Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 19, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(AVOIDING THE BULLY),
(MSFT), (AMZN), (WMT), (GME), (ORCL), (GE), (CPB)
Posts
A bully stealing your lunch is not fun.
Partnering up to subdue a bully isn't only happening on the school playground.
Walmart (WMT) is doing it now, too.
Let me explain.
The Amazon (AMZN) effect is understood as the disruption of traditional brick-and-mortar business by Amazon's domination in e-commerce sales.
This phenomenon was all about how Amazon would take over, and by all means they are, and in brisk fashion.
That is why Amazon trade alerts from the Mad Hedge Technology Letter are nestled away in your email inbox.
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Amazon competitors are facing an existential crisis they have never seen before.
The newest member of the FANG group, Walmart, is transforming into a tech company, and this metamorphosis is picking up steam.
To read my recent story about Walmart's headfirst dive into India, the newest battleground country, by way of its purchase of Indian e-commerce juggernaut Flipkart, please click here.
The second part of its strategy was revealed by announcing that Walmart would partner with Microsoft's (MSFT) cloud platform Azure to tap into the deep A.I. (artificial intelligence) and machine learning expertise.
If you can't beat them, find another competitor to help you change the status quo.
The five-year deal is a game changer in a coveted cloud industry pitting David vs. Goliath.
Amazon's footprint is wide reaching and bosses 33% of the cloud market it invented, far and away surpassing runner-up Microsoft, which garners just 13% market share.
Microsoft is catching up fast and that 13% was just 10% in 2016.
Microsoft and Walmart have a common foe that haunts them in their dreams.
These companies feel they are better served combining forces than being isolated from each other.
In an exclusive Wall Street Journal interview with Satya Nadella, Microsoft's CEO, Nadella directly confirmed what people already knew.
This strategic move "is absolutely core to this (Amazon threat)."
Walmart will use Microsoft's advanced cloud technology to optimize its operations from managing inventory, selecting the most suitable products to display, and running its equipment efficiently.
In 2016, Walmart's purchase of e-commerce company Jet.com was thoroughly integrated onto the Microsoft Azure. This further cooperation will help boost a company that has been aggressively vocal about its tech exploits.
High-quality products sell themselves and the story has played itself over again.
Microsoft is a master at luring in business through the front door, and padlocking the front gate procuring business for decades.
This case is no different and a vital reason the Mad Hedge Technology Letter has pinned down Microsoft as a top three tech stock.
Walmart also has made it crystal clear that a prerequisite for doing business with them is not doing business with Amazon Web Services (AWS), Amazon's lucrative cloud division.
Any profit dropping down to the (AWS) bottom line is used to wield against the retail landscape, damaging Walmart's prospects.
The Amazon effect is starting to work against Amazon, as the threat is forcing other businesses to adopt the same mind-set as Walmart.
Snowflake Computing, a private data firm focused on warehouse databases established by Bob Muglia in 2014, was exclusively available on the AWS platform.
However, more and more retailers such as Walmart started banging on Snowflake Computing's door demanding that it offer its cloud services on a cloud platform that is not its competitor.
Snowflake Computing obliged and is now up and running on Microsoft Azure.
Can you imagine the competition being able to sift through troves of data understanding every strength and weakness?
It's a one-way street to bankruptcy court.
Perhaps that explains why GameStop (GME) is such a poor performer, as its operations are entirely on (AWS).
GameStop is a stock that I am bearish on, because selling video games as a middleman is a legacy business.
Kids just download everything direct from the manufacturer from their broadband connection, making GameStop's business model obsolete.
It has a turnaround plan, apparently Oracle (ORCL) has one too, but it's barely begun.
Microsoft is a bad choice as well for GameStop, which is heart and center in the video game industry as well.
There are many alternatives; someone should notify recently installed GameStop CEO Daniel A. DeMatteo about one.
(AWS)'s dominance is benefitting Microsoft Azure explaining the rapid pace of cloud market share advancement.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Walmart has some other irons in the fire.
Enter Project Kepler.
This is Walmart's response to Amazon Go stores, a partially automated retail store with no cashiers or checkout station, which currently has one functional location in Seattle.
Project Kepler is being developed by Jet.com co-founder and CTO Mike Hanrahan. And guess who is providing the technology for this alternative retail experience store - Microsoft.
