Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 23, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HOW NETFLIX CAN DOUBLE AGAIN),
(NFLX), (AMZN), (IQ), (ORCL), (MU), (AMAT), (CRUS), (QRVO), (IFNNY), (NVDA), (JD), (BABA), (MSFT)
Posts
The first batch of earnings numbers are trickling in, and on the whole, so far so good.
A spectacular earnings season will further cement tech's position at the vanguard of the greatest bull market in history.
The bull case for technology revolves around two figures indicating "RISK ON" or "RISK OFF".
The first set of numbers from Netflix (NFLX) emanated sheer perfection.
Netflix has gambled on its international audience to drive its growth and unceasing creation of premium content to reach these lofty targets set forth.
It worked.
Consensus was that domestic subscription growth had peaked, and Netflix would have to lean on overseas expansion to beat earnings estimates.
American subscription growth knocked it out of the ballpark, beating expectations by 480,000 subscriptions. The street expected only 1.48 million new adds. The 1.96 million shows the American online streamer is resilient, and the migration toward cord-cutting is happening faster than initially thought.
International adds were pristine, beating the 5.02 million estimates by 440,000 million new subscribers.
Content is king as Netflix has proved time and time again (we notice that here at Mad Hedge Fund Trader, too). Netflix plans to fork out about 700 original series in 2018.
By 2023, Netflix could grow its subscriber base to close to 400 million. The potential for international advancement is immense considering foreign companies are playing catch-up and cannot compete with the level of Netflix's content.
The earnings report coincided with Netflix announcing a forceful push into Europe, doubling its allocated content-related investments to $1 billion.
All of Netflix's estimates take into consideration that it is shut out of the Chinese market. Ironically, the Netflix of China, named iQIYI (IQ), just recently went public on the Nasdaq.
Amazon Web Services (AWS), the cloud-arm of Amazon (AMZN), revenue numbers are the other numbers that are near and dear to the pulsating heartbeat of the bull market.
Jeff Bezos, Amazon's CEO, penned a letter to shareholders that Amazon prime subscribers blew past the 100 million mark.
The positive foreshadowing augurs nicely for Amazon to surprise to the upside when it reports earnings next week on April 26.
Expect more of the same from cloud companies that are overperforming.
The few glitches in tech are minor. It is mindful to stay on the right side of the tracks and not venture into marginal names that haven't proved themselves.
For instance, Oracle (ORCL) had a good, not great, earnings report but shares still cratered after CEO Safra Catz dissatisfied analysts with weak cloud forecasts of just 19%-23% growth.
The street was looking for cloud guidance over 24%. Oracle is still being punished for its legacy tech segments.
The chip sector got pummeled after several chip manufacturers announced weak supply order from Apple.
This is hardly a surprise with Apple slightly missing iPhone estimates last quarter by 1%.
Chip stocks such as Lam Research (LRCX), Micron (MU), and Applied Materials (AMAT) look like affordable bargains. They should be seriously considered after share prices stabilize buttressed by support levels.
The outsized problem is that hardware suppliers have headline risks because of large cap tech's preference toward vertically integrating.
Along with price efficiencies, vertically integration aids design aspects and streamline product production time horizons.
This is not the end of chips.
Consumers need the silicon to generate and extract all the data coming to market.
Particularly, Apple (AAPL) went over its skis trying to push expensive smartphones to a saturated market when all the rip-roaring growth is at the low end of the market.
Apple still managed to sell more than 77 million iPhones, but the trade war rhetoric will deter Chinese consumers from purchasing American tech products. Until now, Apple has counted on China as its best growth prospect. The administration had other ideas.
Any noteworthy Apple supplier has gotten punched in the nose, but crucially, investors must stay out of the SMALLER chip players that rely on narrow revenue sources to keep them afloat.
Bigger chip companies can withstand the shedding of a few revenue sources but not Cirrus Logic (CRUS).
(CRUS) shares have been beaten mercilessly the past year sliding from $68 to a horrifying $37.74 today.
