Global Market Comments
June 28, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trades:
(TUESDAY, AUGUST 1, 2023 FLORENCE, ITALY GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(CYBERSECURITY IS ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED)
(PANW), (HACK), (CSCO), (FTNT), (JNPR), (CIBR)
CLICK HERE to download today's position sheet.
Global Market Comments
April 15, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(CYBERSECURITY IS ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED),
(PANW), (HACK), (FEYE), (CSCO), (FTNT), (JNPR), (CYBR)
Global Market Comments
June 2, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(CYBERSECURITY IS ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED),
(PANW), (HACK), (FEYE), (CSCO), (FTNT), (JNPR), (CIBR)
Google (GOOGL) and Facebook (FB) are dominant to the extent that the U.S. administration is hoping to dismantle them.
The two companies enjoy a flourishing duopoly and guzzle up digital ad dollars.
Governments around the world are scratching their heads attempting to figure out how to put a dent in these fortresses and so far, have been unsuccessful.
Big tech has made governments look bad, to say the least, and their response has been even more shambolic.
Alphabet installed Google CEO Sundar Pichai as the top decision-maker for all Alphabet assets preparing for the onslaught of digital privacy headwinds and regulation that the E.U., U.S., and everyone else will throw at them.
Luckily, they do not need to deal with the Chinese communist party as big tech minus Apple was effectively banned years ago.
What’s on Google and Facebook’s plate right now?
Attorney General William Barr has pointed the finger at these two platforms for hiding behind a clause that gives them immunity from lawsuits while their platforms carry material promoting illicit and immoral conduct and suppressing opinions.
Barr is currently looking into potential changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which was passed in 1996 and has been also referred to as the supercharger to tech riches.
What could eventually come of this?
Barr could decide for the Justice Department to explore ways to limit the provision, which protects internet companies from liability for user-generated content.
This could open up Google and Facebook to higher costs of managing content on their platforms and lawsuits related to malcontent in which they fail to remove.
Even though platforms love to market that they actively thwart bad actors, at the end of the day, they aren’t on the hook for what happens.
Massive alterations could fundamentally weaken their business models and force them to review each word and photo that is thrown upon their platform.
They have already hired an army of hourly paid contractors, but at their massive scale, content is simply impossible to smother.
Content generators understand how to sidestep machine learning algorithms which are based on backdated data, meaning they would not be able to catch a new iteration of past content.
Absolving themselves of any responsibility for policing their platforms has been an important catalyst in the outperformance in shares for both Facebook and Google.
The social side of this has cringeworthy unintended consequences.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association, a tech trade group that counts Google and Facebook as members want the government to stay out of it as they believe they are overreaching.
Government has been slowly making inroads in combatting the strength of these digital platforms, and the first successful foray was when Congress eliminated the liability protection for companies that knowingly facilitate online sex trafficking.
Big tech won’t go with a whimper and they will propose a range of changes to avoid direct damage to their business model such as raising the bar a smidgeon on which companies can have the shield, to carving out other laws negating attempt to weaken their platforms, to delaying the repealing of Section 230.
There is too much shareholder value on the line and as the coronavirus rears its ugly head, it’s ironic that investors perceive safety in not only the U.S. dollar but in the vaunted FANG tech group.
Ultimately, the math wins out and these companies with gargantuan earnings can weather any storm with a moat as wide as ever.
It’s to the point that a $10 billion fine is a massive victory, and what other group of companies can boast about that?
We can only trade the market we have in front of us and not the one we want.
I pulled the trigger on a Google call spread and I believe this narrow group of power tech players and their partners in crime cloud stocks of the likes of Twitter (TWTR), eBay (EBAY), Fortinet (FTNT), Adobe (ADBE), and a few others will hoist the market on its back like I predicted it would at the beginning of the trading year.
What does the technology sector’s “last gasp up” mean for tech stocks?
At the Mad Hedge Lake Tahoe Conference in late October, I correctly identified that the tech sector would experience a last leg to the price appreciation that has been part of a broader 10-year bull market in American equities.
The past 7 weeks have been nothing short of spectacular for tech shares as not only have the heavy hitters delivered in spades, like Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT), but tech growth shares have been released from the penalty box after a short-dated growth scare and joined the rally with zeal.
How long will the “last gasp up” last?
The bar was set exceptionally low in 2019 because senior management spun the trade war acrimony into the accounting calculus effectively offering CFOs a chance to lower expectations to the point of getting away with murder.
Even with earnings’ expectations reset at nadir data points, performance was a mixed bag.
Superior tech companies were able to jump over the pitiful expectations, then if that wasn’t enough, they pushed backwards any inklings of earnings growth by guiding as low as they possibly could.
An archetypal example is Palo Alto Networks (PANW) whose shares dipped more than 8.5% in pre-market trading after issuing their quarterly earnings report.
The company announced sales of $771.9 million with an adjusted EPS of $1.05 topping analysts' estimates.
Why did shares sully?
Palo Alto Networks tanked guidance by telling investors they expect sales between $838 million and $848 million in the second quarter.
The expectation represented a midpoint sales forecast of $843 million, which is lower than the consensus estimates of $845.12 million.
The adjusted EPS in the second quarter is estimated to be $1.11–$1.13, below the consensus earnings forecast of $1.30.
Palo Alto Networks is forecasting sales between $3.44 billion and $3.46 billion with an EPS between $4.9 and $5.0 for next year, compared to analyst projections of $3.46 billion in revenue and an EPS of $5.07 in 2020.
PANW accounts for a big piece of the pie in the cybersecurity trade comprising 16.2% in 2019.
Overall industry growth is strong at 10.4%, and PANW managed to increase its sales by 22.3% to $633.7 million.
This cybersecurity company is one of my favorite tech stalwarts and is as rock-solid as they come for a second-tier tech growth company.
Another trend that dovetails closely with the last gasp up thesis is buying growth.
At this stage in the tech cycle, the low hanging fruit has been plucked and tech companies are increasingly finding it hard to generate organic growth.
Companies are now resorting to inorganic growth with Palo Alto Networks announcing that it will acquire Aporeto for $150 million in an all-cash transaction.
This isn’t just a one-off for PANW, they have acquired four other companies in 2019 to plug into their growth puzzle.
They have also completed the acquisition of an IoT cybersecurity firm Zingbox.
Palo Alto Networks acquired two cloud security startups in July as well - Demisto to gain traction in the AI security segment and Twistlock, the leader in container security.
The other top players in this field are Cisco (CSCO), Fortinet (FTNT) and Symantec (SYMC).
The bullish secular trend in cybersecurity is watertight and comments from Nikesh Arora, CEO of Palo Alto Networks, only reconfirmed the strength in cybersecurity when he said, “As a growing number of organizations move their business to the cloud, developers increasingly rely on cloud-native technologies such as containers and serverless infrastructure to accelerate the development, testing, and deployment of modern applications and services.”
What’s next for investors?
Barring any exogenous shocks, the last gasp up continues and recent macro policy developments have supported this hypothesis as well as the tailwinds of an improving economy.
Palo Alto Networks is part of a high growth segment and many corporates are on record contemplating lower enterprise tech spending heading into 2020.
This sets up another incredibly low bar for cybersecurity companies to hop over next year and I believe the best in show such as PANW, Fortinet, Cisco, and Symantec will pass with flying colors.
The interesting acid test will occur at the end of 2020 when tech firms and sub-segments of tech such, as cybersecurity, release commentary on whether 2021 guidance could signal ensuing risk of being dragged into recessionary turbulence.
A 2021 tech sector recession is certainly not priced into current tech share valuations in this frothy period of asset appreciation.
The house is the new smartphone and I will tell you why.
The projected market growth of 18% in smart home technology sales according to Acumen Researching and Consulting will deliver opportunities to shape and prioritize this sector.
The revenues up for grabs from the smart home mean that internet of things’ (IoT) companies will create systems that mesh together with the bare minimum human participation, meaning that tech will have a dramatic influence in our daily lives.
I get several moans and groans a day that the Mad Hedge Technology Letter only shines the spotlight on the FANGs.
But it is hard not to when it comes to the future of the home.
Just look at recent M&A activity.
Automation and connected smart appliances have consumed Amazon by recently acquiring Eero, producer of routers for apartments, houses, and multi-story homes, and after already paying $1 billion to acquire Ring, a doorbell-camera startup. It had also bought Blink, a smart camera maker in 2017.
Google hasn’t shied away either by investing in smart home products pocketing Nest, a firm producing smart home products, for $3.2 billion.
Nest took a few years to sort out its production phase but finally managed to launch new temperature sensors, a video doorbell, and an outdoor smart camera.
What are the trending IoT products now?
The flavors of the day are smart lights, security, entertainment systems, and temperature control.
They are the low hanging fruit of the smart home industry – a de facto gateway into this world.
Most of these smart devices operate with voice assistants, but because of the nature of competition, certain products are aligned with certain ecosystems and compatibility issues will persist until the competition flushes itself out.
A layman’s example would be Apple’s Homekit dovetailing nicely with Apple’s Siri.
Companies are in the first innings of the product iteration cycle and the variations of smart home products are endless stemming from showers that remember preferred water temperature and flow rates or climate-control systems that change in real-time to suit the user.
Security of home networks and connected devices are still a controversial question mark because the receiver of this type of data has the keys to the most intimate details of personal lives.
Even avid technologists are hesitant to dive in and put up smart home products all over the house, and most are being cautious.
In fact, privacy issues are the most distinct headwind to fresh adoption rates.