Microsoft poached a computer vision specialist from Amazon Go who will help develop the appropriate sensors and computer vision algorithms necessary to get this store up and running.
These same sensors can be found in autonomous driving technology.
Shopping cart cameras could also be added to the mix to ensure quality and hopefully avoid the teething pains new technology grapples with.
Microsoft Azure CTO Mark Russinovich commented lately saying firms are on the front foot utilizing "A.I. and machine learning to automate processes to get insights into operations that they didn't have before."
Microsoft is perfectly set up to harvest many of these new contracts.
The deals have started to roll in.
Microsoft is successfully broadening its relationship with GE (GE), using the Azure data analytics capabilities to transform GE Digital's industrial IoT solutions.
This week also saw Microsoft scoop up Campbell Soup Company (CPB) as a new client, which decided on Microsoft Azure to modernize its IT infrastructure.
Campbell Soup will deploy Azure for real-time access to critical operations data, offering deeper intelligence for Campbell's senior management team.
This robust business activity is all because Microsoft is not Amazon, along with having a stellar product about which companies gloat.
Retailers have chosen Microsoft as the cloud platform of choice and expect the majority of retailers to tie their futures to Microsoft.
That's not the only iron in the fire.
Jetblack is another experimental retail service that Walmart is testing as we speak.
The service is still in beta mode in Manhattan targeting urban, high net worth mothers.
It emphasizes a personalized shopping experience in a narrow segment of goods that include household products, cosmetics, health and beauty products.
Shoppers will be able to snap photos of products and send them to Jetblack, receiving them at home with free shipping.
Customer service will be carried out by a high-quality lifelike bot, and Walmart intends to charge a membership fee to take part in this specialized shopping experience.
Microsoft subsidiary LinkedIn has also been leaning more on its parent company's technology lately.
LinkedIn software engineer Angelika Clayton wrote in her blog that "dozens of languages" are being converted into English via Microsoft Translator Text application programming interface, ballooning the candidate database for English speaking headhunters.
Could foreign language learning soon go way of the dodo bird and woolly mammoth?
Machine learning and A.I. have that type of power.
Tech analysts on the street must avoid issuing reports boasting that "everything is priced in," because these tech behemoths are driving innovation faster than people can understand it.
Walmart has turned into one of the most innovative companies around.
Who would have imagined this development a few years ago?
Nobody, not even Walmart itself.
Everything Microsoft touches lately turns into gold, along with being one of the more trusted tech titans out of the motley crew that has ruffled a few feathers this year.
Walmart is aggressively experimenting, systematically attempting to hop on new trends in retail hoping one or two will catch fire.
The credit must go to CEO Doug McMillon who has brought a tech first approach since being installed as CEO in 2014.
Even though conservative Walmart investors have penalized Walmart for the heavy spending, they must come to terms that Walmart's model is plain different now.
It's either spend or die in 2018.
Microsoft is in store to report its status on its pursuit of AWS, and I expect the company to inch closer with each earnings report.
Its outperforming Azure cloud business is in the first stages of a marathon, and sometimes it's not always salubrious to be the schoolyard bully because everybody starts avoiding you like the plague.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"They broke the law on several occasions after being warned," said Larry Kudlow, director of the United States National Economic Council, when asked about Chinese company ZTE, which sold telecommunications equipment to Iran and North Korea.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 21, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY NETFLIX IS UNSTOPPABLE),
(NFLX), (CAT), (AMZN), (CMCSA), (DIS), (FOX), (TWX), (GM), (WMT), (TGT)
Trade war? What trade war?
Apparently, nobody told Netflix (NFLX) that we are smack dab in a tit-for-tat trade war between two of the greatest economic powers to grace mankind.
No matter rain or shine, Netflix keeps powering on to new highs.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter first recommended this stock on April 23, 2018, when I published the story "How Netflix Can Double Again," (click here for the link) and at that time, shares were hovering at $334.
Since, then it's off to the races, clocking in at more than $413 as of today, a sweet 19% uptick since my recommendation.
It seems the harder I try, the luckier I get.
What separates the fool's gold from the real yellow bullion are challenging market days like yesterday.
The administration announced a new set of tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports.