(CRUS) produces audio amplifier chips used in iPhone devices, and weak iPhone X guidance is the cue to bail out of this name.
The company extracts more than 75% of its revenues by selling audio chips used in iPhone devices. Ouch!
Last quarter saw horrific performance, stomaching a 7.7% decline in revenues due to tepid demand for smartphones in Q4 2017.
Cirrus Logic provided an underwhelming outlook, and it is not the only one to be beaten into submission behind the woodshed.
Apple has signaled to its suppliers that it will view production in a different way.
Imagination Technologies, a U.K. company, was informed that its graphic chips are not needed after 2018.
Dialog Semiconductor, another U.K.- based operation, shared the same destiny, as its power management chip was cut out of the production process, sacrificing 74% of revenue.
To top it all off, Apple just announced it plans to manufacture its own MicroLED screens in Silicon Valley, expunging its alliance with Samsung, Sharp, and LG, which traditionally yield smartphone screens for Apple. And Apple plans to make its own chips, phasing out Intel's chips in Apple's MacBook by 2020.
Qorvo (QRVO), Apple's radio frequency chips manufacturer, also can be painted with the same brush.
Apple was responsible for 34% of the company's total revenues in 2017.
Weak iPhone guidance set off a chain reaction, and the trembles were most felt at the bottom feeder group.
Put Infineon Technologies (IFNNY) in the same egg basket as Qorvo and Cirrus Logic. This company installs its cellular basebands in iPhones.
FANG has split into two.
Netflix and Amazon continue producing sublime earnings reports, and Apple and Facebook have hit a relative wall.
It will be interesting if the government's harsh rhetoric toward Amazon amounts to anything.
One domino that could fall is Amazon's lukewarm relationship with the US Postal Service.
Logistics is something the Chinese Amazon's JD.com (JD) and Alibaba (BABA) have successfully adopted. Look for Amazon to do the same.
However, I will say it is unfair that most tech companies are measured against Netflix and Amazon, even for Apple, which earned almost $50 billion in profits in 2017.
It is insane that companies tied to a company that prints money are reprimanded by the market.
But that highlights investors' pedantic fascination with pandemic growth, cloud, and big data.
Making money is irrelevant today. Investors should be laser-like focused on the best growth in tech such as Amazon, Netflix, Lam Research, Nvidia (NVDA), and Microsoft (MSFT), which know how to deliver the perfect cocktail of results that delight investors.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"$500? Fully subsidized? With a plan? That is the most expensive phone in the world. And it doesn't appeal to business customers because it doesn't have a keyboard. Which makes it not a very good email machine." - said former CEO of Microsoft Steve Ballmer on the introduction of the first iPhone.
Global Market Comments
April 13, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ANNOUNCING THE MAD HEDGE LAKE TAHOE, NEVADA, CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 26-27, 2018),
(APRIL 11 GLOBAL STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(TLT), (TBT), (GOOGL), (MU), (LRCX), (NVDA) (IBM),
(GLD), (AMZN), (MSFT), (XOM), (SPY), (QQQ)
Below please find subscribers' Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader April Global Strategy Webinar with my guest co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader.
As usual, every asset class long and short was covered. You are certainly an inquisitive lot, and keep those questions coming!
Q: Many of your April positions are now profitable. Is there any reason to close out before expiration?
A: No one ever got fired for taking a profit. If you feel like you have enough in hand - like 50% of the maximum potential profit in the position, which we do have in more than half of our current positions - go ahead and take it.
I'll probably run all of our April expirations into expiration day because they are very deep in the money. Also, because of the higher volatility and because of higher implied volatility on individual stock options, you're being paid a lot more to run these into expiration than you ever have been before, so that is another benefit.
Of course, one good reason to take profits now is to roll into another position, and when we find them, that may be exactly what we do.
Q: What do you think will be the impact of the US hitting Syria with missiles?
A: Initially, probably a 3-, 4-, or 500-point drop, and then a very rapid recovery. While the Russians have threatened to shoot down our missiles, in actual fact they can't hit the broad side of a barn. When Russians fired their cruise missiles at Syrian targets, half of them landed in Iran.
