Global Market Comments
June 30, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(STORAGE WARS),
(MSFT), (IBM), (CSCO), (SWCH),
(THE MAD HEDGE JUNE 4 TRADERS & INVESTORS SUMMIT RECORDING IS UP),
Posts
Global Market Comments
June 19, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(JUNE 17 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(SPY), (AAPL), (FXE), (FXA), (BA), (UAL), (AAPL), (MSFT), (BIIB), (PFE), (OXY), (SPCE), (WMT), (CSCO), (TGT)
Global Market Comments
June 2, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(CYBERSECURITY IS ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED),
(PANW), (HACK), (FEYE), (CSCO), (FTNT), (JNPR), (CIBR)
Global Market Comments
May 28, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE IRS LETTER YOU SHOULD DREAD),
(PANW), (CSCO), (FEYE),
(CYBR), (CHKP), (HACK), (SNE)
Mass layoffs are on the horizon, thanks to the tech market slowdown sapping vitality for risk in the IPO market, and the widening contagion stemming from the coronavirus.
At a moment in Silicon Valley’s history where the market is rethinking its appetite for risk, it is customary for the loftiest and hottest growth names to drop the most in times like this.
For instance, Tesla (TSLA) was rocked by 32% and ride-hailing app Uber (UBER) gave up 25% in an epic downturn.
In general, tech that isn’t integral to the intricate global supply chain will also be penalized because of cratering overall business demand.
The vacuum of demand isn’t applied to only digital products but most others, as the world literally becomes a walled garden of self-quarantine areas.
The odds are still high that this global phenomenon squeaks by, but the far reach of the virus worries even experts and making crucial decisions on how to cut losses is becoming a pressing and imminent issue.
Airlines have been first to announce a potential readjustment to staff numbers such as Finland’s flagship airline Finn Air, but mass layoffs will start to trickle in from Silicon Valley.
Front-running the layoff parade was online travel tech company Expedia (EXPE) who expects to say adiós to 3,000 employees and network infrastructure company Cisco (CSCO) who announced restructuring plans because they expect revenue to fall between 1.5%-3.5% in Fiscal 2020.
I have been unwavering in my core thesis that tech procuring revenue from Mainland China is nothing more than a short-term Faustian bargain, and now the downsides of that bargain are finally appearing and frankly uncontainable.
The viral coronavirus is escalating on the heels of a new round of layoffs from Silicon Valley’s startups who just don’t know how to make money such as robot pizza startup Zume and car-sharing company Getaround who slashed more than 500 jobs.
Online DNA testing company 23andMe, logistics startup Flexport, Firefox internet browser Mozilla and social platform Quora restructured staff as well.
The “disruptors” are finally getting disrupted out of existence because of a sudden referendum on the health of balance sheets.
The situation turned ugly just before the coronavirus and this health crisis just adds fuel on the fire.
In total, more than 30 startups have cut over 8,000 jobs over the past four months with aggressive venture capital investments pulling back significantly.
The latest to flop at the starting line was Casper Sleep (CSPR) who marketed themselves as the “Nike of sleep” only because they sell online mattresses.
Mr. Market is purging these marginal businesses that over-promise, over-hype, and under-deliver.
The IPO pricing was underwhelming with Casper taking down the price range to the point where it went public at over $13.
The stock is now at $8.
No doubt that some of this negative sentiment was stoked by office-sharing company WeWork, who had an epic fall from grace and cut its valuation by 80% late last year while permanently shelving an IPO.
Now the coronavirus is on the verge of scoring the empty net goal as companies go into full-blown crisis mode.
SoftBank bet two ranches on Uber and WeWork, then poured money into Colombian delivery startup Rappi and Indian hotel startup Oyo.
All have sputtered with mass firings recently.
Poor investment decisions led SoftBank to report a $2 billion operating loss in the last quarter of 2019 from their venture capitalist arm named the Vision Fund.
After Nasdaq flourished in a memorable 10-year run post the financial crisis, flip the parabola upside down and markets are tanking with many experts already contrasting the coronavirus sell-off to the dot-com bust of 2001.
Irrational optimism is part of the DNA of San Francisco.
Entrepreneurs are quietly preparing to change the world, but the climate has soured so quickly that many investors believe many of these current entrepreneurs are unlucky.
The rules of the game deem unprofitable models temporarily obsolete in the current market environment.
In the land where spending money in uneconomic ways is a time-honored tradition, turning to more “responsible” models is gut-check time.
Talent is forgoing chances to enter the start-up world too, instead opting for big box corporates who provide a lower ceiling but higher salary and benefits.
Café X, which operated robot coffee shops and raised $14.5 million in venture funding, fired its own robots and closed three stores in San Francisco recently.
The brightest stars of the IPO pipelines might be able to go public this year, but at a cut-rate price which is a tough pill to swallow for Airbnb and online delivery platform DoorDash.
With no new blood going live on the public tech markets, we focus on the ones already there and recent news is alarming.
Apple whose 42 stores in China have been closed since January and Foxconn, which produces Apple products, are running at around 30%-40% capacity, then it’s ring-the-alarm time.
The most likely scenario is that big tech will need to write off this quarter until the public health crisis improves setting up a bullish second half of 2020.
Even that could get stopped in its tracks.
The only silver lining is that the run-up in shares in January means that the best of tech has only returned one month of share appreciation, but for the weaker companies, they aren’t afforded those types of luxuries in malicious trading conditions and have returned 4-6 months of share appreciation already.
The coronavirus hammer finally came down and hit one of the dominant soldiers of big tech.
Apple (AAPL) led morning headlines nationwide by slashing quarterly revenue guidance stemming from production delays and weak demand in China.
Deleting the China demand for new iPhones is enough for the company to signal a looming revenue miss and rightly so, coronavirus has been 24-hour news for the past 2 months on the Asian continent.
As we speak, the cruise liner named the Diamond Princess is parked outside the port of Yokohama with the victims of infected rising by the day.
The optics are ugly, and China’s cover-up of the spreading went awfully awry and now pandora’s box is open.
Naturally, tech stocks can expect a few percentage points shaved off of this year’s annual growth targets and short-term sluggishness in shares exposed to China revenue.
What are the ramifications?
Telecom companies are in the incubation period of building out 5G wireless networks.
Naturally, tech shares will receive a bounce as network deployment gains traction as management commentary, during company earnings calls, on 5G business heats up.
However, the Mobile World Congress was cancelled by organizers stealing the chance for 5G stocks to hype up their position in 5G.
It is almost guaranteed at this point that China coronavirus will slow down the schedule for 5G wireless network buildouts.
Think about this, SARS lasted roughly half a year during 2002-2003, and the coronavirus appears to be worse than that.
Chinese telcoms will need to delay 5G and related equipment along with business that has around 150 million Chinese ensnared by the domestic quarantine.
Apple’s 5G iPhones in late 2020 could be delayed if there is no meaningful breakthrough in the contagion of the coronavirus and its ill effects on global business.
Apple stock appreciated on the hope that 5G iPhones aim to deliver the first meaningful consumer upgrade cycle in several years with a hefty price tag of $1,250.
This next generation iPhone could get pushed back to 2021 as Apple’s supply chain has been put on ice in mainland China.
If Verizon Communications (VZ), AT&T (T), T-Mobile US (TMUS) and Sprint (S) desire to aggressively expand their 5G networks, they might be in for a rude awakening because semiconductor companies might be stretched to limit and cannot provide the right components with supply chains pressured everywhere.
The truth is that supply chains are impacting diverse and interconnected sectors of the electronics industry.
And the epidemic, arriving at dawn of 5G's mainstream deployment phase, is guaranteed to disrupt the progress of the next-generation wireless standard, as the crisis slows the production of key smartphone components, including displays and semiconductors.
Chip companies and their shares have naturally been rocked by the recent news and they aren’t the only ones.
Expedia (EXPE), the online travel company, revealed it will avoid providing a full-year forecast as the online travel services company reevaluates the impact of the coronavirus outbreak on its operations.
Investors can imagine that on mainland China, the situation is grim exerting a fundamental impact on the country’s consumers and merchants and will slice off revenue growth in the current quarter.
Alibaba (BABA), the Amazon of China, told investors that the virus is undermining production and output in the economy because many workers are stuck at home.
The virus has also changed the commerce patterns of consumers by pulling back on discretionary spending, including travel and restaurants.
The Chinese e-commerce giant’s revenue surged year-over-year by an impressive 38% to 161.5 billion yuan ($23.1 billion), while net income rose 58% to 52.3 billion yuan, but that could symbolize the high-water mark.
