Global Market Comments
February 28, 2025
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(FEBRUARY 26 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(BTC), (NVDA), (TSLA), (BRK/B), (JNK), (TLT), ($WTIC)
Posts
Below, please find subscribers’ Q&A for the February 26 Mad Hedge Fund Trader Global Strategy Webinar, broadcast from Incline Village, NV.
Q: Isn’t this just a cyclical thing? Don’t all bull markets come to an end?
A: Yes, they do. But this time around, it looks like the market is being pushed off a cliff. I guess you have to say that uncertainty is the new element here. Depending on who you talk to, uncertainty is either at a 5-year high, a 30-year high, or a 96-year high (the 1929 crash). Suffice it to say that with the election results being so close (it was the 3rd closest election in history), that means essentially half of all voters are going to be pissed off no matter what happens. It’s a no-win situation. Plus, you go in with multiples at—depending on how you measure them—30-year highs or 96-year highs and dividend yields at all-time lows. A lot of these stocks have gotten stupidly expensive and are begging for a selloff. That is not a good environment to ratchet off the uncertainty.
Q: Should I buy Bitcoin (BTC) on the dip since it’s down about 15 or 20% from the highs?
A: Absolutely not. If you’re going to take a flyer, it was when it was at $6,000, not at $90,000. You can always tell when an asset class is topping because suddenly, I get a bunch of people asking if they should buy it. I've been getting that from Bitcoin all year, and the answer is absolutely not. We're looking for value here, and there's no value to be found anywhere. With Bitcoin, the question you really have to ask is: What happens when Trump leaves office? Does Bitcoin become regulated again? The answer is probably yes, so if the entire rally from $50,000 to $108,000 was based on deregulation, what happens when you re-regulate? So, no thank you, Bitcoin.
Q: Should I sell Tesla (TSLA) and Nvidia (NVDA) LEAPS?
A: It depends on your strike prices, if you're still deep in the money, I would hang on. I think the worst case is Nvidia drops to maybe $100 and Tesla drops to maybe $250. What you should have done is take profits 3 months ago when these things were at all-time highs. I did. Whenever you get up to 80% or 90% of the maximum potential profit on profit LEAPS, you should take that, especially if you have more than a year to run to expiration, because they will go to money heaven if you get a correction like this. Leave the last 10% for the next guy. So yes, I would be de-risking, you know, give all your portfolios a good house cleaning and get rid of whatever you’re not happy to keep for the next several years.
Q: What about LEAPS on financials?
A: I do think financials will come back; it’s just a question of how far they’ll drop first, and you can see I put my money where my mouth is with two financial LEAPS for the short term.
Q: Apple (APPL) expects to increase its dividends. Should I buy the stocks?
A: Actually, Apple has gone down the least out of any of the magnificent 7, but they all tend to trade as a bunch. Apple’s had a terrific run since last summer. Those are the ones that will get paired back the most. So it’s nice to get a dividend, but it’s no reason to buy a stock because you can wipe out a year’s worth of a dividend in a single day’s negative trading.
Q: What do you think of Chinese tech stocks?
A: I think they’re peaking out here; the same with Europe—they’ve had this tremendous rally this year NOT because of the resurgence of Chinese or European economies. It’s happening because of the uncertainty explosion in the United States and the fact that these European and Chinese stocks all got insanely cheap—well into single-digit price-earnings multiples. So, people are just readjusting a decade and a half long short positions in these areas. I don’t see a sustainable bull market in China or Europe based purely on fundamentals. This is just a trading play, which you’ve already missed, by the way—the big move has happened.
Q: Doesn’t it seem like the unemployment claim numbers are being told more truthfully now?
A: Nothing could be further from the truth. The unemployment claims are collected by the states and then collated by the federal government—the Bureau of Labor Statistics. I've been hearing for 50 years that the government rigs the statistics it publishes. The way you'll see that is when you get a major divergence between government data and private sector data, which we have a lot of. When they diverge, you'll know the government is fudging the data. I have a feeling they may be faking the inflation data in the not-too-distant future.
Q: Should I buy Tesla (TSLA) on the dip?
A: Absolutely not. There is no indication that the rot at the top of Tesla has ended. You basically have a company that’s leaderless and rudderless, with falling sales in China and Europe and a boycott going on in Europe against all Tesla products. Sales down 50% year on year isn't an economic thing, it’s a political thing. Suddenly, Europe doesn't like Elon Musk's politics since he’s advocating the destruction of their economies and interfering in their elections. This is why CEOs of public companies should NEVER get involved in politics—once you voice an opinion, you lose half of your customers automatically. But at a certain point, no amount of money you lose can move the needle with Elon Musk; he’s too rich to care about anything and has said as much.
Q: How much cash should I have?
A: It depends on the person. I am watching the markets 12 hours a day. I can go 100% cash and be 100% invested tomorrow. You, I'm not so sure. A lot of you have heavy index exposures, so it really is different for each person. How much do you want to sleep at night? That's what it really comes down to. Are we going to have a big recession or not? That is the question plaguing investors right now.
