Mad Hedge Technology Letter
October 14, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHAT IS AUTONOMOUS DRIVING REALLY WORTH?)
(WAYMO), (UBER)
Posts
Is Waymo the real deal?
Apparently not.
That is my takeaway from an analyst cutting the valuation estimate by 40% for Alphabet’s autonomous car subsidiary Waymo from $175 billion to $105 billion.
At $175 billion, investors were giving Waymo the benefit of the doubt plus a generous serving of hyperbole when this unproven technology has never in the history of mankind been monetized successfully before.
Well, $105 billion is a stretch in current times and that valuation might need to be revisited a few months down the line as well.
In a stock market that has frowned upon the waterfall of cheap money of late to fuel its absurd risk/reward strategies, Waymo’s haircut falls in line echoes the same parallels.
This current market climate is more about bulletproof balance sheets and the Waymos, Ubers and Lyfts of the world are getting a nice bench seat in the penalty box.
Today marked an even lower nadir with Uber Technologies Inc. announcing that it is on the verge of acquiring a majority stake in online grocer Cornershop, a deal designed to both extend its geographic reach and boost profits by commingling food delivery with rides.
Cornershop is a digital grocer in Santiago, Chile.
Yes, Chile, the country in South America.
It’s hard to believe that Uber must reach that far down the olive branch to grow.
Prepare yourself for anything like pig farms in Zimbabwe or plumbing businesses in Baku, Azerbaijan.
Who really knows anymore!
These types of exotic purchases are exactly what Mr. Market despises in a climate of negative tech earnings growth.
But I do believe Uber is at the point where CEO Dara Khosrowshahi must become the unlikely savior as the alarm bells are ringing with current Uber investors presiding over a calamitous decline in shares since the IPO.
It’s a rough one and tough sledding for tech executives in 2019.
And it’s no surprise why the number of fired tech CEOs has mushroomed from the CEO of eBay Devin Wenig to the fake tech CEO of office-sharing company WeWork Adam Neuman who spectacularly lost $3.5 billion of personal wealth in less than 30 days.
He is still left with $600 million but his story epitomizes the tech climate right now and there are no free lunches.
So is Waymo ready to deliver or is it a charade?
Waymo pinged an email to customers of its ride-hailing app that their next trip might not have a human safety driver behind the wheel.
The email, entitled “Completely driverless Waymo cars are on the way,” was sent to riders in Phoenix.
A geofenced area that covers several suburbs, including Chandler and Tempe, have a human safety driver behind the wheel and the grid-like setup makes it easy for self-driving technology to perform well.
Waymo has dabbled in Chandler, Ariz. in 2016 and has slowly built this program toward commercial deployment.
Recently, Waymo opened its second technical service center in the Phoenix area to serve a doubling of the fleet.
The general public has never gotten a taste of this technology and I bet it will be years before Waymo is ready and not the late 2019 and early 2020 projection they promised us a few years ago.
There are too many known unknowns that have yet to be solved such as what limitations Waymo will place on these rides.
Waymo is effective in controlled environments but thrown in the natural elements, nighttime, and unforeseen circumstances and the effectiveness deteriorates by orders of a magnitude.
I believe the hurdles relating to the commercialization and advancement of autonomous driving technology will keep slowing Waymo’s march towards success.
Analysts have underestimated how long safety drivers will accompany cars with the most likely outcome a broad-based delay of the rollout of autonomous ridesharing services.
Profitability has been vastly miscalculated as well.
Each driverless car unit is more expensive than first thought and will stay operationally loss-making for years longer.
The technology isn’t advancing at the rate it was when this technology was incubated, Waymo has clearly plateaued and there is a bottleneck in terms of meaningful solutions.
Alphabet has already invested deeply into driverless cars.
Not only them, but Uber already had spent over $1 billion on autonomous cars at the time they went public.
I won’t say this is a black hole of investment capital, but the losses will keep mounting for the next few years and there is no inflection point in sight.
Waymo will continue to be a drag on Alphabet’s earnings after there were such high hopes for the rapid deployment of self-driving cars.
There is a light at the end of a dark tunnel, but that light seems further away than ever.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 12, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE BIG PLAY IN AUTONOMOUS DRIVING WITH APTIV),
(APTV), (Waymo), (TSLA)
The conventional wisdom on Electric Vehicles (EVs) is that they are here to stay.
The secular trends of harsher government environmental policy, a healthy global economic backdrop, rapid-fire technological development, and broad-based mainstream acceptance are the catalysts that will place EVs at the apex of the digital transportation movement for the rest of this century.
EVs are set to eventually capture more than 60% of market share, forcing legacy automotive and niche start-ups to reinvest into their operations in a fiercely competitive industry.
The EV industry still has a mountain to climb as it only represented less than 1% of total global auto unit sales in 2016. That percentage has gradually risen to 1.25% at the end of 2017.
The transition to 60% EV share of total units will organically occur in a slow and steady manner giving automakers ample time to shed legacy technology.
Cost is a major obstacle for widespread EV adoption. Many consumers cannot afford one, but price efficiencies are slowly dropping the cost of owning an EV, appealing to the masses with sleeker models possessing price tags similar to normal cookie-cutter sedans such as the Tesla Model 3.
EV makers have coped with the arduous task of constructing a car within truncated cost limitations. They make up the difference by offering a proliferation of premium add-ons such as souped-up engines and glitzy interiors that extract additional marginal revenue from well-off individuals.
EV technology advancement paired together with higher emission standards will narrow the gap between electric vehicles and the legacy internal combustion engine within the next decade.
Modern EVs new to market such as the Tesla Model 3 could serve as a springboard for able consumers to dive head in to EV revolution.
The disruption time horizon will take around 15 years and affect 80% of the market.
EV mania is destined to integrate with the traditional concept of a car to give transportation breakthrough A.I. functionality, user-friendly connectivity, and self-driving capabilities.
Let's face it, it's easier to install computer systems and software in an electrified platform, and the technologies complement each other.
About 60% of autonomous, light vehicle retrofits are constructed over an electric powertrain, and an additional 21% go with a hybrid powertrain.
Thus, owning the best autonomous vehicle (AV) technology stocks positions investors for the next leg of hyper-accelerating tech.
Waymo's leadership in the AV space is frightening for Tesla, which trails the Alphabet subsidiary that smoothly rolled out its for-profit service in Arizona in early 2018.
Aptiv PLC made a massive splash in the deep-end by acquiring the second best AV technology company NuTonomy. The Cambridge, MA-based tech firm spun off from MIT in 2013, for $450 million late last year and was spun out again in 2017.
Delphi Technologies spun out its legacy and tech business into two separate companies. The legacy part of the company is now the ticker symbol (DLPH), and the AV company became Aptiv PLC (APTV).
Spin-offs give organizations the opportunity to streamline operations and allow the market to value the company on an independent basis instead of the sum of the parts. This can lead to uncorking additional shareholder value.
Aptiv is the closest thing on the market you will find for an unfettered play on self-driving technology.
Management declined against merging its legacy and AV technology, which is a smart move considering legacy technology gets the wrong rub of the green by investors.
NuTonomy lags Alphabet's Waymo but has been operating robo-taxis in Singapore since 2016. Delphi has gifted additional engineers, reinforcing its fantastic technical talent.
Aptiv has split its business into two new different segments in the new company.
The Advanced Safety and User experience segment will act as the brain in the vehicle, emphasizing software know-how to guarantee user security while a centralized system maintains connectivity.
The new Signal and Power Solutions segment will act as the nervous system in the vehicle by enabling high-speed data fluidity within the next-gen architecture. This segment includes the cable management and connector products that contribute a further $1 billion of revenue to the top line.
In total, Aptiv procured $12.9 billion in annual revenue in 2017, which was a boost of 4.9% from 2016. Earnings per share growth was up 10.5% YOY.
Investors cannot reasonably expect AV companies to annually grow top line by 20% to 30% as cloud companies, and the margins are unfortunately less savory. The dynamics of the business are different, and the revenue guidance of $13.4 to $13.8 billion should keep investors happy.
The pipeline is in fine fettle with $19.3 billion in bookings, which represent the lifetime gross revenue for consummated contracts.
Some of the outsized awards came in the form of an active safety contract with an OEM alliance, a high-voltage mobile charger contract from a leading North American EV producer, and an architectural contract for BYD's SUV platform in China.
It's no wonder both of the newly crafted segments expect a 10% boost in revenue for 2018.
NuTonomy is such a gem of a company that it is shocking that a large-cap tech firm declined to swoop in.
Half a billion is peanuts for such valuable and innovative technology.
Level 4 and Level 5 grade technologies are already starting to mature.
Other minor acquisitions of analytics firms Control-Tec and Movimento will initiate data monetization opportunities that effectively analyze their aggregated data then translate data into actionable profit-making opportunities.
Big data analytics are needed to decipher the path forward after compiling millions of miles of auto-robo data. And algorithms needing refinement are starving for the data, too.
A fully connected user experience will become standard in these robo-cars, and an integrated, optimized architecture is the secret sauce to commercialization of Level 4 and Level 5 automated vehicles.
Aptiv and Waymo are the only end-to-end system providers of the integrated brain and nervous system in a vehicle.
By late 2018, NuTonomy will have more than 150 Level 4 vehicles in live action.
Aptiv forecasts about $300 million in revenue from Level 4 or Level 5 AV systems by 2025.
Level 4 is practically autonomous - ready with a driver waiting to take control if need be.
Level 1, 2 and 3 revenues will mushroom to $1.8 billion per year, more than tripling from $500 million today.
Ottomatika, a Carnegie Mellon University spin-off founded in 2013, which provides software for self-driving cars, and NuTonomy are the in-house duo entirely focused on complex Level 4 and Level 5 solutions.
The shared access to the system has been set up to allow multiple teams access to the algorithms and technology that feeds through to other parts of the business.
Aptiv PLC is the perfect company to place in a buy and forget portfolio because AV monetization is still in its incubation phase.
Just as investors of pure cloud plays recently have been rewarded in spades, pure AV technology companies will be rewarded as mass rollouts of for-profit services become commonplace.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"The only constant in the technology industry is change." - said CEO of Salesforce Marc Benioff
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 3, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE BIG WINNER FROM THE PHOENIX CAR CRASH),
(WAYMO), (TSLA), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (AMZN), (UBER), (GM), (FB)
In 2014, the juicy sound clips recorded by NFL legend Chris Carter at the annual NFL rookie symposium would be enough for those at league headquarters to have nervous breakdowns.
During a keynote speech, Chris Carter recommended that every rookie about to kick-start a sports career should find a "fall guy" just in case they found themselves on the wrong side of the law.
Carter later rescinded his comments and sincerely apologized for insinuating marginal tactics.
Lo and behold, it seems the most attentive listeners at the symposium weren't the players but the swashbuckling chauffeur-share service that has become the "fall guy" of Big Tech, none other than Uber.
The great thing (read: sarcastic here) for Uber about killing a pedestrian with autonomous vehicle technology is that it does not need to change its Silicon Valley mind-set of "move fast and break things."
Everything Uber touches seems to turn to mush. At least lately.
This revelation is extremely bullish for the other big players in the A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) driverless car space, mainly Waymo and General Motors (GM).
Granted, Uber came late to the party, but that cannot be an excuse for the myriad of shortcuts it promotes to build its business.
Waymo, the autonomous subsidiary of Google (GOOGL), has been honing its software, algorithms, and sensors for the past nine years like a sage samurai swordsmith from Kyoto. This type of detailed nurturing has led Waymo to rack up more than 5 million miles of testing on live roads.
The company recently commenced the first niche ride-hailing service in Phoenix, AZ, and just announced that it will purchase up to 20,000 electric cars from Jaguar Land Rover in a $1 billion deal to outfit with its cutting-edge technology.
Every day is a joyous day for Waymo because the first mover advantage is in full effect.
GM, another laggard, though considered in the top three, won't commence its robotic car fleet until late 2019. However, by that time, Waymo could be on the verge of mass rollouts if there are no setbacks.
The cherry on top for Waymo is Uber's knack of making a dog's breakfast of anything it pursues, magnifying an insurmountable lead for Waymo to possess.
Granted, the autonomous vehicle brain trust expected casualties, and the firm that made news for this mishap would be stuck with this label along with suspended operations.
Waymo missed a direct hit thanks to Uber and Tesla.
Tesla also took a direct hit when it announced that Walter Huang, an Apple engineer, sadly was killed in a Model X accident last weekend while his car was on autopilot.
It capped a horrible week by announcing a comprehensive recall of every Model S made before April 2016 for a faulty part. After fighting tooth and nail to maintain the $300 support level, Tesla swiftly sold off down to $250.
