Global Market Comments
June 13, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(TUESDAY, JUNE 25 SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(CYBERSECURITY IS ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED),
(PANW), (HACK), (FEYE), (CSCO), (FTNT), (JNPR), (CIBR)
Posts
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 10, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(TAKE A 2020 RAIN CHECK WITH SYMANTEC)
(SYMC), (FTNT), (PANW),
If you said I am going to the well too many times with this enterprise software theme, I would say you are out of your mind.
Next up is Symantec Corp. (SYMC) who offers global cybersecurity products, services, and solutions, and will be a primary beneficiary of the acceleration of network security products that expanded 12.6% YOY in 2018 and a secondary beneficiary to the migration to enterprise software.
The uptick in gorging cybersecurity products helps reflect the strongest industry metrics since analytics started tracking cybersecurity figures.
As more corporations take the leap of faith and splurge on data centers to house digital secrets, cloud service providers will store corporate data on these massive server farms and perimeter protection software is needed to guard against trojan horses and other malware.
This development has led to a vibrantly healthy market for firewall products, a traditional cybersecurity tool applied to block access to portions of a corporate network from the outside internet.
Firewall products weren’t shy registering 16.3% YOY growth to $2.4 billion in Q4 2018.
Advanced threat protection products used to find more sophisticated and modern offshoots of malicious software exploded to $416 million in Q4 2018, up 19.1% YOY.
Where does it stop?
Nobody knows, but the internet is becoming more of a chaotic free-for-all, and corporations existing for the sheer purpose of maximizing shareholder value will need to dole out an extra layer or two of digital protection.
Remember executive careers can be ruined from corporate cyberespionage these days and being the guy who lets the North Korean cyber army through the front door to fleece proprietary data isn’t a great pitch for a future executive gig.
The thorny Huawei issue has also heightened awareness of this sensitivity of security issues demonstrating how American tech prowess can be looted in a zero-sum cross-border game.
Internet users have also experienced a sudden balkanization of the web by totalitarian governments ready to weaponize the internet where they see fit while clamping down on freedom of expression on expressions that aren’t favorable to the interests above.
The orange alert climate has forced corporations to rush into cybersecurity products and my two favorite companies in this sphere are Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT).
I cannot say that Symantec is a better company than these two, it wouldn’t be true because their model doesn’t have the super growth trajectory when you analyze them head to head.
But this year should be an improvement on last year and I see room to the upside.
Every important metric will improve, aided by a return to better-calibrated execution, stabilization in business mix, and the benefit of revenue already on the balance sheet.
Operating margins slightly beat guidance with a 32% upswing last quarter and strong cash flow from operations of $377 million in the third quarter meant the company is more profitable.
Enterprise Security chipped in with revenue of $616 million, $31 million above the high end of the guidance range, and after a turbulent first half of 2018, Enterprise Security is back to organic growth of 3%.
And the main reason this company won’t be a massive winner is because of the lack of top-line growth indicating expansion in fiscal 2019 of only 1.5% in total revenue comprising of relatively flat revenue for Enterprise Security and 3% growth for the Consumer Digital Safety division.
Not good enough in the tech world of today.
Remember that the Consumer Digital Safety division contributes 49% to the top line while Enterprise Security only makes up 15%.
I believe this amounts to serious weakness in their business model because it should be the other way around to take advantage of the fast-growing enterprise business market and the even better margins.
The sluggish growth has hit shares with the chart flat as a pancake if you string it out the past 5 years with undulation in between.
The top line growth from 2017 to 2018, went from $4.02B to $4.83B and was a revelation, yet management has begged for more time with its prognosis of flat revenue for 2019.
Symantec will compensate for the lack of revenue growth with slightly better profitability maintaining a 30% operating margin, and predicting cash flow from operations for fiscal year 2019 to be in the range of $1.25B to $1.35B, a nice bump from the total cash flows from operations of $950 million in fiscal year 2018.
The catalyst to share appreciation is hidden in between the lines with management hyping up 2020 as the period when Symantec gets its mojo back with mid-single digit growth, with the Enterprise Security segment particularly benefiting from organic revenue expanding in the mid to high single digits from 2019.
A roll-off from existing contract liabilities will boost the Consumer Digital Safety segment but will not demonstrate any meaningful organic revenue growth projected to be unchanged at the low to mid-single digits YOY.
This sets up nicely for 2020 – the company expects a boost in operating margins to mid-30s and expected EPS growth in the low double digits with cash flow from operations benefitting from the 2019 restructuring, transition and transformation effort.
In short, they had a poor 2018 and Symantec’s management is telling investors to allocate downtime to fix the firm - growth will be missing this year, but they will be more profitable than last year, albeit with flat revenue.
The jury will be out in 2020 which is when they promised to have all their ducks in a row.
Even though they aren’t promising double-digit revenue growth in 2020, the high single-digit growth could see shares slowly grind up for the rest of this year.
This is another example of how legacy companies get stuck digging themselves out of a sinkhole before they can hyper-energize their profit model.
They are still in a holding pattern and I am neutral to slightly bullish on Symantec shares.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 18, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE DANGERS OF PLAYING TECH SMALL FRY),
(FIT), (AAPL), (CRM), (FTNT), (SQ), (SNAP), (BBY)
The No. 1 complaint the Mad Hedge Fund Technology Letter receives is that I focus too much on the tech behemoths, and do not allocate much time for the needle-in-the-haystack inspirations aiming to disrupt the status quo.
Let’s get this straight – both are important.
And when a gem of a company riding the coattails of monstrous secular tailwinds comes to the fore, I do not hesitate to usher readers into the stock at a market sweet spot.
Fortunately, many of the lesser-known companies I have recommended have hit their stride such as Salesforce (CRM), Fortinet (FTNT), and Square (SQ), while I alerted readers to avoid Snap (SNAP) like the plague.
There are a lot of moving parts to say the least.
The most recent annual Apple (AAPL) product release event was emblematic of why I cannot go to the well and recommend the minnows of the tech world on a constant basis.
In 2017, Apple registered more than $229 billion in gross revenue. And under this umbrella of assets is a finely tuned operational empire that stretches like the Mongol empire of yore from best-in-class hardware to innovative software services.
Last year brought Apple a king’s ransom of profits to the tune of more than $48 billion.
Many of these upstart firms are fighting tooth and nail to surpass the $100 million gross sales mark, which is peanuts for the intimidating large tech companies.
In the process of expanding their dominion far and wide, the net they cast extends further by the day.
I hammer home the fact that these cash-rich stalwarts have an insatiable drive to initiate new businesses as a way to position themselves at the heart of each groundbreaking trend and capture fresh markets.
Some decisions are rued and some – brilliant.
At the very least, they can afford a few hits.
Algorithms, which suck up voluminous amounts of data, carry out the best decisions that software can buy.
Managers wield these finely tuned algorithms to make precise bets.
These myriads of algorithms are tweaked every day as the level of tech ingenuity snowballs incrementally with each passing day.
Enter Fitbit (FIT).
This company was first known as Healthy Metrics Research, Inc., a decisively less sexy name than its current name Fitbit.
Healthy Metrics Research, Inc. unglamorously began as did most tech companies - with little fanfare.
Its cofounders James Park and Eric Friedman identified the opportunity to jump into the sensor industry, as they saw a monstrous addressable market for future sensors in wearable smart devices.
They soon caught a bid and $400,000 flew into its coffers. They promptly marketed designs to potential investors with nothing more than a circuit board in a wooden box.
Oh, how the wearable smart device market has advanced since those early days…
All in all, the idea was good enough for some initial seed money.
At the first tech conference marketing their new sensors, they were hoping to eclipse 50 orders.
Fortuitously, the upstart firm received more than 2,000 pre-orders, and a reset upward in expectations.
With momentum at their backs, the cofounders now had the sticky situation of physically delivering the end-product to the end-user.
This involved scouring Asia for reasonable suppliers for three-odd months with “7 near death experiences” mixed in the middle of it.
Highlighting the unglamorous nature of incubation stage firms were the cofounders once quick fix sticking a “piece of foam on a circuit board to correct an antenna problem."
Somehow and some way they debuted their product at the tail end of 2009, delivering 5,000 orders with a backlog of additional orders to boot, offering the company some stress relief.
Fitbit had the best product in an industry that barely existed, and everything was rosy at their headquarters in San Francisco.
Best Buy (BBY) even adopted its products, and Fitbit watches were flying off the shelves like hotcakes.
Margins were gloriously high. The lack of threats around the corner made the company the gold standard for smartwatches.
In short, the company was having its cake and eating it, too.
In 2011, Fitbit was furiously adding to the best smartwatch on the market installing an altimeter, a digital clock and a stopwatch to its premium product.
Then came embedded Bluetooth technology: able to track steps, distance, floors climbed, calories burned, and sleep patterns.
After being embroiled in several law quagmires over big data, momentum was still at their back, and Fitbit still managed to go public.
The IPO was a roaring success and then some.
The share price rocketed to almost $50, and the firm sat pretty in the middle of 2015.
Then the company’s shares fell to pieces in one fell swoop.
