Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 26, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE EMPTY PIPELINE OF TECH INNOVATION)
(AAPL), (FB), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (NFLX), (TSLA), (SNAP), (MSFT), (ORCL), (TWTR)
Posts
The oligarchical regime of Northern Californian tech companies stopped innovating because they don’t have to.
When you have a monopoly – you have one objective – to crush anything that remotely resembles competition.
That has been happening for years now by the Silicon Valley oligarchs and the government still hasn’t taken their finger out to do much about it.
Honestly, my bet is that most of U.S. Congress own stock portfolios and these portfolios are spearheaded by the likes of Apple (AAPL), Facebook (FB), Amazon (AMZN), Google (GOOGL), Netflix (NFLX), and possibly even Tesla (TSLA), if they want a little growth.
It’s a direct conflict of interest, but that's not surprising for politics in 2020, is it?
The government likes to jawbone to the public saying they will make competition a level playing field, but actions show they are doing the opposite.
The Silicon Valley oligarchs are whispering in the ear of Congress and they listen.
Who would want Congress to lose money in their retirement portfolios, right?
Well, what now?
Fast forward to the future - mid-September, TikTok — the Chinese-owned, video-sharing phenomenon — MUST sell its U.S. operations.
Given the app’s 100 million U.S. users, this forced divestment by President Trump has triggered a delirious auction now pitting tech giants Microsoft (MSFT), Oracle (ORCL), and Twitter (TWTR) against one another.
The White House and Big Tech are boiling the free for all down to a combined story of national security and opportunistic capitalism amid unfortunate geopolitical tension between the U.S. and China.
But the ultimatum to ByteDance, TikTok’s owner, is more accurately understood as a dark window into Silicon Valley’s utter failure to innovate, and a warning signal of its transformation into a mere protector of long-established turf.
Silicon Valley has long adhered to the motto, “Move fast and break things” – but that was long ago when Steve Jobs was busy making the first iPhone.
The truth is Silicon Valley couldn’t be more corporate than it is now, and they use the corporate machine to serve the ends they desire.
Big Tech is just in love with buybacks like the rest of corporate America and the only reason they avoid it now is to appear as if they are in tune with public discourse and not tone deaf.
Huawei, another punching bag of the Trump administration’s tech war with China, best foreshadowed the optics.
In remarks to reporters in March 2019, Chinese politician Guo Ping said, “The U.S. government has a loser’s attitude. They want to smear Huawei because they can’t compete with us.”
ByteDance produced the hottest new social media platform on a global scale, and Facebook, in typical fashion, responded by brazenly copying TikTok, adding a feature called Reels to Instagram.
Don’t forget that Mark Zuckerberg has been attempting to destroy Snapchat (SNAP) for years after CEO Evan Spiegel refused to sell it to Zuckerberg.
The rest of the tech ecosphere has turned a blind eye to the anti-trust violations because they don’t want to be the next takeout target.
Make no bones about it, Silicon Valley, with the help of the Trump administration, is about to do a smash and grab job on China’s best tech growth asset.
This cunning maneuver alone has the knock-on effect of not only extending the tech rally in U.S. public markets but increasing the scarcity value and emboldening the Silicon Valley oligarchs.
I’m all about good deals and robbing Chinese tech in broad daylight is overwhelmingly bullish for the U.S. tech sector.
Imagine adding another Instagram to the appendage of an already mammoth tech company.
So why innovate? Why deploy capital into research and development when you can just nick a foreign company's crown jewel?
Even if you hate Silicon Valley at a personal level, it is literally impossible to short them, and now they are resorting to stealing companies, what other passes will government, society, and corporate America give American tech?
In either case, it’s not for me to judge, and as a technology analyst - I am bullish U.S. tech.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 17, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(U.S. STYMIES THE ADVANCEMENT OF FOREIGN BAD ACTORS)
(BABA), (AAPL), (IQ), (NFLX), (FB), (GOOGL), (AMZN)
Stay away from Chinese tech companies listed on the U.S. exchanges. I wouldn’t touch them with a 10-foot pole.
