Global Market Comments
March 13, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(The Mad MARCH traders & Investors Summit is ON!)
(HOW TO BUY A SOLAR SYSTEM),
(SPWR), (TSLA)
Global Market Comments
March 13, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(The Mad MARCH traders & Investors Summit is ON!)
(HOW TO BUY A SOLAR SYSTEM),
(SPWR), (TSLA)
With California having cut the amount that PG&E has to pay for third-party home-generated solar energy by 75% this year, the price of solar panels has crashed. That’s why SunPower (SPWR) shares have just cratered from $50 to $3.
As a result, deals of the century are being offered almost everywhere in the US. This is fortuitous as the price of public utility-generated electricity is rocketing everywhere by up to 15% a year.
It’s just a question of how long it takes Moore’s law-type efficiencies to reach exponential growth in the solar industry.
Solar electricity accounts for 4.75% of total US power generation, up from 3.96% in 2022, and compared to 27.3% in California. That means we are only five doublings away from 100% when energy essentially becomes free.
The next question beyond the immediate trading implications is, “What’s in it for you?”
I should caution you that after listening to more than 20 pitches, almost all of the information you get from fly-by-night solar installation salesmen is inaccurate. Most don’t know the difference when it comes to a watt, an ohm, or a volt.
I think they were mostly psychology or philosophy majors if they went to college at all.
The promised 25-year guarantees are only as good as long as the firms stay in business, which for many poorly run operations will not be long.
Talking to these guys reminded me of the aluminum siding salesman of yore. It was all high pressure, exaggerated benefits, and relentless emailing.
I come to this issue with some qualifications of my own, as I have been designing and building my own solar systems for the past 60 years.
During the early 1960s, when solar cells first became available to the public through Radio Shack (RIP), I used to create my own simple sun-powered devices from scratch. But when I measured the output, I would cry, finding barely enough power to illuminate a flashlight bulb.
We have come a long way since then. For years, I watched my organic bean-sprout-eating, Birkenstock-wearing neighbors install expensive, inefficient arrays because it was good for the environment, politically correct, and saved the whales.
However, when I worked out the breakeven point compared to conventional power sources, it stretched out into decades. So, I held off.
It wasn’t until 2015 when solar price/performance hit the breakeven sweet spot acceptable for me, about six years. I actually earned my money back in only four years, thanks to PG&E’s rapid price increases. Thanks to global warming my solar system is also becoming more efficient, not less. Why, I can’t imagine although higher heat might be bringing greater output.
Then I launched into overdrive, attempting to get the best value for money and game the many financing alternatives.
The numbers are now so compelling, that even a number-crunching, blue state-hating Texas oilman should be installing silicon on his roof.
A lot are.
My effort was the father of the many solar research pieces and profitable Trade Alerts you have received since.
Here are my conclusions up front: Learn about “tier shaving” from your local utility, and buy, don’t lease. All electrical utility plans are local.
First, about the former.
Every utility has a tiered system of charging customers on a prorated basis. A minimal amount of power for a low-income family of four living in a home with less than 1,500 square feet, about 20% of the U.S. population, costs about 10 cents a kilowatt hour.
This is a function of the high level of public power utility regulation in the U.S., where companies are granted local monopolies. There are a lot of trade-offs, local politics, and quid pro quos that are involved in setting electric power rates.
My local supplier, PG&E (PGE) has five graduated billing tiers, with the top rate at 55 cents a kWh for mansion-dwelling energy hogs like me (one Tesla in the garage and a Cybertruck on the way).
In order to minimize your up-front capital cost, you want to buy all the power you can at the poor person rate, and then eliminate the top four tiers entirely. Do this, and you can cut the cost of your new solar system by half.
Your solar provider will ask for your recent power bills and will help you design a system of the right size.
Warning! They will try to sell you more than you need. After all, they are in the solar panel-selling business, not the customer-value-for-money delivery business.
