Mad Hedge Technology Letter
January 17, 2025
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(GOOD NEWS FOR META HOLDERS)
(META)
Posts
Investors should rejoice after hearing the great news from Meta (META) management.
This year has started off with a bang.
The stock price will be the outsized winner of the new staffing policy.
Meta Founder Mark Zuckerberg is targeting Meta's low performers. In an internal memo announcing staff cuts, the CEO told employees to prepare for an "intense year."
Zuckerberg is bringing the heat by announcing a fresh round of cuts aimed at managing low performers.
All those H1-B foreign workers making half a salary are probably on the cutting board unable to justify a half salary.
Meta has been widely known to aggressively add from the H1-B transfer portal to snap up Indian workers for a fraction of the cost of an American national.
Along with the H1-B workers, there will be a 100% removal of the fact-checking division.
Zuckerberg announced that he would do away with “fact-checking” all together and luckily, he will not need that entire division to tell me what the Menlo Park, California truth is anymore.
The company reportedly plans to exit roughly 5% of the lowest performers. Meta said it plans to backfill the roles with existing staff members.
Meta said U.S. employees impacted by the cuts would be notified by February 10.
Zuckerberg has also announced that he is trashing the DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) hiring trend which is surprising since it diametrically opposes what Meta has stood for in the past.
It is arguable that Meta has never stood for anything, but it pays to play on the right team when they are in charge of the government and the ultimate control of how businesses operate.
It's the latest round of cuts in Zuckerberg's self-proclaimed efficiency drive.
In 2023, the CEO declared a "year of efficiency" at Meta, announcing plans to eliminate 10,000 positions and flatten the company's structure to remove some layers of middle management.
In 2022, the company laid off another 11,000 employees, or roughly 13% of its workforce.
Zuckerberg’s $1 million donation to Former President Donald Trump post-election is ironic given that Meta’s Zuckerberg banned the former President from his platform.
Trump was also banned on Twitter when the platform was led by Jack Dorsey.
Without getting too political, what does this all mean?
It will result in higher profits in the short-term and remember that labor is the costliest line item.
Zuckerberg is forging his own cut expenses at all costs strategy to appease shareholders.
I have lamented the lack of profit drivers available for big tech and projects like Meta’s VR goggles have been a total failure.
When I was at the store and tried on the VR goggles myself, my head got dizzy and my eyes started to burn.
It is hard to believe that the product was allowed to go into the public without more quality control or testing.
Zuckerberg will rest his case on ultimate “efficiency” this year and I can easily see over half of Meta’s staff jettisoned in 2025.
It’s not a good time to search for a job in Silicon Valley, because there are more firings than ever before.
It’s also not the greatest time to live in the state of California, and this to me is Zuckerberg’s initial steps to leave the state with his money, influence, company, and technology just like many before him.
He might just keep his enormous Lake Tahoe lake house for a vacation or 2.
Buy dips in Meta stock before earnings and harvest what the state of California has to offer.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
January 3, 2025
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE EYEWEAR PIVOT NOBODY SAW COMING)
(META), (ESSILORLUXOTTICA)
Meta (META) migration into the eyewear business is a little bit of a head-scratcher until peeling back the layers and really understanding what is going on.
EssilorLuxottica’s agreement to prolong its long-term collaboration with Meta Platforms for the development of smart eyewear over the upcoming 10 years is a massive victory for Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
This milestone offers meaningful insight into the direction of where the business model is heading.
Many have expected that Meta would start to branch out into other venues once their core businesses start to stagnate.
The digital ad game and social media platforms only go so far in terms of growth these days, and shareholders are waiting for the next big thing.
Short-term prospects are what drives the stock movement, and Meta is looking for that pixie dust.
EssilorLuxottica is the largest maker of eyewear in the world and the owner of many eyewear brands and retailers, including Ray-Ban, LensCrafters, and Pearle Vision in the U.S.
EssilorLuxottica also acquired Heidelberg Engineering, a maker of imaging and healthcare machinery and technology, largely for the ophthalmic and eyecare markets worldwide.
Prescription glasses are not cheap, ranging into the thousands of dollars for designer frames and lenses.
If Meta can figure out how to do this all online without going to the optician, imagine the juicy margins they could extract from this sort of venture.
