Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 11, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(DEATH OF LEGACY MEDIA)
(CHTR), (DIS), (NFLX), (NXST), (DISH)
Posts
Negotiations between Spectrum’s parent company, Charter Communications (CHTR), and Walt Disney (DIS) finally got over the impasse and they struck a deal.
No deal for both would have been catastrophic for both.
Disney faced the potential loss of 14.7 million Charter pay TV subscribers, or 20% of ESPN's current linear subscriber base of 74 million.
That equates to linear revenue losses of roughly $5 billion, or 6% of overall revenue.
Cord-cutting has been occurring at a brisk pace in the last few years, but the lack of solidarity among the legacy media negotiators appears to turn the trickle into a breaking of the dam.
What am I talking about?
Disney decided to go nuclear by removing its channels from the cable provider. Charter (CHTR) proposed that Disney (DIS) offer its customers free access to Disney’s streaming services, especially ESPN; Disney rebuffed the offer, but CHTR finally agreed to add Disney+ Basic ad-supported offering being provided to Charter customers who purchase the Spectrum TV Select package at no additional cost, "as part of a wholesale arrangement."
This is really the beginning of the end for legacy media and this melee could trigger a swift bout of consolidation as disagreements become the norm and not the outlier.
It’s no surprise the cost of creating content is going up and these channels like DIS feel they can just pass the costs
Remember that many people pay for cable just to watch college football and the NFL.
Roughly 25% of Charter’s clients engage with Disney content, Charter said on a call last week.
DirecTV is also embroiled in its own content squabble with local broadcast network Nexstar (NXST), which recently pulled over 200 stations in more than 100 metro areas from DirecTV’s network over a similar price dispute.
While the cable TV business has been declining for years, there’s concern this is the last hurrah.
Down the road, the winners out of all of this may be internet TV operators, including YouTube TV, Hulu TV, FuboTV, and Dish’s DISH’s (DISH) Sling. Some of these have been gaining steady traction even before negotiations soured, with Hulu’s web traffic up 7.2% year-over-year in July and Sling’s traffic up 11.8%.
Web traffic may pick up as consumers look for ways to watch their regularly scheduled programming. Online search interest in five major live TV streaming services picked up Sept. 1 when news of Disney’s blackout became public, according to Google Trends data.
I believe that online momentum will translate to a long-term subscriber bump for these companies.
CEO of CHTR Christopher Winfrey and CEO of DIS had to make this deal.
The ongoing chaos in the legacy media markets signals that cord-cutting will supplant the legacy markets within the next 10 years.
Baby Boomers are the last stalwarts of the legacy media market and they are retiring in droves.
Netflix (NFLX) is another streamer that is in line to pick up some of the demand for streaming content.
With high rates, the era of excesses is rearing its ugly head.
Platforms are being careful with the type of agreements they make as less quality content is facing a bleak future.
Live professional sports are lynchpin to why many consumers don’t quit cable.
I believe the next contract cycle will see many pro sports leagues go all streaming much like the American soccer league MLS did with Apple TV.
When pro sports migrate 100% into digital, expect to be outsized winners and losers while distributors like SlingTV should sink like a rock.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
November 19, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ROKU’S UNASSAILABLE LEAD)
(TIVO), (ROKU), (NFLX), (AMZN), (CHTR), (DISH), (FB), (AAPL), (GOOGL)
Shake off the rust.
That is exactly what management of a fast-growing tech company doesn’t want to hear.
Losing money isn’t fun. And investors only put up with it because of the juicy growth trajectories management promises.
Without the expectations of hard-charging growth, there is no attractive story in a world where investors need stories to rally behind.
Setting the bar astronomically high in the approach to management’s execution and product development will always be, the single most important element in a tech company.
This is the secret recipe for thwarting entropy and rising above the rest.
You might be shocked to find out that most tech firms die a harrowing death, the average Joe wouldn’t know that, with constant headlines glorifying our tech dignitaries.