The day began early on the Shanghai exchange dropping a cringeworthy 3.8%.
The Hong Kong Hang Seng Market didn't fare much better cratering 2.78%.
Investors were waiting for the sky to drop when the minutes counted down to the open in New York and futures were down big premarket.
Just as expected, the Dow Jones Index plummeted on the open, and in a flash the Dow was down 410 points intraday.
The risk off appetite toyed with traders' nerves and American companies with substantial China exposure being rocked the hardest such as Caterpillar (CAT).
After the Dow hit an intraday low, a funny thing happened.
The truth revealed itself and U.S. equities reacted in a way that epitomizes the nine-year bull market.
Tar and feather a stock as much as you want and if the stock keeps going up, it's a keeper.
Not only a keeper, but an undisputable bullish signal to keep you from developing sleep apnea.
In the eye of the storm, Netflix closed the day up a breathtaking 3.73%. The overspill of momentum continued with Netflix up another 2% and change today.
This company is the stuff of legends and reasons to buy them are legion.
As subscriber surveys flow onto analysts' desks, Netflix is the recipient of a cascade of upgrades from sell side analysts scurrying to raise targets.
Analysts cannot raise their targets fast enough as Netflix's price action goes from strength to hyper-strength.
Chip stocks have the opposite problem when surveys, portraying an inaccurate picture of the 30,000-foot view, prod analysts to downgrade the whole sector.
That is why they are analysts, and most financial analysts these days are sacked in the morning because they don't understand the big picture.
Quality always trumps quantity. Period.
Netflix has stockpiled consecutive premium shows from titles such as Stranger Things, The Crown, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, and Orange is the New Black.
This is in line with Netflix's policy to spend more on non-sports content than any other competitors in the online streaming space.
In 2017, Netflix ponied up $6.3 billion for content and followed that up in 2018, with a budget of $8 billion to produce original in-house shows.
Netflix hopes to increase the share of original content to 50%, decoupling its reliance on traditional media stalwarts who hate Netflix's guts with a passion.
A good portion of this generous budget will be deployed to make 30 new anime shows and 80 new original films all debuting by the end of 2018.
Amazon's (AMZN) Manchester by the Sea harvested two Oscars for its screenplay and Casey Affleck's performance, foreshadowing the opportunity for Netflix to win awards next time around, potentially boosting its industry profile.
It will only be a matter of time because of the high quality of production.
Netflix's content budget will dwarf traditional media companies by 2019, creating more breathing room against the competitors who have been late to the party and scrambling for scraps.
This is what Disney's futile attempts to take on Netflix, which raised its offer for Fox to $71.3 billion to galvanize its content business.
Disney's (DIS) bid came on the heels of Comcast Corp. (CMCSA) bid for Disney at $65 billion.
The sellers' market has boosted all content assets across the board.
Remember, content is king in this day and age.
In 2017, Time Warner (TWX) and Fox (FOX) spent $8 billion each and Disney slightly lagged with a $7.8 billion spend on non-sports programming.
Netflix will certainly announce a sweetened content outlay of somewhere close to $9.5 billion next year attracting the best and brightest to don the studios of Netflix.
What's the whole point of creating the best content?
It lures in the most eyeballs.
Subscriber growth has been nothing short of spectacular.
Expectations were elevated, and Netflix delivered in spades last quarter adding quarterly total subscribers to the tune of 7.41 million versus the 6.5 million expected by analysts.
Not only a beat, but a blowout of epic proportions.
Inside the numbers, rumors were adrift of Netflix's domestic numbers stagnating.
Consensus was proved wrong again, with domestic subscribers surging to 1.96 million versus the 1.48 million expected.
The cycle replays itself over. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Quality content attracts a wave of new subscribers. Robust subscriber growth fuels more spending, which paves the way for more quality content.
This is Netflix's secret formula to success.
Netflix has executed this strategy systemically to the aghast of traditional media companies that are stuck with legacy businesses dragging them down and making it decisively difficult to compete with the nimble online streaming players.
Turning around a legacy business is tough work because investors expect profits and curse the ends of the earth if companies spend big on new projects removing the prospects of dividend hikes.
Netflix and the tech darlings usually don't make a profit but have a license to spend, spend, and spend some more because investors are on board with a specific narrative prioritizing market share and posting rapid growth.
