Global Market Comments
May 29, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WEDNESDAY, JULY 10 BUDAPEST, HUNGARY STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(ONSHORING TAKES ANOTHER GREAT LEAP FORWARD),
(TSLA), (UMX), (EWW),
(KISS THAT UNION JOB GOODBYE),
Posts
Have you tried to hire a sewing machine operator lately?
I haven’t, but I have friends running major apparel companies who have (where do you think I get all those tight-fitting jeans?).
Guess what? There aren’t any to be had.
Since 1990, some 77% of the American textile workforce has been lost, when China joined the world economy in force, and the offshoring trend took flight.
Now that manufacturing is, at last, coming home, the race is on to find the workers to man it.
Welcome to onshoring 2.0.
The development has been prompted by several seemingly unrelated events.
There is an ongoing backlash to several disasters at garment makers in Bangladesh, the current low-cost producer which have killed thousands.
Today’s young consumers want to look cool but have a clean conscience as well. That doesn’t happen when your threads are sewn together by child slave laborers working for $1 a day.
Several firms are now tapping into the high-end market where the well-off are willingly paying top dollar for a well-made “Made in America” label.
Look no further than 7 For All Mankind, which is offering just such a product at a discount to all recent buyers of the Tesla Model S-1 (TSLA), that other great all-American manufacturer.
As a result, wages for cut-and-sew jobs are now among the fastest growing in the country, up 13.2% in real terms since 2007, versus a paltry 1.4% for the industry as a whole.
Apparel industry recruiters are plastering high schools and church communities with flyers in their desperate quest for new workers.
They advertise in languages with high proportions of blue-collar workers, such as Spanish, Somali, and Hmong.
New immigrants are particularly being targeted. And yes, they are resorting to the technology that originally hollowed out their industry, creating websites to suck in new applicants.
Chinese workers now earn $3 an hour versus $9 plus benefits at the lowest paying U.S. factories.
But the extra cost is more than made up for by savings in transportation and logistics, and the rapid time to market.
That is a crucial advantage in today’s fast-paced, high-turnover fashion world. Some companies are even returning to the hiring practices of the past, offering free training programs and paid internships.
By now, we have all become experts in offshoring, the practice whereby American companies relocate manufacturing jobs overseas to take advantage of low wages, missing unions, the lack of regulation, and the paucity of environmental controls.
The strategy has been by far the largest source of new profits enjoyed by big companies for the past two decades.
It has also been blamed for losses of U.S. jobs, with some estimates reaching as high as 25 million.
When offshoring first started 50 years ago, it was a total no-brainer.
Wages were sometimes 95% cheaper than those at home. The cost savings were so great that you could amortize your total capital costs in as little as two years.
So American electronics makers began filing overseas to Singapore, Thailand, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, and the Philippines.
After the U.S. normalized relations with China in 1978, the action moved there and found that labor was even cheaper.
Then, a funny thing happened. After 30 years of falling real American wages and soaring Chinese wages, offshoring isn’t such a great deal anymore. The average Chinese laborer earned $100 a year in 1977.
Today, it is $6,000, and $26,000 for trained technicians, with total compensation still rising 20% a year. At this rate, U.S. and Chinese wages will reach parity in about 10 years.
But wages won’t have to reach parity for onshoring to accelerate in a meaningful way. Investing in China is still not without risks.
Managing a global supply chain is no piece of cake on a good day. Asian countries still lack much of the infrastructure that we take for granted here.
Natural disasters such as earthquakes, fires, and tidal waves can have a hugely disruptive impact on a manufacturing system that is in effect a highly tuned, incredibly complex watch.
There are also far larger political risks keeping a chunk of our manufacturing base in the Middle Kingdom than most Americans realize. With the U.S. fleet and the Chinese military playing an endless game of chicken off the coast, we are one midair collision away from a major diplomatic incident.
Protectionism constantly threatens to boil over in the U.S., whether it is over the dumping of chicken feet, tires, or the latest, solar cells.
This is what the visit to the Foxconn factory by Apple’s CEO Tim Cook was all about. Be nice to the workers there, let them work only 8 hours a day instead of 16, let them unionize, and guess what?
Work will come back to the U.S. all the faster. The Chinese press was ripe with speculation that Apple-induced reforms might spread to the rest of the country like wildfire.