At the end of the day, it doesn't really impact the US economy, but you will see a big move in gold, which we're already starting to see, and which is why we're long in gold - as a hedge against all our other positions against this kind of geopolitical event.
Q: Will 2018 be a bull market or a bear market?
A: We are still in a bull market, but we may see only half the returns of last year - in other words we'll get a 10% profit in stocks this year instead of a 20% profit, which means it has to rise 12% from here to hit that 10% up by year-end.
Q: What is your take on the ProShares Ultra Short 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund (TBT)?
A: I am a big buyer here. I think that interest rates (TLT) are going to move down sharply for the rest of the year. The (TBT) here, in the mid $30s, is a great entry point - I would be buying it right now.
Q: How do you expect Google (GOOGL) to trade when the spread is so wide?
A: It will go up. Google is probably the best-quality technology company in the market, after Facebook (FB). We'll get some money moving out of Facebook into Google for exactly that reason; Google is Facebook without the political risk, the regulatory risk, and the security risks.
Q: Are any positions still a buy now?
A: All of them are buys now. But, do not chase the market on any conditions whatsoever. The market has an endless supply of sudden shocks coming out of Washington, which will give you that down-400-points-day. That is the day you jump in and buy. When you're buying on a 400-down-day, the risk reward is much better than buying on a 400-point up day.
Q: What is "sell in May and go away?"
A: It means take profits in all your positions in May when markets start to face historical headwinds for six months and either A) Wait for another major crash in the market (at the very least we'll get another test of the bottom of the recent range), or B) Just stay away completely; go spend all the money you made in the first half of 2018.
Q: Paul Ryan (the Republican Speaker of the House) resigned today; is he setting up for a presidential run against Trump in 2020?
A: I would say yes. Paul Ryan has been on the short list of presidential candidates for a long time. And Ryan may also be looking to leave Washington before the new Robert Mueller situation gets really unpleasant.
Q: What reaction do you expect if Trump resigns or is impeached?
A: I have Watergate to look back to; the stock market sold off 45% going into the Nixon resignation. It's a different world now, and there were a lot more things going wrong with the US economy in 1975 than there are now, like oil shocks, Vietnam, race riots, and recessions.
I would expect to get a decline, much less than that - maybe only a couple 1,000 points (or 10% or so), and then a strong Snapback Rally after that. We, in effect, have been discounting a Trump impeachment ever since he got in office. Thus far, the market has ignored it; now it's ignoring it a lot less.
Q: Thoughts on Micron Technology (MU), Lam Research (LRCX), and Nvidia (NVDA)?
A: It's all the same story: a UBS analyst who had never covered the chip sector before initiated coverage and issued a negative report on Micron Technology, which triggered a 10% sell-off in Micron, and 5% drops in every other chip company.
He took down maybe 20 different stocks based on the argument that the historically volatile chip cycle is ending now, and prices will fall through the end of the year. I think UBS is completely wrong, that the chip cycle has another 6 to 12 months to go before prices weaken.
All the research we've done through the Mad Hedge Technology Letter shows that UBS is entirely off base and that prices still remain quite strong. The chip shortage still lives! That makes the entire chip sector a buy here.
Q: Can Trump bring an antitrust action against Amazon?
A: No, no chance whatsoever. It is all political bluff. If you look at any definition of antitrust, is the consumer being harmed by Amazon (AMZN)?
Absolutely not - if they're getting the lowest prices and they're getting products delivered to their door for free, the consumer is not being harmed by lower prices.
Second is market share; normally, antitrust cases are brought when market shares get up to 70 or 80%. That's what we had with Microsoft (MSFT) in the 1990s and IBM (IBM) in the 1980s. The largest share Amazon has in any single market is 4%, so no there is basis whatsoever.
By the way, no president has ever attacked a private company on a daily basis for personal reasons like this one. Thank the president for giving us a great entry point for a stock that has basically gone up every day for two years. It's a rare opportunity.