Just look at the pageantry on display that was Amazon’s (AMZN) quest to find a second headquarter.
According to Apex Marketing, the hoopla that coalesced around Amazon’s year-long search netted Amazon $42 million in free advertising by tracking the absorbed inventory of exposure from print, TV, and online.
Social media traffic by itself rung up $8.6 million of freebies.
These days, tech really does sell itself, and I didn’t even mention the billions in tax breaks Amazon will harvest from their Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory style headquarter search.
The only thing I would have changed would have been extending the contest into the second year.
Amazon’s brand is probably the most powerful in the world, and that is not because they are in the business of only selling chocolate bars.
One company that might as well sell chocolate bars and has been stymied by the throes of entropy is TiVo (TIVO).
TiVo was once the darling of the technology world.
It was way back in 1999 when TiVo premiered the digital video recorder (DVR).
It modernized how television was consumed in a blink of an eye.
Broad-based adoption and outstanding product feedback were the beginning of a long love affair with diehard users wooed by the superior functionality of TiVo that allowed customers to record full seasons of television shows, and, the cherry on top, fast-forward briskly through annoying commercials.
The technology was certainly ahead of its time and TiVo had its cake and ate it for years.
The stock price, in turn, responded kindly and TiVo was trading at over $106 in August of 2000 before the dot com crash.
That was the high-water mark and the stock has never performed the same after that.
TiVo’s cataclysmic decline can be traced back to the roots of the late 90’s when a small up and coming tech company called Netflix (NFLX) quickly pivoted from mailing DVD’s to producing proprietary online streaming content.
Arrogant and set in their old ways, TiVo failed to capture the tectonic shift from analog television viewers cutting the cord and migrating towards online streaming services.
Consumer’s viewing habits modernized, and TiVo never developed another game-changing product to counteract the death of a thousand cuts to traditional television and its TiVo box that is still ongoing as I write this.
Like a sitting duck, Charter Communications (CHTR) and Dish Network (DISH) devoured TiVo’s market share in the traditional television segment constructing DVR’s for their own cable service.
And instead of licensing their technology before their enemies could build an in-house substitute, TiVo chose to sue them after the fact, resulting in a one-time payment, but still meant that TiVo was bleeding to death.
Enter Project Griffin.
Netflix (NFLX) spent years developing Project Griffin, an over-the-top (OTT) TV box that would host its future entertainment content and poured a bucket full of capital into the software and hardware of this revolutionary product.
Making the leap of faith from the traditional DVD-by-mail distribution model that would soon be swept into the dustbin of history was an audacious bet that looks even better with each passing year.
This Netflix branded OTT box was specifically manufactured for Netflix’s Watch Instantly video service.
In 2007, Netflix was just week’s away from rolling out the hardware from Project Griffin when CEO of Netflix Reed Hastings decided to trash the project.
His reason was that a branded Netflix box would hinder the software streaming content confining their growth trajectory to only their stand-alone platform.
This would prevent their streaming service to populate on other networks.
To avoid discriminating against certain networks was a genius move allowing Netflix to license digital content to anyone with a broadband connection, and giving them chance to make deals with other companies who had their own box.
It was the defining moment of Netflix that nobody knows about.
Netflix became ubiquitous in many Millennial households and Roku (ROKU) was spun-out literally bestowing new CEO of Roku Anthony Woods with a de-facto company-in-a-box to build on thanks to old boss Reed Hastings.
Woods cut his teeth borrowing TiVo’s technology and developed the digital video recorder (DVR) as the founder of ReplayTV before he joined Netflix and was the team leader of Project Griffin.
Now, he had a golden opportunity dropped into his lap and Woods ran with it.
Woods quickly became aware that hardware wasn’t the future of technology and switched to a digital ad-based platform model allowing any and all streaming services to launch from the Roku box.
No doubt Woods understood the benefits of being an open platform and not playing favorites to certain networks in a landscape where Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOGL), Facebook (FB), and Amazon have made “walled gardens” an important part of their DNA.