On the other hand, if you are a scientist or engineer, you can simply calculate these figures yourself. In my case, I use 18,000 kWh a year, but by installing only a 9,000 kWh/year system, my monthly power bill dropped from $500 to $50 a month.
This system cost me $32,000, or $22,400 net of the 30% alternative energy investment tax credit, giving me a breakeven point of four years and eight months.
Don’t focus too much on the panels themselves, as they are only 25% of a system’s costs. The big installers constantly play a myriad of panel manufacturers off against each other to get the cheapest bulk supplies.
The majority of the expense is for labor, the inverter needed to convert DC solar power to AC wall plug power, and permitting.
As for me, Mr. First Class All the Way, I specified only 19 of the best American-made, most efficient 335 kWh SunPower (SPWR) panels.
If I had settled for lower-cost 250 kWh imported panels and just bought more of them, I would have saved a few thousand bucks. That’s fine if you have the roof space.
One other frill I ordered was a top-of-the-line SunPower SPR-6000m inverter, which includes two 110-volt AC outlets. Many solar systems won’t work without access to the grid to run the inverter and software.
This will enable me to operate independently of the grid in case it is knocked out by an earthquake or storm, and power a few select appliances, such as my refrigerator, cell phones, laptop, and, of course, my car.
Once you get your connection notice from your utility, you enter electricity Nirvana, selling power at a premium during the day, and buying it back at a discount at night.
You are, in effect, using the grid as a giant storage device, or battery.
You can then log into your account online and measure how much your solar panels are generating in San Francisco, even from places as remote as Africa, as I did last summer.
My statement is posted below, showing my roof is happily generating about 38 kW a day, or one full Tesla 100kW battery recharge every 2 1/2 days.
Since my system is in California, it also expresses the solar energy produced in terms of gallons of gasoline equivalent, tree seedlings grown over 10 years, an average home’s power consumption for one year, or the number of tons of waste sent to a landfill.
Call this “feel good” with a turbocharger.
At the end of every 12 months, the utility will then perform a “true up” calculation. If you produce more power than you used, the utility owes you a check.
Buzzkill warning!
PG&E has to pay me only its lowest marginal cost of power, or 4 cents/kWh for the excess power I produce. That is why it pays to underbuild your system, which for me costs $2.49/kWh to install, net of the tax credit.
This was the quid pro quo that enabled PG&E to agree to the whole plan in the first place. So, you won’t get rich off your solar system.
I am now protected against any price increase for electricity for the next 25 years!
PG&E has already notified me of back-to-back 7.5% annual rate increases for the next two years to pay for the replacement of their aging, dilapidated infrastructure, a problem that is occurring nationally.
Oh, and my $32,000 investment has increased the value of my home by $64,000, according to my real estate friend.
Now for the lease or buy question. If you don’t have $32,000 for a solar installation, (or $16,000 for a normal size house with no Tesla’s), or you want to preserve your capital for your trading account, you may want to lease from a company such as Solar City.
The company will design and install an entire system for you for no money down and lease it to you for 20 years. But after your monthly lease payment, Solar City will end up keeping half the benefit, and raise your cost of electricity annually.
In my case, my monthly power bill will have dropped from $450 to $250. And you don’t get any 30% investment tax credit. However, this is still cheaper than continuing to buy conventional power.
So if you can possibly afford it, buy, don’t rent.
This being Silicon Valley, niche custom financing firms have emerged to let you have your cake and eat it, too.
Dividend Solar (click here for their site) will lend you the money to buy your entire system yourself, thus qualifying you for the investment tax credit.
As long as you use the tax credit to repay 30% of your loan principal within 15 months, the interest rate stays at 6.49% for the 20-year life of the loan. Otherwise, the interest rate then rises to a credit card like 9.99%. A FICO score of only 690 gets you in the door.
There are a few provisos to add.
You can’t install solar panels on clay or mission tile roofs popular in the U.S. Southwest (where the sun is), or tar and gravel roofs, as the breakage or fire risk is too great. The racks that hold the panels down in hurricane-force winds simply won’t fit.