Not only are these firms unscrupulous, but the U.S. administration is specifically attacking them as a cornerstone campaign strategy as we close in on the November election.
The blitzkrieg has been increasing at a rapid clip with U.S. President Donald Trump banning social media asset TikTok and chat app WeChat.
Just in the last few hours, the U.S. administration has said they are also “looking at” going after Chinese eCommerce firm Alibaba (BABA) who is the Chinese Amazon.
If the trends continue, there could be no Chinese tech companies freely extracting American revenue by this November.
Things will only get worse.
No doubt the coronavirus fiasco has exacerbated tensions between the countries with both sides dealing with a plunging economy.
The only reason we do not hear about the depths of despair going on in the Chinese economy is because the media is suppressed there.
Chinese media is tightly controlled disabling any negative news that shines an unfavorable light on the Chinese communist party.
Then there is the immoral fraud aspect of Chinese tech companies as every mainland Chinese firm wishes to go public in New York because company financials are never audited, and they are immune from any criminal liability.
This is a recipe to enable reckless Chinese management who state opaque numbers in their financials in the hope that American investors will take the bait.
Another cheater has been unearthed by Wolfpack Research who along with Muddy Waters have made it their mission to root out the bad actors.
The supposed “Netflix (NFLX) of China” Chinese streaming service iQiyi (IQ) plunged in after-hours trade in the U.S. after it announced the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has launched a probe into the company.
The case revolves around iQiyi falsifying their subscription numbers which everyone knows is the key to exhibiting growth in the company.
iQiyi said the SEC is “seeking the production of certain financial and operating records dating from January 1, 2018, as well as documents related to certain acquisitions and investments that were identified in a report issued by short-seller firm Wolfpack Research in April 2020.”
Wolfpack Research has accused iQiyi of inflating 2019 revenue by around 44%.
Wolfpack also said iQiyi artificially overexaggerated expenses among other data.
The SEC probe into iQiyi comes amid rising scrutiny on U.S.-listed Chinese companies following the Luckin Coffee debacle in which they committed the same act of falsifying numbers.
This copycat crime is clearly seen as a big winner in Mainland China encouraging a slew of companies to decide on the same strategy.
The Coffee company admitted to fabricating sales numbers for 2019. The company was subsequently delisted from the Nasdaq in June.
China and its tech firms are one of the few bipartisan issues with strong support from both sides of the aisle and I can only see the temperature in the kitchen getting hotter.
The side effect of purging the Chinese tech out of the U.S. is that it bolsters the investor case for American tech.
Not that they needed help in the first place.
If the government won’t allow foreign companies to compete with Silicon Valley, then the monopolies built by the likes of Apple (AAPL), Facebook (FB), Google (GOOGL), and Amazon (AMZN) will feel protected because of the government effectively widening their moats.
One might argue that the crimes these American companies have committed are just as bad as the Chinese firms, but they get a free pass for being American.
Remember this is the age of de-globalization with national governments protecting national companies and not the other way around.
Silicon Valley companies have tried to pervert the U.S. employment situation by maneuvering around U.S. nationals by applying for the foreign HB-1 visas in droves and underpaying mostly Chinese and Indian nationals to work for the likes of Google and Facebook.
We can’t say these Silicon Valley companies are saints. They certainly are not, but that doesn’t matter in today’s climate when government, billionaires, and tech moguls are assumed as scum from the get-go.
Then there is the personal data issue that can’t be said to be much better than what the Chinese companies are doing.
The double standard is not surprising, and a heavy dose of politics has been injected into the global tech ecosphere to the detriment of cross border trade.
In the fog of war, this is why I have largely focused on U.S. software companies with subscription revenue because it offers more visibility than an unstable revenue model like Uber or Lyft.
In any case, nobody can blame the U.S. government for going this route since, after all, Facebook, Google, Amazon, and Netflix are all banned in China as well.
You don’t see U.S. tech companies trading on the Shenzhen tech index for a reason and after this monster run-up from the March nadir, it’s obvious why Chinese tech firms want to keep that funnel to U.S. investor capital clear.