Meta and EssilorLuxottica have a relationship for the production of the Ray-Ban smart glasses. The glasses’ latest version gives consumer’s video, camera, and Bluetooth headset capability in a stylish eyewear frame with a cool brand on it.
Heidelberg Engineering makes complex, sophisticated, expensive equipment that you may be exposed to if you’re examined in an ophthalmologist’s office. Buying Heidelberg makes EssilorLuxottica more entrenched in the industry where it is the established leader.
The tie-up with EssilorLuxottica is the perfect onboarding situation to understand how to perfect the optimal glasses and lenses and then transfer it into an online experience.
Remember, even if this investment is for VR purposes, the application revolves around virtual eyewear as well.
Meta now understands they need to secure a monopoly on eyewear, and it is a conscious decision to make that a launching point for more of their products.
In the future, Meta wants consumers to access Instagram, Whatsapp, and Facebook through EssilorLuxottica eyewear products.
Meta also hopes to secure the first mover advantage while other big tech firms lack the deep knowledge of eyewear. There have already been numerous failed attempts at smart glasses, and so Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg is doubling down with a relationship with Europe’s most deeply entrenched premium eyewear firm.
Although the boost to the bottom and top line won’t happen quickly with a possible relationship with EssilorLuxottica, this could anoint Meta as the gatekeeper to the new virtual world through this new eyewear tech.
It’s becoming clear that Meta is running up to certain upper limits in regards to the growth of their 3 platforms, and they are looking for another super booster to prop up profits.
I don’t believe that Meta will be allowed to acquire this eyewear company because of anti-competitive laws, but adopting its best product practices and hiring their best talent seems a lot more on brand from Meta.
Meta has never been shy at poaching outside talent and rewarding them handsomely.
On the flip side, EssilorLuxottica would be smart to adopt some tech now by hiring the right people and trying to digitize the experience further otherwise, Meta will get what they are coming for.
Meta pushing the envelope is one of the big reasons why they have stayed ahead of other big tech companies and why the stock has done so well the past few years.
Meta stock is a great short-term and long-term proposition for patient and impatient investors.
Global Market Comments
December 13, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2025 ST AUGUSTINE FLORIDA STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(DECEMBER 11 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(BLK), (BAC), (GME), (TSLA), (META),
(AMZN), (WBA), (TSLA), (BITO), (USO), (LCID)
Below, please find subscribers’ Q&A for the December 11 Mad Hedge Fund Trader Global Strategy Webinar, broadcast from Lake Tahoe, Nevada.
Q: I was assigned options—called away on both my short-call positions in BlackRock (BLK) and Bank of America (BAC).
A: What you do there is call your broker and exercise your long to cover your short; that should get you 100% of the profit 10 days ahead of expiration, and that is the best way to get out of that position. If you get hit with the dividend, then you're at break-even on the total trade. The way to get around this is you have 10 positions, including several non-dividend paying positions, so you don't have a call-away risk. You really only have about a 1 in 100 chance to get called away, so it's worth doing. If the worst case is you break even, the best case is you make 15% or 20% on the position in a month. That is worth doing.
Q: What do you think of the situation in Syria?
A: We don't know. For us, it's a huge win because it eliminates the last Russian position in the Middle East. They have lost Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and at one point Algeria—so they have no more positions in the Middle East. They lose all their air bases, military bases, and naval bases in Syria, and they also lose their only warm water port in the Mediterranean. It happened because they couldn't afford to draw troops away from Ukraine to help support Syria. Given the choice between Syria and Ukraine, they'll pick Ukraine. It is another argument for the US to maintain support for Ukraine.
The trouble is in the Middle East, whenever you get a chance, you often end up getting somebody else that's worse. Did we just trade one terrorist for another one? We'll have to wait and see. Fortunately, this war didn't cost us any money. It cost Russia a lot. We had no troops in Syria and no weapons commitments, so we got off easily on this one. It’s probably the most important foreign policy achievement of the last four years.