Chief Executive Officer Daniel Zhang and Chief Financial Officer Maggie Wu were explicit in mentioning that risks from the pandemic could deaden a piece of revenue moving forward and they weren’t shy about stating this.
Sound bites such as “overall revenue will be negatively impacted,” and expecting growth to be “significantly” negative is quite black and white.
China is almost certain to print weak GDP growth numbers because of cratering imports and a big drop in demand.
Echoing Alibaba’s weakness was network infrastructure company Cisco (CSCO) with a revenue shortfall of 3.5% year-over-year as major product categories like Infrastructure Platforms and Applications were hit.
Cisco must find new cycles in core activities to regain any momentum and chip companies must do the same as the administration turns the screws on Huawei and injects more barriers to U.S. chip companies selling abroad.
This adds to the broader risks of elevated corporate debt and the upcoming U.S. election where tech management is nervous that a new President could throw big tech under the bus.
The coronavirus pours fuel on the flames.
The silver lining is the blows to these companies are softened by the ironic fact that big tech has become the safety trade to the coronavirus and even if 5G is delayed, chip stocks will eventually benefit from a fresh wave of revenue drivers when the 5G network is finally deployed.
However, it is way too early to announce the death of big tech, there are far too many secular tailwinds driving these companies.
The tech bull market is still intact and there will be opportunity to buy.
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader February 12 Global Strategy Webinar broadcast from Silicon Valley, CA with my guest and co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader. Keep those questions coming!
Q: What do you think about Facebook (FB) here? We’ve just had a big dip.
A: We got the dip because of a double downgrade in the stock from a couple of brokers, and people are kind of nervous that some sort of antitrust action may be taken against Facebook as we go into the election. I still like the stock long term. You can’t beat the FANGs!
Q: If Bernie Sanders gets the nomination, will that be negative for the market?
A: Absolutely, yes. It seems like after 3 years of a radical president, voters want a radical response. That said, I don't think Bernie will get the nomination. He is not as popular in California, where we have a primary in a couple of weeks and account for 20% of total delegates. I think more of the moderate candidates will come through in California. That's where we see if any of the new billionaire outliers like Michael Bloom or Tom Steyer have any traction. My attitude in all of this is to wait for the last guy to get voted off the island—then ask me what's going to happen in October.
Q: When should we come back in on Tesla (TSLA)?
A: It’s tough with Tesla because although my long-term target is $2,500, watching it go up 500% in seven months on just a small increase in earnings is pretty scary. It’s really more of a cult stock than anything else and I want to wait for a bigger pullback, maybe down to $500, before I get in again. That said, the volatility on the stock is now so high that—with the short interest going from 36% down to 20%—if we get the last of the bears to really give up, then we lose that whole 20% because it all turns into buying; and that could get us easily over $1,000. The announcement of a new $2 billion share offering is a huge positive because it means they can pay off debt and operate with free capital as they don’t pay a dividend.
Q: Is Square (SQ) a good buy on the next 5% drop?
A: I would really wait 10%—you don't want to chase trades with the market at an all-time high. I would wait for a bigger drop in the main market before I go aggressive on anything.
Q: What about CRISPR Technology (CRSP) after the 120% move?
A: We’ve had a modest pullback—really more of a sideways move— since it peaked a couple of months ago; and again, I think the stock either goes much higher or gets taken over by somebody. That makes it a no-lose trade. The long sideways move we’re having is actually a very bullish indication for the stock.
Q: If Bernie is the candidate and gets elected, would that be negative for the market?
A: It would be extremely negative for the market. Worth at least a 20% downturn. That said, according to all the polling I have seen, Bernie Sanders is the only candidate that could not win against Donald Trump—the other 15 candidates would all beat Trump in a 1 to 1 contest. He's also had one heart attack and might not even be alive in 6 months, so who knows?
Q: I just closed the Boeing (BA) trade to avoid the dividend hit tomorrow. What do you think?
A: I’m probably going to do the same, that way you can avoid the random assignments that will stick you with the dividend and eat up your entire profit on the trade.
Q: When do you update the long-term portfolio?
A: Every six months; and the reason for that is to show you how to rebalance your portfolio. Rebalancing is one of the best free lunches out there. Everyone should be doing it after big moves like we’ve seen. It’s just a question of whether you rebalance every six months or every year. With stocks up so much a big rebalancing is due.
Q: I have held onto Gilead Sciences (GILD) for a long time and am hoping they’ll spend their big cash hoard. What do you think?
A: It’s true, they haven’t been spending their cash hoard. The trouble with these biotech stocks, and why it's so hard to send out trade alerts on them, is that you’ll get essentially no movement on them for years and then they rise 30% in one day. Gilead actually does have some drugs that may work on the coronavirus but until they make another acquisition, don’t expect much movement in the stock. It’s a question of how long you are willing to wait until that movement.
Q: Is it time to get back into the iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short Term Futures ETN (VXX)?
A: No, you need to maintain discipline here, not chase the last trade that worked. It’s crucial to only buy the bottoms and sell the tops when trading volatility. Otherwise, time decay and contango will kill you. We’re actually close to the middle of the range in the (VXX) so if we see another revisit to the lows, which we could get in the next week, then you want to buy it. No middle-of-range trades in this kind of market, you’re either trading at one extreme or the other.
Q: Could you please explain how the Fed involvement in the overnight repo market affects the general market?
A: The overnight repo market intervention was a form of backdoor quantitative easing, and as we all know quantitative easing makes stocks go up hugely. So even though the Fed said this wasn't quantitative easing, they were in fact expanding their balance sheet to facilitate liquidity in the bond market because government borrowing has gotten so extreme that the public markets weren’t big enough to handle all the debt; that's why they stepped into the repo market. But the market said this is simply more QE and took stocks up 10% since they said it wasn't QE.
Q: What about Cisco Systems (CSCO)?
A: It’s probably a decent buy down here, very tempting. And it hasn't participated in the FANG rally, so yes, I would give that one a really hard look. The current dip on earnings is probably a good entry point.
Q: Should we buy the Volatility Index (VIX) on dips?
A: Yes. At bottoms would be better, like the $12 handle.
Q: When is the best time to exit Boeing?
A: In the next 15 minutes. They go ex-dividend tomorrow and if you get assigned on those short calls then you are liable for the dividend—that will eat up your whole profit on the trade.
Q: Do you like Fire Eye (FEYE)?
A: Yes. Hacking is one of the few permanent growth industries out there and there are only a half dozen listed companies that are cutting edge on security software.
Q: What are your thoughts on the timing of the next recession?
A: Clearly the recession has been pushed back a year by the 2019 round of QE, and stock prices are getting so high now that even the Fed has to be concerned. Moreover, economic growth is slowing. In fact, the economy has been growing at a substantially slower rate since Trump became president, and 100% of all the economic growth we have now is borrowed. If the government were running a balanced budget now, our growth would be zero. So, certainly QE has pushed off the recession—whether it's a one-year event or a 2-year event, we’ll see. The answer, however, is that it will come out of nowhere and hit you when you least expect it, as recessions tend to do.
Q: Would you buy gold (GLD) rather than staying in cash?
A: I would buy some gold here, and I would do deep in the money call spreads like I have been doing. I’ve been running the numbers every day waiting for a good entry point. We’re now at a sort of in between point here on call spreads because it’s 7 days to the next February expiration and about 27 days to the March one after that, so it's not a good entry point this week. Next week will look more interesting because you’ll start getting accelerated time decay for March working for you.
Q: When are you going to have lunch in Texas or Oklahoma?
A: Nothing planned currently. Because of my long-term energy views (USO), I have to bring a bodyguard whenever I visit these states. Or I hold the events at a Marine Corps Club, which is the same thing.
Q: Would you use the dip here to buy Lyft (LYFT)? It’s down 10%.
A: No, it’s a horrible business. It’s one of those companies masquerading as a tech stock but it isn’t. They’re dependent on ultra-low wages for the drivers who are essentially netting $5 an hour driving after they cover all their car costs. Moreover, treating them as part-time temporary workers has just been made illegal in California, so it’s very bad news for the stocks—stay away from (LYFT) and (UBER) too.
Q: Is the Fed going to cut interest rates based on the coronavirus?
A: No, interest rates are low enough—too low given the rising levels of the stock market. Even at the current rate, low-interest rates are creating a bubble which will come back to bite us one day.
Q: Household debt exceeded $14 trillion for the first time—is this a warning sign?
A: It is absolutely a warning sign because it means the consumer is closer to running out of money. Consumers make up 70% of the economy, so when 70% of the economy runs out of money, it leads to a certain recession. We saw it happen in ‘08 and we’ll see it happen again.
Good Luck and Good Trading
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Global Market Comments
December 30, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WILL SYNBIO SAVE OR DESTROY THE WORLD?),
(XLV), (XPH), (XBI), (IMB), (GOOG), (AAPL), (CSCO), (BIIB)
What does the technology sector’s “last gasp up” mean for tech stocks?
At the Mad Hedge Lake Tahoe Conference in late October, I correctly identified that the tech sector would experience a last leg to the price appreciation that has been part of a broader 10-year bull market in American equities.
The past 7 weeks have been nothing short of spectacular for tech shares as not only have the heavy hitters delivered in spades, like Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT), but tech growth shares have been released from the penalty box after a short-dated growth scare and joined the rally with zeal.
How long will the “last gasp up” last?
The bar was set exceptionally low in 2019 because senior management spun the trade war acrimony into the accounting calculus effectively offering CFOs a chance to lower expectations to the point of getting away with murder.
Even with earnings’ expectations reset at nadir data points, performance was a mixed bag.
Superior tech companies were able to jump over the pitiful expectations, then if that wasn’t enough, they pushed backwards any inklings of earnings growth by guiding as low as they possibly could.
An archetypal example is Palo Alto Networks (PANW) whose shares dipped more than 8.5% in pre-market trading after issuing their quarterly earnings report.
The company announced sales of $771.9 million with an adjusted EPS of $1.05 topping analysts' estimates.
Why did shares sully?
Palo Alto Networks tanked guidance by telling investors they expect sales between $838 million and $848 million in the second quarter.
The expectation represented a midpoint sales forecast of $843 million, which is lower than the consensus estimates of $845.12 million.
The adjusted EPS in the second quarter is estimated to be $1.11–$1.13, below the consensus earnings forecast of $1.30.
Palo Alto Networks is forecasting sales between $3.44 billion and $3.46 billion with an EPS between $4.9 and $5.0 for next year, compared to analyst projections of $3.46 billion in revenue and an EPS of $5.07 in 2020.
PANW accounts for a big piece of the pie in the cybersecurity trade comprising 16.2% in 2019.
Overall industry growth is strong at 10.4%, and PANW managed to increase its sales by 22.3% to $633.7 million.
This cybersecurity company is one of my favorite tech stalwarts and is as rock-solid as they come for a second-tier tech growth company.
Another trend that dovetails closely with the last gasp up thesis is buying growth.
At this stage in the tech cycle, the low hanging fruit has been plucked and tech companies are increasingly finding it hard to generate organic growth.
Companies are now resorting to inorganic growth with Palo Alto Networks announcing that it will acquire Aporeto for $150 million in an all-cash transaction.
This isn’t just a one-off for PANW, they have acquired four other companies in 2019 to plug into their growth puzzle.
They have also completed the acquisition of an IoT cybersecurity firm Zingbox.
Palo Alto Networks acquired two cloud security startups in July as well - Demisto to gain traction in the AI security segment and Twistlock, the leader in container security.
The other top players in this field are Cisco (CSCO), Fortinet (FTNT) and Symantec (SYMC).
The bullish secular trend in cybersecurity is watertight and comments from Nikesh Arora, CEO of Palo Alto Networks, only reconfirmed the strength in cybersecurity when he said, “As a growing number of organizations move their business to the cloud, developers increasingly rely on cloud-native technologies such as containers and serverless infrastructure to accelerate the development, testing, and deployment of modern applications and services.”
What’s next for investors?
Barring any exogenous shocks, the last gasp up continues and recent macro policy developments have supported this hypothesis as well as the tailwinds of an improving economy.
Palo Alto Networks is part of a high growth segment and many corporates are on record contemplating lower enterprise tech spending heading into 2020.
This sets up another incredibly low bar for cybersecurity companies to hop over next year and I believe the best in show such as PANW, Fortinet, Cisco, and Symantec will pass with flying colors.
The interesting acid test will occur at the end of 2020 when tech firms and sub-segments of tech such, as cybersecurity, release commentary on whether 2021 guidance could signal ensuing risk of being dragged into recessionary turbulence.
A 2021 tech sector recession is certainly not priced into current tech share valuations in this frothy period of asset appreciation.
The house is the new smartphone and I will tell you why.
The projected market growth of 18% in smart home technology sales according to Acumen Researching and Consulting will deliver opportunities to shape and prioritize this sector.
