Nimble tech firms like online taxi company Lyft will be penalized in the coronavirus economy as it de-globalizes for a period of time.
If you read the Mad Hedge Technology Letter, you already know that I believe rideshare business models will never become profitable.
Fast forward to today and ask yourself how can these companies make profitability headway when the state mandates shelter in place policies?
The answer is they cannot.
It is not exactly the type of foundational policy that promotes more ride-sharing volume, so bad news for Uber and Lyft.
Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi told investors that ride volume has gone down by as much as 60%-70% in ground zero cities like Seattle, and that’s before you consider the pauses in some of its secondary services and the dubious distinction of becoming one of the earliest proof-of-concepts of just how fluid this virus really is.
But Khosrowshahi also told investors that Uber is “well-positioned” to ride the troubles out even in the worst-case scenario of rides down by 80% for the year. And even as ride volume crashes, it is also considering leveraging its network for delivering other things, such as medicine or basic goods.
Basically, Uber specializes in losing money and lots of it.
Then imagine how demoralizing it is for the inferior version of Uber, it’s little brother Lyft.
Lyft has no “other” businesses such as food delivery service Uber Eats, leading me to conclude that this massive retracement in shares must be a bear market rally that will run out of steam.
Finding entry points to short growth stocks is an imprecise endeavor but I do believe that poor revenue reports in the upcoming earnings season is going to cap this bear market rally in Lyft’s shares.
What do we know already?
A global and tech recession will be sharp and it will be worse than the global financial crisis possibly by a factor of 4.
Investors still cannot wrap their head around whether this contagion will spill over into being a depression.
Tech investors will need to respect the “new, new normal” following the pandemic, in which corporates make aggressive cuts to their spending side-- again, bad news for Uber and Lyft.
This type of scenario is especially problematic for Lyft who must spend illogically just to stay in business.
Lyft burned $463.5 million in the third quarter of 2019, which was almost twice the amount that the company lost over the same period of time the previous year.
The fourth quarter net loss includes $246.1 million of stock-based compensation and related payroll tax expenses as well as $86.6 million related to changes to the liabilities for insurance.
That translates into an adjusted net loss of $121.6 million, which is better than the adjusted loss of $245.3 million over the same period last year.
Considering the elevated amount of cash burn to Lyft’s model pre-virus and aware that nobody knows how long the cash burn will accelerate beyond Lyft’s earnings – investors are staring into a black hole of infinite losses moving forward as Lyft’s business model looks worse every day.
I must conclude that the post-coronavirus economy is highly likely to not be kind to marginal companies like Lyft who is a glorified taxi service.
Uber controls about 60% of the ride-sharing market in the US and managed to accomplish this by losing $5.2 billion in the Q2 2019.
Lyft has already slashed its R&D budget by deleting the autonomous vehicle development program.
Yes, the very program that was supposed to be the x-factor in its quest for real profits.
Laughably, Lyft’s executives emphasized that they believed the company will turn a profit in the fourth quarter of 2021, a year earlier than they had previously projected, but that forecasts looks foolish in hindsight.
The one miniscule silver lining for Lyft - fewer discounted rides than it did a year ago.
Lyft is also trying to boost the number of more-profitable rides, which are premium trips such as “airport” or “business” trips.
It’s a shame these premium trips have gone to zero.
The narrative has quickly pivoted to “grow at all costs” to “survive at all costs” and it’s not surprising to see Lyft grossly underperform the Nasdaq index in relative terms and most quality cloud stocks are in the midst of a v-shaped recovery.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2020-04-17 09:02:462020-05-19 11:33:44Why You Should Sell the Uber Rally
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader March 25Global Strategy Webinar broadcast from Silicon Valley, CA with my guest and co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader. Keep those questions coming!
Q: Since we flipped the off button on the economy, I don’t see how we can simply flip the on button and have a V-shaped recovery. It seems much more unlikely that it will get back to pre-recession levels.
A: Actually, all we really need is confidence. Confident people can go outside and not get sick. Once we start seeing a dramatic decline in the number of new cases, the shelter-in-place orders may be cancelled, and we can go outside and go back to work. It’s really that simple. So, we will get an initial V-shaped recovery probably in the third quarter, and after that, it will be a slower return spread over several quarters to get back to normal. Everybody wants to get back to normal and let's face it, there's an enormous amount of deferred consumption going on. I have hardly spent any money myself other than what I’ve spent online. All of those purchases get deferred, so in the recovery, there's going to be a massive binge of entertainment, shopping, and travel that is all being pent up now—that will get unleashed once the airlines start flying again and the shelter-in-place orders are cancelled. We’re not losing so much of this growth, we’re just deferring it. Obviously, some of the growth is gone permanently; you can forget about any kind of vacation in the next couple of months. I would say, the great majority of consumption in the US—and thus growth and thus stock appreciation—is just being deferred, not cancelled outright.
Q: Other than the ProShares Ultra Technology ETF (ROM), do you have any other leveraged sectors coming into the recovery?
A: There is a 50/50 chance the Roaring 20s started 2 days ago, on Monday, March 23 at the afternoon lows. We may go back and test those lows one more time, which at this point is 3,700 points below here, but we are clocking 1,000 points a day. It doesn’t take much, like a bad non-farm payroll number, to go back and test those lows. The good news is out; they're not going to spend any more money other than the $10 trillion they're putting in now.
Q: Would you buy Boeing (BA) here? Is this the bottom?
A: The bottom was at $94 on Monday; we went up 100% in three days and now we’re at $180. Incredible moves, and a total lack of liquidity. One reason I haven't added any positions lately is that they have closed the New Yok Stock Exchange floor and its not clear that of I send out a trade alert, it could get done. We have gone totally online, so I just want to see what happens as a result of that. I don’t want to be putting out trade alerts that no one can get in or out of, heaven forbid.
