One of the few people who can magnify pressure on the venture capitalists of Silicon Valley is none other than Masayoshi Son.
What a ride it has been so far. At least for him.
His $100 billion SoftBank Vision Fund has put the Sand Hill Road faithful in a tizzy – utterly revolutionizing an industry and showing who the true power broker is in Silicon Valley.
He has even gone so far as doubling down his prospects by claiming that he will raise a $100 billion fund every few years and spend $50 billion per year.
This capital logically would flow into what he knows best – technology and the best technology money can buy.
As Yahoo Japan and Alibaba (BABA) shares have floundered, SoftBank’s stock has decoupled from the duo displaying explosive brawn.
SoftBank’s stock is up 30% in the past few months and I can tell you it’s not because of his Japanese telecommunications business which has served him well until now as his cash cow.
Yahoo Japan, in which SoftBank owns a 48.17% stake, has existing synergies with SoftBank’s Japanese business, but has experienced a tumble in share price as Son turns his laser-like focus to his epic Vision Fund.
His tech investments are bearing fruit and not only that, Son revealed his Alibaba investment is about to clean up shop to the tune of $11.7 billion next year shooting SoftBank shares into orbit.
A good portion of the lucrative windfall will arrive from derivatives connected to the sale of Alibaba, and the other 60% comes from the paper profits finally realized in this shrewd piece of business.
Equally paramount, SoftBank’s Vision Fund hauled in $2.13 billion in operating profits from the April-June quarter underscoring the effectiveness of Masayoshi Son’s tech ardor.
Son said it best of the performance of the Vision Fund saying, “Results have actually been too good.”
So good that after this June, Son changed his schedule to spend 3% of his time on his telecom business down from 97% before June.
His telecommunications business in Japan has turned into a footnote.
It was the first quarter that Son’s tech investments eclipsed his legacy communications company.
Son vies to rinse and repeat this strategy to the horror of other venture capitalists.
The bottomless pit of capital he brings to the table predictably raises the prices for everyone in the tech investment world.
Son’s capital warfare strategy revolves around one main trope – Artificial Intelligence.
He also strictly selects industry leaders which have a high chance of dominating their field of expertise.
Geographically speaking, the fund has pinpointed America and China as the best sources of companies. India takes in the bronze medal.
Unsurprisingly, these two heavyweights are the unequivocal leaders in artificial intelligence spearheading this movement with the utmost zeal.
His eyes have been squarely set on Silicon Valley for quite some time and his record speaks for himself scooping up stakes in power players such as Uber, WeWork, Slack, and GM (GM) Cruise.
Other stakes in Chinese firms he’s picked up are China’s Uber Didi Chuxing, China’s GrubHub (GRUB) Ele.me and the first digital insurer in China named Zhongan International costing him $500 million.
Other notable deals done are its sale of Flipkart to Walmart (WMT) for $4 billion giving SoftBank a $1.5 billion or 60% profit on the $2.5 billion position.
In 2016, the entire venture capitalist industry registered $75.3 billion in capital allocation according to the National Venture Capital Association.
This one company is rivalling that same spending power by itself.
Its smallest deal isn’t even small at $100 million, baffling the local players forcing them to scurry back to the drawing board.
The reverberation has been intense and far-reaching in Silicon Valley with former stalwarts such as Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers breaking up, outmaneuvered by this fresh newcomer with unlimited capital.
Let me remind you that it was considered standard to cautiously wade into investment with several millions.
Venture capitalists would take stock of the progress and reassess if they wanted to delve in some more.
There was no bazooka strategy then.
SoftBank has thrown this tactic out the window by offering aspiring firms showing promise boatloads of capital up front even overpaying in some cases.
Conveniently, Son stations himself nearby at a nine-acre estate in Woodside, California complete with an Italianate mansion he bought for $117.5 million in 2012.
It was one of the most expensive properties ever purchased in the state of California even topping Hostess Brands owner Daren Metropoulos, who bought the Playboy Mansion from Hugh Hefner in 2016 for $100 million.
If you think Son is posh – he is not. He only fits himself out in the Japanese budget clothing brand Uniqlo. He just needed a comfortable place to stay and he hates hotels.
In August, SoftBank decided to top off the $4.4 billion investment in WeWork, an American office space-share company, with another $1 billion leading Son to proclaim that WeWork would be his “next Alibaba.”
Son continued to say that WeWork is “something completely new that uses technology to build and network communities.”
The rise of remote workers is taking the world by storm and this bet clearly follows this trend.
The unlimited coffee and beer found in the new Japanese Roppongi WeWork office that opened earlier this year was a nice touch.
WeWork plans to open 10-12 offices in Japan by the end of 2018.
Thus far, WeWork is operating in over 300 locations in over 20 countries.
Revenue is growing rapidly with the $900 million in 2017 a 12-fold improvement from 2014.
The newest addition to SoftBank’s dazzling array of unicorns is Bytedance, a start-up whose algorithms have fueled news-stream app Jinri Toutiao’s meteoric rise in China.
The deal values the company at $75 billion.
It also runs video sharing app Douyin, and overseas version TikTok.
Bytedance’s proprietary algorithm, serving to personalize streams for users, is the best in China.
They have been able to insulate themselves from local industry giants Tencent and Alibaba.
TikTok has piled up over 500 million users and brilliant investment like these is why Son revealed that the Vision Fund’s annual rate of return has been 44%.