The revenues up for grabs from the smart home mean that internet of things’ (IoT) companies will create systems that mesh together with the bare minimum human participation, meaning that tech will have a dramatic influence in our daily lives.
I get several moans and groans a day that the Mad Hedge Technology Letter only shines the spotlight on the FANGs.
But it is hard not to when it comes to the future of the home.
Just look at recent M&A activity.
Automation and connected smart appliances have consumed Amazon by recently acquiring Eero, producer of routers for apartments, houses, and multi-story homes, and after already paying $1 billion to acquire Ring, a doorbell-camera startup. It had also bought Blink, a smart camera maker in 2017.
Google hasn’t shied away either by investing in smart home products pocketing Nest, a firm producing smart home products, for $3.2 billion.
Nest took a few years to sort out its production phase but finally managed to launch new temperature sensors, a video doorbell, and an outdoor smart camera.
What are the trending IoT products now?
The flavors of the day are smart lights, security, entertainment systems, and temperature control.
They are the low hanging fruit of the smart home industry – a de facto gateway into this world.
Most of these smart devices operate with voice assistants, but because of the nature of competition, certain products are aligned with certain ecosystems and compatibility issues will persist until the competition flushes itself out.
A layman’s example would be Apple’s Homekit dovetailing nicely with Apple’s Siri.
Companies are in the first innings of the product iteration cycle and the variations of smart home products are endless stemming from showers that remember preferred water temperature and flow rates or climate-control systems that change in real-time to suit the user.
Security of home networks and connected devices are still a controversial question mark because the receiver of this type of data has the keys to the most intimate details of personal lives.
Even avid technologists are hesitant to dive in and put up smart home products all over the house, and most are being cautious.
In fact, privacy issues are the most distinct headwind to fresh adoption rates.
Many people simply aren’t willing to make the jump yet until they are more convinced of its use case.
Even with all the reservations, an alternative global shipment company believes smart home devices will post 24% in growth next year.
For the smart home device believers, this cohort averages 6 smart home devices per household and will certainly rise to 7 or 8 by the end of 2020.
Popular items include the Amazon Echo, Google Home, and Apple (AAPL) HomePod.
Smart speakers are already present in 36% of American homes and rising.
Consumers are also worried about technology invading their daily lives along with allowing artificial intelligence to dominate personal decision making.
Others have concluded that items such as smart microwaves are a waste of money and are unneeded when analog devices function admirably.
Another legitimate reason is that the software and technology involve a perceived steep learning curve to operate which many people do not have the patience for.
And some are just burnt out by the volume of technology thrown in our faces.
Who wants to operate 50 apps on their phone to control their smart home devices when there are other pressing needs in life?
Companies with skin in the game are Alarm.com (ALRM), ADT (ADT), Arlo Technologies (ARLO) and Resideo Technologies (REZI) and they will be outsized winners if they can solve many of the industries lingering issues.
The value thesis in the case of home automation companies is that they are financially efficient, time-effective, boost wellness and will be easy to use.
About 11% of U.S. broadband households have smart thermostats and Nest’s smart thermostat is the most popular.
Networked security cameras by Arlo are in 10% of homes.
Video doorbells from Amazon.com (AMZN), Google are in 8% of homes and help deter theft of e-commerce packages.
Smart light bulbs and lighting are at 8% market share while smart door locks are at 7% penetration.
There are several second derivates bet on this as well.
The most common user interface for the smart home is apps on a smartphone or tablet and voice commands to smart speakers are second.
The conundrum of installation complexities leads to the demand of professional installers.
This demand has delivered opportunities for companies like Comcast's (CMCSA) Xfinity and Vivint.
Electronics retailer Best Buy (BBY) has stepped up its footprint in this market as well.
Another stock play would be cybersecurity companies because they will win contracts protecting the software that smart home products rely on.
Hackers are getting more sophisticated and a private cybersecurity company Firewalla can track where data is flowing to and from your devices.
Firewalla management recommends buying devices from reputable home automation companies like Amazon and Google because they have more accountability and are of higher quality.
There will be a huge onramp of cybersecurity contracts doled out to the likes of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW), CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD), Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT), and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO).
We are in the first mile of a marathon and smart home product manufacturers, cybersecurity companies, 5G internet, and semiconductor companies will all benefit from the broad-based integration of these next-generation home consumer products.
