he earned a $4 billion bonus after making huge bets against subprime loans going into the housing crash.

Since then, his touch has grown somewhat icy. He started out 2011 with a huge, bullish bet on US banks, a play, I confess, I never really understood. This was back when Bank of America (BAC) was trading at a lofty $14/share. As a hedge, he backed up these gargantuan positions with big holdings in gold, which quickly made him the largest owner of the ETF (GLD).

John?s P&L held up reasonably well during the first part of the year. As the banks faded, gold went from strength to strength, limiting his damage. That all changed on April 29 when global financial markets flipped into ?RISK OFF? mode and gold melted along with everything else. Its hedging capability proved to be nil. By August, John?s losses approached a near death 50%.

Needless to say, his investors failed to see the humor in the situation, and rumors of cataclysmic redemptions started sweeping the street. By implication, this could only mean large scale liquidation of the yellow metal. This was happening when the rest of the hedge fund industry was catching daily margin calls, forcing them to dump even more gold into a downward spiral, their best performing holding for the year. When the sushi hits the fan, you sell what you can, not what you want to. By the time the carnage ended, gold was down $392.

When the crying was over, Paulson had reduced his ownership in the ETF (GLD) from 31.5 million shares to 20.3 million. That?s a haircut of $1.76 billion of the shiny stuff. In the end, Paulson says he only suffered redemptions of 10% of his somewhat reduced funds, much lower than expected.

Gold actually anticipated the new ?RISK ON? trade by a week, bottoming on September 26. Since then it has behaved like a paper asset, tracking the S&P 500 almost tick for tick, adding a quick 19.6%. So, what?s up with gold?

As we approach yearend, the downward pressure of this redemption selling is waning, hence my basketball analogy. New bull arguments have also come to the fore. The contagion in Europe has prompted massive buying of all precious metals by panicky individuals, including silver (SLV), platinum (PPLT), palladium (PALL), and even neglected rhodium, with a collapse of the Euro imminent. And how will the ECB eventually end the crisis? With a continental TARP and quantitative easing, which we here in the US already know is hugely positive for gold prices.

How far will the gold get this time? The gold bugs say we?re going to break the old high and power on through to the inflation adjusted high at $2,300. I?m not so sure. I am not willing to bet the ranch here on an asset class that could plunge $1,000 going into the next recession, which could be just around the corner.

But there may be a trade here in precious metals space for the nimble. My pick has been to buy lagging silver, which offers much more bang per buck if the sector starts to build a head of steam. The white metal will not get hit with IMF gold sales, which are also a rumored part of any European bailout package.

November 15, 2011/by DougD

Posts

Hmmm. Doesn?t Look Like Ben Bernanke

Cookie and Privacy Settings