If you want to maintain your aesthetics, you can take the mission tiles off, install a simple composite shingle roof, bolt your solar panels on top, and then put back the clay tiles back around the edges. That way it still looks like you have a mission tile roof.
Also, it is best to install your system in the run-up to the summer solstice, when the days are longest and the sunshine brightest. Solar systems produce 400% more power on the longest day of the year compared to the shortest, because of the lower angle of the sun’s rays hitting the Northern Hemisphere.
Tesla (TSLA) has added a whole new chapter to the solar story.
It offers the PowerWall, a 13.5 kW home storage battery that will cost up to $7,000 (click here for “The Solar Missing Link is Here!”)
The development is made possible by the enormous economies of scale for battery manufacturing made possible by the new Gigafactory near Reno, Nevada.
The Gigafactory will double world lithium-ion battery capacity in one shot. Plans for a second Gigafactory are already in the works.
This will permit homeowners to use their solar panels to charge batteries during the day, and then run off them at night, making them fully energy-independent.
Yes, a total American solar energy supply in 15 years sounds outrageous, insane, and even ludicrous (to use some of Elon Musk’s favorite words).
But, so did the idea of a 3-gigahertz laptop microprocessor for a mere $1,000 24 years ago, when Moore’s law first applied.
The graphics for my own solar power supply are below:
SunPower SPR-6000m
Global Market Comments
February 21, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HOW FREE ENERGY WILL POWER THE COMING ROARING TWENTIES),
(SPWR), (TSLA)
With the price of Texas tea barely scratching $78 a barrel today it is time to revisit the doomed future of this ancient energy source.
With energy stocks now trading like they’re having a going out of business sale, you have to wonder if the sector will ever come back. The short answer is short-term yes, long term no.
A key part of my argument for a new Golden Age to take place during the current Roaring Twenties is that the price of energy is effectively going to zero.
It may not actually make it to zero. I’ll settle for down 90%-95%, which is good enough for me.
Take a look at the charts below.
The first one shows how the price of a watt of solar generated electricity has plunged by 99.03% since 1977, from $76.67 to $0.74.
Just in the past six years, retail prices for completed solar panels dropped by a staggering 80%. That is cheaper than electricity supplies generated by new natural gas plants
The potential price declines for natural gas from here are near zero. After all, it’s hard to improve on the near 100% burn rates you get with gas, and many producers are already losing money at current price levels of $1.61 per MM BTU.
Squeezing efficiencies out of our existing solar technology through improved software, production methods, chemistry, and design are nearly unlimited, are expected to drive solar costs by half down to 3 cents per kwh by 2035.
And here is the great shortcoming of all these wonderful predictions. Technology NEVER stays the same.
My own SunPower (SPWR) SPR A420 panels with their Maxeon solar cell technology deliver an efficiency of 20.1%, the best on the market available four years ago.
This means that they convert 22.5% of the solar energy they receive into electricity.
SunPower is now producing 25.1% efficiency panels in the lab. Another research lab in Germany, Fraunhofer, is getting 44.7%.
And my friends at the Defense Department tell me they have functioning solar cells delivering 70% efficiencies which they use in space. Whether they are economic and scalable is anyone’s guess.
(Warning: most cheap Chinese made solar cells have only lowly 15% efficiencies, so don’t be tricked by any great “deals”).
And this is how most long-term predictions fall short.
When I bought the system, I was warned the electricity production would fall 1% a year thanks to the natural degradation of the solar cells.
Instead, output has risen by 1% annually. Global warming is the only possibly explanation.
Not only do they assume that technology doesn’t change, they fail to account for dramatic improvements in other related fields.
EV technology is a classic example. Battery costs are currently falling off a cliff.
When I bought the first Nissan Leaf offered for sale in California in 2010, the battery cost $833 per kilowatt. In 2012, I purchased a high-performance Tesla (TSLA) P85 Model S-1 at $353 per kilowatt.