SoftBank’s ceaseless ambition has them in the news again with whispers of investing in a Chinese online education space with a company called Zuoyebang.
China’s online education market is massive. In 2017, this industry pulled down over $33 billion in revenue, and 2018 is poised to break $55 billion.
Zuoyebang has lured in Goldman Sach’s (GS) as an investor.
This platform allows users to upload homework questions for third party assistance – the name of the app literally translates into “homework help.”
Cherry-picking off the top of the heap from the best artificial intelligence companies in the world is the secret recipe to outperforming your competitors.
At the same time, aggressively throwing money at these companies has effectively frozen out any resemblance of competition. Once the competition is frozen out, the value of these investments explodes, swiftly super-charged by rapidly expanding growth drivers.
How can you compete with a man who is willing to pay $300 million for a dog walking app?
Venture capitalist funds have been scrambling to reload and mimic a Vision Fund-like business of their own, but its not easy raising $100 billion quickly.
This genius strategy has made the founder of SoftBank the most powerful businessman in the world.
Son owns the future and will have the largest say on how the world and economies evolve going forward.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Softbank-CEO-2.png539472MHFTFhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTF2018-10-04 09:01:392018-10-04 08:51:07How Softbank is Taking Over the US Venture Capital Business
Warren Buffett is right, retail is a tough game in the face of the Amazon (AMZN) threat.
I wouldn't want to face off with them either.
Technology has been the biggest catalyst fueling a tectonic shift in the retail climate with large cap technology players usurping market share decimating competition.
The rise of e-commerce platforms has been nothing short of spectacular.
Management has also used technology to modernize the global supply chain, in-house operations, and ramp up the hyper-targeting of prime customers.
The treasure trove of big data collected has been the key to pinpointing the weaknesses and finding solutions.
Amazon knew all of this before everybody else. And, Jeff Bezos has already annihilated a large swath of the retail community that will never return.
Walmart was one of the first retailers to wipe out the small brick-and-mortar shops, and Amazon is attempting to do what Walmart did to others in the past.
Luckily, the sleeping giant of Walmart (WMT) has awoken and is laying the groundwork to launch a full-frontal assault on Amazon.
Better late than never.
More than 90% of Walmart's customers live within a 15-minute drive of one of their stores, but why drive 15 minutes with exorbitant gas prices when Amazon says you don't have to?
Once a laggard, Walmart is now instilling its newfound e-commerce operation with a new sense of zeal and purpose, offering Amazon a real threat and copying its best ideas such as two-day free shipping.
Someone must stand up to Amazon. And Walmart with its massive embedded base of loyal and fervent customers and revenue is the ideal challenger.
Currently, Amazon has extracted more than 49% of the U.S. e-commerce market in 2018.
Walmart trails Amazon by a wide margin, and the investment into developing its e-commerce business will boost the 3.7% e-commerce market share.
If Walmart maintains the drive to enhance tech operations, its e-commerce division could double its market share to more than 7.5% from its low base.
This is entirely manageable as it would only need to convert a small percentage of current non-digital customers into using its digital portals whose quality has remarkedly improved the past few years.
Redesigning the official website was timely as the new interface is sleeker, more functional than past versions, and just plain better.
There is even a tinge of Amazon in the design borrowing the best parts of its foe's design and integrating it into a modern look.
The statement of intent is there, and Amazon won't have a frictionless pathway to profits anymore.
Walmart CEO Doug McMillon has been the main man to ramp up the tech side of the business and has injected a fresh batch of youth into the management style.
Online purchases only comprise less than 20% of sales and that runway is still long and wide for a company that has only barely scratched the surface of its tech strategy.
Most tech companies are in the first innings of a long game, but Walmart is even further behind meaning there is ample room to grow.
Even McMillon believes that Walmart will morph into a certain "kind of technology company" going forward.
Not only is it beefing up its digital commerce strategy, but physical stores are getting makeovers to extract additional marginal revenue from each customer.
Walk into your nearest Walmart and you might notice it looks completely different than your father's Walmart.
It is also dabbling a bit with augmented reality to boost the in-store customer experience.
Walmart has installed an avalanche of self-checkout kiosks at the front of the store to ease and quicken customer payment.
The use of big data analytics is now aiding decisions on how to best create the optimal shopping environment for its customers.
In-store pickup automated machines called towers help customers in picking up their goods if they choose to drive to the physical store, thereby enhancing the customer service quality.
Walmart is no longer playing defense and sticking to what it knows.
It is on the front foot and should be.
Walmart announced e-commerce sales spiked 40% YOY in Q, and the man responsible for this execution is Marc Lore.
Who is Marc Lore?
Marc Lore is the chief executive officer of Walmart eCommerce U.S., and the showdown against Amazon is a personal gripe for him.
Lore joined Walmart when his e-commerce company Jet.com was snapped up for $3.3 billion in 2016.
This was more of a talent and expertise grab that Walmart needed at the time to learn the ropes of the e-commerce business to better understand how to respond to Amazon.
Before Jet.com and Walmart, Lore was on the books at Bezos' Amazon.com where his feud began.
Lore joined Amazon by way of his e-commerce company Quidsi, which he cofounded and which was bought by Amazon for $545 million in 2011.
Following Amazon's purchase, Lore and Bezos did not always see eye to eye on how Quidsi would operate inside the confines of Amazon, creating long-lasting tension that has turning into bad blood.
Quidsi specialized in certain genres such as baby products and household goods. After Amazon sucked all the knowledge and life out of Quidsi, it fired the remaining 260 employees at its New Jersey headquarters and closed down the firm.
Bezos cited "unprofitability" for shuttering Quidsi, and the thinly veiled parting shot at Lore registered deeply inside the back of his mind.
Lore reinvented himself and launched a new e-commerce business called Jet.com.
After being absorbed by Walmart, Lore was repositioned to the top of Walmart's e-commerce division leading the helm.
Lore understands how to take on Amazon after working inside its Seattle headquarters for years after the Quidsi integration and knows how to beat the company at its own game.
He is the perfect person to help Walmart infuse success into its e-commerce division. Walmart is the optimal platform for Lore to get revenge against Jeff Bezos.
A win-win proposition.
Walmart e-commerce business is on track to rise 40% in 2018.
A few changes he set off right away were the expansion of Walmart's online selection adding more than 1,100 brands, setting up a creative discount program attracting more shoppers into physical stores, cooperating with Google to integrate voice-activated shopping mechanisms, and signing up a new in-house brand called Bonobos to design an exclusive portfolio of brands mirroring Amazon's 76 private labels on its platform.
Lore even took a page out of Amazon's playbook and made two-day free shipping possible for millions of products through its website.
Warren Buffett has said in the past that not investing in Amazon and not investing more in Walmart when he had the chance were two of his most regrettable mistakes.
It could be true that this time around Buffett jumped the gun in unloading his Walmart shares. I agree that retail can be scary, but not all retail is created equal.
For some particular retailers such as Walmart, the future doesn't look so bad.
I agree with Buffett that Walmart has more than tough competitors, but if Walmart emphasizes its digital first strategy via mobile and desktop, there is a lot of wiggle room to harvest gains from these positive changes.
Walmart has been used to growing 1% to 2% in U.S. same-store sales per year, and it was habitually assumed as a constant.
The growth of 4.5% proves that tech investments are paying dividends and even though margins are pressured, it's a must to stay competitive.
If Walmart can lure in growth investors who believe in the evolving tech narrative, it would expand the variety of investors interested in Walmart.
Walmart has a lot going for them and sometimes that gets lost around all the hoopla about the Amazon threat.
Walmart has the mind-boggling scale retailers dream of and migrating its own customers online is the key to unlocking new value.
Certainly, these customers will purchase more products after algorithms identify the products customers desire to buy.
Margins will suffer somewhat from this new strategy, but growing pains and reinvestment are sorely needed to turn around the ship.
Luckily, this legacy retailer is on the right path and has hit on the right strategy.
Once the technology is running efficiently, the average revenue per user will start to rise as with for all top-tier technology companies because of leveraged scale making it possible to boost profits.
In addition, there is potential digital ad business to nurture along if Walmart can shift a decent number of legacy customers to mobile or desktop platforms.
The future doesn't look so bleak for Walmart, neither does its share price.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00MHFTRhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTR2018-08-20 01:05:212018-08-20 01:05:21Is Walmart the Next Amazon?
In its latest earnings report for Q2 2018 Netflix definitely disappointed. Revenues came in at $3.91 billion compared to an expected $3.94 billion. New subscribers came up short 1 million of those expected.
It also provided weaker guidance, expecting to ad only 5 million new subscribers versus an earlier expected 6 million, with most coming from international.
The stock market noticed, taking the shares from $420 down to $330, a loss of 21.42%. Is it time to bail on Reed Hasting's miracle firm? Or is it time to load the boat once again?
If you have any doubts just ask any former employee of Blockbuster. In 1997, Blockbuster was the 800-pound gorilla in the VHS video rental business, with 9,000 worldwide, a 31% market share, and a $5 million market capitalization.
Today, Blockbuster has only one store left somewhere in rural Alaska. There is but one company to blame for this turn of events, and that would be Netflix.
Not only did Blockbuster bite the dust, so did the entire $8 billion-a-year movie rental industry, including Movie Gallery, Hollywood Video, and the rental operations of Walmart (WMT) and Amazon (AMZN).
That year, Reed Hastings returned his rental of the video Apollo 11 a month late and was hit with a huge $40 late charge. He was struck with a bolt of lightning. "There must be a business opportunity here," he thought.
The next day, he and friend Marc Randolph bought an oversized greeting card, tossed the card, and mailed a CD in the remaining envelope to Hastings' house. It arrived the next day in perfect condition. It was a simple matter of geometry. While the CD sat in the middle of the envelope, the Post Office only stamped the corners. This simple experiment became the basis of a business that eventually grew to $186 billion.
Yes, and now you're all thinking, "Why didn't I think of that?"
Hastings was the scion of an East Coast patrician family, a member of the social register and a regular in the New York Times society pages. His great-grandfather, Alfred Lee Loomis, was an early quant who made a fortune.
He received his undergrad degree from Bowdoin College and then joined the Peace Corps. Following a two-year stint in Swaziland to teach math, Hastings then obtained a master's degree in Computer Science from Stanford University in 1988.
Hastings founded his first firm at the age of 30, Pure Software, which went public in 1995. It then merged with Atria Software in 1996 and as Pure Atria was acquired in 1997. That left him flush with cash and looking for new challenges.
Based on the successful mail experiment Hastings invested $2 million into the Netflix idea, which Marc Randolph ran for the first two years.
Netflix then become the lucky beneficiary of a number of sea changes in technology then underway, none of which it anticipated. Sales of DVD players were taking off. The Internet and online commerce were gaining respectability, and massive overinvestment in broadband led to exponential improvements in streaming speeds.
There was also a crucial Supreme Court decision regarding the Copyright Act of 1909 that protected the right to rent a video that you owned. Hollywood had been fighting rentals tooth and nail to protect their substantial profits from DVD sales.
Hastings assembled a team of former colleagues who managed to build a website and a primitive distribution system. The Netflix website went live on April 14, 1998. The site crashed within 90 minutes, overwhelmed by demand. A rushed trip to the nearest Fry's Electronics brought 10 more PCs, which were quickly wired in as servers. By the end of the first day, Netflix had rented 500 videos.
The DVD optical format first launched in March 1997, creating the DVD player industry. Sales reached 400,000 units by the first half of 1998 and prices collapsed, from $1,100 to $580 in the first year. Netflix was swept up in the tide and monthly revenues reached $100,000 within four months.
Since newly released titles were so expensive at $15, Netflix focused on older, niche films in anime, Chinese martial arts, Bollywood movies, and, yes, soft-core porn. Netflix later exited this market when Hastings accepted an appointment to the California State Board of Education.
The company thrived. The headcount rose from an initial three to more than 100. But it was losing money - some $11 million in 1998.
Then the company caught a major break. The French luxury goods tycoon, Bernard Arnault, CEO of LVMH, was desperate to get into the Dotcom Boom and invested $30 million in Netflix. This attracted another $100 million from other venture capitalists and angel investors.
This allowed the company to experiment with its business model. It launched next-day delivery in San Francisco, which proved wildly popular, new sign-ups, renewals, and customer loyalty soared. Then in a stroke of genius Netflix initiated its Marquee Program, which allowed customers to rent four DVDs a month for only $15.95 a month, with no late fees. DVD player sales in 1999 reached 6 million, but Netflix lost $29.8 million that year.
In 2000, the Marquee Program evolved into the Unlimited Movie Rental service and the price rose to $19.95. It included a free rental, which customers could obtain by entering their credit card data, which then renewed indefinitely. This is common now but was considered wildly aggressive in 2000. Netflix was also an early artificial intelligence user, using algorithms to find movies that both members of a couple would like based on past rental data.
Netflix is a company that did 100 things wrong, any one of which could have wiped out the firm. It was the few things it did right that led it to stardom.
Hastings worked out deals with manufacturers to include a free Netflix rental coupon with every DVD player sold. The move earned it valuable market share, but almost bled the company dry since most didn't return. But a labeling error caused hard-core Chinese porn discs to get sent out instead.
A programing glitch caused members' video queues to be sent out all at once, landing some happy subscribers with 300 videos all at once. Coupon counterfeiting was rife until the company began individually coding each one.
Netflix planned to go public in 2000. Existing shareholders rushed to top up their holdings in expectation of cashing in on a first-day pop in the share price. But the Dotcom Crash intervened, and all new tech IPOs were canceled for years. This episode of greed and attempt at insider trading left Netflix well-funded through the following recession. Netflix lost $57.4 million in 2000.
In the meantime, the installed base on DVD players reached 8.6 million by 2002. Then disaster struck. Hastings learned that Amazon was entering the DVD sales market, the only source of Netflix profits. Hastings flew up to Seattle to sell Netflix to Amazon. But Jeff Bezos only offered $12 million and Hastings walked. It was a rare miss for Bezos. DVD players dropped to $200, and demand for content soared.
An important part of the Netflix story was the self-destruction of industry leader Blockbuster. Hastings offered to sell Netflix to Blockbuster at the bargain price of $50 million. By then, Netflix had 300,000 paid subscribers compared to Blockbuster's 50 million. But Blockbuster charged late fees while Netflix didn't. That difference would change the world. However, CEO John Antioco passed believing that online commerce was nothing more than a passing fad. It was a disastrous decision.
To dress up the company's financials for an IPO in 2002, Hastings fired about 40% of the company's workforce to cut costs. On May 23, 2002, Reed Hastings stood on the floor of wealth manager Merrill Lynch as the stock started trading on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol of (NFLX) at $15 a share. The company raised another $82.5 million in the deal. A year later Netflix announced it had 1 million paid subscribers, and the stock soared to $75 and the stock later split 2 for 1.
Realizing his error, Blockbuster's Antioco launched an all-out effort to catch up with Netflix in online rentals. When that news hit the market, (NFLX) shares fell back to its IPO price of $15. Late in 2004, Blockbuster launched a clunky copy of the Netflix website, but without the magical algorithms in the backend that made it work so well. Blockbuster undercut Netflix on price by $2, offering memberships for $17.95. It immediately captured 50% of all new online sign-ups but continued with its notorious late fees.
Blockbuster Online was plagued with software glitches from the start and every day presented a new crisis. Netflix also fought back with its own price cut, to $17.99. Both companies bled money. Short sellers started accumulating big positions in Netflix stock. Hastings vowed to run Blockbuster out of the online market with a $90 a quarter ad spend.
This Netflix received some manna from heaven. Corporate raider Carl Icahn secretly accumulated a chunk of Blockbuster stock in the market and then demanded that the company pursue an asset stripping strategy. Icahn eventually obtained three board seats and became de facto CEO. So, to say that management time was distracted was a gross understatement.
Netflix received another gift when Walmart finally threw in the towel for online movie rentals. Hastings jumped in and did a deal whereby (WMT) would refer all future movie rental customers to Netflix.