In the meantime, we're destroying all their weapons stockpiles, just in case the new people coming in are bad guys. We'd rather not wait until after they identify themselves as bad guys—we might as well destroy all the weapons now while nobody is defending them. So, as I speak, we're destroying weapons stockpiles for its ships and rocket facilities. Also, this is a huge loss for Iran because they lose easy sea access to Gaza. They used to just truck weapons to the coast in Lebanon, put them on a boat, and send them to Gaza. Now, they have to go all the way around Africa to supply Gaza. So basically it's a huge win for us, and I'll write more about that in the Monday letter.
Q: Do the spread positions need to be actively closed out to achieve profits?
A: No, they don't. You don't have to touch them. That's the beauty of these positions. All ten I expect to expire in the money at maximum profit point, and on the following Monday morning opening, you will find that the margin is freed up, the cash profit is credited to your account, and you're in a 100% cash position. So don't do anything, even if your broker will tell you to individually buy and sell the individual legs and wipe out your profit. I sent out a research piece on this today about how to handle when calls are called away.
Q: I sold BlackRock (BLK) last week because Schwab called and warned me I could owe $6,000 due to the dividend. They did not suggest I close my long position.
A: Again, it goes back to how to handle option call-aways. The only reason they call you is to eliminate any liability for Charles Schwab because, in the past, people would get options called away, they'd say my broker never told me, and they sued the broker. So, the reason they emailed you and called you with warnings is to avoid liability for themselves. In actual fact, only 1 out of 100 different options actually get called away. It's done randomly by a computer, and you're far better off holding the position. And then, if you do get called away, use your long to exercise your short. It's a perfectly hedged position, so you have no actual outright risk. The only real risk is if you don't check your email every day and you don't know you've been called away, so you don't call your broker to exercise your long to cover your short.
Q: Do you envision other countries trending towards more tariffs? How would that affect global growth?
A: Any time we raise a tariff on another country, they're going to raise by an equal amount, and it becomes a perfect growth destruction machine. That's why every economic agency in the world is predicting lower growth for next year.
Q: Why are stocks so expensive? Can the high prices be an impediment for new investors to participate or not?
A: It's obviously not an impediment because we're at an all-time high, and we keep going to new all-time highs. Most investors, not just a few, are still underweight stocks, and they're chasing the market. I predicted this would happen all year basically, and now it's happening, and we're 100% invested in making a fortune. So that's what happens when you make big predictions far into the future, and they happen.
Q: What do you think about meme stocks like GameStop (GME)?
A: Don't bother with the meme stocks like GameStop when the good stuff like Tesla (TSLA), Meta (META), and Amazon (AMZN) are going up like a rocket. Why buy the garbage when the high-quality stuff is doing well? And, of course, most of the people buying that stuff, the meme stocks, are kids who don't know what the good stuff is, but they'll find out someday.
Q: If you like Japanese cars, what do you think of Korean cars and, therefore, those companies’ stocks?
A: I don't like them. When you take your Tesla in for a service, sometimes you get a KIA in return. Ouch. You can literally hear every bolt rattle as you drive down the freeway, and you leave behind a trail of parts; the quality difference is enormous.
Q: How do you determine the limit price on spread trades?
A: I don't like making less than a 5% profit in a month. It's just not worth the risk. So let's say if I do a trade alert at $9.00, I'll create a spread of, say, $9.00, $9.10, $9.20, $9.30, $9.40, and that's it. We tell people to not pay more than $9.40. Before we told people not to do that, they used to buy at market, and they would end up paying $10.00 for a $10.00 spread, and it is absolutely not worth it. That is the reason we do that.
Q: I have trouble getting your recommended price.
A: When we put out a trade alert, and 6,000 people are trying to do it at once, you'll never get the recommended price. You may get it at the close because a lot of the high-frequency traders that pile into these positions and pay the maximum price have to be out of that position by the end of the day, so they often dump their positions at the close. And if you just leave your limit order in there, it'll get filled. If it doesn't get filled at the close, it will get filled at the opening the next morning. So that's why I'm telling people on every alert now to put in a spread, put in good-until-cancelled orders, and most of the time, you'll get some or all of those orders done. That is a good way to make money; if you don't believe me, just go to our testimonials page (click here), where hundreds of people have sent in recommendations on their experience.
Q: What do you think about crypto here (BITO)?