Q: How will the trade war end?
A: I think the model for the China trade war is the US steel tariffs, where we announced tariffs against the entire world, and then exempted 75% of the world, declaring victory. That's exactly what's going to happen with China: We'll announce massive tariffs, do nothing for a while, and then negotiate modest token tariffs within a few areas. The US will declare victory, and the stock market rallies 2,000 points. That's why I have been adding risk almost every day for the last two weeks.
Q: Would you be buying ExonMobil (XOM) here, hoping for an oil breakout?
A: No, I think it's much more likely that oil is peaking out here, especially given the slowing economic data and a huge onslaught in supply from US fracking. We're getting big increases now in fracking numbers - that is very bad for prices a couple of months out. The only reason oil is this high is because Iran-sponsored Houthi rebels have been firing missiles at Saudi Arabia, which are completely harmless. In the old days, this would have caused oil to spike $50.
Q: Would you be selling stock into the rally (SPY), (QQQ)?
A: Not yet. I think the market has more to go on the upside, but you can still expect a lot of inter-day volatility depending on what comes out of Washington.
Q: Do you ever use stops on your option spreads?
A: I use mental stops. They don't take stop losses on call spreads and put spreads, and if they did they would absolutely take you to the cleaners. These are positions you never want to execute on market orders, which is what stop losses do. You always want to be working the middle of the spread. So, I use my mental stop. And when we do send out stop loss trade alerts, that's exactly where they're coming from.
Q: Will the Middle East uncertainty raise the price of oil?
A: Yes, if the Cold War with Iran turns hot, you could expect oil to go up $10 or $20 dollars higher, fairly quickly, regardless of what the fundamentals are. It's tough to be blowing up oil supplies as a great push on oil prices. But that's a big "if."
Hello from the Italian Riviera!
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 10, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY I'M PASSING ON ORACLE),
(ORCL), (MSFT), (AMZN), (CRM)
To say 2018 is the Year of the Cloud is an understatement.
Oracle (ORCL) felt the tremors of investors' fickle preference for quality cloud growth when the stock sold off hard after earnings that were relatively solid but unspectacular.
Oracle is a Silicon Valley legacy firm established in 1977 under the name of Software Development Laboratories. The company was co-founded by Larry Ellison, Bob Miner, and Ed Oates and the name later was changed to Oracle.
The company made its name through database software and still relies on it for the bulk of its $37 billion in annual revenue.
Legacy companies are put through the meat grinder by investors, and analysts are micro-sensitive to just a few narrow-defined metrics.
Not all cloud companies are treated equally.
It has become consensus that the only way to move forward is through advancing the cloud model, and neglecting this segment is a death knell for any quasi-cloud stock.
Oracle skirted any sort of calamitous earnings performance but left a lot to be desired.
Cloud SaaS (software-as-a-service) revenue for the quarter was $1.2 billion, up 21% YOY, and growth rates were in line with many that are part of the winners' bracket.
Oracle's overall cloud business is still a diminutive piece of its overall business constituting just 16%, which is incredibly worrisome.
This number accentuates the lack of brisk execution and its late entrance into this industry.
Gross cloud margin only increased 2% to 67%, up from 65% QOQ, providing minimum incremental growth.
Total cloud revenue guidance was substantially weak, which includes SaaS, PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and IaaS (infrastructure-as-a-service) expected to grow 19% to 23% in 2018, much less than the forecasted guidance of 27%.
Oracle should be growing its cloud segment faster, especially since its cloud business is many times smaller than competition, and growing pains habitually occur later in the growth cycle.
The outsized challenge is attempting to leverage its foundational database business to convince existing corporate clients to adopt Oracle's in-house cloud services instead of diverting capital toward cloud offerings from Microsoft (MSFT), Salesforce (CRM), or Amazon (AMZN).
It could be doing a better job.
Weak guidance of 1%-3% for annual total revenue topped off a generally underwhelming cloud forecast.