This series of events that effectively coddles American big tech will insulate them from any real share weakness. The trend is your friend and I am bullish on American big tech.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 10, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SCRAPING THE BOTTOM OF THE TECH BARREL WITH UBER)
(UBER), (LYFT), (FB), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (NFLX), (AAPL), (MSFT)
The coronavirus and the resulting effects from it have had the single most sway on tech companies since the 2001 tech bust.
Marginal tech companies or even quasi-fraudulent ones have been exposed for what they are, while the secondary effects from the virus have supercharged the behemoths of the industry.
The stock market has no earnings growth in the past 5 years without the earnings from Microsoft (MSFT), Facebook (FB), Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), and Netflix (NFLX). That means that without the Republican corporate tax cut, there has been negative earnings growth in the past five years.
One of those tech companies at the bottom of the barrel has been chauffeur service company Uber (UBER) and their latest earnings report is a glaring indictment of a shoddy business model that operates in a gray area.
The only reason this stock is at $33 is because of the piles of easy money printed by the central bank.
Uber needs all the help they can get, and shares are still trading 20% below the IPO price.
Competitor chauffeur service Lyft (LYFT) is doing even worse registering a 50% decline since the IPO.
Let’s do a little snooping around to see why these companies are doing so poorly and why you shouldn’t even think about investing in these companies long-term.
No matter how you dice it up, Uber’s core business, the one where they refuse to properly compensate their drivers, had a disaster of a quarter with gross ride volumes down 73% year-over-year.
Before we go any further with this one, I would like to point out yes, other areas of the business grew substantially, the problem is that the “other” part of the business is only 30% of total revenue.
Therefore, when 70% of your business that relies on pure volume to scale out crashes by 73%, it doesn’t really matter what else is in the report.
The only sensible idea now is capturing a snapshot of the silver linings, of which there were a few.
Delivery volumes through Uber Eats were up 49%, but the problem here is that first, it’s not profitable per delivery and second, it’s still a small part of the business.
Uber acquired Postmates who is another loss-making delivery service and the idea behind this is to achieve significant cost savings by scaling out these powerful assets.
The problem here is that it is essentially throwing good money on top of bad money because it’s proven that deliveries don’t make money per ride and that won’t change in the near future.
CEO of Uber Dara Khosrowshahi is on record saying Uber will become “profitable on an adjusted earnings basis before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization before the end of the year.”
This is almost like saying we won’t lose as much money as before and ironically, Dara Khosrowshahi has withdrawn this statement as the ride-sharing model has been repudiated by the consumer during the coronavirus.
Nowhere in the earnings report is the explanation of how Dara Khosrowshahi plans to attract people to share a car ride with a stranger during a global pandemic.
He didn’t share a solution because there isn’t one, hence the 73% decline in ride volumes.
If we assume this company is semi-fraudulent, then the silver lining would be that ride volumes didn’t decline by 100%.
That is where we are now with U.S. corporate companies such as the airlines that fired their employees but have subsidized them to stick around even though there is no work.
Instead of re-imagining itself through bankruptcies, the Fed has encouraged many marginal companies by breathing life into their finances through cheap loans.
This gives failing firms a last chance to enrich management with the capital and “cash out” before they hand the business off to someone who will essentially plan to do the same.
I will say that traders might have a trade or two in this one, because it’s hard to imagine Uber posting another 73% loss in ride volume and a dead cat bounce trade could be in the cards.
Long term investors should steer clear of this one and allow Uber to struggle on its own and just maybe in 5 or 10 years, it might just be “profitable on an adjusted earnings basis before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization before the end of the year.”
With so many high-quality tech companies and even one that is about to add super growth elements like TikTok into its portfolio, there are so many superior names to deploy capital in the tech ecosphere.