The disruption fetish permeating the ranks of the tech industry has its merits. Often the end result manifests through cheaper prices and better consumer services.
However, Uber's over-aggressiveness has placed it at the forefront of the regulation backlash along with Facebook (FB).
Google has certainly been playing its cards right, and having not run over a pedestrian consolidates its leading position
Luckily, the National Transportation Safety Board does not punish every participant using this technology.
No news is good news.
An extensive review of internal processes will hit team morale, and the burden of blame with fall upon the engineers.
The fallout from the tragic incidents will set back Tesla and Uber at least three to six months.
The suspension of their operations is akin to a white flag because Waymo is currently leaps ahead and plans to ramp up the mass rollout in the next two years with technology that is best of breed.
The running joke in the industry is that Uber's autonomous vehicle engineers are comprised of Waymo rejects.
Waymo already has more than 600 for-profit vehicles in operation in Arizona. And as every day without a fatality is considered a success, the Jaguars are next in line to be tricked-out with sensors and software.
Unceremoniously, Waymo has focused on safety as the pillar of its autonomous driving operation. Its conservative attitude toward danger will serve it well in the future. Waymo even spouted that its technology would have avoided the Uber accident.
Waymo has no desire to physically produce cars, but it aspires to sell licenses to the technology that could be installed in trucks and delivery vehicles, too.
The licenses could act as de-facto SaaS (software as a service) reoccurring revenue that has catapulted cloud companies to untold heights.
Google would also be able to integrate Google Maps, Google Docs, and all Google services into the robot-cab experience. The robo-taxi would merely serve as an incubation chamber to use the plethora of Google services while being transported from point A to point B.
And with Uber temporarily wiped off the map, Waymo seems like a great bet to monetize this segment at massive scale.
Google is truly on a roll as of late, even finding the perfect fall guy for the big data leak that has roiled the tech world, inducing a wicked tech sell-off - Facebook.
Instead of extracting data from user-posted content, Google's search builds a profile on users' search tendencies, and it is just as culpable in this ordeal.
Ironically, all the heat is coming down on Facebook's plate, and Mark Zuckerberg's lack of tactical PR noise is cause for investor concern.
The mountains of cash vaulted up over the years has made barriers of entry into new fields simple.
For example, Amazon's desire to lead health care came out of left field, and 10 years ago nobody ever thought the iPod company would make smart watches.
The interesting development in broader tech is the disintegration of unity that once supported the backbone of these firms.
Tim Cook, chief executive officer of Apple, railed on Facebook's business model and trashed Mark Zuckerberg's blatant disregard for privacy in order to profit from people's personal lives.
Large cap tech has never had as much overlap as it does now, and the new normal is throwing others under the bus.
If Google is dragged into the Facebook regulatory orbit, the silver lining is that the world's best autonomous driving technology will soon transform its narrative and put its incredibly profitable search business on the back burner.
Markets are forward looking and reward outstanding growth stories.
Tech is growth.
Morgan Stanley issued a report claiming the repercussions of mass-integrating this technology would be to the tune of about half a trillion dollars. That includes the $18 billion saved in annual health costs to automotive injuries. Also, 42% of police work ignites from a simple traffic stop. This would vanish overnight as well as concrete parking garages that blight cities. Car insurance is another industry that will be swept into the dustbin of ancient history.
Yes, tech has evolved that fast when Google can start claiming its revered search business as the daunted L word - legacy business.
The fog of war is starting to burn off and the visible winner is Waymo.
The shaping of its autonomous vehicle business is starting to take concrete form and although this won't affect earnings in the next few years, it will be a game changer of monumental proportions.
Uber is seriously in the throes of having an existential problem because of Waymo's outperformance. Venture capitalists heavily invested in Uber because of the promises of autonomous vehicle technology.
This is its entire growth story of the future.
Without it, it is a simple taxi company run on an app. There is no competitive advantage.
Waymo is on the verge of creating a scintillating growth business that is effectively Uber without a driver while simultaneously destroying Uber.
Ouch!
It speaks volumes to the ascendancy. And if Waymo miraculously capitulates, Google can always call Chris Carter and find another "fall guy."
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
Asked what he would do if he was Mark Zuckerberg, Apple CEO Tim Cook said, "I wouldn't be in this situation."