The cherry on top is the booming secular story happening as we speak in Silicon Valley.
Effectively, all other sectors that are not tech have become legacy sectors thanks in large part to the high degree of innovation and cross-functionality of big cap tech companies.
The future legacy winners are the legacy stocks and sectors reinventing themselves as new tech players such as General Motors (GM), Walmart (WMT), and Target (TGT).
The rest will die a miserably and excruciatingly slow death.
The Game of Thrones M&A battle with the traditional media companies is a cry of desperate search for these dinosaurs.
They were too late to react to the Netflix threat and were punished to full effect.
Halcyon days are upon Netflix, and this company controls its own destiny in the streaming wars and online streaming content industry.
As history shows, nobody executes better than CEO Reed Hastings at Netflix, which is why Netflix maintains its grade as a top 3 stock in the eyes of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"I got the idea for Netflix after my company was acquired. I had a big late fee for Apollo 13. It was six weeks late and I owed the video store $40. I had misplaced the cassette. It was all my fault," - said cofounder and CEO of Netflix Reed Hastings.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 7, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE NEW TECHNOLOGY PLAY YOU'VE NEVER HEARD OF),
(GM), (UBER), (WMT), (GOOGL)
Welcome to the new cutting-edge high-tech play - General Motors (GM).
The tectonic shifts permeating through the tech landscape seem like there is no end.
Another blockbuster announcement hit the airwaves melding together a brand-new partnership between SoftBank and GM's self-driving unit Cruise.
SoftBank invested an eye-popping $2.25 billion into Cruise for a 19.6% stake, adding to its scintillating arsenal of big data assets focusing on transportation including Uber, India's Ola, China's DiDi, and Southeast Asia's Grab.
GM disclosed it will divvy up a further $1.1 billion into the deal.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter has been an astute follower of the autonomous driving technology race because the technology will be the next proprietary technology to change the world, creating enormous windfalls for the few involved.
The timeline commences later this year, when Waymo, a subsidiary of Alphabet (GOOGL), rolls out a robo-taxi commercial service.
General Motors is right on Waymo's heels rolling out its own commercial service "sometime in 2019."
This momentous investment by SoftBank solidifies (GM) as the No. 2 industry player going forward.
This is a huge victory.
The historic shift symbolizes the next gap up in the technology movement.
Tech stocks have been on a tear of late leaving other equities in the dust.
Waymo was the first mover and confidently never relinquished the top-dog position while avoiding any big disasters along the way.
The unparalleled success of Waymo's self-driving unit has led analysts to put a valuation figure ranging anywhere from $75 billion to $125 billion.
GM paid a measly $1 billion for Cruise in 2016, which is peanuts in today's thriving tech landscape.
Analysts estimated the valuation of Cruise at $4 billion just before the SoftBank investment. The almost 20% stake for $2.25 billion puts the new valuation number over $11 billion, three times more than analysts initially speculated.
Tech acquisitions have exploded in 2018 and show no signs of slowing down.
The hallmarks of Waymo's operation hinge on safety-first initiatives, which went a long way to upholding its industry leader position.
The safety-second attitude led Uber to attempt to short circuit its way to the top from a position of weakness to ill effect.
Uber's technology failed, and the result of the Phoenix, Arizona, casualty was a suspended operation.
Game over.
To stick the blade cleanly through the back, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi revealed that talks are ongoing between Waymo and Uber to add Waymo's technology to Uber's broker app service.
This revelation is interesting considering Uber infuriated Waymo. It means Uber will effectively recede itself from competing with Waymo in self-driving technology.
The company doesn't need to anymore and it burns too much cash.
The protracted court ruling revealed Uber had stolen trade secrets using poached Waymo engineers.
This time, it really is the nail in the coffin for Uber's self-driving technology.
It will change strategy and refine its core app that made them famous in the first place.
The SoftBank investment into Cruise has clear synergies with Uber.
If Waymo refuses to go into bed with Uber, the natural logical step would be for the GM Cruise technology to be integrated with the Uber platform since they are both SoftBank investments.
SoftBank's management will clearly push for this arrangement. It makes no sense to use the Lyft platform with the GM Cruise division.