Democratizing its platform was in effect what the internet and technology were supposed to be from the onset and Roku has excavated value from this premise by playing nice with everyone.
This also meant scooping up all the ad dollars from everyone too.
At the same time, Wood’s mentor Hastings has rewritten the rules of the media industry parting the sea for Roku to mop up and dominate the OTT box industry with Amazon and Apple trailing behind.
Roku was perfectly positioned with a superior finished product, but also took note of the future and zigged and zagged when they needed to which is why ad sales have surpassed their hardware sales.
By 2021, over 50 million Americans will say adios to cable and satellite TV.
The addressable digital ad market is a growing $80 billion per year market and Roku will have a more than fair shot to secure larger market share.
The rock-solid foundations and handsome growth story are why the Mad Hedge Technology Letter is resolutely bullish on Roku and Netflix.
Roku and Netflix have continued to evolve with the times and TiVo is now desperately attempting to sell the remains of itself before the vultures feast on their corpse.
What is left is a portfolio of IP assets that brought in $826 million in 2017, and they have exited the hardware business entirely halting production of the iconic TiVo box.
Digesting 100% parabolic moves up in the share price is a great problem to have for Roku and Netflix.
These two are set to lead the online streaming universe and stoked by robust momentum to go with it.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter currently holds a Roku December 2018 $30-$35 in-the-money vertical bull call spread bought at $4.35, and it is just the first of many tech trade alerts that will be connected to the rapidly advancing online streaming industry.
THE FRUITS OF PROJECT GRIFFIN
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 4, 2018
Fiat Lux
SPECIAL SPACE X ISSUE
Featured Trade:
(WILL SPACE X BE YOUR NEXT TEN-BAGGER?)
(EBAY), (TSLA), (SCTY), (BA), (LMT)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 3, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING TELEPHONE INDUSTRY)
(TMUS), (S), (NFLX), (T), (VZ), (CHTR), (CMCSA)
Talk is cheap.
Do not believe half-truths that go against economic convention.
This was the case when T-Mobile (TMUS) CEO John Legere and Sprint (S) CEO Marcelo Claure popped up on live TV promoting affordability, elevated competition, and massive 5G infrastructure investments if the two companies joined forces in a $26.5 billion deal.
This was a case of smoke and mirrors. The speculative claim of adding 3 million workers and investing $40 billion into 5G development is just a line pandering toward President Trump's nationalistic tendencies.
They want the deal to move forward any way possible.
Jack Ma, founder and executive chairman of Alibaba (BABA), met President Trump at Trump Towers before his term commenced and promised to add 1 million jobs in order to curry favor with the new order.
Where are those jobs?
If this merger came to fruition, market players would shrink from 4 to 3 - a newly reformulated T-Mobile plus Verizon (VZ) and AT&T (T).
Pure economics dictate that shrinking competition by 25% would create pricing leverage for the leftover trio.
Industry consolidation is usually met with accelerated profit drivers because companies can get away with reckless price increases without offering more goods and services.
Being at the vanguard of the 4G movement, America overwhelmingly benefited from lucid synergistic applications that fueled domestic job growth and economic gains.
Japanese and German players were hit hard from missing out in leading the new wave of wireless technology.
T-Mobile and Sprint wish to be insiders of this revolutionary technology and this is their way in.
In the past, T-Mobile jumped onto the scene with aggressively twisting its business model to fight tooth and nail with Verizon and AT&T.
It was moderately successful.
T-Mobile even offered affordable plans without contracts offering customers optionality and advantageous pricing.
It was able to take market share from Sprint, which is the monumental laggard in this group and the butt of jokes in this foursome.
The average cost of wireless has slid 19% in the past five years, and traditional wireless Internet companies are sweating bullets as the future is murky at best.
The bold strategy to merge these two wireless firms derives from an urgent need to combat harsh competition from the two titans Verizon and AT&T.