Q: What do you mean by “The spike to $80 in the Volatility Index (VIX) was totally artificial?”
A: When you have a series of cascading shorts triggered by margin calls, that is artificial. I have seen this happen many times before, both on the upside and the downside. This happened twice in the (VIX) in the last two years. When you go from a (VIX) of $25 to $80 and back down to $39 in days, which is what we did, you know it was a one-time-only spike and we are not going to visit the $80 level again— at least not until the next financial crisis because those positions are gone and are never coming back. A (VIX) of $80 means we are going to have 1,000 point move in the Dow Average for the next 30 days.
Q: I bought some ProShares Ultra Pro ETF (UPRO) which is the 3x long the S&P 500 at $1,829. Do I take profits by selling calls or just hold longer?
A: I would just sell the whole position outright. The (UPRO) is so incredibly volatile that you are rewarded heavily for just coming out completely and then reopening fresh positions on these big meltdown days. We will probably be doing trade alerts on (UPRO) or its cousin, the 2x long ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO) sometime in the near future.
Q: With 2-year LEAPs, would you go at the money or out of the money?
A: This is the golden opportunity to go way out of the money because the return goes from 100% to 500%, or even 1000% if you go, say, 30%-50% out of the money. A lot of these stocks are ripe for very quick 30% bouncebacks, especially the (ROM). So yes, you want to do out of the money 20% to 30%. It will easily recover those losses in weeks if you are picking the right stocks. Over a two-year view, a lot of these big tech stocks could double by the time your LEAP expires, and then you will get the full profit. The rule of thumb is: the farther out of the money you go, the bigger the profit is. But I wouldn’t go for more than a 1000% profit in 2 years; you don't want to get greedy, after all.
Q: You called the Dow to hit 15,000. Is that still possible? We got down to the 18 handle.
A: Yes, if the coronavirus data gets worse, which is certain, we could get another panic selloff. How will the market handle 100,000 US deaths, given the exponential rise in cases we are seeing? With cases doubling every three days that is entirely within range. So, I would say, there is a 50% chance we hit the bottom on Monday at 18,000, and 50% chance we go lower.
Q: Do you know anything about the coronavirus stocks like Regeneron (REGN)?
A: Actually, I do, it's covered by the Mad Hedge Biotech & Health Care Letter, click here for the link. If you get the Biotech Letter, you already know all about stocks like Regeneron. Regeneron literally has hundreds of drugs in testing right now to work as vaccines or antivirals, and some of them, like their arthritis drug, have already been proven to work. So, we just have to get through the accelerated trials and testing to unleash it on the market. But for anybody who has a drug, it's going to take a year to mass-produce enough to inoculate the entire country, let alone the world. So, don't make any big bets on getting a vaccine any time soon—it's a very long process. Even in normal times, some of these drugs take months to manufacture.
Q: Are there any ventilator stocks out there?
A: There are; a company called Medtronic (MDT), which the Mad Hedge Biotech & Healthcare Letter also covers. They are the largest ventilator company in the US. Their normal production is 100 machines a week. Now, they are increasing that to 500 a week as fast as they can, but it isn’t enough. We need about 100,000 ventilators. China is now selling ventilators to the US. Elon Musk from Tesla (TSLA) just bought 1,000 ventilators in China and had them shipped over to San Francisco at his own expense, and Virgin Atlantic just flew over a 747 full of ventilators and masks and other medical supplies from China. So yes, there are stocks out there to play these things, they have already had large moves. We liked them anyway, even before the pandemic, so those calls were quite good. And China thinks their epidemic is over, so they are happy to sell us all the medical supplies they can make.
Q: Why did 30-year mortgage rates just go up instead of down? I thought the Fed rate cuts were supposed to take them down; am I missing something?
A: In order to get 30-year mortgage rates down, you have to have buyers of 30-year loans, and right now there are buyers of nothing. The lending that is happening is from banks lending their own money, which is only a tiny percentage of the total loan market. When the Fed moves into the mortgage market, you will see those yields move to the 2% range. The other problem is how to get a loan if all the banks are closed. They are running skeletal staff now, and you can’t close on real estate deals because all the notaries and title offices are closed; so essentially the real estate industry is going to shut down right now and hopefully, we’ll finish that in a month.
Q: Do you think Uber (UBER) and Lyft (LYFT) will go bankrupt?
A: It is a possibility because one to one human contact inside a car is about the last situation you want to be in during a pandemic. Their traffic was down 25% according to a number I saw. It’s very heavily leveraged, very heavily indebted, and those are the companies that don’t survive long in this kind of crisis. So, I would say there is a chance they will go under. I never liked these companies anyway; they are under regulatory assault by everybody, depend on non-union drivers working for $5 an hour, and there are just too many other better things to do.
Q: Is this the end of corporate buybacks?
A: To some extent, yes. A future Congress may make it either illegal or highly tax corporate buybacks, in some fashion or another because twice in 12 years now, we have had companies load up on buying back their own stock, boosting CEO compensation to the hundreds of millions—if not billions—and then going broke and asking for government bailouts. Something will be done to address that. If you take buybacks out of the market (the last 10,000-point gain in the Dow were essentially all corporate buybacks), we may not see a 20X earnings multiple again for another generation. Individuals were net sellers of stock for those two years. We only reached those extreme highs because of buybacks, so you take those out of the equation and it's going to get a lot harder to get back to the super inflated share prices like we had in January.
Q: How long before an Italian bank collapses, and will they need a bailout?
A: I don’t think they will get a collapse; I think they will be bailed out inside Italy and won’t need all of Europe to do this. But the focus isn't on Europe right now, it's on the US.
Q: Do you think this virus is really subsiding in China based on their past history of dishonest reporting?
A: Yes, that is a risk, and that's why people aren’t betting the ranch right now—just because China is reporting a flattening of cases. And China could be hit with a second wave if they relax their quarantine too soon.
Q: What's your opinion on how the Fed is doing and Steve Mnuchin in this crisis?
A: I think the Fed is doing everything they possibly can. I agree with all of their moves—this is an all-hands-on-deck moment where you have to do everything you can to get the economy going. Notice it’s Steve Mnuchin doing all the negotiating, not the president, because nobody will talk to him. For a start, he may be a Corona carrier among other things, and you’re not seeing a lot of social distancing in these press conferences they are holding. About which 50% of the information they give out is incorrect, and that's the 50% coming from Donald Trump.
Q: What do you think about no debt and no pension liability?
A: That’s why Tech has been leading the upside for the last 10 years and will lead for the next 10. You can really narrow the market down to a dozen stocks and just focus on those and forget about everything else. They have no net debt or net pension fund liabilities.
Q: Why have we not heard from Warren Buffet?
A: I'm sure negotiations are going on all over the place regarding obtaining massive stakes in large trophy companies that he likes, such as airlines and banks. So that will be one of the market bottom indicators that I mentioned a couple of days ago in my letter on “Ten Signs of a Market is Bottoming.”
Q: What’s the outlook for gold?
A: Up. We just had to get the financial crisis element out of this before we could go back into gold, so I would be looking to buy SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD), the gold miners like Barrick Gold (GOLD) and Newmont Mining (NEM), the Van Eck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX), and the 2X long ProShares Gold ETF (UGL).
Q: Does the Fed backstop give you any confidence in the bond market?
A: Yes, it does. I think we finally may be getting to the natural level of the market, which is around an 80-basis point yield. Let’s see how long we can go without any 50-point gyrations.
Q: Do you foresee a depression?
A: We are in a depression now. We could hit a 20% unemployment rate. The worst we saw during the Great Depression was 25%. But it will be a very short and sharp one, not a 12-year slog like we saw during the 1930s.
Good Luck and Good Trading and stay healthy.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Mass layoffs are on the horizon, thanks to the tech market slowdown sapping vitality for risk in the IPO market, and the widening contagion stemming from the coronavirus.
At a moment in Silicon Valley’s history where the market is rethinking its appetite for risk, it is customary for the loftiest and hottest growth names to drop the most in times like this.
For instance, Tesla (TSLA) was rocked by 32% and ride-hailing app Uber (UBER) gave up 25% in an epic downturn.
In general, tech that isn’t integral to the intricate global supply chain will also be penalized because of cratering overall business demand.
The vacuum of demand isn’t applied to only digital products but most others, as the world literally becomes a walled garden of self-quarantine areas.
The odds are still high that this global phenomenon squeaks by, but the far reach of the virus worries even experts and making crucial decisions on how to cut losses is becoming a pressing and imminent issue.
Airlines have been first to announce a potential readjustment to staff numbers such as Finland’s flagship airline Finn Air, but mass layoffs will start to trickle in from Silicon Valley.
Front-running the layoff parade was online travel tech company Expedia (EXPE) who expects to say adiós to 3,000 employees and network infrastructure company Cisco (CSCO) who announced restructuring plans because they expect revenue to fall between 1.5%-3.5% in Fiscal 2020.
I have been unwavering in my core thesis that tech procuring revenue from Mainland China is nothing more than a short-term Faustian bargain, and now the downsides of that bargain are finally appearing and frankly uncontainable.
The viral coronavirus is escalating on the heels of a new round of layoffs from Silicon Valley’s startups who just don’t know how to make money such as robot pizza startup Zume and car-sharing company Getaround who slashed more than 500 jobs.
Online DNA testing company 23andMe, logistics startup Flexport, Firefox internet browser Mozilla and social platform Quora restructured staff as well.
The “disruptors” are finally getting disrupted out of existence because of a sudden referendum on the health of balance sheets.
The situation turned ugly just before the coronavirus and this health crisis just adds fuel on the fire.
In total, more than 30 startups have cut over 8,000 jobs over the past four months with aggressive venture capital investments pulling back significantly.
The latest to flop at the starting line was Casper Sleep (CSPR) who marketed themselves as the “Nike of sleep” only because they sell online mattresses.
Mr. Market is purging these marginal businesses that over-promise, over-hype, and under-deliver.
The IPO pricing was underwhelming with Casper taking down the price range to the point where it went public at over $13.
The stock is now at $8.
No doubt that some of this negative sentiment was stoked by office-sharing company WeWork, who had an epic fall from grace and cut its valuation by 80% late last year while permanently shelving an IPO.
Now the coronavirus is on the verge of scoring the empty net goal as companies go into full-blown crisis mode.
SoftBank bet two ranches on Uber and WeWork, then poured money into Colombian delivery startup Rappi and Indian hotel startup Oyo.
All have sputtered with mass firings recently.
Poor investment decisions led SoftBank to report a $2 billion operating loss in the last quarter of 2019 from their venture capitalist arm named the Vision Fund.
After Nasdaq flourished in a memorable 10-year run post the financial crisis, flip the parabola upside down and markets are tanking with many experts already contrasting the coronavirus sell-off to the dot-com bust of 2001.
Irrational optimism is part of the DNA of San Francisco.
Entrepreneurs are quietly preparing to change the world, but the climate has soured so quickly that many investors believe many of these current entrepreneurs are unlucky.
The rules of the game deem unprofitable models temporarily obsolete in the current market environment.
In the land where spending money in uneconomic ways is a time-honored tradition, turning to more “responsible” models is gut-check time.
Talent is forgoing chances to enter the start-up world too, instead opting for big box corporates who provide a lower ceiling but higher salary and benefits.
Café X, which operated robot coffee shops and raised $14.5 million in venture funding, fired its own robots and closed three stores in San Francisco recently.
The brightest stars of the IPO pipelines might be able to go public this year, but at a cut-rate price which is a tough pill to swallow for Airbnb and online delivery platform DoorDash.
With no new blood going live on the public tech markets, we focus on the ones already there and recent news is alarming.
Apple whose 42 stores in China have been closed since January and Foxconn, which produces Apple products, are running at around 30%-40% capacity, then it’s ring-the-alarm time.
The most likely scenario is that big tech will need to write off this quarter until the public health crisis improves setting up a bullish second half of 2020.
Even that could get stopped in its tracks.
The only silver lining is that the run-up in shares in January means that the best of tech has only returned one month of share appreciation, but for the weaker companies, they aren’t afforded those types of luxuries in malicious trading conditions and have returned 4-6 months of share appreciation already.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2020-03-02 04:02:312020-05-11 13:16:35Tech's Big Corona Hit
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader February 12Global Strategy Webinar broadcast from Silicon Valley, CA with my guest and co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader. Keep those questions coming!
Q: What do you think about Facebook (FB) here? We’ve just had a big dip.
A: We got the dip because of a double downgrade in the stock from a couple of brokers, and people are kind of nervous that some sort of antitrust action may be taken against Facebook as we go into the election. I still like the stock long term. You can’t beat the FANGs!
Q: If Bernie Sanders gets the nomination, will that be negative for the market?
A: Absolutely, yes. It seems like after 3 years of a radical president, voters want a radical response. That said, I don't think Bernie will get the nomination. He is not as popular in California, where we have a primary in a couple of weeks and account for 20% of total delegates. I think more of the moderate candidates will come through in California. That's where we see if any of the new billionaire outliers like Michael Bloom or Tom Steyer have any traction. My attitude in all of this is to wait for the last guy to get voted off the island—then ask me what's going to happen in October.
Q: When should we come back in on Tesla (TSLA)?
A: It’s tough with Tesla because although my long-term target is $2,500, watching it go up 500% in seven months on just a small increase in earnings is pretty scary. It’s really more of a cult stock than anything else and I want to wait for a bigger pullback, maybe down to $500, before I get in again. That said, the volatility on the stock is now so high that—with the short interest going from 36% down to 20%—if we get the last of the bears to really give up, then we lose that whole 20% because it all turns into buying; and that could get us easily over $1,000. The announcement of a new $2 billion share offering is a huge positive because it means they can pay off debt and operate with free capital as they don’t pay a dividend.
Q: Is Square (SQ) a good buy on the next 5% drop?
A: I would really wait 10%—you don't want to chase trades with the market at an all-time high. I would wait for a bigger drop in the main market before I go aggressive on anything.
Q: What about CRISPR Technology (CRSP) after the 120% move?
A: We’ve had a modest pullback—really more of a sideways move— since it peaked a couple of months ago; and again, I think the stock either goes much higher or gets taken over by somebody. That makes it a no-lose trade. The long sideways move we’re having is actually a very bullish indication for the stock.
Q: If Bernie is the candidate and gets elected, would that be negative for the market?
A: It would be extremely negative for the market. Worth at least a 20% downturn. That said, according to all the polling I have seen, Bernie Sanders is the only candidate that could not win against Donald Trump—the other 15 candidates would all beat Trump in a 1 to 1 contest. He's also had one heart attack and might not even be alive in 6 months, so who knows?
Q: I just closed the Boeing (BA) trade to avoid the dividend hit tomorrow. What do you think?
A: I’m probably going to do the same, that way you can avoid the random assignments that will stick you with the dividend and eat up your entire profit on the trade.
Q: When do you update the long-term portfolio?
A: Every six months; and the reason for that is to show you how to rebalance your portfolio. Rebalancing is one of the best free lunches out there. Everyone should be doing it after big moves like we’ve seen. It’s just a question of whether you rebalance every six months or every year. With stocks up so much a big rebalancing is due.
Q: I have held onto Gilead Sciences (GILD) for a long time and am hoping they’ll spend their big cash hoard. What do you think?
A: It’s true, they haven’t been spending their cash hoard. The trouble with these biotech stocks, and why it's so hard to send out trade alerts on them, is that you’ll get essentially no movement on them for years and then they rise 30% in one day. Gilead actually does have some drugs that may work on the coronavirus but until they make another acquisition, don’t expect much movement in the stock. It’s a question of how long you are willing to wait until that movement.
Q: Is it time to get back into the iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short Term Futures ETN (VXX)?
A: No, you need to maintain discipline here, not chase the last trade that worked. It’s crucial to only buy the bottoms and sell the tops when trading volatility. Otherwise, time decay and contango will kill you. We’re actually close to the middle of the range in the (VXX) so if we see another revisit to the lows, which we could get in the next week, then you want to buy it. No middle-of-range trades in this kind of market, you’re either trading at one extreme or the other.
Q: Could you please explain how the Fed involvement in the overnight repo market affects the general market?
A: The overnight repo market intervention was a form of backdoor quantitative easing, and as we all know quantitative easing makes stocks go up hugely. So even though the Fed said this wasn't quantitative easing, they were in fact expanding their balance sheet to facilitate liquidity in the bond market because government borrowing has gotten so extreme that the public markets weren’t big enough to handle all the debt; that's why they stepped into the repo market. But the market said this is simply more QE and took stocks up 10% since they said it wasn't QE.
Q: What about Cisco Systems (CSCO)?
A: It’s probably a decent buy down here, very tempting. And it hasn't participated in the FANG rally, so yes, I would give that one a really hard look. The current dip on earnings is probably a good entry point.
Q: Should we buy the Volatility Index (VIX) on dips?
A: Yes. At bottoms would be better, like the $12 handle.
Q: When is the best time to exit Boeing?
A: In the next 15 minutes. They go ex-dividend tomorrow and if you get assigned on those short calls then you are liable for the dividend—that will eat up your whole profit on the trade.
Q: Do you like Fire Eye (FEYE)?
A: Yes. Hacking is one of the few permanent growth industries out there and there are only a half dozen listed companies that are cutting edge on security software.
Q: What are your thoughts on the timing of the next recession?
A: Clearly the recession has been pushed back a year by the 2019 round of QE, and stock prices are getting so high now that even the Fed has to be concerned. Moreover, economic growth is slowing. In fact, the economy has been growing at a substantially slower rate since Trump became president, and 100% of all the economic growth we have now is borrowed. If the government were running a balanced budget now, our growth would be zero. So, certainly QE has pushed off the recession—whether it's a one-year event or a 2-year event, we’ll see. The answer, however, is that it will come out of nowhere and hit you when you least expect it, as recessions tend to do.
Q: Would you buy gold (GLD) rather than staying in cash?
A: I would buy some gold here, and I would do deep in the money call spreads like I have been doing. I’ve been running the numbers every day waiting for a good entry point. We’re now at a sort of in between point here on call spreads because it’s 7 days to the next February expiration and about 27 days to the March one after that, so it's not a good entry point this week. Next week will look more interesting because you’ll start getting accelerated time decay for March working for you.
Q: When are you going to have lunch in Texas or Oklahoma?
A: Nothing planned currently. Because of my long-term energy views (USO), I have to bring a bodyguard whenever I visit these states. Or I hold the events at a Marine Corps Club, which is the same thing.
Q: Would you use the dip here to buy Lyft (LYFT)? It’s down 10%.
A: No, it’s a horrible business. It’s one of those companies masquerading as a tech stock but it isn’t. They’re dependent on ultra-low wages for the drivers who are essentially netting $5 an hour driving after they cover all their car costs. Moreover, treating them as part-time temporary workers has just been made illegal in California, so it’s very bad news for the stocks—stay away from (LYFT) and (UBER) too.
Q: Is the Fed going to cut interest rates based on the coronavirus?
A: No, interest rates are low enough—too low given the rising levels of the stock market. Even at the current rate, low-interest rates are creating a bubble which will come back to bite us one day.
Q: Household debt exceeded $14 trillion for the first time—is this a warning sign?
A: It is absolutely a warning sign because it means the consumer is closer to running out of money. Consumers make up 70% of the economy, so when 70% of the economy runs out of money, it leads to a certain recession. We saw it happen in ‘08 and we’ll see it happen again.
Good Luck and Good Trading
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Autonomous or bankrupt; that is the ultimate fate of Uber (UBER).
In the short-term, Uber is a master at moving the goalposts in order to breathe life in the stock.
CEO of Uber Dara Khosrowshahi can only pray that the Fed will continue to pump cheap money into the market because without artificially low-interest loans, tech firms like Uber would implode.
Is it really time to give Uber the benefit of the doubt?
No more hype, just profits? Is the calculus to profits legitimate?
That's what we call a bubble. Bubbles always burst. Here's the scary part.
Many people are counting on the continued existence of Uber and Lyft to provide "cheap transportation."
Commuters will have to get suddenly unused to it.
There are many companies today that are running the same scheme as Uber in the “gig economy.”
It’s true that management loves to use a lot of flowery language to disguise a lack of profitability.
But as the conditions are ripe for a leg up in tech, the tide rises, and even Uber’s boat rises with it.
I have yet to see even one realistic analysis of how Uber or Lyft is going to become profitable - not even basic math!
I have met a plethora of drivers for both companies, and hope they do well, but there is only so long that one can put lipstick on a pig.
So here we are, Uber in the green everyday because they moved the goalposts yet again and promise us earlier than expected profitability but still losing billions of dollars.
Lyft and Uber have apparently increased revenues somewhat by reducing promotional discounts to riders, but that does not project to even a breakeven point and the unit economics tell me no even if my heart says yes.
The only trick up their sleeve seems to be fare increases, but where is the roadmap detailing this treacherous path?
Once we get to the point in time when Uber is supposed to be profitable, I bet that management will call in another trick play and move the goal posts yet again.
It is quite laughable when so called “tech experts” want Uber to join the ranks of Facebook Inc. (FB), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), Netflix Inc. (NFLX), and Alphabet Inc.’s Google (GOOGL) as part of a FANGU acronym.
Reasons for this new bundle is thought to be because of the ability to take advantage of its massive scale while working toward profitability.
Uber is the global ridesharing leader and is becoming the global food delivery leader, but do they really add value?
What if the local government finally got their finger out and built a proper transport system?
They are merely taking advantage of a broken system and passing on the costs of paying drivers to the drivers themselves by designating them as hourly workers.
Are we supposed to celebrate when Uber becomes more “rational?”
Meaning that players have limited their attempts to undercut one another with the sorts of pricing and big discounts that had at one time suggested the business might be a race to the bottom.
Uber projected a lower loss than analysts were expecting for 2020, does less loss mean profits in 2020?
And I do agree that it is encouraging that the company is finally disclosing more data, but shouldn’t they be doing that in the first place?
Love it or hate it, there is a “war” going on between profitability and growth at Uber as the company manages the trade-offs.
Uber had previously talked up that it would become Ebitda profitability by the end of 2021, but Khosrowshahi now forecasts profitability for the fourth quarter of this year.
He says it is possible because Uber initiated a “belt-tightening program” in the last half of 2019, exiting unprofitable ventures and laying off about 1,000 employees.
For instance, Uber sold its food-delivery business in India to a local startup, Zomato, in return for a 9.9% stake in that company.
I do believe that they haven’t done enough to build credibility with investors and the stock’s price action is behaving as we should trust Uber’s management with whatever comes out of their mouths.
The lack of visibility and uncertainty around trends in ridesharing and Eats outside the U.S. continue to be hard to quantify.
So that sounds great! Uber is more serious than ever about becoming profitable and investors have backed them up with the stock flying to the moon.
The trend is your friend and I would suggest readers to get out of the way of this one because you could get trampled on just like the Tesla bears.
And I do support Uber in making steps in the right direction and it also can be said that stocks appreciate the fastest when they transform from a horrible company to a less horrible company.
But there is no way that I am giving Khosrowshahi a pass for Uber’s current situation and no chance I am praising him to the hills.
It is what it is, and Uber is less bad than before, and if they don’t meet their targets, I don’t think investors will believe Khosrowshahi version of a spin doctor forecast anymore.
Uber will rise in the foreseeable future and if they fail to become profitable by 4th quarter, expect a massive drawdown.
If they succeed, expect a vigorous wave of new players to buy into Uber shares.
The stakes have never been higher for Uber and Khosrowshahi.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2020-02-12 05:02:052020-05-11 13:12:40Uber's Dark Future
That is the latest takeaway from a slew of negative news overflowing the news wires lately.
As many of you know, I hate this niche of tech with a passion, and it has been discovered as nothing more than a marginal fly-by-night sub-sector passing off the cost of employees and their wages to the investor.
They also contribute no meaningful technology that moves the needle.
When the hammer fell on Adam Neumann’s WeWork, the hammer fell equally as hard on the gig economy business model that brought public markets the likes of Uber and Lyft.
The path to venture capitalist’s cashing in abruptly closed off was the end development to all this mayhem.
So I was not surprised when online food deliverer Grubhub (GRUB) had a dead cat bounce after rumors of them looking for a sale to their badly run company.
Then last Friday was the day the chickens came home to roost with Grubhub shares cratering over 8%.
If there is a sale, at what heavily discounted price will it go for?
We could see a marked down shell of its former self.
Grubhub naturally came out and rejected the notion that they are about to be sold off.
Where there is smoke – there is fire.
They did, however, admit they are in the process of “consulting” about certain acquisitions which could mean purchasing inorganic growth to juice up their numbers ahead of a sale.
There are four market leaders who control roughly 80% of the food delivery service business.
But the food war is far from over as competitors undercut each other time after time.
Competition in the food delivery market is driving down the unit economics of online food delivery to a nadir at a time when they can least afford it.
The other three involved are Uber Eats division of Uber (UBER) as well as Postmates and DoorDash.
Grubhub mentioned that there will likely be opportunities to acquire market share, but at what cost?
Acquiring inorganic revenue is at peak cost in 2020.
Cost per unit matters more now than any other time in the past 10 years boding ill for Grubhub and its competition.
And until they adequately address the unit economics in detail, readers must assume that Grubhub is on a suicide mission and you won’t know how close they are to the end until there is a dramatic announcement describing it.
The big takeaway here is that conditions are ripe for consolidation in the online delivery business.
As we go further out on the risk curve, private unicorns are in dire straits too.
Taking a barometer of this subsector allows investors to digest the level of risk premium in the overall markets that can be applied to safer parts of the tech ecosphere through extrapolation techniques.
Venture capitalist Masayoshi Son is infamous for overpaying a slew of tech growth firms and in 2020, so far, it has not been kind to him.
Oyo allows customers to book hotel rooms in more than 80 countries through its app.
It even converts struggling local hotels into Oyo franchises, puts up some money to remodel the interior, and takes commission on every booking.
The startup is dumping 5% of its staff in China and another 12% of employees in India, as part of a reorganization.
Oyo is the third company in SoftBank's portfolio to shed jobs in a week, following the layoffs at robotic pizza startup Zume and car rental company Getaround.
Oyo has sucked in more than $3 billion in capital and the last insane tranche of investment values the company at more than $10 billion.
SoftBank has been throwing money at the company since 2015.
The firm is otherwise known as the "SoftBank's jewel in India" for being one of the country's most valuable private companies.
However, there has been a recent barrage of sub-optimal reports suggesting they have accelerated sales by underhanded business practices.
A peek into the firm showed explicit evidence that Oyo rented thousands of rooms at unlicensed hotels and guesthouses then allowing police and other officials use the service for free to avoid trouble with the authorities.
The pain for Softbank doesn’t just stop at Oyo, Rappi has been dragged down as well.
The Latin American delivery startup is laying off 6% of its workforce, less than a year after Japan’s SoftBank Group pumped in nearly $1 billion in the company.
Softbank is putting pressure on local management to trim the fat off their models and forcing them to become profitable now.
Rappi has expanded to nine countries since its founding in 2015.
It plans to be the swiss army knife of online deliveries by getting into groceries, restaurant meals, medication, furniture, and has even foolishly branched out into scooter rental, travel, and basic banking services.
Softbank plans to pour another $4 billion into South American startups but one must beg to ask, are they throwing good money on top of bad money?
Certainly seems so.
When asked how soon Rappi would turn in a profit, co-founder Sebastian Mejia was adamant that his sole priority was to grow fast, and that investors were on board with the plan.
This is code name for NEVER!
Softbank and its vision fund are set for more death by a thousand cuts in 2020, and being in the wrong place at the wrong time aggravates the mess they find themselves in.
Short all companies reliant on gig economy workers in the public markets and prepare for a gloomy IPO pipeline that will last through the end of 2020.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/oyo-jan13-e1578921112729.png250450Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2020-01-13 08:02:552020-05-11 13:07:57The Death of the Gig Economy
Drones whip by like mini whirling dervishes but are actually hardworking aerial robots that carry out surveillance and inspections for utilities, construction sites, airplanes, and trains from onboard cameras.
Drone delivery appears to be the next transportation bottleneck in the e-commerce wars as Amazon (AMZN) and Uber (UBER) pile capital investment into the technology.
In 2013, Founder and CEO of Amazon Jeff Bezos audaciously said that Amazon would have drone delivery operational by 2018.
But the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) did not acquiesce to Bezos’s ambitious timeline.
Progress has been slow.
When it comes to consumer appetite, the demand for drones will be voracious but only if delivered in a way to add value to the customer experience.
The last thing the world needs is billions of unmanned drones polluting the sky and parked in the sky.
More than 60% of consumers would accept the delivery of dry goods through a drone delivery service, it contrasts to only 26% of fresh produce or meat.
Clearly, fresh foods are more complicated to deliver because of temperature requirements to accommodate the products, and more R&D will need to take place to find a solution.
“When we (Amazon) have a full drone fleet, you'll be able to order anything and get it in 30 minutes if you live near a hub that's serviced by drones," said Amazon’s CEO of Worldwide Consumer Jeff Wilke
Amazon has spent more than six years developing drones which may one day drop packages in backyards assuming regulators green light it.
Timely delivery is important but the diversity of products that can be delivered is just as important.
This is not a one-size-fits-all solution.
Amazon has already ravaged through more than $35 billion on shipping costs this year, more than double what it spent two years ago.
It is yet to be determined whether the four-wheeled delivery robots they are testing that roll on sidewalks will ultimately be slipped into the delivery process, but at least they are making headway and allocating new resources to it by announcing plans for a new facility outside Boston to design and build robots.
Major companies such as Alphabet (GOOGL), FedEx (FDX) and UPS (UPS) are all investing in drone delivery all hoping to be the ones to lead this industry in the future.
The drone battles are taking place under the backdrop of military and political gamesmanship because drones have a large and legitimate role in military affairs.
Even though America’s e-commerce companies hope to take drones and nicely fit it into their delivery service, America is not even close to dominating.
One word – China.
The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission recommended that the US government promote advanced manufacturing and robotics technologies, monitor China’s advances, review bilateral investments and cooperation, and consider closely vetting proprietary academic research.
The Shenzhen, China-based drone company DJI Technology is the dominant worldwide market leader in the civilian drone industry, accounting for over 75% of the global drone market.
In 2017, the U.S. Army banned the military application of DJI drones because the Pentagon was worried that DJI would leak data to the Chinese government.
In 2018, the Defense Department banned the purchase of all commercial off-the-shelf unmanned aircraft system (UAS).
An amendment from Sen. Chris Murphy in the 2020 defense policy bill would ban all Chinese-made drones and Chinese-manufactured parts from military purpose.
DJI’s dramatic rise in the drone race has been nothing but breathtaking dwarfing Western competitors such as France’s Parrot.
They are cost-effective, making them the go-to product for individual consumers.
China has not only succeeded in pulling ahead in the drone wars, but are also pushing the envelope in areas like hypersonic weapons, artificial intelligence, and 5G.
The U.S. military has limited options now because of a generation of underinvestment and inactivity causing a dwindling of U.S. supply of the smallest class of unmanned aerial systems (UASs) that are needed for reconnaissance missions.
DJI has a near-monopoly for one of the most important pieces of technology moving forward.
“We don’t have much of a small UAS industrial base because DJI dumped so many low-price quadcopters on the market, and we then became dependent on them,” said Ellen Lord, the Pentagon’s chief weapons buyer. “We want to rebuild that capability,” she added.
China’s DJI was hit by the recent tariff tsunami levied by the U.S. administration and the drone maker has decided to pass on the cost to the consumer.
DJI has also been banned from bidding for any U.S. military contracts because the Trump administration has concerns that DJI is a national security threat.
DJI reacted to the move by commenting that they are “obviously false” and is “unsubstantiated speculation.”
The second tranche of tariffs, which is scheduled to go live on December 15th, will put an additional 15% tariff on virtually everything that comes to the United States from China, including laptops, smartphones, and drones.
The DJI Mavic Air, now costs $919 on Best Buy instead of $799. Similarly, the DJI Mavic 2 Pro which I have crowned as the best drone to buy in 2019 will cost $1,729, up from $1,499.
Apart from DJI, China has state money pouring into the sector with the most cutting-edge drone technology in the works called Tianyi quadcopter built by a subsidiary of a state aerospace corporation.
It is designed to carry out ground-level reconnaissance and hyper-targeted strikes in cities.
The unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are still in the works, but once ready, could be available on the international market as a cheap and versatile option widening the gulf between America’s military in drone technology.
The drone is designed to be controlled by soldiers on the ground, has an operational distance of 5km (3 miles) and has a vertical range of 6km.
It will be loaded with infrared and laser detectors to enable night surveillance operations and is armed with two 50mm rockets designed to strike from up to 1km.
Sadly, there are no quality drone plays on the American public markets that I can confidently recommend.
The seriousness of the lack of investment really appears in the weakness of U.S. military drone capabilities and on the consumer side of things, drones will be a supercharger input to revenue growth for the likes of Walmart (WMT), Amazon, and the e-commerce companies.
It might be time to wake up and support the creation of a national champion in this critical technology then spin off the commercial synergies in similar fashion to how the personal computer and the internet developed.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/drone.png535793Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2019-12-02 11:02:032020-05-11 13:00:05The Drone Wars Have Started
All of a sudden, and without warning, a buying panic has ensued in the stock market, breaking it out of a tedious two-year range.
The many concerns that kept investors out of stocks, like the trade war, interest rates, and a global economic slowdown, were shaken off like water off the back of a wet dog.
I could see all this coming. Even with my Mad Hedge Market Timing Index at 86, and trading as high as 91, screaming “SELL” I have been ignoring it. It usually has to spend 2-4 weeks at these elevated levels to make a real top anyway. Hedge fund compatriots who were sucked into selling too early by their own inferior in-house algorithms have been stopping out in great pain.
I’ll tell you the people who are really screwed by this move. Those who watched the economic data deteriorate all year, cut their equity allocations to the bone, and only started chasing the market upward once it broke new ground. It is a strategy that can only end in tears.
We here at Mad Hedge Fund Trader did a lot better. Followers of Global Trading Dispatch missed the breakout but bought every major dive of 2019. With double a good year’s performance in hand, we have no need to chase.
The newer Mad Hedge Technology Letter and Mad Hedge Biotechand Healthcare Letter have continued to go long pedal to the metal bringing in double-digit gains for all. Above all, we took profit on no less than four positions on Friday.
Can the market grind higher? Absolutely, yes. The world is awash in cash looking for any kind of return, and US stocks, with a (SPY) 1.81% dividend, are among the world’s highest yielding. In fact, the move could continue until the end of the year.
When will I come back in? After we get a substantial dip. Disciplines are useless unless you stick to them. In the meantime, while stocks are going crazy, there is fertile ground to harvest in other asset classes. I bought bonds (TLT) at the bottom last week and they are already performing nicely.
If you remember, I sold short, and then bought oil (USO) in September, taking advantage of a spate of volatility there. Such is the advantage of an all-asset class strategy I have been preaching and teaching for the past 12 years.
There will be no interest rate cuts in 2020, says Fed chairman Jay Powell, reading in between the lines. To do so would undermine our ability to get out of the next recession. We are still way below the 2.0% inflation target in this deflationary world.
The de-inversion of the yield curve is clearly driving stocks, with long term interest rates at last higher than short term ones. The markets are backing the recession out of the forecast. “Fear of missing out” is replacing just fear. Consumer Prices rose faster than expected as tariffs feed into prices, up 0.4% in October. It’s going to take a lot more than that to move the needle on inflation. The YOY rate climbed to 1.8%. Also, US Producer Prices jumped, up 0.4% in October, a six-month high. It’s going to take a lot more than this to start ringing the inflation bell.
Weekly Jobless Claims soared by 14,000 to 225,000. It’s the first big jump in many months. Is the employment top in? Is this the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end?
Charles Schwab (SCHW) trading accounts soared 31%, in the wake of the commission cut to zero. What happens when you lower the price? You sell more of them. It’s a classic law of supply and demand. Uber founder dumped stocks, as Travis Kalanick unloads $700 million worth of shares. He’s not selling because he can’t think of new ways to spend the money. It’s not exactly a “BUY” recommendation, is it? Avoid (UBER) like the plague. Apple hit a new all-time high at $264, on three broker upgrades, with the high end reaching $290. The market capitalization tops $1.2 trillion, making it the world’s largest publicly-traded company. It looks like I’m going to have to increase my own target from a conservative $200. I made this prediction when the newsletter started a decade ago and the share traded under $20. People said I was nuts, except Steve Jobs. The Tesla Model 3 returns to “reliable” list, from Consumer Reports. They had been taken off due to pieces falling off new cars and failing transmissions exactly at the 44,000-mile mark. It was all covered by warranty, of course. Looks like Elon is figuring out how to put these things together and stay that way. It follows an onslaught of good news about the company that has wiped out the shorts. Who is last on the quality list now? Cadillac. Buy (TSLA) on dips. US short interest falls 1.6%, to 16.8 billion shares, as hedge funds scramble to limit losses. It’s got to be at least half the current net buying. Disney launched its streaming service, Disney Plus, at $6.99 a month. The site crashed from overwhelming demand. It’s a problem I wish I had. Netflix (NFLX) won’t go under but their growth will be clearly impaired. Let the streaming wars begin! Buy (DIS) on dips. US Productivity plunged sharply, down 0.3% in Q3. It’s completely a result of the trade war-induced freeze on capital spending by US businesses this year. It means we’re eating out seed corn to grow. This was a week for the Mad Hedge Trader Alert Service to stay level. With only one position left, a bargain long in (TLT), not much else was going to happen. My long position in Boeing (BA) expired on Friday at its maximum profit point.
By the way, running out of positions at a market top is a good thing.
My Global Trading Dispatch performance held steady at +349.38% for the past ten years, pennies short of an all-time high. My 2019 year-to-date leveled out at +48.68%. So far in November, we are down a miniscule -0.31%. My ten-year average annualized profit held steady at +35.17%.
With my Mad Hedge Market Timing Index sitting around the sky-high 86 level, it is firmly in “SELL” territory and at a three-year high. The markets have been up in a straight line for 2 ½ months.
The coming week is pretty non-eventful of the data front after last week’s fireworks. Maybe the stock market will be non-eventful as well.
On Monday, November 18 at 11:00 AM, the US NAHB Housing Market Index for November is out. On Tuesday, November 19 at 9:30 AM, US Housing Starts for October are released.
On Wednesday, November 20 at 2:00 PM, the Fed’s FOMC Minutes for their October meeting are published.
On Thursday, November 7, at 8:30 AM, Weekly Jobless Claims come out. At 11:00 AM the October Existing Home Sales are announced. On Friday, November 8 at 11:00 AM, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment is out.
The Baker Hughes Rig Count follows at 2:00 PM.
As for me, I am going to see the latest Harry Potter play on Saturday, Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. It’s a reward for two kids who got straight A’s on their report cards. They seem to be strangely good at math. Maybe the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Good luck and good trading.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/john-thomas-4.png518483Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2019-11-18 05:02:102020-05-11 13:56:59The Market Outlook for the Week Ahead, or The Melt Up is On
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Google Analytics Cookies
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