Many people simply aren’t willing to make the jump yet until they are more convinced of its use case.
Even with all the reservations, an alternative global shipment company believes smart home devices will post 24% in growth next year.
For the smart home device believers, this cohort averages 6 smart home devices per household and will certainly rise to 7 or 8 by the end of 2020.
Popular items include the Amazon Echo, Google Home, and Apple (AAPL) HomePod.
Smart speakers are already present in 36% of American homes and rising.
Consumers are also worried about technology invading their daily lives along with allowing artificial intelligence to dominate personal decision making.
Others have concluded that items such as smart microwaves are a waste of money and are unneeded when analog devices function admirably.
Another legitimate reason is that the software and technology involve a perceived steep learning curve to operate which many people do not have the patience for.
And some are just burnt out by the volume of technology thrown in our faces.
Who wants to operate 50 apps on their phone to control their smart home devices when there are other pressing needs in life?
Companies with skin in the game are Alarm.com (ALRM), ADT (ADT), Arlo Technologies (ARLO) and Resideo Technologies (REZI) and they will be outsized winners if they can solve many of the industries lingering issues.
The value thesis in the case of home automation companies is that they are financially efficient, time-effective, boost wellness and will be easy to use.
About 11% of U.S. broadband households have smart thermostats and Nest’s smart thermostat is the most popular.
Networked security cameras by Arlo are in 10% of homes.
Video doorbells from Amazon.com (AMZN), Google are in 8% of homes and help deter theft of e-commerce packages.
Smart light bulbs and lighting are at 8% market share while smart door locks are at 7% penetration.
There are several second derivates bet on this as well.
The most common user interface for the smart home is apps on a smartphone or tablet and voice commands to smart speakers are second.
The conundrum of installation complexities leads to the demand of professional installers.
This demand has delivered opportunities for companies like Comcast's (CMCSA) Xfinity and Vivint.
Electronics retailer Best Buy (BBY) has stepped up its footprint in this market as well.
Another stock play would be cybersecurity companies because they will win contracts protecting the software that smart home products rely on.
Hackers are getting more sophisticated and a private cybersecurity company Firewalla can track where data is flowing to and from your devices.
Firewalla management recommends buying devices from reputable home automation companies like Amazon and Google because they have more accountability and are of higher quality.
There will be a huge onramp of cybersecurity contracts doled out to the likes of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW), CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD), Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT), and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO).
We are in the first mile of a marathon and smart home product manufacturers, cybersecurity companies, 5G internet, and semiconductor companies will all benefit from the broad-based integration of these next-generation home consumer products.
Some might say that we were due for a revaluation of growth tech stocks.
They have contributed greatly in this nine-year bull market.
Profit-generating software stocks are the order of the day.
Tech has led the overall market higher after projected quarterly earnings growth of -9% came in better than expected at -5%.
We have ebbed and flowed from pricing in a full-out recession in mid-2020 to now believing a recession is further off than first thought.
The pendulum swing ruptured many growth stocks from Workday (WKDAY) to The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) plummeting 30%.
We have retraced some of those losses but momentum in share appreciation has shifted to the perceived safer variation of tech stocks.
Investors have cut volatility and headed into bulletproof companies of Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOGL), and Microsoft (MSFT).
These companies have significant competitive advantages, Teflon balance sheets, and print money.
The tech markets just about priced in the U.S - China trade war in the fall as broad-based volatility plummeted because of optimism around making a deal.
This, in turn, has boosted chips stocks along with investors front running the 5G revolution and the administration granting Huawei a reprieve was a cherry on top.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter has taken every dip to initiate new longs in safe trades like software companies Adobe (ADBE) and Veeva Systems (VEEV).
Tech is at the point that all loss-making companies are out of the running for tech alerts because the moment there is a recession scare, these shares drop 10% and often don’t stop until they lose 30%.
Now there is a deeply embedded set of narrow tech leadership by a few dominant tech companies buttressed by a select set of second-tier software stocks.
I would put PayPal (PYPL) and Twitter (TWTR), which I currently have open trades on, in the ranks of the second tier and they should do well as long as economic growth does better than expected.
Their share prices dipped on weak guidance and the bad news appears to have been shaken out of these names.
Professional investors could also be hanging on to meet end-of-year performance targets.
I do expect unique entry points on software stocks that drop after bad future guidance.
Profitability has moved to the fore as the biggest factor in holding a name or not.
Newly minted IPOs have fared even worse showing the markets' waning appetite for loss makers like Uber (UBER) and Lyft (LYFT).
Loss-making companies often tout their ability to change the world and disrupt industry, but that has been discovered as nothing more than a ruse.
They aren’t disrupting the way we change the world. For example, Uber is a dressed-up taxi service and the new CEO has failed to create any new momentum in the unit economics that spectacularly fail by any type of metric.
Even worse for these growth stocks, as the economy starts to falter, there will be even less appetite for them, and even more appetite for safer tech stocks.
A worst-case scenario would see Uber drop to $10 and Lyft to $20.
New all-time highs have crystalized with Google (GOOGL) under the gauntlet of regulation hysteria displaying the domination of these big tech machines.
The ongoing, consistent rotation out of growth and into value hasn’t run its course yet and fortunately, by identifying this important trend, our readers will be well placed to advantageously position themselves going into 2020.
Growth stocks won’t make a comeback anytime soon and deteriorating conditions could trigger renewed synchronized global monetary policy easing and central bank stimulus.
And yes, more negative rates.
I believe Oracle (ORCL), Fortinet (FTNT), Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) could weather the storm next year.
Tech growth is slowing and trade uncertainty is high, and readers must have a sense of urgency to avoid the losers in this scenario.
U.S. economic growth could slow to 1.3% next year, avoiding a recession, and the lack of enterprise spend will reduce software sales and combine that with peak smartphone growth and it won’t be smooth sailing.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter has the pulse of the tech market and will show you how to navigate this minefield.
The administration banning 8 Chinese tech companies screams one thing – American cybersecurity will become more important than ever before.
Interestingly enough, most of the entry list included Chinese own version of cybersecurity companies which usually participate in heavy-handed censorship including facial recognition startups Sensetime, Megvii and Yitu, video surveillance specialists Hikvision and Dahua Technology, iFlyTek, Xiamen Meiya Pico Information Co and Yixin Science and Technology Co.
All of these companies have “borrowed” American source code while applying American designed semiconductors to create a business aiding the interests and model of the Chinese Communist Party.
As the stakes become higher, American companies too will have to grow cybersecurity budgets, and instead of budgeting for mass authoritarian censorship, American companies will need to spend to protect the technology and networks they develop from getting pillaged from totalitarian regimes.
If American tech companies renege on the Faustian bargain of doing business in China for their technology, then it will force the Chinese to acquire this sensitive technology by any means possible and that doesn’t involve sitting on the emperor’s chair in Beijing.
What does this mean for the broader trade war?
Even if we get a mini deal, it won’t address that the main guts of the trade conflict entails killing off Chinese tech in the way we know it now.
Being able to agree on some sort of enforceable mechanism is a pipe dream, even if an enforceable mechanism is agreed on, who will enforce the enforceable mechanism?
That’s how tricky it is for corporates doing business in China and now the NBA (National Basketball Association) has received a small sampling of the trade war with one innocuous quote by Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey who tweeted then deleted his democratic support for the Hong Kong freedom movement.
The ban of these 8 Chinese companies means they will no longer be able to purchase U.S.-made technology parts to use as inputs of a censorship business model that goes against democratic values.
The trigger for the blacklist was the way these technologies were used to imprison ethnic Muslim minorities in Chinese Xinjiang province paving the way for China to lash out again against the U.S for the ban.
Not only has China applied the technology to Chinese nationals, they have exported this technology to African states and are allowed access to the data which could theoretically be exploited for additional economic and political gain about which they essentially have no qualms.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang has characterized this move as “interfering in China’s internal affairs” and as you probably believe, he expressed great unsatisfaction with this move as Chinese and American delegations plan to meet shortly to hash out their differences.
The 8 banned companies will need to source alternative tech in the same way that Huawei Technologies has done.
Huawei was banned this past April under national security premises blocking access to US-made software for its handsets and devices, such as Google’s Android operating system and Microsoft’s Windows.
This will hurt certain semiconductor manufacturers like Nvidia who sell artificial intelligence chips for video surveillance to Hikvision and semiconductor stocks have sold off hard on this news.
Washington’s move has laid bare the fierce struggle for technology supremacy and America’s refusal to allow Chinese technology companies to reign supreme off of ill-gotten intellectual property and American semiconductor chips.
It could be the final straw in corporate America funding China to take down itself or at least another step to disengaging with the Sino cash cow.
And this new episode is almost guaranteed to usher in a flight of capital to American cybersecurity companies as Chinese hackers open up a new frontier to hack the best of America’s intellectual property.
I envision the likes of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW), Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT), CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD), and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) as good long term buy and holds that offer quality exposure to the cybersecurity story and the future growth of it.
Global Market Comments
June 13, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(TUESDAY, JUNE 25 SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(CYBERSECURITY IS ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED),
(PANW), (HACK), (FEYE), (CSCO), (FTNT), (JNPR), (CIBR)
Global Market Comments
May 1, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(FRIDAY, JUNE 15, 2018, DENVER, CO, GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(ANATOMY OF A GREAT TRADE)
(TLT), (TBT), (SPY), (GLD), (USO),
(CYBERSECURITY IS ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED),
(PANW), (HACK), (FEYE), (CSCO), (FTNT), (JNPR), (CIBR)