Blockbuster finally decided to dump its despised late fees, costing it $400 million in annual revenues. Hundreds of stores were closed to cut costs. The downward spiral began. The value of Blockbuster fell to $684 million. With 4.2 million subscribers Netflix was now worth about $1.5 billion. Blockbuster lost an eye-popping $500 million in 2005.
DVD sales and rentals reached their all-time peak of $27 billion in 2006. Slightly more than 50% of Americans then had broadband access.
Blockbuster, growing weary of the competition from Netflix, finally decided to deliver a knockout blow. It launched its Total Access program in another attempt to bleed Netflix to death by undercutting Netflix's membership price by $2. It worked, and Netflix was facing another near-death experience. Blockbuster Online's share of new subscriptions soared to 70%, and total subscribers soared from 1.5 million to 3.5 million in months. The Netflix share fell to only 17%, and the company was now losing money for the first time in years.
In a last desperate act, Netflix offered to buy Blockbuster Online for $600 billion, and would have gone up to $1 billion just to eliminate the competition. An overconfident Blockbuster, smelling blood, refused. Movie Gallery and Hollywood Video were already on the bankruptcy trail, so why shouldn't Netflix go the same way?
And then the inexplicable happened. Icahn refused to pay Antioco a promised $7 million performance bonus based on the Blockbuster Online success. Instead, he offered only $2 million and Antioco resigned, collecting an $8 million severance bonus in the process. Icahn replaced him with Jim Keyes, the former CEO of 7-Eleven.
Keyes immediately pulled the plug on the Total Access discount, thus dooming Blockbuster Online. Instead, he ordered that the company's 6,000 remaining stores sell Slurpees and pizzas to return to profitability, in effect turning them into 7-Elevens that rented videos. It was one of the worst decisions in business history. Many of the senior staff resigned and sold their stock on hearing this news. Keyes in effect seized defeat from the jaws of victory.
Reinvigorated and with subscriptions soaring once again, Netflix launched headlong in online streaming. It introduced its set top box, Roku, in 2008. It then got Microsoft to offer Netflix streaming through its Xbox 360 game console that Christmas, instantly adding potentially10 million new subscribers.
And this is what makes Netflix Netflix. Although the company had the best recommendation engine in the industry, CineMatch, Hastings thought he could do better. So, in 2006, he offered a $1 million prize to anyone who could improve Cinematch's performance by 10%. To facilitate the competition, he made public the data on 100 million searches carried out by the firm's customers.
It was the largest data set put in the public domain. Some 40,000 teams in 186 countries entered the contest, including the best artificial intelligence and machine language and mathematical minds. It became the most famous scientific challenge of its day.
After a heated three-year struggle, a team named BellKor's Pragmatic Chaos won, a combination of three teams from Bell Labs, Hungary, and Canada. The copyright for the algorithm is owned by AT&T and licensed to Netflix for a fixed annual fee. AT&T also uses the winning algorithm for its own U-verse TV programming.
When the 2008 financial crisis hit, Netflix subscribers just kept on rising at the rate of 10,000 a day as consumers stayed at home and obtained cheaper forms of entertainment. Total subscriptions topped 10 million in 2009. Those at Blockbuster cratered. A new competitor appeared on the scene, Redbox, with 20,000 supermarket kiosks offering DVDs for 99 cents a day. But Netflix was hardly affected.
By 2012, Netflix subscriptions reached 20 million. Streaming was a blowout success, with half of its customers using streaming only to watch TV shows and movies. Hollywood beat a path to Hastings' door, with Paramount Pictures, Lionsgate, and MGM earning a collective $800 million in Netflix fees. Netflix now accounted for 60% of movies streamed and 20% of total broadband usage.
When Blockbuster finally declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 23, 2010, so did its Canadian operations. That opened the way for Netflix to enter the international market, picking up 1 million new subscribers practically overnight. Next it launched into Latin America, introducing Spanish and Portuguese streaming in 43 countries.
As streaming replaced DVD rental by mail, Hastings attempted to spin off the rump of the business into a firm called Quickster. Customers would now have to open two accounts, one for streaming and one for mail and pay high prices. Customers and shareholders rebelled, taking the stock from $305 down to a heartbreaking $60. This was the last chance you could buy the stock at a decent price.
Hastings recanted on Quickster and let go the 200 staff applied to the unit. Icahn made a reappearance in this story, this time accumulating a 10% share in Netflix. After demanding management changes nothing happened, and Icahn eventually sold his shares for a large profit. Finally, Icahn made money in the video business.
Going forward, Netflix's strategy is finally straightforward. Create a virtuous circle whereby superior content attracts new subscribers, who then deliver the money for better content.
CineMatch knows more about what you want to watch than you do. The immense data it is generating gives Netflix not only the insight on how to sell you the next movie, it also proves unmatched insight into trends in the industry as a whole. It also makes Netflix unassailable in the movie industry.
That has given the firm the confidence to double its original content budget from $4 billion to $8 billion this year to produce Emmy-winning series such as House of Cards and Orange is the New Black.
So, the future for Netflix looks bright. As for me, I think I'll spend the rest of the evening watching the 1931 version of Frankenstein on Netflix.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00MHFTRhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTR2018-08-02 01:06:312018-08-29 13:33:44What's Next for Netflix?
Please be advised there will be no Technology Letter
Thursday, August 2, or Friday August 3,
as Editor Arthur Henry will be traveling.
Publication will resume Monday, August 6.
Thank you for your understanding.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter August 1, 2018 Fiat Lux
Featured Trade: (THE RACE DOWN TO ZERO), (SCHW), (FB), (WMT), (AMZN), (FFIDX), (BOX)
It seems time after time, entire industries get flipped on their heads without notice.
The modern-day hyper-acceleration of technology is creating tectonic shifts in the economy that only some can truly understand.
There is the good, the bad, and the ugly.
The functionality of technology has helped enhanced our daily lives infinitely, yet there is a dark side of technology that has reared its ugly head threatening the future existence of mankind.
One industry next in line to be smashed to bits will have the effect of unimaginably reshaping Wall Street as we know it.
Gone are the days of brokers shouting from the trading pits, a bygone era where pimple-faced traders cut their teeth rubbing shoulders with the journeymen of yore.
The stock brokerage industry is at an inflection point with the revolutionary online stock brokerage Robinhood on the verge of shaking up an industry that has needed shaking up for years.
A common thread revisited by this newsletter is the phenomenon of broker apps being low-quality tech.
These apps can be built by a pimple-faced freshman college student in his dorm.
A broker ultimately serves little or no value to the real players among the deal, usually extracting huge commissions.
Technology and now blockchain technology vie to completely remove this exorbitant layer from the business process.
Well, for the stock brokerage industry, that time is now.
Robinhood is an online stock brokerage company based in Menlo Park, Calif., trading an assortment of asset classes including equities, options, and cryptocurrencies.
So, what's the catch?
Robinhood does not charge commission.
That's right, you can invest up until the $500,000 threshold protected by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) and you can go along with your merry day trading for free.
The online brokerage industry has been getting away with murder for years.
How did the online brokers get away with this in a technological climate where industries such as the transportation sector are being flipped on their head?
They got comfortable and stopped innovating - the death knell of any company.
Effectively, high execution costs reaping massive profits were the norm for brokers, and nobody questioned this philosophy until Robinhood exposed the ugly truth - unreasonably high rates.
Peeking at a monthly chart of brokerage costs will make your stomach churn.
For instance, a trader frequently executing trades with an account of $100,000 would hand over $1836 in commission in 2017 if their account was with Fidelity.
On the cheaper side, Interactive Brokers would charge $854 for its brokerage services to habitual traders per month.
The outlier was Tradier, a start-up brokerage founded in 2014 using the powerful tool of an API (Application Programming Interface), which charged $213 per month to trade frequently.
An API is described as a software intermediary allowing two applications to communicate with each other.
This model helped cut costs for the online brokerage because Tradier did not have to focus its funds on the trading platform that was delegated to various third-party platforms.
Tradier is largely responsible for the aggregation of data and charts thus employing an army of developers to meet their end of the business.
This model is truly the democratization of the online brokerage industry, which has been coming for years.
Cost are cut to a minimum with equity trades at Tradier costing investors $3.49 per order and option contracts costing $0.35 per contract with a $9 options assignment and exercise fee.
Technology has defeated the traditionalist again.
Day traders will tell you their largest worry is keeping a lid on execution costs.
Volume traders plan their strategies according to bare bones commission.
Marrying technology with online brokerages has the deflation effect that Amazon (AMZN) deftly took advantage to perfection.
Brokerages do not pay higher costs for an incremental bump in trading volume. Costs are mainly fixed.
If you hold an account in one of these legacy brokers charging an arm and a leg to trade with them, jump ship and join the revolution.
So how does Robinhood generate revenue if the broker trades for free?
Hawk ads? No.
They are not rogue ad sellers as is Facebook (FB).
The plethora of accounts opened with Robinhood earn interest, and Robinhood collects the earned interest as revenue.
Also, Robinhood has one paid service for sale.
Robinhood Gold is a subscription allowing traders to use margin. The margin accounts will set traders back $10 per month adding up to $120 per year, and they won't be charged interest on the funds.
This is peanuts compared to what other traditional brokerages are charging clients for margin account interest.
This is also a data grab with the proprietary data building up profusely turning into a potential Masayoshi Son SoftBank Vision fund acquisition.
Robinhood has already registered more than 5 million accounts for a company that started its operations in 2013.
The rise of these 5 million accounts coincided with the explosion of the price of bitcoin breaching the $20,000 level.
This price surge inspired a whole generation of millennials to get off the sofa and start trading cryptocurrencies.
More than 80% of Robinhood's accounts are owned by millennials.
Trading cryptocurrencies acts as a gateway asset to springboard into other asset classes such as equities and derivative contracts.
Vlad Tenev, co-CEO of Robinhood, indicated that Robinhood will have to modify its radical business model to monetize more of the business in the future, but he is comfortable with the current business model.
But Tenev has already seen fruit borne with the likes of Robinhood applying fierce pressure to the legacy brokerages' pricing models.
The traditionalists are locked in a vicious pricing war with each other slashing their commission rates to stay competitive.
The longer the likes of Charles Schwab (SCHW) feel it necessary to charge $4.95, down from the January 2017 cost of $8.95, the better the chances are that Robinhood can build its account base rapidly.
Charles Schwab has more than 10 million accounts, only double the number of Robinhood, after being founded in 1971.
The 42-year head start over Robinhood has not produced the desired effect, and it is ill-prepared to battle these tech companies that enter the fray.
Robinhood has been able to add a million new accounts per year. If Charles Schwab relatively performed at the same rate, it would have 47 million accounts open today.
It doesn't and that is a problem, because the company can be caught up to.
The lack of urgency to combat the tech threat is astounding. Companies such as Walmart (WMT) have taken the initiative to transform the narrative with great success.
The race to zero is a grim reality for the Fidelities (FFIDX) of the world, and adopting a Robinhood approach will be the playbook going forward.
Brokerages and a slew of other industries are turning into a legion of top-level developers fighting tooth and nail to stay relevant.
The transportation industry has grappled with this harsh reality lately, but the economy is on the cusp of many other industries digitizing to the extreme.
My guess is that Robinhood starts rolling out a slew of subscription services catering toward specific investors.
The age of specialization is upon us with full force, and customer demand requires care and diligence that never existed before.
Robinhood continues to enhance its offerings of various products adding Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash to the crypto lineup.
Only Bitcoin and Ethereum were offered before.
The company is not without headline investors boasting the likes of Andreessen Horowitz, the venture capitalist firm based in Menlo Park, Calif., Box (BOX) CEO Aaron Levie, and hip-hop mogul Snoop Dogg.
Expect Robinhood to pile the funds into improving the technology, data accuracy while offering a new mix of hybrid products.
The enhancements will attract another wave of adopters spawning another wave of panic from the legacy brokers.
To visit the pricing information at Robinhood, please click here.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00MHFTRhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTR2018-08-01 01:05:352018-08-01 01:05:35The Race Down to Zero
Amazon earnings come out after the close today so it's a good time to bone up on the history of the online retail giant. Forewarned is to be forearmed.
Is to time to cash in on the huge profits you have already attained or is it time to load the boat some more?
Jeff Bezos, born Jeff Jorgensen, is the son of an itinerant alcoholic circus clown and a low-level secretary in Albuquerque, New Mexico. When he was three, his father abandoned the family. His mother remarried a Cuban refugee, Miguel Bezos, who eventually became a chemical engineer for Exxon.
I have known Jeff Bezos for so long he had hair when we first met in the 1980s. Not much though, even in those early days. He was a quantitative researcher in the bond department at Morgan Stanley, and I was the head of international trading.
Bezos was then recruited by the cutting-edge quantitative hedge fund, D.E. Shaw, which was making fortunes at the time, but nobody knew how. When I heard in 1994 that he left his certain success there to start an online bookstore, I thought he'd suffered a nervous breakdown, common in our industry.
Bezos incorporated his company in Washington state later that year, initially calling it "Cadabra" and then "Relentess.com." He finally chose "Amazon" as the first interesting word that appeared in the dictionary, suggesting a river of endless supply. When I learned that Bezos would call his start-up "Amazon," I thought he'd gone completely nuts.
Bezos funded his start-up with a $300,000 investment from his parents who he promised stood a 50% chance of losing their entire investment. But then his parents had already spent a lifetime running Bezos through a series of programs for gifted children, so they had the necessary confidence.
It was a classic garage start-up with three employees based in scenic Bellevue, Washington. The hours were long with all of the initial effort going into programming the initial site. To save money, Bezos bought second-hand pine doors, which stood in for desks.
Bezos initially considered 20 different industries to disrupt, including CDs and computer software. He quickly concluded that books were the ripest for disruption, as they were cheap, globally traded, and offered millions of titles.
When Amazon.com was finally launched in 1995, the day was spent fixing software bugs on the site, and the night wrapping and shipping the 50 or so orders a day. Growth was hyperbolic from the get go, with sales reaching $20,000 a week by the end of the second month.
An early problem was obtaining supplies of books when wholesalers refused to offer him credit or deliver books on time. Eventually he would ask suppliers to keep a copy of every book in existence at their own expense, which could ship within 24 hours.
Venture capital rounds followed, eventually raising $200 million. Early participants all became billionaires, gaining returns of 10,000-fold or more, including his trusting parents.
Bezos put the money to work, launching into a hiring binge of epic proportions. "Send us your freaks," Bezos told the recruiting agencies, looking for the tattooed and the heavily pierced who were willing to work in shipping late at night for low wages. Keeping costs rock bottom was always an essential part of the Amazon formula.
Bezos used his new capital to raid Wal-Mart (WMT) for its senior distribution staff, for which it was later sued.
Amazon rode on the coattails of the Dotcom Boom to go public on NASDAQ on May 15, 1997 at $18 a share. The shares quickly rocketed to an astonishing $105, and in 1999 Jeff Bezos became Time magazine's "Man of the Year."
Unfortunately, the company committed many of the mistakes common to inexperienced managements with too much cash on their hands. It blew $200 million on acquisitions that, for the most part, failed. Those include such losers as Pets.com and Drugstore.com. But Bezos's philosophy has always been to try everything and fail them quickly, thus enabling Amazon to evolve 100 times faster than any other.
Amazon went into the Dotcom crash with tons of money on its hands, thus enabling it to survive the long funding drought that followed. Thousands of other competitors failed. Amazon shares plunged to $5.
But the company kept on making money. Sales soared by 50% a month, eventually topping $1 billion by 2001. The media noticed Wall Street took note. The company moved from the garage to a warehouse to a decrepit office building in downtown Seattle.
Amazon moved beyond books to compact disc sales in 1999. Electronics and toys followed. At its New York toy announcement Bezos realized that the company actually had no toys on hand. So, he ordered an employee to max out his credit card cleaning out the local Hammacher Schlemmer just to obtain some convincing props.
A pattern emerged. As Bezos entered a new industry he originally offered to run the online commerce for the leading firm. This happened with Circuit City, Borders, and Toys "R" Us. The firms then offered to take over Amazon, but Bezos wasn't selling.
In the end Amazon came to dominate every field it entered. Please note that all three of the abovementioned firms no longer exist, thanks to extreme price competition from Amazon.
Amazon had a great subsidy in the early years as it did not charge state sales tax. As of 2011, it only charged sales tax in five states. That game is now over, with Amazon now collecting sales taxes in all 45 states that have them.
Amazon Web Services originally started out to manage the firm's own website. It has since grown into a major profit center, with $17.4 billion in net revenues in 2017. Full disclosure: Mad Hedge Fund Trader is a customer.
Amazon entered the hardware business with the launch of its e-reader Kindle in 2007, which sold $5 billion worth in its first year. The Amazon Echo smart speaker followed in 2015 and boasts 71.9% market share. This is despite news stories that it records family conversations and randomly laughs.
Amazon Studios started in 2010, run by a former Disney executive, pumping out a series of high-grade film productions. In 2017 it became the first streaming studio to win an Oscar with Manchester by the Sea with Jeff Bezos visibly in the audience at the Hollywood awards ceremony.
Its acquisitions policy also became much more astute, picking up audio book company Audible.com, shoe seller Zappos, Whole Foods, and most recently PillPack. Since its inception, Amazon has purchased more than 86 outside companies.
Sometimes, Amazon's acquisition tactics are so predatory they would make John D. Rockefeller blush. It decided to get into the discount diaper business in 2010, and offered to buy Diapers.com, which was doing business under the name of "Quidsi." The company refused, so Amazon began offering its own diapers for sale 30% cheaper for a loss. Diapers.com was driven to the wall and caved, selling out for $545 million. Diaper prices then popped back up to their original level.
Welcome to online commerce.
At the end of 2018, Amazon boasted some 306,000 employees worldwide. In fact, it has been the largest single job creator in the United States for the past decade. Also, this year it disclosed the number of Amazon Prime members at 100 million, then raised the price from $80 to $100, thus creating an instant $2 billion in profit.
The company's ability to instantly create profit like this is breathtaking. And this will make you cry. In 2016, Amazon made $2.4 billion from Amazon gift cards left unredeemed!
In 2017, Amazon net revenues totaled an unbelievable $177.87 billion. It is currently capturing about 50% of all new online sales.
So, what's on the menu for Amazon? There is a lot of new ground to pioneer.
1) Health Care is the big one, accounting for $3 trillion, or 17% of U.S. GDP, but where Amazon has just scratched the surface. Its recent $1 billion purchase of PillPack signals a new focus on the area. Who knows? The hyper-competition Bezos always brings to a new market would solve the American health care crisis, which is largely cost driven. Bezos can oust middle men like no one else.
2) Food is the great untouched market for online commerce, which accounts for 20% of total U.S. retail spending, but sees only 2% take place online. Essentially this is a distribution problem, and you have to accomplish this within the prevailing subterranean 1% profit margins in the industry. Books don't need to be frozen or shipped fresh. Wal-Mart (WMT) will be target No. 1, which currently gets 56% of its sales from groceries. Amazon took a leap up the learnings curve with its $13.7 billion purchase of Whole Foods (WFC) in 2017. What will follow will be interesting.
3) Banking is another ripe area for "Amazonification," where excessive fees are rampant. It would be easy for the company to accelerate the process through buying a major bank that already had licenses in all 50 states. Amazon is already working the credit card angle.
4) Overnight Delivery is a natural, as Amazon is already the largest shipper in the U.S., sending out more than 1 million packages a day. The company has a nascent effort here, already acquiring several aircraft to cover its most heavily trafficked routes. Expect FedEx (FDX), UPS (UPS), DHL, and the United States Post Office to get severely disrupted.
5) Amazon is about to surpass Wal-Mart this year as the largest clothing retailer. The company has already launched 76 private labels, with half of them in the fashion area, such as Clifton Heritage (color and printed shirts), Buttoned Down (100% cotton shirts) and Goodthreads (casual shirts) as well as subscription services for all of the above.
6) Furniture is currently the fastest growing category at Amazon. Customers can use an Amazon tool to design virtual rooms to see where new items and colors will fit best.
7) Event Ticketing firms like StubHub and Ticketmaster are among the most despised companies in the U.S., so they are great disruption candidates. Amazon has already started in the U.K., and a takeover of one of the above would ease its entry into the U.S.
If only SOME of these new business ventures succeed, they have the potential to DOUBLE Amazon's shares from current levels, taking its market capitalization up to $1.8 trillion. Amazon will easily win the race to become the first $1 trillion company. Perhaps this explains why institutional investors continue to pour into the shares, despite being up a torrid 83% from the February lows.
Whatever happened to Bezos's real father, Ted Jorgensen? He was discovered by an enterprising journalist in 2012 running a bicycle shop in Glendale, Arizona. He had long ago sobered up and remarried. He had no idea who Jeff Bezos was. Ted Jorgensen died in 2015. Bezos never took the time to meet him. Too busy running Amazon, I guess. Worth $160 billion, Bezos is now the richest man in the world.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00MHFTRhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTR2018-07-26 01:06:192018-07-26 01:06:19So Where Did Those Amazon Earnings Really Come from and Where Are They Going?
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Google Analytics Cookies
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.