The merger is in serious threat of being shot down by the Department of Justice (DOJ) on antitrust grounds.
History is littered with companies that became complacent and toppled because of monopolistic positions.
Case in point, the predominant force in the American and global economy was the American automotive industry and Detroit in the 1950s.
Detroit had the highest income and highest rate of home ownership out of any major American city at that time.
Flint, Michigan, oozed prosperity, and the top three car manufacturers boasted magnanimous employee benefits and a tight knit union.
During this era of success, 50% of American cars were made by GM and 80% of cars were American made.
The car industry could do no wrong.
This would mark the peak of American automotive dominance, as local companies failed to innovate, preferring stop-gap measures such as installing add-ons such as power steering, sound systems, and air conditioning instead of properly developing the next generation of models.
American companies declined to revolutionize the expensive system put in place that could produce new models because of the absence of competition and were making too much money to justify alterations.
It's expensive to make cars but neglecting reinvestment yielded future mediocrity to the detriment of the whole city of Detroit.
The tech mentality is the polar opposite with most tech firms reinvesting the lion's share of operational profit, if any, back into product improvement.
Sprint got burned because it skimped on investment. It is in a difficult predicament dependent on T-Mobile to haul it out of a precarious position.
GM, Ford, and Chrysler met their match when Toyota imported a vastly more efficient way of production and the rest is history.
Detroit is a ghastly remnant of what it used to be with half the population escaping to greener pastures.
A carbon copy scenario is playing out in the mobile wireless space and allowing a merger would suppress any real competition.
To add confusion to the mix, fresh competition is growing on the fringes desiring to disrupt this industry sooner than later by cable providers such as Charter (CHTR) and Comcast (CMCSA) entering the fray offering mobile phone plans.
Google also offers a mobile phone plan through the Google Fi division.
The fusion of wireless, broadband, and video is attracting competition from other spheres of the business world.
The paranoia served in doses originates from the Netflix (NFLX) threat that vies for the same entertainment dollars and eyeballs.
Remember that AT&T is in the midst of merging with Time Warner Cable, which is the second largest cable company behind Comcast.
The top two in the bunch - AT&T and Verizon - are under attack from online streaming business models, and the Time Warner merger is a direct response to this threat.
There are a lot of moving parts to this situation.
AT&T hopes to leverage new video content to extract digital ad revenue capturing margin gains.
Legere and Claure put on their fearmongering hats as they argued that this deal has national security implications and losing out to Chinese innovation is not an option.
This argument is ironic considering T-Mobile is a German company and Sprint is owned by the Japanese.
Sprint have been burning cash for years and this move would ensure the businesses survives.
Sprint's crippling debt puts it in an unenviable position and this merger is an all or nothing gamble.
Sprint has not invested in its network and is miles behind the other three.
AT&T has outspent Sprint by more than $90 billion in the past 10 years.
This is the last chance saloon for Sprint whose stock price has halved in the past four years.
However, T-Mobile sits on its perch as a healthier rival that would do fine on a stand-alone basis.
Consolidation of this great magnitude never pans out for the consumer as users' interests get moved down the pecking order.
Wireless stocks were taken out and beaten behind the wood shed on the announcement of this news as the lack of clarity moving forward marked a perfect time to sell.
There will be many twists and turns in this saga and any capital put to use now will be dead money while this imbroglio works itself out.
If the deal doesn't die a slow death and finds a way through, the approval process will be drawn out and cumbersome.
The ambitious deadline of early 2019 seems highly unrealistic even with the most optimistic guesses.
The outsized winner from a deal would be AT&T, Verizon, and the newly formed T-Mobile and Sprint operation.
If this new wave of consolidation becomes reality, pricing pressure on the business model would ease for the remaining players, particularly allowing more breathing room for the leaders.
Stay away from this sector until the light can be seen at the end of the tunnel.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"Everything is designed. Few things are designed well." - said radio producer Brian Reed