Fitbit’s stock cratered more than 50% in 2016. To inject new life into the company, CEO James Park trumpeted Fitbit’s imminent face-lift that would transform the young company from a "consumer electronics company" to a "digital healthcare company."
Bad news for Fitbit. Apple planned to do the same exact thing but do it better than Fitbit.
The readjustment to Fitbit’s grand plan was to combat the original Apple smartwatch that debuted on April 24, 2015 – three years ago.
The Apple smartwatch rapidly became the dominant smartwatch in the wearable industry, selling more than 4.2 million units in just one quarter alone.
Fitbit is now trading just a smidgen over $5 today, and the devastation is far from over.
Fitbit’s shares are down almost 1,000% from its 2015 peak, stressing the dangers that minnow tech companies face getting outgunned by companies that have superior talent, unlimited resources, and top-grade management.
Not only that, Apple can integrate any wearable device linking it with the rest of its ecosystem in a heartbeat.
Even better, it does not need to develop an operating system from scratch because it can use what it already has in place - iOS.
Even if it were to run into development troubles, it would be able to throw around a wad of capital to find someone to solve idiosyncratic issues that pop up.
Yes, Tim Cook has not been the second incarnation of Steve Jobs, but he has demonstrated a natural ability to become a trustworthy steward, advancing the interests of the company, its shareholders, and most importantly its lineup of ultra-premium products.
Fitbit was enjoying its beach promenade stroll and walked into a doozy of a tsunami with little warning.
Spearheading a revival is even more daunting.
For David to outdo Goliath takes an emphatic sum of capital and a master plan to go with it.
Fitbit has neither.
The most recent Apple product launch event introduced a gem of a smartwatch, and Fitbit’s shares once again are on life support.
With each passing Apple smartwatch iteration, Fitbit experiences a new dramatic leg down in the share price.
It is almost curtains for this company.
It will be unceremoniously laid to rest in what is now quite an expansive tech graveyard of futility.
The best-case scenario is possibly salvaging itself by drastic reinvention.
It is easier said than done.
Add this company to your list of small companies obliterated by the phenomenon known as FANG, and this story gives credence to investors trying to be cute with their tech investments.
On paper it looks great until the company becomes steamrolled.
And the paper Fitbit was written on doesn’t even look all that hot with Fitbit poised to lose money until 2021.
It sounds cliché, but the network effect cannot be underestimated.
Without this powerful effect, tech investors are exposed to a demonstrably higher level of risk.
The risk of extinction.
Stay away from Fitbit shares and any dead cat bounces that shortly arise.
The Apple watch series 5 could be the dagger that finishes the walking wounded.
As an endnote, the next potential Fitbit creeping closer to the eye of the FANG storm could be the smart speaker company Sonos (SONO).
Sometimes the calm before the storm can be awfully quiet.
Not Good Enough In 2018
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
“The best way to predict the future is to create it,” said influential philosopher Peter Drucker.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 24, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SECURE THE GATES),
(FTNT), (PANW)
Does it give you the creepy-crawlies to know that while you are meandering around on your favorite website, nefarious forces are preying on your every click?
An entire industry is devoted to defending your needs, to ensure you can roam and frolic aimlessly on the World Wide Web.
The global cybersecurity industry aimed at protecting the end user is on pace to mushroom, surpassing $180 billion in revenue by 2023, a monstrous uptick in business activity from the $114 billion in 2017.
Recent political sable rattling and aggressive posturing underscores the seriousness of defending proprietary trade secrets and vital data, which are propelling these businesses to outperform.
The multitude of security breaches has fueled a security spending binge in 95% of firms.
And this is just the beginning.
Hyper-accelerating technology has augmented big data as the new oil, and this data is useless if hackers can infiltrate a system leaving it a shell of its former self, then selling it on to the highest bidder on the dark web.
Corporations are furiously spending on the newest cutting-edge fortifications.
CEOs have awoken and realize getting nicked of a precarious treasure trove of data is a sackable offense.
The trend in global cybersecurity spending augurs well for Fortinet (FTNT), a company I have touted in the past. To read my recommendation for this stock click here. Please note you must be logged in to read the article.
I urged readers to dip their toe in this stock when shares were trading at $54 in the middle of March.
The ensuing price action has been nothing short of spectacular with frequent antagonistic macroeconomic headlines boosting the stock.
Fortinet is trading at $68 today, levitating over 20% since I recommended it barely four months ago.
Fortinet has the pulse on the cybersecurity industry and provided some insight to the industry combat zone from its 30,000-foot perch as one of the leading lights of the industry.
This is what it deals with on a daily basis.