The lack of over-performance is highly disappointing for a company that has been touting its pivot to cloud.
The message from Oracle is the transformation is nowhere close to finished. That was investors' queue to stampede for the exits.
Investors only need to look a few miles up the coast at the competition.
Salesforce is putting up solid numbers, and many cloud companies are judged solely on a relative basis to the industry leaders.
The turnaround companies are getting crushed by these growth magnates. Salesforce is sequentially increasing total revenue over 20% each quarter and expects total revenue to rise more than 20% in 2019. It has set ambitious revenue targets for 2020, 2030, and 2040.
Microsoft Azure grew cloud revenue 98% QOQ, and Microsoft Windows, its legacy business, only makes up 42% of Microsoft's total revenue and is shrinking by the day.
Microsoft has earned its positon as the King of the Legacy Businesses offering proof by way of its position as the industry's second-best cloud company, engineering cloud quarterly revenue of $7.8 billion and gaining on Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Microsoft was in the same situation as Oracle a few years ago, stuck with a powerful business in a declining industry. It then turned to the cloud and never looked back.
Instead of leveraging databases, Microsoft leveraged its operating system and proprietary software to persuade new clients to adopt its cloud platform - and the numbers speak for themselves.
Oracle still has the chance to pivot toward the cloud because its database product is a brilliant entrance point for potential cloud converts.
In the meantime, Amazon has its sights set on Oracle's database product and plans to go after market share.
Oracle believes its database product is the best in the business - more affordable, quicker, and dependable. However, technology is evolving at such a rapid pace that these nimble companies can flip the script on their opponents in no time.
It's a dangerous proposition to compete with Amazon because of the nature of competing means dumping products, and unlimited cash burn battering opponents into submission by crushing profitability.
Oracle's margins would get hammered in this circumstance at a time when Oracle's gross margins have been a larger sore spot than first diagnosed.
Legacy companies are unwilling to enter price wars with Amazon because they still have dividends to defend and profit margins to nurture skyward.
Concurrently, Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics CRM are attacking Oracle's CRM products (Customer Relationship Management), which could further impair margins.
The breadth of competition showed up to the detriment of margins with PaaS and IaaS gross margins eroding from 46% YOY, down to 35% YOY.
Microsoft's cloud revenue eked out a better than 60% gross margin even with its gargantuan size.
Investors punished Oracle for whispers of its cloud business plateauing with a size that is just a fraction of Microsoft Azure.
The leveling out is hard to take after Larry Ellison claimed cloud margins would soon breach 80% in upcoming quarters.
Conversely, Microsoft has claimed margins could start to erode as the company reallocates capital into expanding its cloud infrastructure, but it is understandable for maturing companies that must battle with the law of large numbers.
At the end of the day, Oracle's cloud business is failing to grow enough.
Oracle's competitors are speeding down the autobahn while Oracle has been dismissed to the frontage road.
Growth impediments with the small size of Oracle's cloud business is a red flag.
Avoid this legacy turnaround story that hasn't turned around yet.
Oracle looks like a value play at this point and could rise if it gets its cloud act together or the mere anticipation of a resurgence.
But with margins and competition pressuring its attempts at transformation, I would take a wait-and-see approach.
It's clear that Oracle is in the third inning of its turnaround, and teething problems are expected.
If you get the urge to suddenly buy cloud stocks, better look at any dip from Microsoft, Salesforce, and Amazon, which all directly compete with Oracle but are performing at a much higher level.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"A company is like a shark, it either has to move forward or it dies." - said Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 9, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HOW TO LOSE MONEY IN TECHNOLOGY STOCKS),
(AAPL), (MSFT), (OFO), (UBER), (MOBIKE), (OneCoin), (BABA)
Every new bull market in technology brings its excesses, and this time is more different.
Today, I'll outline some of the more egregious cases, which you and your money should avoid like the plague.
Spoiler alert: You are better off just parking your money in Apple (AAPL) or Microsoft (MSFT) and then forgetting about it.