When the Tesla 3 became available in 2017, the 60-watt battery will ran at $250 per kilowatt. Efficiencies gained through the economies of scale from the Sparks, Nevada Gigafactory took that under $100.
However, that is not the end of the story.
The car industry will start to move towards carbon fiber in five years, which has ten times the strength of steel at one-tenth the weight. The only issue now is mass production cost.
Some 67% of the weight of a Tesla S-1 is in the body, with the four motors at 13%, and the 1,200-pound lithium ion battery at 20%.
What happens when the body weight falls by 90%, to only 6.7% of total weight? The battery weight, and cost declines by two thirds. That cuts the effective cost of the battery to $66/kilowatt.
Add up all of this, and it is easy to see how energy costs can plunge by 90% or more. And it will happen must faster than you expect.
This has been the experience with memory costs, processor speeds, and hundreds of other digital technologies over the past 70 years. The cost of cotton yarn fell by 1,000 times during the 17th and 18th century, wiping out hundreds of existing industries but creating thousands more.
I could go on and on.
This is why the State of California has mandated to get 50% of its energy from alternative sources by 2030, and to ban the new sale internal combustion engines by 2035.
Some researchers believe a 100% target could be achieved. And it is doing this while closing its last remaining nuclear power plants at Diablo Canyon by 2030.
It already hit that target on several days this year when winter filled up all the dams, producing excess hydroelectric power.
As a result, the wholesale price of electricity fell to zero on those days. The grid was producing more power than could be consumed.
To say that free energy would be a game changer is a huge understatement.
The elimination of energy as a cost has enormous consequences for all companies. You can start with the energy intensive ones in transportation, steel, and aluminum, and work your way down the list.
My bet is that you won’t recognize the car industry in 10 years.
At a $66/kilowatt effective battery cost it will make absolutely no sense to build internal combustion engines in new cars.
Too bad Detroit is a decade behind in this technology.
Lose transportation, and you lose 50% of US oil consumption, or about 10 million barrels a day. Guess what that does to oil prices?
Goodbye Middle East. Go blow yourself up.
The profitability and efficiency of the entire economy will take a great leap forward, much like we saw with the mass industrialization that was first made possible by electricity during the 1920’s.
Share prices of all kinds will go ballistic.
Since energy costs will eventually fall effectively to near zero, that wipes out the present business model of the entire electric power, coal, oil, and gas industries, about 10% of US GDP.
Their business models will be reduced to trying to sell something that is free, like air.
Dow 250,000 anyone?
Goodbye Electric Power Bills
Getting Ready for the 2020’s
Global Market Comments
October 31, 2023
Fiat Lux
ANOTHER SPECIAL SOLAR ISSUE
Featured Trade:
(HOW TO BUY A SOLAR SYSTEM),
(SCTY), (SPWR), (TSLA), (USO)
Global Market Comments
February 3, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(QUEEN MARY II JULY 13 SEMINAR AT SEA)
(SOME BASIC TRICKS FOR TRADING OPTIONS)
CLICK HERE to download today's position sheet.
Global Market Comments
February 2, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(TESTIMONIAL)
(HOW THE COST OF ENERGY IS GOING TO ZERO),
(SPWR), (TSLA),
CLICK HERE to download today's position sheet.
A key part of my argument for a new Golden Age to take place during the coming Roaring Twenties is that the price of energy is going to zero.
It may not actually make it to zero. I’ll settle for a 90%-95% decline, which is good enough for me.
Take a look at the charts below.
The first one shows how the price of a watt of solar-generated electricity has plunged by 99.60% since 1977, from $76.67 to $0.30.
Just in the past six years, retail prices for completed solar panels dropped by a staggering 80%.
That is cheaper than electricity supplies generated by new natural gas plants, which now cost 7 cents per kWh.
Squeezing efficiencies out of our existing solar technology through improved software, production methods, chemistry, and design are nearly unlimited, and are expected to drive solar costs by half down to 3 cents per kWh by 2035.