The late General Motors (GM) CEO Dan Adkerson once told me his company was reconsidering its global production strategy in the wake of the Thai floods.
Which car company was most impacted by the Japanese tsunami? General Motors, which obtained a large portion of its transmissions there.
The impact of a real onshoring move on the U.S. economy would be huge. Some economists estimate that as many as 10% to 30% of the jobs lost to offshoring could return.
At the high end, this could amount to 8 million jobs. That would cut our unemployment rate down by half, at least.
It would add $20 billion to $60 billion in GDP per year or up to 0.4% in economic growth per year.
It would also lead to a much stronger dollar, rising stocks, and lower bond prices. Is this what the stock market is trying to tell us by failing to have any meaningful correction for the past 2 ½ years?
Who would be the biggest beneficiaries of an onshoring trend? Si! Ole! Mexico (UMX) (EWW), which took the biggest hit when China started soaking up all the low-wage jobs in the world.
After that, the industrial Midwest has to figure pretty large, especially gutted Michigan. With real estate prices there under their 1992 lows, if there is a market at all, you know that doing business there costs a fraction of what it did 20 years ago.
So How Does This Thing Work?
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 28, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(CHINA’S RARE EARTH WEAPON)
(TSLA), (AAPL), (LMT), (BAESY), (RTN)
There are many ways to describe the trade war the U.S. administration finds itself in.
Many experts have chimed in too categorizing it as a fight for technological supremacy.
There are many different ways to skin a cat.
I’ll tell you what is really going on.
Above all else, this logjam has more to do with a battle for resources, and more specifically, rare earth elements that power the devices, cars, and gadgets that many westerners have become accustomed to.
Let’s make no bones about it, Beijing has cornered the rare earth’s market spanning from assets in the Congo and the cobalt that is produced there to supply on their own turf forcing the U.S. to be reliant on China for about 85% of its rare earth supply.
In other words, the rare earth industry in China is a large industry that is important to Chinese internal economics.
Rare earths are a group of elements on the periodic table with similar properties.
The elements are also critical to national governments because they are used in the defense industry for top-secret weaponry.
Permanent magnets can be used for several applications including serving as essential components of weapon systems and high-performance aircraft such as drones.
China has touted their own state-owned companies to reach deep into this market and make it their own.
The results are visible to the entire world and China gaining a stranglehold on these valuable inputs will have lasting consequences.
Rare earth metals are made up of 17 elements — lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium.
U.S. companies will need to start developing new supply channels in other markets and Australia could allow U.S. companies' lifelines in securing the orders they need to function as a company.
Military companies important to national security devour these types of precious metals and Raytheon Co (RTN), Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT) and BAE Systems (BAESY) all produce sophisticated missiles with these elements powering their guidance systems, and sensors.
These traded companies’ shares could be in for short-term turbulence if China decides to pull the rug out from underneath banning Chinese companies doing business with American companies, or by slapping on tariffs to respond to the tariffs on Chinese imports.
California's Mountain Pass mine is the sole US rare earth facility with a caveat.
The owner of the mine ships over 50,000 tons of rare earth concentrate for processing in China, meaning that it will be harder than first thought to strip China out of the process.
China and America are in the first stages of a massive decoupling.
Not only smartphone operating systems will be affected with Huawei announcing it will roll out its own in-house operating system after Google announced that they will pull its apps and use of the Android system off of Huawei’s phone, but almost anything of significant value from an Ivy league computer engineering degree to electric cars will be retrenched on each side.
This is terrible news for Tesla (TSLA), and they could be hit next by the Chinese communist party if they deem electric cars integral to national security because of the data and sensors that deliver precious information back to Silicon Valley.
Tesla is in the midst of building a Gigafactory in Shanghai and their growth strategy is solely focused on China.
China standing up to the U.S. is a blunt force way of saying that nobody will dictate to the Chinese their future prospects except themselves.
They feel after 35 years of economic super growth, they should be granted with the options of choosing their destiny.
Huawei will feel the repercussions of these detrimental policies with their European business a big question going forward.
Germany was always a large bullseye for the Chinese government and scooping up robotic centerpiece Kuka, was a smash and grab in broad daylight.
The sleeping giant of Germany has woken up and is on the offensive after allowing the Chinese unfettered access for a generation.
Risks are high in Germany and they could be the first industrial power to be gutted and left behind the woodshed by China Inc and the CCP.
The U.S. faces a conundrum in that the method in which aided China’s rise of forced technology transfers and IP theft can only be stopped if actively removed, meaning we are headed for a game of chicken with the other side hoping the other side blinks first.
The market fallout will be deep and wide-ranging with the most movement in technology companies that are leveraged to China meaning chip companies.
But then there are the tech companies who have deeply embedded interests in China such as Apple (AAPL) whose supply chain is in the eye of the storm with Foxconn.
The worst possible case is China banning the sales of precious earth metals to the U.S. forcing the U.S. to buy from a 3rd party country which in turn would increase costs of American products.
This is what I would categorize as a hard landing and absolute decoupling.
The common denominator of this trade war is higher costs for the American consumer and mass layoffs in China – this is my base case.
However, I would argue that a rare earth's ban would not be as bad as initially thought because many consumers are tapped out with phones, tablets, and computers.
The elongated refresh cycle will not mean consumers will go without access to the internet and its services.
In terms of the stock market, this puts a wet towel on the positive momentum of early spring when the Nasdaq roared higher.
The Nasdaq could be stuck under 8,000 for the summer unless a rapprochement takes place which I would put at 30% for a structural détente and 65% for a kick the can down the road détente.
The ironic unintended consequence is the safe haven trade of buying treasuries has come back in vogue and could be a huge boon for the domestic real estate market.
This extends the bull market in properties at least another six months with lower rates allowing fresh buyers to take advantage of lower financing opportunities amid a bump in inventory.
The bull market absolutely needs the real estate market on-sides to perpetuate because of the fragile nature of this part of the late economic cycle.
I also believe that U.S. President Donald Trump will become even more brazen as stronger economic data stateside suggests he could pile on even more pressure on the Chinese communist party to coerce them into a big win that will aid him in his reelection efforts.
Let’s not forget that much of this has to do with the 2020 road back to the White House.
As it stands, corporate America has finally understood the message of moving their supply chain out of China which means mass layoffs for many Chinese particularly in the southern region around Guangzhou.
This is not a marketing charade, this trade war has teeth.
China’s Central Bank will be forced into dovish policy to help state-owned companies who many are akin to zombie companies and another relic of communism that has yet to be uprooted.
All this means debt, debt, and more debt piling up on the mainland and on American shores.
If you thought this was the time of austerity, then you are truly wrong.
The end game could be a Chinese yuan that drops like a heavy stone through the psychological threshold of $7 and on its way down to $7.50.
If this comes to pass, expect a 10% correction and a demonstrably strong U.S. dollar, Japanese yen, Swiss Franc, and a generational entry points into the equity market.
Global Market Comments
May 20, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MARKET OUTLOOK FOR THE WEEK AHEAD, OR I’LL TAKE SOME OF THAT!)
(FXI), (CYB), (TSLA), (AAPL), (BA), (WMT), (TLT), (INTU), (GOOGL)
Whatever the market is drinking right now, I’ll take some of that stuff. If you could bottle it and sell it, you’d be rich. Certainly, the Viagra business would go broke.
To see the Dow average only give up 7% in response to the worst trade war in a century is nothing less than stunning. To see it then make half of that back in the next four days is even more amazing. But then, that is the world we live in now.
When the stock market shrugs off the causes of the last great depression like it’s nothing, you have to reexamine the root causes of the bull market. It’s all about the Fed, the Fed, the Fed.
Our August central bank’s decision to cancel all interest rate rises for a year provided a major tailwind for share prices at the end of 2018. The ending of quantitative tightening six months early injected the steroids, some $50 billion in new cash for the economy per month.
We now have a free Fed put option on share prices. Even if we did enter another 4,500-point swan dive, most now believe that the Fed will counter with more interest rate cuts, thanks to extreme pressure from Washington. A high stock market is seen as crucial to winning the 2020 presidential election.
Furthermore, permabulls are poo-pooing the threat to the US economy the China (FXI) trade war presents. Some $500 billion in Chinese exports barely dent the $21.3 trillion US GDP. It’s not even a lot for China, amounting to 3.7% of their $13.4 trillion GDP, or so the argument goes.
Here’s the problem with that logic. The lack of a $5 part from China can ground the manufacture of $30 million aircraft when there are no domestic alternatives. Similarly, millions of small online businesses, mostly based in the Midwest, couldn’t survive a 25% price increase in the cost of their inventory.
As for the Chinese, while trade with us is only 3.7% of their economy, it most likely accounts for 90% of their profits. That’s why the Chinese yuan (CYB) has recently been in free fall in a desperate attempt to offset punitive tariffs with a substantially cheaper currency.
The market will figure out all of this eventually on a delayed basis and probably in a few months when slowing economic growth becomes undeniable. However, the answer for now is NOT YET!
Markets can be dumb, poor sighted, and mostly deaf animals. It takes them a while to see the obvious. One of the problems with seeing things before the rest of the world does, I can be early on trades, and that can translate into losing money. So, I have to be cautious here.
When that happens, I revert to an approach I call “Trading devoid of the thought process.” When prices are high, I sell. When they are low, I buy. All other information is noise. And I keep my size small and stop out of losers lightning fast. That’s how I managed to eke out a modest 0.63% profit so far this month, despite horrendous trading conditions.
You have to trade the market you have, not what it should be, or what you wish you had. It goes without saying that the Mad Hedge Market Timing Index become an incredibly valuable tool in such conditions.
It was a volatile week, to say the least.
China retaliated, raising tariffs on US goods, ratcheting up the trade war. US markets were crushed with the Dow average down 720 intraday and Chinese plays like Apple (AAPL) and Boeing (BA) especially hard hit.
China tariffs are to cost US households $500 each in rising import costs. Don’t point at me! I buy all American with my Tesla (TSLA).
The China tariffs delivered the largest tax increases in history, some $72 billion according to US Treasury figures. With Walmart (WMT) already issuing warnings on coming price hikes, we should sit up and take notice. It is a highly regressive tax hike, with the poorest hardest hit.
The Atlanta Fed already axed growth prospects for Q2, from 3.2% to 1.1%. This trade war is getting expensive. No wonder stocks have been in a swan dive.
US Retail Sales cratered in March while Industrial Production was off 0.5%. Why is the data suddenly turning recessionary? It isn’t even reflecting the escalated trade war yet.
European auto tariff delay boosted markets in one of the administration’s daily attempts to manipulate the stock market and guarantee support of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania during the next presidential election. All government decisions are now political all the time.
Weekly Jobless Claims plunged by 16,000 to 212,000. Have you noticed how dumb support staff have recently become? I have started asking workers how long they have been at their jobs and the average so far is three months. No one knows anything. This is what a full employment economy gets you.
Four oil tankers were attacked at the Saudi port of Fujairah, sending oil soaring. America’s “two war” strategy may be put to the test, with the US attacking Iran and North Korea simultaneously.
Bitcoin topped 8,000, on a massive “RISK OFF” trade, now double its December low. The cryptocurrency is clearly replacing gold as the fear trade.
The Mad Hedge Fund Trader managed to blast through to a new all-time high last week.
Global Trading Dispatch closed the week up 16.35% year to date and is up 0.63% so far in May. My trailing one-year rose to +20.19%. We jumped in and out of short positions in bonds (TLT) for a small profit, and our tech positions appreciated.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter did OK, making some good money with a long position in Intuit (INTU) but stopping out for a small loss in Alphabet (GOOGL).
Some 10 out of 13 Mad Hedge Technology Letter round trips have been profitable this year.
My nine and a half year profit jumped to +316.49%. The average annualized return popped to +33.21%. With the markets incredibly and dangerously volatile, I am now 80% in cash with Global Trading Dispatch and 80% cash in the Mad Hedge Tech Letter.
I’ll wait until the markets retest the bottom end of the recent range before considering another long position.
The coming week will see only one report of any real importance, the Fed Minutes on Wednesday afternoon. Q1 earnings are almost done.
On Monday, May 20 at 8:30 AM, the April Chicago Fed National Activity Index is out.
On Tuesday, May 21, 10:00 AM EST, the April Existing Home Sales is released. Home Depot (HD) announces earnings.
On Wednesday, May 22 at 2:00 PM, the minutes of the last FOMC Meeting are published. Lowes (LOW) announces earnings.
On Thursday, May 16 at 23 AM, Weekly Jobless Claims are published. Intuit (INTU) announces earnings.
On Friday, May 24 at 8:30 AM, April Durable Goods is announced.
As for me, I’ll be taking a carload of Boy Scouts to volunteer at the Oakland Food Bank to help distribute food to the poor and the homeless. Despite living in the richest and highest paid urban area in the world, some 20% of the population now lives on handouts, including many public employees and members of the military. It truly is a have, or have-not economy.
Good luck and good trading.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Global Market Comments
May 17, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(APRIL 15 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(MSFT), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (LMT), (XLV), (EWG), (VIX), (VXX), (BA), (TSLA), (UBER), (LYFT), (ADBE),
(HOW TO HANDLE THE FRIDAY, MAY 17 OPTIONS EXPIRATION), (INTU),
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader May 15 Global Strategy Webinar with my guest and co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader. Keep those questions coming!
Q: Where are we with Microsoft (MSFT)?
A: I think Microsoft is really trying to bottom here. It’s only giving up $8 from its recent high, that's why I went long yesterday, and you can be hyper-conservative and only do the June $110-$115 vertical bull call spread like I did. That will bring in a 13.68% profit in 28 trading days, which these days is pretty good. This morning would have been a great entry point for that spread if you couldn’t get it yesterday.
Q: How will tariffs affect Apple (AAPL) when they hit?
A: The price of your iPhone goes up $140—that calculation has already been done. All of Apple's iPhones are made in China, something like 220 million a year. There’s no way that can be moved, they need a million people for the production of these phones. It took them 20 years to build that facility and production capacity; it would take them 20 years to move it and it couldn't be done anywhere else in the world. So, that's why Apple led the charge on the downside and that's why it will lead the charge to the upside on any trade war resolution.
Q: How bad is the trade war going to get?
A: The market is betting now by only going down 1,400 Dow points it will be resolved on June 28th in Osaka. If that doesn’t happen it could get a lot worse. It could get down to my down 2,250-point target, and if it continues much beyond that, then we’ll get the whole full 4,500 points and be back at December lows. After that, you’re really looking at a global recession, a global depression, and ultimately nearing 18,000 in Dow, the 2016 low.
Q: Will global trade wars force US Treasuries down to around 2.10% on the ten year?
A: Yes. Again, the question is how bad will it get? If we resolve the trade war in six weeks, treasuries will probably double bottom here at around a 2.33% yield. If we go beyond that, then 2.10% is a chip shot and we go into a real live recession. The truth is no one knows anything, and we really don’t have any influence over what happens.
Q: How will equities digest and increase in European tariffs for cars?
A: It would completely demolish the European economy—especially that of Germany (EWG) which has 50% of its economy dependent on exports (primarily cars) and mostly to the U.S. And if we wipe out our biggest customer, Europe, then that would spill over here very quickly. Anybody who sells to Europe—like all the big Tech companies—would get slaughtered in that situation.
Q: Is it time to buy the Volatility Index (VIX)?
A: It’s too late to buy (VIX) now. I don’t want to touch it until we get down to that $12-$13 handle again because the time decay on this is enormous. Time decay is more than 50% a year, so your timing has to be perfect with trading any (VIX) products, whether it’s the (VXX), the (VIX) futures, the (VIX) options, or so on. There are countless people shorting (VIX) here, and they will short it all the way down to $12 again.
Q: What should I do about Boeing at this point?
A: We went long, got out, took our profit and caught this rally up to $400 a share. Then (BA) gave it up and it broke down. It’s a really tempting long here. Along with Apple, Boeing has the largest value of exports to China of any company. They have orders for hundreds of airlines from China, so they are an easy target, especially if there is a ramp up in the intensity of the trade war. That said, something like a June $270-$300 vertical bull call spread is very tempting, especially with elevated volatility up here, so I’m watching that very closely. We’re looking for the recertification of the 737 MAX bounce which could happen in the next few weeks; if that does happen it should rally at least back up to 380.
Q: Are your moving averages simple or exponential?
A: I just use the simple. I find that the simpler a concept is, the more people can understand it, and the more people buy it; that’s why I always try to keep everything simple and leave the algorithms for the computers.
Q: What stocks are insulated from a US/China trade war?
A: None. When the whole market goes risk off, people sell everything. Remember that an overwhelming portion of the market is now indexed with passive investment funds, so they just go straight risk on/risk off. It makes no difference what the fundamentals are, it makes no difference who has a lot of Chinese business or a little—everyone gets hit and everyone will get boosted when the trade war ends. There is no place to hide except cash, which is why I went 100% cash going into this. People seem to forget that cash has option value and having a lot of cash going into one of these situations is actually worth a lot of money in terms of opportunities.
Q: Do you have any thoughts on Uber’s (UBER) bad performance?
A: Yes, the whole sector was wildly overvalued, but no one knew that until they brought it to market and found out the real supply and demand for the issue. The smartest company of the year has to be Lyft (LYFT), which got a nice valuation by doing their issue first and keeping it small. So, they kind of rained on Uber’s parade; at one point, Uber was down 25% from their IPO price. That’s awful.
Q: Is Trump forcing the Fed to drop rates with all this tariff threat?
A: Yes, and if you remember, Trump really ramped up the attacks on the Fed in December. And my bet is at the first sign the trade talks were in trouble, they wanted to lower rates to offset the hit to the U.S. economy. There was no economic reason to suddenly demand huge interest rate cuts last December other than a falling stock market. The tariffs amount to a $72 billion tax increase on the American consumer, felt mostly at the low end, and that is terrible for the economy in that it reduces purchasing power by exactly that much.
Q: Would you buy the dollar as a safe haven trade?
A: No, I would not. The dollar may actually go down some more, especially with the collapse in our interest rates and European interest rates bottoming at negative levels. The best thing in the world in a high-risk environment like this is cash—don’t try to get clever and buy something you think will outperform. You could be disappointed.
Q: Why is healthcare (XLV) behaving so badly?
A: You don’t want to get into political football ahead of an election. That said, they're already so cheap that any kind of recovery could very well take healthcare up big, especially on an individual company basis. This is a sector where individual stock selection is crucial.
Q: Would you buy deep in the money calls on PayPal (PYPL)?
A: Yes, I would. Wait for a down day. Today we’re up slightly, but if we have a weak afternoon and a weak opening tomorrow morning, that would be a good time to add more longs in technology. PayPal is absolutely at the top of the list, as are names like Adobe (ADBE) and Alphabet (GOOGL).
Q: Should I be buying LEAPS in this environment?
A: No; a LEAP is a one-year long term deep out-of-the-money call spread. That was a great December bottom trade. The people who bought leaps then made huge fortunes. We’re too high here to consider leaps for the main market unless it's for something that’s just been bombed out, like a Tesla (TSLA) or a Boeing (BA), where you had big drops—then I would look at LEAPS for the super decimated stocks. But the rest of the market is still too high for thinking about leaps. Wait a couple of months and we may get back to those December lows.
Q: What happened to your May 10th bear market call?
A: Actually, it’s kind of looking good. It’s looking in fact like the market topped on May 2nd. If saner heads prevail, the trade war will end (or at least we’ll get a fake agreement) and the market will go to a new high. If not, then that May 10th target forecast I made two years ago IS the final top.
Q: You’re saying today we’re at a bottom?
A: We’re at a bottom for a short-term trade with a June 21st target. That was the expiration date of the options spreads I did this week. Whether this is the final bottom in the whole down move for a longer term, no one has any idea, even if they try to say differently. This is totally dependent on political developments.
Q: What do you have to say about Lockheed Martin (LMT)?
A: This sector usually does well with a wartime background. Expect that to continue for the foreseeable future. But at a certain point, the defense stocks which have had fantastic runs under Trump will start to discount a democratic win in the next election. If that does happen, defense will get slaughtered. I would be using any future strength to sell out of the whole defense area. Peace could be fatal to this sector.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 13, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE TIDAL WAVE OF EUROPEAN EV SUPPLY)
(TSLA)
It’s not Volkswagen’s first attempt at an all-electric car, but it’s certainly the most crucial attempt in their long history.
There have been iterations such as the e-Golf and other pure-electric vehicles before.
This time around, VW will debut the ID.3 and its new MEB platform.
The newest architecture for electric vehicles will be the lynchpin for several models across all of VW Group’s brands.
According to VW, “The architecture is aimed to consolidate electronic controls and reduce the number of microprocessors, advance the application of new driver-assistance technology and somewhat alter the way cars are built.”
The German company has committed $48 billion in car battery supplies too and plans to run 16 factories to build electric cars by the end of 2022.
At the lowest rung, there’ll be a battery expected to get around 205 miles and this ID.3 will be priced at under 30,000 euro ($33,650) before any subsidies or incentives.
In the middle, there’ll be an ID.3 capable of roughly 261 miles on a full charge which could mushroom into the most popular battery size.
Lastly, there’ll be a 342-mile battery option.
VW is certainly betting big on EVs along with its other in-house brands.
In March, VW announced it plans to launch 70 battery electric vehicles over the next decade and sell 22 million of them.
Previously, VW had said it would sell 15 million battery-electric vehicles by 2025.
The previous plan called for 25% of its global sales to be all-electric by 2025.
VW in-house brands are cranking up launches of new all-electric models.
Audi has started with the e-tron SUV and Porsche’s Taycan goes on sale in September.
VW brand’s I.D. and I.D. Crozz will appear next year while its subsidiaries like Skoda and SEAT are also going electric.
VW is not without its problems.
The recent charge by the European Union (EU) that it colluded with other German manufacturers to limit advances in clean emissions technology was another management misstep.
And the EU provides another challenge to all European carmakers with its harsh rules for 2020 fuel efficiency.
Recent research showed that it could cost VW up to 10 billion euros ($11.3 billion) in fines if it is unable to reduce its current fleet average of 123 grams per kilometer.
Cars like VW’s Audi e-tron offer zero reasons for consumers to buy, costing upwards of 70% more than conventionally powered equivalent vehicles.
The efficiency of the Audi is poor compared with Tesla models and the e-tron’s 95kWh battery offered a range of 2.5 miles per kWh, while the Tesla Model X managed 3.25 miles and the long-range Model 3, 4.13 miles.
Costs should come down substantially for vehicles deploying the MEB platform.
Theoretically, it’s the MEB platform that will serve further electric models going forward.
Yet, it’s highly possible the market is being overly optimistic that VW can deliver on its EV strategy and targets, which is the underlying thesis of the bull story.
VW’s lack of transformative structural improvements and its difficulties in making value-accretive strategic decisions that could unlock shareholder value means multiple upgrades in share price is less than probable.
Volkswagen is offering a Tesla style pre-booking to those who purchase an ID.3 and the possibility of charging electric power at no cost for the first year up to a maximum of 2,000 kWh at all public charging points connected to the Volkswagen charging app WeCharge and using the pan-European rapid charging network IONITY.
The ID.3 is to be delivered to customers in carbon-neutral form.
Production of the ID.3 1ST is to start as planned at the end of 2019 and the first vehicles will be delivered in mid-2020.
With its electric offensive, the Volkswagen brand plans to become the world's number one by 2025.
Mercedes is getting in on the act as well with the EQC Edition 1886 aiming to deliver 292 miles per charge and, with an output of 402 horsepower.
The metrics indicate that it will pose a direct threat to both Tesla's older Model X and upcoming Model Y.
The new Mercedes isn’t attacking the low-end of the market where Volkswagen hopes to apply pressure by offering the base version at 71,281 euros, or just short of $80,000, slightly less expensive than the e-tron quattro in Europe.
The new product from Mercedes qualifies for Germany's 4,000-euro federal tax incentive for EVs.
Ultimately, the avalanche of supply from the European high-end carmakers will heap more pressure on Tesla’s Elon Musk to deliver outperformance.
The entire pivot to EVs is predicated on millennials picking up the demand slack and buying into this story when the Baby Boomer generation did not.
By then, the stringent requirements from government and regulators in tackling climate change by itself might offer a massive customer base to tap into EVs whether they like it or not.
EVs have come a long way since the Chevy Bolt, but it’s far from certain that the Europeans will destroy Tesla, but the new developments will sap German demand for Tesla’s car with a domestic alternative.