Intrusion methods are constantly transforming to keep the cybersecurity forces off-kilter.
The game of cat and mouse has become a zero-sum proposition deploying massive scale. This newfound acceleration is forcing cybersecurity companies to up their game.
The latest data from Fortinet illustrates cybercriminals malware usage has crept up in sophistication relying on formulating modern zero-day vulnerabilities, better understood as attacks exploiting previously unknown security vulnerabilities, operating with lighting quick speed and mammoth scale.
Unique exploit detections surged by 12%, and from these intrusions, 73% of firms were materially damaged.
These aren't your father's cybercriminals.
The newfound mainstream popularity of cryptocurrency has caused a new wave of fiat money to funnel through Internet checkpoints into their crypto brokerage accounts.
This fashionable asset class for Millennials has coincided with a major increase in "cryptojacking," the theft of crypto assets.
The aforementioned malware is becoming uber complex undetectable to the unexperienced cybersecurity professional.
The migration into cryptomining has given cybercriminals another platform to strike it digitally rich.
The activity of cryptomining malware has shot up doubling the amount of malware permeating through the system.
Cryptomining malware has demonstrated a vast array of variations of malware. This brand of stealthier, fileless malware deploys infected, undetectable code into browsers.
Hackers aren't just targeting one type of cryptocurrency. They are going after the alternative currencies such as Dash and Monero that knock about in the crypto asset ecosphere.
Monero is a favorite of the North Korean state hacker team.
Hackers are employing a trial and error strategy, aggregating the industries' best practices to mold into an even more deadly weapon.
These dark forces aren't just spraying around attacks mindlessly. To cause maximum damage, hackers are growingly deploying their venom in a targeted fashion, pinpointing the exact weakness in a system, providing a timely entry point into a gateway allowing them to open a Pandora's box when inside.
Worldwide events are magnets to this bombardment of attacks, and these hackers are routinely carrying out diligent reconnaissance work to lay the groundwork for a laser-like, designed attack.
These digital Ocean's 11 are hard to stop unless you call on Fortinet.
The scope of damage is increasing over time with hackers directing malware to disperse laterally throughout a network before triggering the most vicious phase of the attack.
The Olympic Destroyer malware and the SamSam ransomware rearing its ugly head in Q1 2018, demonstrate how cybercriminals fused together a designer attack with a destructive payload for devastating results.
Some examples of the rapid escalation in expertise are GandCrab ransomware that turned up in January. It was the first ransomware demanding Dash cryptocurrency as a payment.
Complicating the matter, attacks aren't just pointed at one direction. A multifaceted pronged attack has proved effective for expert hackers and mobile is becoming a habitual point of entry.
Hackers would target routers or Internet hardware exploiting these soft spots contributing to 21% of corporations being blindsided by malware, a sharp increase from 7%.
The explosion of IoT devices such as Amazon Echo and Apple's HomePod will be a battleground arena for this industry to stop probing hackers from extracting the treasure trove of data.
Unpatched software and hardware are also ripe for penetration.
Microsoft ranked as the most targeted firm. The other avenue for attacks mainly fell to routers that garnered a substantial portion of malware volume.
Botnets are described as a network of private computers infected with malware while controlled without the owners' knowledge.
Logically, the longer the botnets are in the system, the more havoc they cause.
Same-day detection and removal of botnets came in at 58.5% of infections.
Unfortunately, it took two days to get rid of 17.6% and three days to oust 7.%.
Further down the time horizon, it took more than a week to dispose of 5%.
One glaring example was the Andromeda botnet removed in Q4 2017, but it was still running riot prominently in Q1 2018.
An elixir to solve the problem is not always perfect, but Fortinet manages to successfully smother potential carnage leading to a slew of massive contracts.
All of these aforenoted dangers are on what Fortinet clamps down.
It does its best to put a muzzle on the hideous activity. Then the review and enhancement of products will only help them generate a flurry of sales going forward.
The cybersecurity sector is relatively new and swiftly evolving to the forefront of corporate governance.
The speed of change in technology is outstripping the development of academic qualifications for cybersecurity experts.
Consequently, an acute scarcity of qualified technicians could stifle the effort to combat these wicked forces. Reports suggest a substantial number of middle-tier specialist positions cannot be found causing strain further down the pecking order.
Fortinet uses the most modern A.I. (artificial intelligence) algorithms to address these hyper-critical security threats, whether in networks, applications, cloud, or mobile environments.
The company is the industry leader along with Palo Alto Networks Inc, (PANW), hawking premium firewall technology, end-point security software, and cloud protection solutions.
They have been consistently growing the top line while expanding their hybrid-solutions product lineup.
Just four years ago Fortinet took home $770 million of revenue Fast-forward to 2017, and Fortinet ended the year with $1.49 billion in revenue.
Fortinet continues to hit all-time highs as its stock is on fire.
Its total addressable market maintains robust, and Fortinet is well placed to reap the benefits moving forward.
Its revenue mix is slowly changing from a reliance on hardware to a pivot to software and services boding well for the future.
Gross margins are healthy ticking higher to 77% in Q1 2018, a small increase of 2% YOY.
Revenues are set to blow past $3 billion by 2022, and Fortinet is an all-around great company.
Shares have run too far too fast. Wait for shares to drop anywhere close to the 50-day moving average to put new money to work in this high-caliber cybersecurity stock.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"A company shouldn't get addicted to being shiny, because shiny doesn't last," - said Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos.
Global Market Comments
May 1, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(FRIDAY, JUNE 15, 2018, DENVER, CO, GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(ANATOMY OF A GREAT TRADE)
(TLT), (TBT), (SPY), (GLD), (USO),
(CYBERSECURITY IS ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED),
(PANW), (HACK), (FEYE), (CSCO), (FTNT), (JNPR), (CIBR)
It looks like the cyber security sector is about to take off like a rocket once again. There could be another 25%-50% in it this year.
The near destruction of Sony (SNE) by North Korean hackers last November has certainly put the fear of God into corporate America. Apparently, they have no sense of humor whatsoever north of the 38th parallel.
As a result, there is a generational upgrade in cyber security underway, with many potential targets boosting spending by multiples.
It's not often that I get a stock recommendation from an army general. However that's exactly what happened the other day when I was speaking to a three star about the long-term implications of the Iran peace deal.
He argued persuasively that the world will probably never again see large-scale armies fielded by major industrial nations. Wars of the future will be fought online, as they have been, silently and invisibly, over the past 15 years.
All of those trillions of dollars spent on big ticket, heavy metal weapons systems are pure pork designed by politicians to buy voters in marginal swing states.
The money would be far better spent where it is most needed, on the cyber warfare front. Needless to say, my friend shall remain anonymous.
The problem is that when wars become cheaper, you fight more of them, as is the case with online combat.
A little known fact is that during the Bush administration, the Chinese military downloaded the entire contents of the Pentagon's mainframe computers at least seven times.
This was a neat trick because these computers were in stand alone, siloed, electromagnetically shielded facilities not connected to the Internet in any way.
In the process, they obtained the designs of all of out most advanced weapons systems, including our best nukes. And what have they done with this top-secret information?
Absolutely nothing.
Like many in senior levels of the US military, the Chinese have concluded that these weapons are a useless waste of valuable resources. Far better value for money are more hackers, coders and servers, which the Chinese have pursued with a vengeance.
You have seen this in the substantial tightening up of the Chinese Internet through the deployment of the Great Firewall, which blocks local access to most foreign websites.
Try sending an email to someone in the middle Kingdom with a gmail address. It is almost impossible. This is why Google (GOOG) closed their offices there years ago.
My awareness of this comes from several Chinese readers complaining to me that they are unable to open my Trade Alerts or access their foreign online brokerage accounts.
As a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently told me, "The greatest threat to national defense is wasting money on national defense."
If wars are now being fought online, then investing in national defense has actually come to mean investing in cyber security.
And although my brass-hatted friend didn't mention the company by name, the implication was that I need to go out and buy Palo Alto Networks (PANW) right now.
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is an American network security company based in Santa Clara, California just across the water from my Bay Area office. The company's core products are advanced firewalls designed to provide network security, visibility and granular control of network activity based on application, user, and content identification.
Palo Alto Networks competes in the unified threat management and network security industry against Cisco (CSCO), FireEye (FEYE), Fortinet (FTNT), Check Point (CHKP), Juniper Networks (JNPR), and Cyberoam, among others.
The really interesting thing about this industry is that there are no real losers. That's because companies are taking a layered approach to cyber security, parceling out contracts to many of the leading firms at once, looking to hedge their bets.
To say that top management has no idea what these products really do would be a huge understatement. Therefore, they buy all of them.
This makes a basket approach to the industry more feasible than usual. You can do this through buying the $435 million capitalized PureFunds ISE Cyber Security ETF (HACK), which boasts Cyberark Software (CYBR), Infoblox (BLOX) and FireEye (FEYE) as its three largest positions. (HACK) has been a hedge fund favorite since the Sony attack.
For more information about (HACK), please click here: http://www.pureetfs.com/etfs/hack.html.
And don't forget to change your password.