A: I wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole. The time to get involved in crypto was when it was at $6,000 two years ago, not at $100,000 now. And when the quality is trading and rising up almost every day, why bother with crypto? You'd never know if your custodian is going to steal your position. And by the way, if anyone knows an attorney expert at recovering stolen crypto, please send me their name because I have a few clients who took someone else's advice, invested in crypto, and had their accounts completely wiped out.
Q: Should I bet big on oil stocks (USO) because of the possible deregulation starting in 2025?
A: Absolutely not. “Drill, baby, drill” means oil glut—lower oil prices, which is terrible for oil companies, so you shouldn't touch them. The only plus for oil under the new administration is they'll probably refill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in Texas and Louisiana from the current 425 million barrels to 700 million barrels by buying on the open market and enriching the oil companies.
Q: Would you sell long-term holds in pharma stocks?
A: No. If it's a long-term hold, your holding will survive the new administration. They'll probably go back up starting from a year going into the next election unless they find ways to deal with the current administration. But if you're in the vaccine business and the head of Health and Human Services is a lifetime anti-vaxxer, that is not going to be good for business, no matter how you cut it, sorry.
Q: Why is Walgreens (WBA) doing so poorly?
A: Terrible management and too late getting into online commerce. The service there is terrible. Every time I go to Walgreens to get a prescription filled, there's a line a mile long. It seems to be a dying company. Someone actually is making a takeover offer for the company today, so I would stand aside on that.
Q: Is Tesla (TSLA) risky?
A: Any stock that's tripled in four months is risky. But the rule of thumb with Tesla is that it always goes up more than you expect and then down more than you expect. Here is where high risk means high reward. My $1,000 target is now looking pretty good.
Q: If you're receiving Global Trading Dispatch, do you get the stock option service?
A: Yes, every trade alert we send out gives you the choice of a stock, an ETF, or an option to buy to take advantage of that alert.
Q: The EV stock Lucid (LCID) just got an analyst upgrade, but the chart looks terrible. Should I buy this cheap stock?
A: Absolutely not. Never confuse “gone down a lot" with “cheap.” Lucid only exists because it's supported by the Saudi royal family. They own about 75% of the company. They have no chance of ever competing with Tesla. Period. End of story.
Q: I have LEAPS on Google (GOOG), Amazon (AMZN), and Microsoft (MSFT). They expire in January, February, and March.
A: I would keep all of those—those are all good stocks. I expect them to keep rising at least until January 20th. After that, the Trump administration may announce antitrust actions against all three of these companies, but you'll probably have most of your profit by then. So from here on, if I had longs in all of these companies, I would definitely run them over the holidays because you'll probably get another pop sometime in January.
To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to www.madhedgefundtrader.com, go to MY ACCOUNT, click on GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH, TECHNOLOGY LETTER, or JACQUIE'S POST, then WEBINARS, and all the webinars from the last 12 years are there in all their glory.
Good Luck and Good Trading.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
November 18, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SPOTIFY WORTH A LOOK)
(SPOT), (META), (PINS)
If new research from Pew Research is anything close to accurate, there appears to be a massive shift underway that has major ramifications for the online media landscape.
Pew Research discovered that 40% of young adults rely on social media influencers without formal journalism training.
Gone are the days when journalists needed to cut their teeth doing coverage on the ground.
This phenomenon has reversed with social media influencers and podcasters dishing out the real media from the comfort of their home.
Yes, this has been happening for a while, but the data suggests we are on the cusp of the legacy media becoming the minority.
The evolving landscape was most notably taken advantage of the richest man in the world, Elon Musk, who used X.com to propel him into politics.
Most social media users relying on news influencers say the information they offer is unique and sometimes more helpful than what they’d find elsewhere and less likely to be fake.
Social media news is also reliant on ad revenue to stay afloat, so in that sense, it could be beholden to advertiser demands on viewpoint and ideology. The legacy media has the same ongoing problem with advertisers, and I believe there is no perfect model.
Yet, the direct connection of social media profiles to audience has grown and will remain attractive moving forward.
According to the survey, traditional journalism is dead, and 40% of young adults under 30 rely on these news influencers to stay updated on current events and politics.