The tie up with GM Cruise was the catalyst for Uber seeking "talks" with Waymo, knowing very well if talks failed, a backup plan was hatched and would be able to partner up with Cruise's technology.
This is the luxury Uber has now since it is part of the SoftBank umbrella along with the GM Cruise division.
This nullifies the existential threat Uber was anxious about as it is guaranteed a certain slice of the pie leading to material future revenue stream post IPO.
The SoftBank investment is a stamp of approval for the quality of GM self-driving technology.
SoftBank only invests in the most innovative firms.
The conundrum with legacy car companies is that the bulk of revenue is reliant on selling combustion-engine cars that will soon become obsolete.
Any large commitment to R&D, unfocused on its main profits levers, hurt margins. Investors do not buy American car manufacturers that operate at a loss.
Therefore, legacy companies are penalized for spending on new businesses that could be hit or miss.
They stick with their bread and butter through thick and thin because that is what investors expect them to do. This was why Walmart (WMT) sold off when it acquired a stake in Flipkart.
A certain type of Walmart investor would be aghast at this unexpected new direction and amount of dollars drained.
In support of Walmart, CEO Doug McMillon has been positively vocal about the pivot to tech and e-commerce.
It should not be a surprise.
Old technology gets swept into the dustbin of history. Examples are legion.
Let me explain why.
The shift from horse-drawn carriages to the automobile was an equally jaw-dropping development at the time.
Not all horse-drawn carriage manufacturers were able to make the massive leap from creating simple horse-carriage passenger vehicles to automotive vehicles with combustion engines.
When Abraham Lincoln was transported to the Ford Theatre the night of his assassination, he was rolling in a Studebaker horse-drawn carriage.
Studebaker, which was established in 1852 with $68 of capital and a tool belt, was the only top-notch horse-drawn carriage manufacturer to make the gigantic shift from horse-drawn carriage builder to automotive producer.
The other players shriveled up and waved the white flag.
Studebaker actually manufactured both horse-drawn carriages and cars from 1902-1920.
The company mutated again during World War II making military vehicles, M29, M29C, and engines for B-17 bombers.
Financial mismanagement ruined the company. In 1963 it shuttered its South Bend, Indiana, factory and then went out of business by 1967, missing out on a chance to take on Uber and Waymo by about 55 years.
Such are the annals of history.
(GM) is the first American legacy car company to make the complicated transition from traditional American car producer to self-driving technology player.
And it could be the only one.
The deal will raise the price range for the Uber IPO planned for 2019. The (GM) cruise division will report financials separately from the rest of the (GM) balance sheet, which could be the precursor to spinning it out as its own company creating more shareholder value.
No matter how you dice this up, (GM) is the real deal. Investors voted with their feet causing the stock to explode skyward closing 13% higher on the news of the investment.
Buy (GM) on the next sell-off instead of chasing the bolted stallion out of the starting gate.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"Indian software engineers are the best in the world; even in Silicon Valley, the best software engineers are Indians," - said CEO of Softbank Masayoshi Son
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 4, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE INNOVATOR'S DILEMMA),
(UBER), (WMT), (SNAP), (MSFT), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (GM), (IBM)
I must confess, innovation can't be taught.
You are innovative, or you aren't. Don't pretend otherwise.
Innovation drives companies to outperform.
The economic environment becomes more cutthroat by the day rendering complacent companies obsolete.
Top-quality innovation leading to outstanding entrepreneurship is a well-traversed theme transcending industries across the American economic landscape.
The reservoir of innovation in 2018 is primarily flowing from one narrow source - the tech sector.
This is the primary motive for many adjacent industries to incorporate tech expertise into existing and commonly ancient legacy systems.
Tech promises laggards a ride atop the gravy chain.
In many instances, these companies are grappling with existential threats from all directions.
The best example is Walmart (WMT), which effectively mutated into the next FANG with its majority stake in Indian e-commerce juggernaut Flipkart. This deal followed its purchase of Jet.com in 2016, which was its first foothold in the e-commerce world.
Traditional companies are becoming tech companies because of the ability to innovate all leads through the fingertips of talented coders.
When all roads lead to Rome, you will have to go through Rome.
The hunger for innovation has had major implications to the financial side of technology.
The story picks up from a recent report disclosing the 2017 remuneration of co-founder and CEO of Instagram competitor Snapchat (SNAP) Evan Spiegel.
The $637.8 million he received in 2017 was the third-highest annual compensation ever to be collected by a CEO.
Snapchat has tanked following its 2017 IPO and the main reason is Facebook is stealing its lunch and leaving Snap the crumbs on which to nibble.
Instagram, using a cunning strategy of cloning Snap's best features, single-handedly bludgeoned Snap's share price cutting it by half after the successfully launched IPO.
Snap has been an unequivocal sell on the rallies stock since the inception of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter and the disastrous redesign did no favors either.
My first risk off recommendation was Snapchat and at the time it was trading at $19. To revisit the story, please click here.
Microsoft (MSFT) is a great stock because it posts accelerated revenue and earnings, while Snapchat is a terrible company because it produces accelerated losses and lousy user growth.
A company almost 100 times smaller than Microsoft should not be struggling to grow.
It's a failure of epic proportions.
Small companies expand briskly because the law of numbers is leveraged in their favor and the tiniest bump of additional business has a larger effect on the bottom line.
As it stands, Snapchat lost $373 million in 2015, and followed that up with a disastrous $514 million loss in 2016, and a gigantic $3.45 billion loss in 2017.
Losses accelerated by 800% but annual revenue only doubled last year.
It was no shocker that the poor relative performance resulted in the sacking of 100 Snapchat developers.
Smart people would assume an annual salary of this magnitude (Spiegel's) would be the result of excellent performance.
Why else would a CEO get a lavish payout?
I'll explain.
The demand for tech knows no bounds.
In this environment, venture capitalists will pay up for brilliant ideas.
The problem is that brilliant ideas don't grow on trees.
The few cutting-edge ideas have stacks of money thrown at them.
In this sellers' market, founders can cherry-pick the best financing deal that will enrich them the quickest and empower them the most.
Multiple offers have become the norm just as with the Silicon Valley housing market.
The consequences are the premium for these brilliant ideas keeps rising and investors keep paying higher prices without a second thought.
Therefore, founders and CEOs are opting for the financial packages that offer them bulletproof voting shares, allowing the innovators to control operations to the very last detail.
The founders are responsible for leading innovation, and investors are offering glorious pay terms for this innovation because it can't be substituted. Low-quality tech has less of a premium because the technology can easily be rebranded and substituted.
Technology from the ground up is slowly being automated away leaving runaway valuations the norm.
Giving the keys to the Ferrari makes sense as tech companies formulate long-term strategies based on scale. And securing job security without the threat of an activist takeover offers peace of mind for CEOs who are focused on the daily grind.
Knowing their baby won't get stolen from the carriage goes a long way in tech land.
Venture capitalists are reticent about following through with proper governance because they do not want to alienate the innovators who could choose to stop innovating.
These investors also know that tech is the least regulated industry in the world, so it's better to turn a blind eye to cunning growth strategies that push the border of regulation.
The competition to fund these emerging tech companies is borderline criminal.
Uber declined a $3 billion investment by no other than the Oracle of Omaha Warren Buffett.
Buffett described himself as a "great admirer" of Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi.
Uber is one of the most unlikely Warren Buffett investments because it doesn't create anything and burns cash faster than a Kardashian.
Buffett's faith in Uber underscores the reliance on tech to fuel the stock market to new heights.
Buffett also admitted mistakes on missing out on Alphabet (GOOGL) and Apple (AAPL).
Rightly so.
Then add in the mix of SoftBank's $100 billion vision fund that just announced an upcoming sequel with another $100 billion vision fund.
Where is all this money flowing into?
Of the tech companies that went through an IPO last year backed by venture capitalist money, 67% relinquished superior voting rights to key founders, a rise of 54% since 2010.
Compare that to non-tech companies that only allow 10% to 15% of CEOs to institute a voting structure that will put them in charge indefinitely.
In many instances, the persona of these ultra-famous tech CEOs has taken on a life of its own.
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, is the most prominent example of a celebrity tech innovator milking every possible penny from his shareholders and is not shy about flaunting it.
News has it that Musk needs to go back to the well for another stage of financing later this year.
Don't worry, the money will be there in this climate.
Buffett's rejection was due to losing out to SoftBank, which beat out Buffett to invest in Uber.