Either you must be galvanized by a gambler’s mentality to invest in Uber, or losing money is something that is habitual in your routine.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 26, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(GETTING READY FOR THE SECOND WAVE)
(DOCU), (TDOC), (NFLX), ($COMPQ)
The coronavirus is dangerously inching towards knocking out the main street economy which would finally land a heavy blow to the tech sector because of the knock-on effect of a substantial drop in future tech budgets.
This leads me to believe that tech stocks are overvalued in the short-term and are due for consolidation.
Daily coronavirus cases have more than doubled from 18,000 to 45,000 as of June 24rd as Americans reclaim the streets and the summer heatwaves kick into gear.
Florida, California, Arizona, and Texas appear to be the new ground zero of the coronavirus and 26 states are experiencing an explosion in cases compared to the prior week.
The blatant disregard for human safety after the reopening means that deaths are likely to spiral out of control in the short-term boding ill for the Nasdaq index but great for shelter-in-place tech stocks.
DocuSign (DOCU), Netflix (NFLX), and Teladoc Health (TDOC) could be in for another run-up.
The jolt in death levels is not baked into tech shares yet, and if things get out of hand, Americans could voluntarily resort back to a shelter-in-place existence.
From March until today, the Nasdaq index has done nothing but sprint upwards due to the eclectic mix of the “re-opening” trade and copious amounts of fiscal stimulus.
If the re-opening trade is killed, the tech market will then go through another contentious referendum to test whether Jay Powell and the Fed are willing to save the equity market yet again.
Propping up the markets ultimately means propping up the tech markets.
If U.S. coronavirus cases re-accelerate from 45,000 to 70,000 then 100,000 per day, the streets could empty out in 1-day.
The risks are certainly to the downside now and the mushrooming of U.S. coronavirus cases could be the catalyst for mass profit-taking in tech names.
Saying the Nasdaq is a little frothy does not mean that tech shares can’t still go higher from here.
They certainly can and there is a legitimate base case surrounding the enormous amount of liquidity sloshing around in the system, meaning that every dip will be bought up.
Then we look forward to the next earnings and news like Apple re-closing 18 stores in coronavirus hot spots doesn’t help.
However, even in the throes of the pandemic, Apple is as innovative as ever - announcing plans to cut ties with Intel during its virtual Worldwide Developers Conference on Monday, saying that it will phase out the use of Intel’s chips in its Mac line of computers over the next two years to use its own in-house chips.
That’s a big deal.
Big tech has so many levers at its disposal.
This goes a long way in a pandemic when specific revenue avenues are blocked off.
Tech is nimble as ever.
Another prime example, after the success of video conferencing software Zoom Communications (ZM), Facebook, Google, and Microsoft posted replica software in a matter of weeks.
Even if their video communication replicas do not catch on, it shows you the vast resources they can muster to harness in whichever direction they please in a blink of an eye.
Many firms are confronting some harsh realities, but investors aren’t penalizing tech firms by selling.
Facebook has seen an ad boycott because of not doing enough against extremism and racism on their platform.
Their algorithms often pit two opposite opinions against each other stoking engagement and more hatred.
Companies including REI, The North Face, Magnolia Pictures, and Upwork have said they won't buy ads on Facebook at least through July as part of a boycott.
The boycott is mostly all bark and no bite and earnings won’t change in a meaningful way.
Uber is a less robust tech firm in the regulatory crosshairs with the state of California about to file court documents that could force Uber and Lyft to reclassify drivers as employees in less than a month.
This could wipe out a small tech company like Uber which is only a $53 billion company.
If the courts rule against Uber, the law would require them to grant drivers employment status while they await the outcome of a pending lawsuit over the issue which would crush the bottom line.
They are having a tough time figuring out how to become profitable.
Investors are doing their best to analyze what the tech industry will look like post-Covid-19 and the assumption is that tech and big tech will dominate which is why any sell-off is temporary.
Every big tech name will survive the pandemic with its business models intact.
Throw in that news of a vaccine and treatment inching forward to fruition and there is a solid bottom for any temporary dip.
It is irrelevant if big tech loses 10% or 20% of revenue this year just as long as they don’t structurally break.
Global Market Comments
June 23, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HERE ARE THE FOUR BEST PANDEMIC-INSPIRED TECHNOLOGY TRENDS),
(AMZN), (CHWY), (EBAY), NFLX), (SPOT), (TMUS), (ATVI), (V), (PYPL), (AAPL), (MA), (TDOC), (ISRG), (TMDI)
By now, we have all figured out that the pandemic has irrevocably changed the course of technology investment. Some sectors are enjoying incredible windfalls, while others are getting wiped out.
The digitization of the economy has just received a turbocharger. It has become a stock pickers market en extemus.
The good news is that we are still on the ground floor of trends that have a decade to run, like working from home, more online food purchases, and a rise in touchless payments. This means there's a huge upside for investors willing to make big bets on what’s expected to become some of the most important technologies in the years ahead.
Covid-19 is a wake-up call to accelerate trends that have been around for years and are now greatly speeding up. The pandemic seems to have triggered a new survival instinct: innovate fast or die. Let me list some of the frontrunners.
1. E-commerce
E-commerce is the No. 1 shelter-in-place beneficiary by miles, as a combination of stay-at-home orders, reduced spending on dining, and government stimulus have sent Americans in search of other ways to spend their money. Even though Covid-19 restrictions are now being eased, the e-commerce industry should still see about 25% growth across all of 2020.
The estimated $60 billion spent by consumers from their stimulus checks has also been a tailwind. While the world is now re-opening, we expect these buckets of available dollars to remain e-commerce tailwinds for the foreseeable future as we expect adjusted retail and travel spend to decline an aggregate of 18% in and for as much as half of all small retail stores to potentially close this year.
When Amazon shares were at $1,000, I wrote a report calculating that its breakup value was at least $3,000 a share. It looks like Amazon may hit that target before yearend….without the breakup.
Want to know the winners? Try Amazon (AMZN), Chewy (CHWY), and eBay (EBAY).
2. Digital Entertainment
The Covid-19 pandemic has also left more Americans in search of digital, at-home entertainment, a trend that’s delivered a huge push for companies like Activision Blizzard that develop online games. New users, time spend gaming and in-game purchases are only accelerating and spell even more lasting benefit for game developers.
Content names like video streaming site Netflix (NFLX), as well as bandwidth and connectivity companies including Comcast (CMCSA) and T-Mobile (TMUS), are names to focus on.
This increased use of high bandwidth applications is likely to continue post-COVID-19 and has the impact of similarly increasing the demand for bandwidth and connectivity. This increases the value of upstream assets in the infrastructure sectors like fiber-based wireline broadband networks and nascent 5G build-outs.
Names to play the space: Netflix (NFLX), Spotify (SPOT), T-Mobile (TMUS), Activision Blizzard (ATVI).
3. Touchless payments
Another trend the stock market still underappreciated is a generational surge in contactless payments, which has recently seen a jump higher amid Covid-19 fears and efforts to minimize physical contact. Companies like Visa (V), Mastercard (MA), and PayPal (PYPL), already integral to the payments world, should be major beneficiaries in the years ahead.
The market assumes that COVID-19 related adoption of digital payments is a near-term benefit for payment service providers, offsetting some of the consumer spending headwinds. However, digitization of payments is part of a multi-year secular growth driver, with COVID-19 as just the latest accelerator.
Names to play the space: Visa (V), PayPal (PYPL), Apple (AAPL), and Mastercard (MA).
4. Telemedicine
Healthcare is one of the most inefficient industries left in the United States. I call it a 19th century industry operating with 21st century technology. While progress has been made, those massive stacks of paper records are finally disappearing, there still is a long way to go.
These days, even doctors don’t want to see patients in person, as they may contract the Coronavirus. Far better to see them online, which could address 90% of most patients. Teledoc (TDOC) does exactly that (click here for my full report).
So does Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), maker of DaVinci Surgical Systems, which enables remote operations for a whole host of maladies. Titan Medical (TMDI) is another name to look at here.
Names to play the space: (TDOC), (ISRG), (TMDI).