While X, formerly Twitter, is the most popular platform for news influencers, video app TikTok and Google’s YouTube are home to the largest share of news influencers who monetize their content and have no formal background in journalism. Of the news influencers on TikTok, 84% haven’t worked in journalism, and roughly three-quarters of those influencers try to make money off their news analysis, whether by asking for tips, peddling merchandise, or touting separate subscriptions to additional exclusive material, Pew found.
The Pew report analyzed hundreds of news influencer accounts with more than 100,000 followers; surveyed more than 10,600 US adults about their news consumption habits; and reviewed content from more than 100,000 posts across Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, and YouTube from July and August.
One of the reasons traders cannot short META stock is because of this cash cow business tied to social media.
Instagram and Facebook are still great businesses, even if they aren’t growing like they used to.
TikTok is a private company, and so is X.com, and there are no stock opportunities there.
However, I would suggest readers take a look at Pinterest (PINS) and Spotify (SPOT).
PINS is still growing almost 20% per year, and I do believe the stock has an upside with the recent involvement of venture capitalists.
SPOT is in the podcast industry and has a locked-in quasi-monopoly in this sub-sector.
Podcasts and their popularity have exploded in the past few years, highlighted by SPOT signing podcaster Joe Rogan to a monster $100 million contract.
Legacy media has also followed up the election with terrible audience numbers, suggesting that the existing viewer base has decided to move on or temporarily pause participation.
META, PINS, and SPOT should be serious buy-the-dips candidates moving forward as the pivot to alternative media goes from a drip to a waterfall. As I am rereading this newsletter, the AP just fired 8% of its staff, citing “fast- changing conditions in the media industry.”
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
November 13, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HANG ON TO THE A.I. STORY WITH META)
(META), (AAPL)
One of the reasons I believe this AI narrative will continue in the short-term is because cash cow tech firms like Meta (META) are pouring cash into AI infrastructure.
There is a lot we still don’t know about the direction of AI – the future is uncertain.
However, the one takeaway is that the AI infrastructure spend continues right now unabated, and we know that because Meta raised capital expenditures guidance for the 2024 fiscal year to between $38 billion and $40 billion, up from $37 billion to $40 billion previously.
They also expect capital expenditures to continue to grow significantly in 2025 due to an acceleration in infrastructure expenses.
Founder Mark Zuckerberg is desperate to not miss out on the “next big thing.” Remember, he whiffed big time at the smartphone, and he will never stop blaming himself for it. Apple has been a constant pain in the ass for his company because Meta still needs to go through Apple management and their app store to get their platform to users. They also changed the privacy settings, which were directly targeted at Meta.
Zuckerberg is also on record for saying that Meta would be twice as profitable if he could remove the costs of going through Apple.
Meta is still growing at 19% year over year, and that is quite impressive for a company this big.
The company reported 3.29 billion daily active people for the third quarter. That was up 5% year over year, and we can expect that percentage point to stick in the single digits.
Zuckerberg has been pointing to the company’s massive investments in artificial intelligence, which includes spending billions of dollars on Nvidia’s popular graphics processing units, as helping improve the company’s core online ad business in the aftermath of Apple’s 2021 iOS privacy update. The company has been improving upon and building more data centers to help provide the technology infrastructure needed for its AI strategy.
The company’s Reality Labs hardware unit posted an operating loss of $4.4 billion in the third quarter, which was less than analysts’ expectations of $4.68 billion.
Facebook Reality Labs is a research and business unit of Meta Platform that develops virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) products and technologies.
I do believe the jury is still out on the Facebook Google story. It is not a given that consumers will just adopt some ridiculously looking VR headset and venture off into daily life with that thing on. The over $4 billion of losses points to a challenging time to turn the VR business into something legitimate.
Apple has also had some issues with its VR headset as well.
In the short term, Meta is still highly profitable, and they roll these profits into trying out new businesses.
It only takes one new killer business for the stock to explode again, much like what happened when Zuckerberg doubled down in social media through the acquisition of Instagram.
Investors need to be patient and keep a hold of META stock as it grinds higher.
In the event the stock does experience a mild sell-off, I am certain dip buyers will come to the rescue because of the nature of the stock being high quality.
Although digital ads aren’t the growth engine it once was, they are giving time and money for META to find the next path forward. 99% of tech companies don’t have that luxury.