SoftBank just announced a $3.35 billion investment into GM's (GM) autonomous driving unit called Cruise enhancing the best big data portfolio in the world.
At this pace, CEO of SoftBank Masayoshi Son will have a piece of every major big data company in the world.
This all bodes well for tech equities as the insatiable hunt for emerging, innovative tech spills over into daily equity market driving up the prices for all the top innovating public companies such as Salesforce, Amazon, Microsoft and Netflix.
Buffett, down on his luck after being shafted by Uber, picked up more Apple shares.
He sold all his IBM (IBM) shares after reading the Mad Hedge Technology Letter advising him to stay away from legacy companies.
Smart move, Warren. You can pick up the tab for our next lunch date.
If you have a few billion to throw around, expect multiple offers over the asking price for any high-grade tech innovation.
The going rate is shooting through the roof and you might NEVER be able to sack the founder.
Caveat emptor.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"We knew that Lyft was going to raise a ton of money. And we went (to their investors): 'Just so you know, we're going to be fund-raising after this, so before you decide whether you want to invest in them, just make sure you know that we are going to be fund-raising immediately after.' " - said former CEO and founder of Uber Travis Kalanick when asked how he copes with competition.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 14, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MEET THE NEW FANG),
(AMZN), (WMT), (FB), (NFLX), (GOOGL), (UBER)
Yes, it's Wal-Mart (WMT).
No, I'm not making this recommendation because they let you park your RV in their parking lots at night for free.
And no, I'm not smoking California's biggest cash crop either (it's not grapes).
I predicted as much in my recent research piece, "Who Will Be the Next FANG?" by clicking here.
It is the dawn of a new era with the world absorbing yet another FANG to add to the list of Facebook (FB), Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), and Netflix (NFLX).
As the tech world powers on to new heights, nothing can slow down these juggernauts.
Let's face it - companies are more lucrative when technical expertise is ramped up and infused into the business model.
Ground zero of the tech movement - Silicon Valley - has helped supercharge the economy and prodigious earnings' results support this thesis.
New innovations will fuel the next level up in the tech arm's race but more crucially, so will new geographical locations.
Instead of throwing a dart at a world map, the locations are a no-brainer because tech scavenger hunts orbit around one idiosyncrasy and that is scale.
Scalability is a sacred word in the tech world.
If a start-up cannot scale up, investors can't imagine future profits, entrepreneurs can't imagine growth, and funding dries up.
End of story.
For instance, Amazon's business model does not mesh kindly with pint-sized Iceland.
Not because Amazon discriminates against Iceland's culinary delicacy of sheep testicles but because the population is only around 330,000 people.
Scale equals success.
Indisputably, every country with an Amazon-esque business is being bid up because big tech firms know how to digitally monetize, effectively out-sourcing an incredibly profitable business model that has worked unabated for the developed world for the past decade or two.
The heightened awareness of existential survival is pitting foreign money against each other in far-flung places jostling for the same digital assets after a decade of cheap financing enriching tech companies.
Remember that first mover advantage leads to dominance in the datasphere because the volume of data is directly correlated to the bottom line.
Examples are rife around the world, for instance Amazon's $580 million purchase of Souq.com, described as the Amazon of the Middle East headquartered in Dubai and the biggest e-commerce site in the Arab world.
E-commerce commands a paltry 2% of sales in the region. That number is poised to explode as digital-savvy, tech Millennials reach peak consuming age and the migration to mobile erupts.
A preemptive strike is usually the most compelling strategy for large cap tech as it pushes out the smaller players, which lack the resources to compete.
Even the corporate offices of Walmart (WMT) in Bentonville, Arkansas, would wholeheartedly agree with me after doling out for its new toy.
Yes, Walmart acquired a 77% share in the Amazon of India, Flipkart, for $16 billion after the real Amazon failed to cut a deal with the most famous e-commerce unicorn in India.
This new development is a game changer.
India is a country that tech executives pinpoint as the future because of its massive population, economic growth, and economic potential foreign investors hope to tap up.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has anointed India as the fastest growing economy in 2018, and the 7.4% growth this year will follow with an even sturdier 7.8% in 2019.
Amazon has been well aware of India's ascent. Its CEO Jeff Bezos pledged to invest more than $5 billion in India and Amazon began its e-commerce operation in 2013.
Amazon's early entrance into the Indian e-commerce industry has paid off grabbing 31% of market share putting it in second place behind Flipkart's 40%, according to big data firms.
The Indian e-commerce space was $20 billion in 2017, and by 2019, expect that number to grow to $35 billion.
Walmart CEO Doug McMillon noted that by 2026, the Indian e-commerce industry will surpass $200 billion. When it comes to clothing and fashion, Flipkart has a 70% share in India.
Even more valuable than the economic growth is the new pipeline of tech talent that will help Walmart compete with Amazon.
The Trump administration's crackdown on H-1B visas that Silicon Valley utilizes to bring developers to American shores has forced American tech companies to implement a work-around.
Essentially, the only difference now will be that the past recipients of H-1B visas will be sitting in an air-conditioned office in Bengaluru, India, until the visa documents come through.
Flipkart has a deep pipeline into the best engineering schools in India and the staff of more than 30,000 employees work on Indian wage levels.
This deal is one of the biggest talent grabs of tech developers the world has ever seen. And this group has the know-how of building an Amazon-style digital marketplace platform from zero.
The Flipkart investment comes after Walmart's purchase of Jet.com, an e-commerce company based in Hoboken, New Jersey.
The $3.3 billion purchase of Jet.com in 2016 was the beginning of Walmart's digital strategy, and it has come a long way in a very short time.
Walmart is now a vaunted member of the FANG group and has a new army of developers to back up this claim.
Glancing at the opportunities to scale, Indonesia is clearly the runner-up behind India.
Indonesia has been tagged as a tech new battleground with a population of 260 million in 2016 and growing.
The country has a medium age of 28, meaning this young population could turn into a reliable source of new tech developers who traditionally are young and digital natives.
Economic prosperity has been welcomed with open arms to this tropical island nation. It is poised to become the seventh largest economy by 2030, up from its rank of No. 16 today, creating a burgeoning middle class with newfangled discretionary spending.
The rural migration to urban environments will add another 90 million people living in Indonesian cities by 2030, while Internet access is growing by 20% each year in Indonesia.
Goldman Sachs recently issued a note to investors citing Indonesia's unbridled potential.
Capital is pouring into Indonesia at a breakneck speed with Alibaba investing $1.1 billion into Tokopedia, the Amazon of Indonesia.
Companies are coming to the stark realization that the domestic low hanging fruits have been picked, and aging developed countries are turning to undeveloped regions of growth to advance business objectives.
This is why South East Asia has been bombarded with an onslaught of Japanese, Korean, and Chinese investments and not only in the tech sector.
The Far East powerhouse countries are battling each other in Southeast Asia for consumer goods, infrastructure, high speed trains, and of course technology.
Uber just sold its Southeast Asian ride-sharing asset Grab to China's DiDi Chuxing and SoftBank for $2 billion.
The Southeast Asian region is one of the hottest places to make a deal because of a lack of FANG occupancy.
Walmart sold off on the Flipkart news because of the potential impairment to margins, but this move is a long-term positive for Walmart shareholders.
Flipkart does not turn a profit and Walmart is still solely judged by earnings. Unfortunately, it does not receive the same license to focus on growth like Tesla, Amazon, and Netflix.
However, I have a hunch that down the road, investors will agree this move by Walmart's McMillon was as shrewd as can be.
Like the colonial powers of yore, India and Southeast Asia are likely to be divvied up.
American companies already own more than 70% of market share in India e-commerce.
India is the biggest democracy in Asia and a staunch ally of the United States.
India's frosty relationship with China due to border spats and communist origins will stunt China's ability to take over and expand in India.
However, Southeast Asian countries are more likely to go the way of Cambodia, which is reliant on Chinese money to fund new initiatives, hamstrung by Chinese debt up to its eyeballs, and acquiesced political capital to the Mandarins.
Chinese investment's path of least resistance is Southeast Asia. This progression will be facilitated by the sizable Chinese expat population that resides in Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Philippines, Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia.
Long-term shareholders of Amazon and Walmart will be rewarded. However, expect a few more Indians walking around Bentonville, Seattle, and Hoboken.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"My life is now a constant assessment of whether what's happening in real life is more entertaining than what's happening on my phone." - said television host Damien Fahey.