The thirst to own a little sliver of technology in the greatest bull market of all time has reached a fever pitch with capital allocating to marginal assets.
Serious investors need to avoid the madness.
The excess was bred from the realization of how valuable data extraction and generation is to profitability.
The investment climate is reminiscent of the dot-com bubble during the 1990s that spawned companies with no intention of ever turning a profit.
This time, loss-making is blatant.
Ride-share vehicle services such as Uber and Lyft are great at losing money, and passengers would stand aside if prices became exorbitant.
Paying a derisory sum to ride in someone else's car while being chauffeured around is part of the allure of this business model.
The result is an artificially low price for the benefit of consumers amid a vicious price war with competitors.
The biggest problem with these ride-share services is they create nothing.
They are not building a proprietary operating system or creating technology that did not exist before.
Hence, these types of companies execute risky strategies that backfire.
Any technology company that expects to be in the game long term must create something unique and organic that other companies value and cannot copy.
These ride-hailing companies simply use an app on a smartphone, and this smartphone app can be created by any half decent high school app programmer.
Uber lost $4.5 billion in 2017, and that was great news for CEO Dara Khosrowshahi because Uber is losing less than before.
If you thought a tech company glorifying an annual loss of $4.5 billion was strange, then analyzing the state of the ride-share business model for the industry one degree further out on the risk curve will leave you scratching your head.
And by the way, Uber will try to soak your wallet when it launches its initial public offering next year.
Enter dockless ride-sharing bicycles.
Dockless bike-sharing has mushroomed around the world, spreading like wildfire fueled by grotesquely large injections of venture capital.
Ofo, a Chinese firm, initially raised more $1.2 billion and another $866 million from Alibaba (BABA) from a recent round of fundraising. CEO Dai Wei has stated that his company is worth north of $2 billion.
Mobike lured in more than $900 million in venture capital.
China is the epicenter of the bicycle ride-sharing experiment. More than 40 firms have sprouted up creating a bizarre scenario in major Chinese cities because of these companies dumping bicycles on every public street corner.
According to Xinhua News Agency, more than 2.5 million bikes are littered throughout the city by 15 companies in Beijing alone.
Local American firms have jumped on the bandwagon, too, with examples such as LimeBike, based in San Mateo, CA, that raised $12 million from Andreessen Horowitz in 2017, and topped up another $50 million from Coatue Management.
Meanwhile, Spin, the first stationless bikeshare company in the US, raised $8 million led by Grishin Robotics.
More than 40 bike-sharing companies have beat down the price of renting a bicycle to the paltry rate of 1 RMB (renminbi) ($0.15 USD) per 30-minute trip.
The intentional dumping at absurd price levels is not sustainable. The business model is predicated on collecting an initial deposit of $15 before a customer can hop on a bike.
The deposit has proved high risk as some companies have disappeared or gone bust.
Bluegogo, the third leading company in this space, emptied out its headquarters office, locked the doors, and failed to notify employees who claimed their wages had been garnished.
By last count, Bluegogo had distributed roughly 700,000 bicycles, and was estimated to have 20 million users, each paying $15 deposits to use the service.
Bluegogo was considered a legitimate competitor in the space along with Mobike and Ofo.
The $300 million dollars in Bluegogo deposits floated up to money heaven, and the deposits will never be repaid to customers.
Didi Chuxing, China's version of Uber and subsidiary of Tencent and Alibaba (BABA), purchased the bankrupt bike-sharing company, paid the work staff, and slipped them inside its portfolio of emerging tech firms in January 2018.
Mingbike, which failed in Shanghai and Beijing, migrated to emptier pastures in third and fourth tier Chinese cities and sacked 99% of its staff.
All told, $3 billion to $4 billion has been funneled into these bicycle-share monstrosities in the past 18 months.
It gets a lot worse in terms of high risk.
Another frontier of interest that has gone absolutely bananas is the ICO (Initial Coin Offering). ICOs are an unregulated new cryptocurrency venture raising funds by crowdfunding. A certain percentage of coins is sold to early investors in exchange for legal tender or Bitcoin.
This controversial means of raising money is a hotbed for scams galore. Of 1,000 that now exist, maybe 10 are legit.
These criminals are taking advantage of the headline effect of cryptocurrencies, promising every Joe and Jane early retirements and an easy way to provide college funds for children.
It's true that a founder of a cryptocurrency demonstrably benefits financially from leading this new form of payment.
Simply put, these ICOs function as Ponzi schemes with the last one to buy holding the bag when the sushi hits the fan after the founders run for the exits.
These fraudulent ICOs take on some of the characteristics of real Ponzi schemes such as guaranteed profits, promising their blockchain technology will solve all of the world's ills, no detailed roadmap except collecting funds, and lack of an online digital footprint.
Adding to the outsized risk is the confusion of which jurisdiction these companies are in and absence of any proper compliance.
OneCoin was a cryptocurrency promoted by offshore companies OneCoin Ltd (Dubai) and OneLife Network Ltd (Belize), founded by Ruja Ignatova. Many of the shady characters crucial to OneCoin were architects of similar Ponzi schemes, which was a dead giveaway to authorities.
Bulgarian enforcement officials raided and hauled away servers and other sensitive evidence at OneCoin's office in Sofia, Bulgaria, at the request of the prosecutor's office in Bielefeld, Germany.
German police and Europol also busted 14 other companies connected to OneCoin.
OneCoin CEO Ignatova was imprisoned in India for swindling investors after being investigated by Indian authorities in 2017.
The Ministry of Planning and Investment of Vietnam even issued a rebuttal that a forged document OneCoin used as proof to show it was the official licensed cryptocurrency in Vietnam was fake. It stated there was no possibility this document could ever exist.
SEC chairman Jay Clayton recently chimed in after being asked if all ICOs are fraudulent, boldly stating, "Absolutely not."
Uber and Ofo also are not frauds, but that does not mean investors should take a flier on it.
The strength of technology has attracted the marginal character to its doorstep; separating the wheat from the chaff is more important than ever.
These nascent industries can look good in the shop window, and slick advertising campaigns numb our rational decision making, but investors need to stay away at all costs.
The bicycle-sharing industry is a way for cash-rich venture capitalists to hoard data for applications irrespective of operating at a profit. The ICOs are charlatans attracted to the fluid cash flow tech companies command desiring a share in the spoils.
Keep your money in your pockets and wait for my next actionable trade alert.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"Stay away from it. It's a mirage, basically." - said legendary investor Warren Buffett when asked about cryptocurrency.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 5, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(GOOGLE IS FIRING ON ALL CYLINDERS ... BUY THE DIP),
(GOOGL), (FB), (AMZN), (AAPL), (MSFT)
Google (GOOGL) makes bucket loads of money and even makes Facebook's (FB) business model look dwarfish.
Total revenue in 2017 came in at more than $110 billion, up 23% YOY and almost three times larger than Facebook's annual revenue of $40.65 billion in 2017.
It's easy to comprehend why the big keep getting bigger if you understand the basic trajectory of technology companies.
A new report from the search consulting firm Adthena chronicled the flow of ad dollars into digital e-commerce and found that retailers are spending 76.4% of total ad budget on Google shopping ads.
Last year was a record-breaking year for total digital ad revenue, and this year the industry is slated to grow another 20%.
Young people aren't watching television as they used to and are more comfortable using computers, tablets, and smartphones to gorge on their entertainment and work.
By 2020, digital ads will comprise 44.6% of total ad revenue as cord-cutting by consumers accelerates and broadband streaming becomes the norm across all of America and the world.
Mobile is the triumphant victor here as the majority of dollars will migrate to smartphone platforms.
China and America will overwhelmingly make up the bulk of digital ad spend, and Europe will remain a distant third.
Last quarter, Alphabet missed Wall Street expectations on the bottom line failing to reach earnings per share (EPS) targets of $9.98. The $9.70 miss wasn't a total failure but disappointing enough for Alphabet shares to nosedive.
Alphabet has positioned itself perfectly for the future and has many irons in the fire.
Google's ad business remains its go-to segment totaling $27.27 billion in revenue in Q4, a main driver of outperformance.
Cost per click (CPC) decreased slightly less than what analysts expected, but that was the trigger for a quick dip in share prices even though Alphabet beat on the top line.
In total, it is immaterial if Alphabet misses slightly on this metric. And, coincidentally, Alphabet is changing the way it calculates ad fees by switching over to cost per impression (CPI), which charges advertisers for raw viewing of an ad.
This pricing mechanism will create higher margins that slightly suffered last quarter because advertisers now are charged for users not clicking an ad as well.
(CPC) has been eroding for years. Alphabet attributes the slight dip to the widespread migration to mobile and the importance of YouTube ads, which yield lower rates than desktop ads.
Alphabet's "other revenues" segment, including its burgeoning enterprise business, hardware sales, and app store Google Play, posted $4.69 billion in revenue, bringing total Google revenue to $31.91 billion in Q4 2017.
Google search, the premier legacy business in tech, still comprises 85% of total revenue. Crucially, the cash mountain procured aids in capital allocation. Alphabet heavily reinvests back into different parts of the business or M&A.
Certainly, it has laid some eggs such as the Google glasses and its attempt at social media through Google+, which flamed out, too.
Many of these new projects originate from the 20% of work time that is allocated to free-spirited entrepreneurship. This initiative has harvested benefits spawning from Google news and other supplementary projects.
Alphabet's innovative qualities feedback into their core product as well, but management understands it needs to evolve to meet the capricious needs of users.
Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page thirst for a fresh injection of vivacity into their business and added several outside valuable pieces that include YouTube, Motorola, and Nest Labs for around $17 billion.
These growth engines will fit nicely under the umbrella of firms that Google has collated.
The cloud segment has become a "billion dollar per quarter business." It is dwarfed by the ad revenue but is still the glue that holds the firm together because of the heavy reliance of big data storage to power its firm.
The cloud is still a small sliver of the business and trails Amazon (AMZN), and Microsoft's (MSFT) cloud businesses, but Google drive cloud platform was "the fastest growing major public cloud provider" in 2017.
Apple (AAPL) has even subcontracted Google to store iPhone data on its Google cloud. I bet you didn't know that.
The cloud will continue to gain momentum for Google. Developing the best search engine in the world makes the company specialists in harvesting data because refining a search engine takes an extraordinary amount of data to fine-tune the user searches to perfection.
There are a few headwinds Alphabet is coping with, predominantly traffic-acquisition costs (TAC) as a percentage of revenue will continue to rise, but the increase in velocity will taper off by mid-2018.
Google's total (TAC), which includes funds it pays to phone manufacturers such as Apple that integrates its services, such as search, hit $6.45 billion, or 24% of Google's advertising revenues.
The rising cost of finding eyeballs will squeeze margins.
Another bogey on the horizon is Amazon's foray into the digital ad sphere. It possesses the quality of data to claw away market share and could damage the comprehensive duopoly that Alphabet enjoys with Facebook.
Large cap tech is competing with each other in almost every critical industry guided by the invisible hand of a massive treasure trove of big data. This is unavoidable.
Alphabet's other gambles such as smart-home hardware maker Nest Labs and health-care company Verily are bets on the future as all big tech firms position themselves to compete in a myriad of emerging industries.
These products aren't expected to harvest profits for years and lost Alphabet a combined $500 million last year.
There are a few companies that are perfectly aligned with the direction of future business and technological development, and Alphabet is one of them.
Whether the autonomous vehicle subsidiary Waymo or its smart-home investment in Nest Labs, Alphabet is diversified into most of the cutting-edge trends moving forward.
If the sushi hits the fan with its up-and-coming segments, Alphabet can always fall back on what it knows best - selling ads.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"We want Google to be the third half of your brain." - said co-founder of Google and president of Alphabet, Sergey Brin.