And here is the great shortcoming of all these wonderful predictions. Technology NEVER stays the same.
My own SunPower (SPWR) panels with their Maxeon solar cell technology deliver an efficiency of 22.7%, the best on the market available 18 months ago. That means that convert 22.7% of the solar energy they receive into electricity.
SunPower is now producing 25.1% efficiency panels in the lab. Another research lab in Germany, Fraunhofer, is getting 44.7%.
And my friends at the Defense Department tell me they have functioning solar cells delivering 70% efficiencies. Whether they are economic and scalable is anyone’s guess.
(Warning: most cheap Chinese-made solar cells have only lowly 15% efficiencies, so don’t be tricked by any great “deals”).
And this is how most long-term predictions fall short.
Not only do they assume that technology doesn’t change, they fail to account for dramatic improvements in other related fields.
Electric car technology is a classic example. Battery costs are currently falling off a cliff.
When I bought the first Nissan Leaf offered for sale in California in 2010, the battery cost $833 per kilowatt. In 2012, I purchased a high-performance Tesla (TSLA) P85 Model S-1 at $353 per kilowatt. My last purchase in 2018 of a Tesla Model X P100D further dropped the cost to $150.
Efficiencies gained through the economies of scale from the Sparks, Nevada Gigafactory could take that down to under $100. From $833 down to $100, not bad.
However, that is not the end of the story.
The car industry will start to move towards carbon fiber in five years, which has five times the strength of steel at one-tenth the weight. The only issue now is mass production cost.
Some 67% of the weight of a Tesla S-1 is in the body, with the four motors at 13%, and the 1,200-pound lithium-ion battery at 20%.
What happens when the body weight falls by 90%? The battery weight, and cost decline by two-thirds. That cuts the effective cost of the battery to $66/kilowatt.
Add up all of this, and it is easy to see how energy costs can plunge by 90% or more. And it will happen must faster than you expect.
This has been the experience with memory costs, processor speeds, and hundreds of other technologies over the past half-century I have been following them.
I could go on and on.
This is why the State of California has mandated to get 50% of its energy from alternative sources by 2030. Some researchers believe an 80% target could be achieved. And it is doing this while closing its two remaining nuclear power plants.
To say that free energy would be a game-changer is a huge understatement.
The elimination of energy as a cost has enormous consequences for all companies. You can start with the energy-intensive ones in transportation, steel, and aluminum, and work your way down the list.
My bet is that you won’t recognize the car industry in 20 years. At a $66/kilowatt effective battery cost, it will make absolutely no sense to build internal combustion engines in new cars. Too bad Detroit is a decade behind in this technology.
Lose transportation, and you lose 50% of US oil consumption, or about 10 million barrels a day. Guess what that does to oil prices.
Goodbye Middle East and Russia.
The profitability and efficiency of the entire economy will take a great leap forward, much like we saw with the mass industrialization that was first made possible by electricity during the 1920s.
Share prices of all kinds will go ballistic.
Since energy costs will eventually fall effectively to zero, that wipes out the present business model of the entire electric power, coal, oil, and gas industries, about 10% of US GDP.
Their business models will be reduced to trying to sell something that is free, like air.
Dow 240,000 anyone?
For more about the economic rationale behind these predictions, please read my book, Stocks to Buy for the Coming Roaring Twenties.
Enough Batteries to Operate Grid-Free Forever!
Global Market Comments
January 24, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(TESTIMONIAL)
(HOW TO BUY A SOLAR SYSTEM),
(SPWR), (TSLA)
CLICK HERE to download today's position sheet.
Global Market Comments
September 9, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SEPTEMBER 7 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(MSFT), (NVDA), (RIVN), (AMZN), (POAHY), (SPWR), (FSLR), (CLSK), (FCX), (CCJ), (GOOG), (TLT), (TSLA)
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
OKLearn moreWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds: