Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 16, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE REGULATION EFFECT),
(GOOGL), (AMZN), (FB), (SNAP), (TWTR), (NFLX)
Posts
Locking horns with large cap technology companies in court is inconceivable for regulators in Washington.
Yes, it is their job to put out fires left, right, and center, but when the scorching inferno reaches full intensity, regulators hit the pass button.
Taking on an industry that employs an army of lawyers and data analysts up the wazoo is frightful.
Tech wants to make the skirmish into a resource fight and no cohort has more ammunition than these four companies.
They are already on the way to create more unregulated industries simply because they do not exist yet.
This is why regulators cannot keep up with the nimbleness on display by the tech industry.
They are always one, maybe two steps ahead.
Investors have been able to digest consequences of the data fiasco fueling an even more bullish narrative for the likes of Facebook (FB) and Alphabet (GOOGL).
Facebook and Alphabet are the two laggards in the vaunted FANG group, only because they are up against Netflix (NFLX) and Amazon (AMZN), two of the most transformational companies of the gig economy generation.
Facebook and Alphabet give traders entry points; Amazon and Netflix hardly ever.
Investors are hard pressed to find days when Amazon and Netflix drop more than 1%, and a brief respite is met with a torrent of new buying.
Even more of a head-scratcher is the American law etched into the books, calculating harm by connecting it with price increases, underscoring the FANG's dominant position.
It is almost impossible to prove caused "harm" because Alphabet and Facebook services are free. However, the free service is a misnomer, because of the extreme manipulation of data allowing tech titans to profit from data opportunities instead of charging customers a service fee.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter has been rolling out a steady dose of Facebook recommendations since its inception to scintillating effect.
The Cambridge Analytica scandal stoked mayhem on the global news waves ravaging Facebook shares from $192 down to $153.
Investors were panicking and rightly so. A precipitous drop is nothing investors with skin in the game like to see.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter saw it as a gift from the celestial stars and ushered subscribers into this suave stock at $168, to reread this memorable story please click here.
Facebook has gone from strength to strength blowing past expectations celebrating all-time highs of a recent intraday price of $207 earlier this week.
I am still highly bullish on Facebook, even more so after the first fines were doled out for the recent scandals.
Under the old data laws in Britain, Facebook was fined a grand total of $660,000 along with a detailed report from the Information Commissioner's Office castigating Facebook's business practices.
This amount is peanuts for Facebook, practically equaling the cost of providing a16-person security detail for CEO Mark Zuckerberg around his Palo Alto, California, estate for maybe two weeks.
If Facebook can hold down these fines to inconsequential amounts, regulation will be a decisive tailwind going forward.
How does a headwind turn into a tailwind in the blink of an eye?
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) rolled out in Europe lately has helped Alphabet and Facebook solidify their digital ad business.
Alphabet has adopted a stringent version of the rules to its new model because the behemoth does not need to take on the added risk of noncompliance.
Marginal companies do.
The possibility of exorbitant fines clearly grabbed the attention of Silicon Valley CEOs, and they have put the ball in motion to insulate themselves from such downside risk.
Unsurprisingly, Alphabet has a higher opt-in consent rate than its smaller tech brethren.
Users are more comfortably entrusting data to an Alphabet instead of a smaller unknown that could potentially be 10 times worse than Alphabet.
Uncertainty breeds risk aversion.
Recent data shows other companies have a galling time keeping up with the same percentage of consent as Alphabet.
You cannot expect a college basketball player to perform miracles like Steph Curry.
This puts Alphabet in a healthier strategic position as the users who consent are five times more valuable to digital ad exchanges and easier to monetize.
Other ad exchanges face an uphill battle against Alphabet if they cannot increase the rate of consent.
The extra premium is derived from the ability to personalize the advertisements boosting the conversion rate for sellers.
Alphabet has in effect increased its quality of data just by being Alphabet.
It is certainly not fair, but life is not fair.
And then there is the conundrum of where do you go if you do not want to sell on Alphabet or Facebook?
Well, Twitter (TWTR), Snapchat (SNAP), and Instagram (owned by Facebook) are the other alternatives fighting for the scraps.
The battle to get users to consent is really the be-all and end-all for many of these ad sellers.
Facebook and Alphabet have seen the best results and will likely extend their hegemony.
Recently, Alphabet has been offering 15% less ads on its exchange. But, it all involves consented users demonstrating the unenviable position for other exchanges to match Alphabet's quality.
The EU antirust watchdog is expected to levy a multi-billion dollar fine for abusing its dominant position of its Android operating system.
This comes on the heals of fining Alphabet $2.82 billion last year for abusing the dominance of a search again.
The stock barely budged on this news.
Alphabet's punishment for being too dominant in Europe is laughable.
When a company is punished for being too good then you sit back and admire from afar.
There is no other company that can undermine its position and even hit with billions in fines - its leadership status is unquestioned.
American readers sometimes forget the popularity of the Android ecosystem outside of America because of the ubiquitous nature of iPhones stateside. The network effect has made it impossible to do business in Europe without collaborating with the Android platform.
Facebook took more than eight years to reach a billion users but only half that time to reach the next billion.
The stock has held up relatively well. The 73% market share of digital ad dollars Facebook and Alphabet extracted in 2017 is up from 63% in 2015.
This two-headed monster shows no sign of abating, demonstrated by taking in 83% of all digital ad growth, leaving the crumbs for the rest.
They are specialists at exploiting their business environments, much like mining companies exploit the earth.
Their platforms are so influential, they turn elections on its head.
Governments are scared of taking them down, empowering these companies to new heights creating a massive halo effect worldwide.
The Chinese communist government has even used Chinese social media platforms to establish an Orwellian surveillance system monitoring its people at all times. Such is the power of technology these days.
Users are forced to accept any conditional terms they offer, because many jobs are reliant on these platforms such as the millions of app developers hustling to create the new hot app.
They all have families to feed.
On an individual level, people would not sacrifice a cushy income because they do not wish to consent to tracking services.
The next step is for the Amazons and Alphabets to ramp up their private label businesses using their high-quality treasure trove of data.
Amazon has been the leader in selling its own products from tech behemoths, and that percentage in terms of overall sales will increase over time.
It does not need others to sell products they can make themselves for cheaper, better quality retaining every cent.
Amazon's private label is geared toward decent quality and low prices capturing the volume of transactions desired.
Bundling services, exploiting the data, and applying discriminatory pricing will become the new normal for these powerful platforms and nobody does that better than Amazon.
It has no incentive to allow eyeballs, data and dollars to escape these proprietary walled gardens hence the term walled gardens.
Even more genius, Facebook and Alphabet can track users outside their walled gardens if they are signed into their Facebook or Google accounts.
Granted, Facebook has had better price action of late as traders understand there has been no lasting effect from the misuse of leaked data.
However, Alphabet has the crown jewel of the next leg up in A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) - Waymo. Waymo is a company I have chronicled in the past leading the race in autonomous driving inching closer to full-scale deployment sometime in the next year.
If you think Alphabet and Facebook shares are lofty now and "overbought," then I cannot imagine what you'll think when these companies dominate further because the runway is as far as the eye can see.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"One machine can do the work of 50 ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man," - said American author Elbert Hubbard.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 9, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HOW ENVIRONMENTALISTS MAY KILL OFF BITCOIN),
(BTC), (ETH), (TWTR), (SQ)
If Jack Dorsey's proclamation that bitcoin will be anointed the global "single currency," it could spawn a crescendo of pollution the world has never seen before.
In a candid interview with The Times of London, Dorsey, the workaholic CEO of Twitter (TWTR) and Square (SQ), offered a 10-year time horizon for his claim to come to fruition.
The originators of cryptocurrency derive from a Robin Hood-type mentality circumnavigating the costly fees and control associated with banks and central governments.
Unfolding before our eyes is a potential catastrophe that knows no limits.
Carbon emissions are on track to cut short 153 million lives as environmental issues start to spin out of control while the world's population explodes to 9.7 billion in 2050, from 8.5 billion people in 2030, up from the 7.3 billion today.
All these people will need to barter in bitcoin, according to Jack Dorsey.
Cryptocurrency is demoralizingly energy intensive, and the recent institutional participation in crypto server farms will exacerbate the environmental knock on effects by displacing communities, destroying wildlife, and climate-changing carbon emissions.
This seemingly controversial means to outmaneuver the modern financial system has transformed into a murky arms race among greedy cryptocurrency miners to use the cheapest energy sources and the most efficient equipment in a no-holds-barred money grab.
Bitcoin and Ethereum mining combined energy consumption would place them as the 38th-largest energy consuming country in the world - if they were a country - one place ahead of Austria.
Mining a bitcoin adjacent to a hydropower dam is not a coincidence. In fact, these locales are ground zero for the mining movement. The common denominator is the access to cheap energy usually five times cheaper than standard prices.
Big institutions that mine cryptocurrency install thousands of machines packed like a can of sardines into cavernous warehouses.
In 2015, a documentary detailed a large-scale foreign mining operation with an electricity outlay of $100,000 per month creating 4,000 bitcoins. These are popping up all over the world.
An additional white paper from a Cambridge University study uncovered that 58% of bitcoin mining comes from China.
Cheap power equals dirty power. Chinese mining outfits have bet the ranch on low-cost coal and hydroelectric generators. The carbon footprint measured at one mine per day emitted carbon dioxide at the same rate as five Boeing 747 planes.
The Chinese mining ban in January set off a domino effect with the Chinese mining operations relocating to mainly Canada, Iceland, and the United States.
Effectively, China has just exported a tidal wave of new pollution and carbon emissions.
Bitcoin is mined every second of every day and currently has a supply of approximately 17 million today, up from 11 million in 2013.
Bitcoin's electricity consumption has been elevated compared to alternative digital payment currencies because the dollar price of bitcoin is directly proportional to the amount of electricity that can profitably be used to mine it.
To add more granularity, miners buy more servers to maintain profitability then upgrade to more powerful servers. However, the new calculating power simply boosted the solution complexity even faster.
Mines are practically outdated upon launch, and profitability could only occur by massively scaling up.
Consumer grade personal computers are useless now because the math problems are so advanced and complicated.
Specialized hardware called Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) is required. These mining machines are massive, hot, and guzzle electricity.
Bitcoin disciples would counter, describing the finite number of bitcoins - 21 million. This was part of the groundwork laid down by Satoshi Nakamoto (a pseudonym), the anonymous creator of bitcoin, when he (or they) constructed the digital form of money.
Nakamoto could not have predicted his digital experiment backfiring in his face.
The bottom line is most people use bitcoins to literally create money out of thin air in digital form, rather than using it as a monetary instrument to purchase a good or service.
That is why people mine cryptocurrency, period.
Now, excuse me while I go into the weeds for a moment.
Enter hard fork.
A finite 21 million coins is a misnomer.
A hard fork is a way for developers to alter bitcoin's software code. Once bitcoin reaches a certain block height, miners switch from bitcoin's core software to the fork's version. Miners begin mining the new currency's blocks after the bifurcation, creating a new chain entirely and a brand spanking new currency.
Theoretically, bitcoin could hard fork into infinite new machinations, and that is exactly what is happening.
Bitcoin Cash was the inaugural hard fork derived from the bitcoin's blockchain, followed by Bitcoin Gold and Bitcoin Diamond.
Recently, the market of hard fork derivations includes Super Bitcoin, Lightning Bitcoin, Bitcoin God, Bitcoin Uranium, Bitcoin Cash Plus, Bitcoin Silver, and Bitcoin Atom.
All will be mined.
The hard fork phenomenon could generate millions of upstart cryptocurrency server farms universally planning to infuse market share because new currencies will be forced to build up a fresh supply of coins.
If Peter Thiel's prognostication of a 20% to 50% chance of bitcoin's price rising in the future is true, it could set off a cryptocurrency server farm mania.
By the way, Thiel also believes that there is a 30% chance that Bitcoin could go to zero.
A surge in price of bitcoin results in mining cryptocurrency operations everywhere by any type of electricity, especially if the surge maintains price stability. Even mining in Denmark, where one finds the world's costliest electricity at $14,275 per bitcoin, would make sense.
Recently, miners' appetite for power is causing local governments to implement surcharges for extra infrastructure and moratoriums on new mines. Even these mines built adjacent to hydro projects are crimping the supply lines, and consumers are forced to buy power from outside suppliers. Miners are often required to pay utility bills months in advance.
By July 2019, mining will possibly need more electricity than the entire United States consumes. And by February 2020, bitcoin mining will need as much electricity as the entire world does today, according to Grist, an environmental news website.
Geographically, most locations around the world were profitable based on May's bitcoin price of $10,000.
However, the sudden slide down to $6,556.55 reaffirms why the Mad Hedge Technology Letter avoids this asset class like the plague.
The most unrealistic operational locations are distant, tropical islands, such as the Cook Islands at $15,861, to mine one bitcoin.
If you'd like to drop your life and make a fortune mining bitcoin, then Venezuela is the most lucrative at $531 per bitcoin.
As bitcoin's nosedive perpetuates, Venezuela might be the last place on earth with mining farms.
Who doesn't like free money? Set up a few devices, crank up the power, collect the coins, pay off the electricity bill, pocket the difference and hopefully the world - or Venezuela - hasn't keeled over by then.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"If privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy," - said Philip R. "Phil" Zimmermann, Jr., creator of the most widely used email encryption software in the world.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 5, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE HIGH COST OF DRIVING OUT OUR FOREIGN TECHNOLOGISTS),
(EA), (ADBE), (BABA), (BIDU), (FB), (GOOGL), (TWTR)
There is only so much juice you can squeeze from a lemon before nothing is left.
Silicon Valley has been focused mainly on squeezing the juice out of the Internet for the past 30 years with intense focus on the American consumer.
In an era of minimal regulation, companies grew at breakneck speeds right into families' living quarters and it was a win-win proposition for both the user and the Internet.
The cream of the crop ideas was found briskly, and the low hanging fruit was pocketed by the venture capitalists (VCs).
That was then, and this is now.
No longer will VCs simply invest in various start-ups and 10 years later a Facebook (FB) or Alphabet (GOOGL) appears out of thin air.
That story is over. Facebook was the last one in the door.
VCs will become more selective because brilliant ideas must withstand the passage of time. Companies want to continue to be relevant in 20 or 30 years and not just disintegrate into obsolescence as did the Eastman Kodak Company, the doomed maker of silver-based film.
The San Francisco Bay Area is the mecca of technology, but recent indicators have presaged the upcoming trends that will reshape the industry.
In general, a healthy and booming local real estate sector is a net positive creating paper wealth for its local people and attracting money slated for expansion.
However, it's crystal clear the net positive has flipped, and housing is now a buzzword for the maladies young people face to sustain themselves in the ultra-expensive coastal Northern California megacities.
The loss of tax deductions in the recent tax bill make conditions even more draconian.
Monthly rental costs are deterring tech's future minions. Without the droves of talent flooding the area, it becomes harder for the industry to incrementally expand.
It also boosts the costs of existing development/operations staffers whose capital feeds back into the local housing market buying whatever they can barely afford for astronomical prices.
Another price spike ensues with first-time home buyers piling into already bare-bones inventory because of the fear of missing out (FOMO).
After surveying HR tech heads, it's clear there aren't enough artificial intelligence (A.I.) programmers and coders to fill internal projects.
Compounding the housing crisis is the change of immigration policy that has frightened off many future Silicon Valley workers.
There is no surprise that millions of aspiring foreign students wish to take advantage of America's treasure of a higher education because there is nothing comparable at home.
The best and brightest foreign minds are trained in America, and a mass exodus would create an even fiercer deficit for global dev-ops talent.
These U.S.-trained foreign tech workers are the main drivers of foreign tech start-ups.
Dangling carrots and sticks for a chance to start an embryonic project in the cozy confines of home is hard to pass up.
Ironically enough, there are more A.I. computer scientists of Chinese origin in America than there are in all of China.
There is a huge movement by the Chinese private sector to bring everyone back home as China vies to become the industry leader in A.I.
Silicon Valley is on the verge of a brain drain of mythical proportions.
If America allows all these brilliant minds to fly home, not only to China but everywhere else, America is just training these workers to compete against American workers.
A premier example is Baidu co-founder Robin Li who received his master's degree in computer science from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 1994.
After graduation, his first job was at Dow Jones & Company, a subsidiary of News Corp., writing code for the online version of the Wall Street Journal.
During this stint, he developed an algorithm for ranking search results that he patented, flew back to China, created the Google search engine equivalent, and named it Baidu (BIDU).
Robin Li is now one of the richest people in China with a fortune of close to $20 billion.
To show it's not just a one-hit-wonder type scenario, three of the top five start-ups are currently headquartered in Beijing and not in California.
The most powerful industry in America's economy is just a transient training hub for foreign nationals before they go home to make the real moola.
More than 70% of tech employees in Silicon Valley and more than 50% in the San Francisco Bay Area are foreign, according to the 2016 census data.
Adding insult to injury, the exorbitant cost of housing is preventing burgeoning American talent from migrating from rural towns across America and moving to the Bay Area.
They make it as far West as Salt Lake City, Reno, or Las Vegas.
Instead of living a homeless life in Golden Gate Park, they decide to set up shop in a second-tier American city after horror stories of Bay Area housing starts populate their friends' Instagram feeds and are shared a million times over.
This trend was reinforced by domestic migration statistics.
Between 2007 and 2016, 5 million people moved to California, and 6 million people moved out of the state.
The biggest takeaways are that many of these new California migrants are from New York, possess graduate degrees, and command an annual salary of more than $110,000.
Conversely, Nevada, Arizona, and Texas have major inflows of migrants that mostly earn less than $50,000 per year and are less educated.
That will change in the near future.
Ultimately, if VCs think it is expensive now to operate a start-up in Silicon Valley, it will be costlier in the future.
Pouring gasoline on the flames, Northern California schools are starting to fold like a house of cards due to minimal household formation wiping out student numbers.
The dire shortage of affordable housing is the region's No. 1 problem.
A 1,066-sq.-ft. property in San Jose's Willow Glen neighborhood went on sale for $800,000.
This would be considered an absolute steal at this price, but the catch is the house was badly burned two years ago. This is the price for a teardown.
When you combine the housing crisis with the price readjustment for big data, it looks as if Silicon Valley has peaked or at the very least it's not cheap.
Yes, the FANGs will continue their gravy train, but the next big thing to hit tech will not originate from California.
VCs will overwhelmingly invest in data over rental bills. The percolation of tech ingenuity will likely pop up in either Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Utah, or yes, even Michigan.
Even though these states attract poorer migrants, the lower cost of housing is beginning to attract tech professionals who can afford more than a burned down shack.
Washington state has become a hotbed for bitcoin activity. Small rural counties set in the Columbia Basin such as Chelan, Douglas, and Grant used to be farmland.
The bitcoin industry moved three hours east of Seattle for one reason and one reason only - cost.
Electricity is five times cheaper there because of fluid access to plentiful hydro-electric power.
Many business decisions come down to cost, and a fractional advantage of pennies.
Globalization has supercharged competition, and technology is the lubricant fueling competition to new heights.
Once millennials desire to form families, the only choices are regions where housing costs are affordable and areas that aren't bereft of tech talent.
Cities such as Las Vegas and Reno in Nevada; Austin, Texas; Phoenix, Arizona; and Salt Lake City, Utah, will turn into hotbeds of West Coast growth engines just as Hangzhou, China-based Alibaba (BABA) turned that city into more than a sleepy backwater town with a big lake at its center.
The overarching theme of decentralizing is taking the world by storm. The built-up power levers in Northern California are overheated, and the decentralization process will take many years to flow into the direction of these smaller but growing cities.
Salt Lake City, known as Silicon Slopes, has been a tech magnet of late with big players such as Adobe (ADBE), Twitter (TWTR), and EA Sports (EA) opening new branches there while Reno has become a massive hotspot for data server farms. Nearby Sparks hosts Tesla's Gigafactory 1 along with massive data centers for Apple, Alphabet, and Switch.
The half a billion-dollars required to build a proper tech company will stretch further in Austin or Las Vegas, and most of the funds will be reserved for tech talent - not slum landlords.
The nail in the coffin will be the millions saved in state taxes.
The rise of the second-tier cities is the key to staying ahead of the race for tech supremacy.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"Twitter is about moving words. Square is about moving money," - said CEO of Twitter, Jack Dorsey, to The New Yorker, October 2013.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 27, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(DON'T NAP ON ROKU)
(MSFT), (ROKU), (AMZN), (AAPL), (CBS), (DIS), (NFLX), (TWTR), (SQ), (FB)
Unique assets stand the test of time.
In an era of unprecedented disruption, unique assets' strength begets strength.
This is one of the big reasons the vaunted FANG group has carved out power gains in the business landscape bestowed with a largesse dwarfing any other sector.
As the FANGs trot out to imminent profitability by supercharging massive scale, the emerging tech environment gives food for thought.
These up-and-coming companies fight tooth and nail to elevate themselves to FANG status because of the ease of operating in a duopoly or an outright monopoly.
Microsoft (MSFT) is the closest substitute to an outright FANG. In many ways CEO Satya Nadella has positioned himself better than Facebook (FB) and Apple.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter has pounced on the newest kids on the block offering subscribers buy, sell or hold recommendations zoning in on the best first and second tier companies in tech land.
The top echelon of the second tier is led by no other than Jack Dorsey and both of his companies, Square (SQ) and Twitter (TWTR), offer idiosyncratic services that cannot be found elsewhere.
I have devoted stories to Dorsey gushing about his ability to build a company and rightly so.
Another solid second tier tech company bringing uniqueness to the table is Roku (ROKU), which I have talked about in glowing terms before when I wrote, "How Roku is Winning the Streaming Wars."
To read the archived story, please click here.
Roku is a cluster of in-house, manufactured, online streaming devices offering OTT (over-the-top) content in the form of channels on its proprietary platform.
The word Roku means six in Japanese and it was chosen because Roku was the sixth company established by founder and CEO Anthony Wood commencing in 2002.
Cord-cutting has been a much-covered topic in my newsletters and this generational shift in consumer behavior benefits Roku the most.
In 2017, 25% of televisions purchased were Roku TVs. According to several reports, more than half of all streaming players purchased last year were Roku players.
This would explain how Roku has shifted its income streams from the physical box itself to selling ads and licensing agreements.
Yes, Roku earns the lion's share of its profits similar to the rogue ad seller Facebook.
Roku does not actually sell anything physical except the box you need to operate Roku, which earned Roku a fixed $30 per unit.
The box serves as the gateway to its platform where it sells ads. Migrating to higher caliber digital businesses like selling ads will stunt the hardware revenue part of its business.
That is all part of the plan.
A new survey conducted regarding fresh cord-cutters demonstrated that out of 2,000 cord-cutters questioned, 70% already had a Roku player and felt no need to pay for cable TV anymore.
Second on the list was Amazon Fire TV at 34%, and Apple TV (AAPL) came in third at 10%.
The dominant position has forced content creators to pander toward Roku TV's platform because third-party content creators do not want to miss out on a huge swath of cord-cutter millennials who are entering into their peak spending years and spend most of their time parked on Roku's platform.
Surveys have shown that millennials do not need a million different streaming services.
They only choose one or two for main functionality, and in most cases, these are Netflix (NFLX) and Amazon (AMZN).
Roku allows both these services to be integrated onto its platform. Cord-cutters can supplement their Netflix and Amazon Prime Video binge with a few more a la carte channels to their preference depending on points of interest.
In general, this is how millennials are setting up their entertainment routine, and all roads don't lead through Rome, but Roku.
If the massive scale continues at this pace, 2020 could be the year profitability explodes through the roof.
The next 18 months should give way to parabolic spikes, followed by consolidation to higher lows in the share price.
When I recommended this stock, its shares were trading at a tad above $32 on April 18, 2018, and immediately spiked to $47 on June 20, 2018.
The tariff sell-off hit most second tier tech companies flush in the mouth. The 5% and occasional 7% intraday sell-offs churn the stomach like Mumbai street food during the height of the Indian summer.
That is part and parcel of dipping your toe into these rising stars.
The move ups are parabolic, but the sell-offs make your hair fall out.
Well, glue your locks back onto your scalp, because we have reached another entry point.
Roku is now trading back down in the low $40 range, and I would bet my retirement fund that Roku will end the year above $50.
This unique company is expected to grow its subscriber base by at least 20% annually, and in five years total subscribers will eclipse 45 million users.
Reinforcing its industry leadership, traditional media companies such as Disney and CBS do not have built-in streaming viewership that comes close to touching Roku.
This has forced these traditional media giants to push their content through Roku or lose a huge amount of the 18 to 34 age bracket for which advertisers yearn.
These traditional players are armed with robust ad budgets, and a good bulk of it is allocated to Roku among others.
For each additional a la carte channel users sign up for on Roku, the company earns a sales commission.
As a tidal wave of niche streaming channels plan to hit the market, the first place they will look to is Roku's platform and this trend will only become stronger with time.
A prominent example was Sling TV, which showed up at Roku's front door first before circling around the rest of the neighborhood.
The runway for Roku's three main businesses of video ads, display ads, and licensing with streaming partners, is long and robust.
The one caveat is the fierce competition from Amazon Fire TV, which puts its in-house content on Amazon front and center when you start the experience.
Roku has head and shoulders above the biggest library of content, and the Amazon effect could scare traditional media for licensing content to Amazon.
We have seen the trend of major players removing their content from streamers because of the inherent conflict of interests licensing content to them while they are developing an in-house business.
It makes no sense to voluntarily offer an advantage to competition.
Roku has no plans to initiate its own in-house original content, and this is the main reason that Amazon and Netflix will lose out on Disney (DIS), CBS (CBS), NBC, and Fox content going forward.
These traditional players categorize Roku as a partner and not a foe.
To get into bed with the traditional media giants means digital ads and lots of them. In terms of a user experience, the absence of ads on Netflix and Amazon is a huge positive for the consumer experience.
But traditional players have the option of bundling ads and content together on Roku making Roku even more of a diamond in the rough.
In short, nobody offers the type of supreme aggregator experience, deep penetration of cord-cutting viewership, and the best streaming content on one graphic interface like Roku.
It is truly an innovative company, and it is in the driver's seat to this magnificent growth story.
It's hard to argue with CEO Anthony Wood when he says that Roku is the future of TV.
He might be right.
If Roku keeps pushing the envelope enhancing its product, it will be front and center as a potential takeover target by a bigger tech company.
Either way, the scarcity value of these types of assets will drive its share prices to the moon, just avoid the nasty sell-offs.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"Google's not a real company. It's a house of cards," - said former CEO of Microsoft Steve Ballmer.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 14, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THREE RULES FOR JACK DORSEY),
(TWTR), (SQ), (MSFT), (FB)
I am Jack Dorsey's biggest fan.
If he has an entourage, I would like to be part of it.
Even if he just needs a chauffeur, I would be willing to drive for free just to pick up little pearls of wisdom percolating through his brain.
He is perhaps the biggest name outside the vaunted FANG group that is not Microsoft (MSFT) CEO Satya Nadella.
The special Jack Dorsey issue (click here for the link http://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/a-straight-line-to-profits-with-square/) gloating about his company Square was not a misjudgment.
I am supremely bullish on his other company Twitter (TWTR) too.
Like I said last time about Dorsey, do not bet against Jack Dorsey.
Rule No. 2 don't bet against Jack Dorsey.
If he has a heartbeat, then success will follow him wherever he goes.
Dorsey co-founded Twitter in 2006 and was sacked, later to return in a blaze of glory seven years later ala Steve Jobs.
Evan Williams, the other co-founder of Twitter, got rid of Jack after he found out Jack slipped out of work each day at 6 p.m. for drawing classes, hot yoga sessions, and fashion classes where he learned how to design mini-skirts.
Williams reportedly told Dorsey, "You can either be a dressmaker or the CEO of Twitter, but you can't be both."
Williams replaced Dorsey as the CEO of Twitter in 2007.
Dorsey's dismissal led him to Mark Zuckerberg's doorstep where he was practically hired at the Menlo Park offices but could not find a suitable role at the company.
What a legendary exclusion if there ever was one!
Out of options at the time, Dorsey summoned his inner genius and created a new company named Square (SQ) in 2009. Ironically, he was rehired at Twitter as CEO in 2015 and currently runs both companies at the same time.
Apparently, his dressmaking career died before it could take off.
Dorsey is such a stud, he does not even have an office or a desk at his corporate offices.
He simply roams around the office wielding an iPad solving problems that need solving.
He starts his day at Twitter and walks across the street to Square after lunch.
How convenient!
In 2015, Twitter was having growing pains. User growth stagnated in Q4 2015 at 305 million users, down from the 307 million users in Q3.
Management wrote an investment letter promising it will "fix the broken windows and confusing parts" and boy, did they.
Fast forward to today and Twitter just nailed down its second profitable quarter in a row. Monthly active users (MAU) topped 336 million in Q1 2018, up from 330 million in Q4 2017.
Management projects (MAU) to increase at a nice 6% per year clip.
The lion's share of the growth derives from the mass migration of advertisement dollars to social media platforms, the same reason why Facebook (FB) harvests spectacular profits.
Video content has transformed into a robust growth engine carving out more than half of Twitter's revenue.
This is something that never could have been envisaged in 2015. As the quality of broadband develops, more video will be splashed across its platform.
Twitter considers video as a vital part of the road map moving forward.
Video is a better way for advertisers to engage users. Plain and simple.
Summer projects to be an exciting one with the biggest entertainment every four years, the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia, set to invigorate Twitter feeds throughout the world.
America missed out on World Cup qualification on the last day of qualifiers because it could not salvage a draw against a second-string Trinidad and Tobago team.
It doesn't matter.
Eyeballs will be glued to the matches in Russia and the audience will vent, cry for joy, and express their emotions on Twitter feeds.
Live events energize Twitter feeds, and advertisers will be throwing money at Twitter to put themselves in the store window for targeted Twitter followers.
Twitter will stream every goal from the World Cup, which is a nice coup.
In total, Twitter has 30 live partnerships and hopes to expand.
MLB, Major League Soccer, and People TV are other live programming that will integrate with Twitter's live feed.
Twitter's total ad revenue is expected to grow by 6% in 2018, which is a nice feather in its cap compared to 2017 when revenue dipped by 6%.
As the pie for ad revenue grows, it will not be one winner takes all.
Facebook, Google, Amazon, and Twitter are strategically positioned to benefit from this mass migration to digital ad spend.
Twitter is a unique product that cannot be undermined. The platform is the mouthpiece for every notable person in their world to speak their piece.
No other platform gains this type of trust from the elite in the world.
That won't change anytime soon.
What's more, Twitter has morphed into a reliable news feed. Its nimbleness is reflected with breaking news flowing into the Twitter channels first, even before the traditional news media can get a sniff.
The agility of tech companies continues to be a huge competitive advantage versus the stalwarts of antiquity that move at sloth-like speeds.
Dorsey epitomizes this ethos by his systematic efficiency, making him view a corner office as a physical and psychological barrier to preventing him from success.
Financials back up my diagnosis. Total revenue increased last quarter 21% YOY.
Twitter has little exposure to data regulations as the data is posted in the public. It does not sell any individual personal information.
A year and a half of continuous double-digit daily active user (DAU) growth resonates with advertisers.
Twitter continues to enhance the core products and executes in fine fashion. This outperformance feeds back into the quality of products basking in advertisers' satisfaction.
Moving forward, expect video to extract a higher percentage of revenue because of the attractiveness to advertisers.
In addition, expect moderate growth from daily active users and more live events integrated into the Twitter platform.
Video has been a salient reason for the great success in the past year and a half. The Twitter management, led by Dorsey, has a great handle on the steps it must take going forward.
Jack Dorsey is the preeminent CEO of his day. A bigger problem is finding an entry point into Twitter or Square.
Granted, Twitter climbed from a low base after Dorsey was reinstalled in 2015 as the CEO. It took him a few years to figure out how to briskly execute and to harness the potential of Twitter.
Both companies have shot to the moon in 2018. Waiting for macro sell-offs to get into these stocks makes more sense than chasing the fumes.
Dorsey is on record saying Square will be bigger than Twitter because it speaks the language everyone understands - money.
Twitter, Square, and Jack Dorsey are the real deal.
Rule No. 3: Don't bet against Jack.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"You are the product on Facebook, Facebook is a data company by its very nature of mass surveillance, collective manipulation and hacking the attention economy for profit," - said cofounder of Apple Steve Wozniak when talking about Facebook's business model.