Q: What are your thoughts on Berkshire Hathaway (BRK/B)?
A: Buy the dips. I mean it's, you know, 50% cash right now, so it's a great place to hide out if you're a conventional money manager who isn't allowed to own cash or more than 5% cash. So yeah, I think we could go higher. Just expect a 5% correction when Warren Buffet dies. He’s 95.
Q: Why buy SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and not iShares 20+ year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)?
A: JNK has a yield that is now almost 2.3% higher than the (TLT), and that gives you a lot of downside protection, you know, a 6.54% yield. That is the reason you buy junk.
Q: Why have you changed your opinion on the markets when you've been bullish for the last many years?
A: I have a Post-it note taped to my computer monitor with a quote from John Maynard Keynes: “When the facts change, I change. What do you do, sir? The answer is very simple: the principal story of the market up until the end of last year was the miracle of AI and how it was going to make us all rich. Now, the principal story of the market is the destruction of government spending, the chaos in Washington, and tariffs. That is not an investor-friendly backdrop on which to invest. The government is 25% of the GDP, and if you cut back even a small portion of that, even just 5%, that is called a recession, ladies and gentlemen, and nobody wants to own stocks in a recession. And this is all happening with valuations at all-time highs, so it is a very dangerous situation. Suffice it to say, the Trump that campaigned and the Trump we got are entirely different people with far more extreme politics. The market is just figuring that out now, and the conclusion is the same everywhere: sell, sell, go into cash, hide. Certain markets trade at rich premiums, while uncertain markets trade at deep discounts. Guess what we have now.
Q: Isn’t $65-$77 a barrel the new trading range for crude oil ($WTIC)?
A: This has recently been true, but if we go into recession, that breaks down completely, and we probably go to the $30s or $40s, and a severe recession takes us to zero. So that is a higher risk play than you may realize; that is where the charts can get you into big trouble if you ignore the fundamentals.
Q: Do you expect interest rates to drop?
A: No, they have dropped 50 basis points this year on a weak dollar and declining confidence, and the US Treasury has issued almost no long-term bonds this year. So that has created a bond shortage, which has created a temporary shortage and a fall in long-term interest rates. That will change as soon as the new budget is passed, and the earliest that can happen is March 14th. After that, we may get a new surge in interest rates as the government becomes a big seller of bonds once again, which will drive up interest rates massively. The Treasury has to issue $1.8 trillion in new bonds this year just to break even, and now it has only 10 months to do it. So there may be a great short setting up here in the (TLT), and of course, we’ll let you know when we see that.
To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to www.madhedgefundtrader.com, go to MY ACCOUNT, click on GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH, then WEBINARS, and all the webinars from the last 12 years are there in all their glory.
Good Luck and Good Trading,
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Global Market Comments
August 21, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trades:
(MARKET OUTLOOK FOR THE WEEK AHEAD, or LEARNING A NEW WORD),
(JPM), (WPM), (FCX), (OXY), (CCI)
(SPY), (TLT), (TSLA), (NVDA), ($WTIC)
CLICK HERE to download today's position sheet.
It’s not often that I learn a new word, at least in English anyway. Anyone who has read all 4,000 pages of John Steinbeck, where you are sent running for your Funk & Wagnalls on every page, shouldn’t be surprised too often. Steinbeck spent two winters house-sitting at Lake Tahoe where he memorized the dictionary cover to cover. But, last week I was.
The word in question is “disinversion.”
Disinversion happens in two ways. When bond yields fall and short yields fall much faster, you get good disinversion and stocks usually rise. This is what I expect to happen in 2024 and is why I am loading the boat with falling interest plays like banks (JPM), precious metals (WPM), commodities (FCX), energy (OXY), and REITS (CCI).
However, stock markets are insecure things, afraid of their own shadows, always shrinking from a fight, and constantly looking for new reasons to worry. Now they are also losing sleep over disinversion.
Disinversion also takes place when short rates are falling but bond yields are rising. When that happens the real estate market gets slaughtered but sky-high mortgage rates, the economy collapses and stocks fall. The good news is that bad disinversion only happens about 10% of the time.
However, a rising number of bond analysts are raising the alarm that we may be in for a dose of the bad kind of disinversion before the good kind kicks in. That could trigger a capitulation in the bond market that could take the ten-year US Treasury bond yield from the current 4.25% yield to 5.0% or even higher, and take the (TLT) down to a low of $90, or even $85. Stocks would drop 10%.
That would be a nightmare for 2024 LEAPS holder, no matter how brief it may be.
It doesn’t help that the government is borrowing now at a record pace, some $109 billion last week alone. That is why the (TLT) is probing one-year lows.
But whether bonds are inverting, disinverting, converting, or perverting, I’ll be buying two-year bond (LEAPS) if that happens. A 100% return in two years on a government bond risk sounds like a petty good deal to me, even if they are now rated only AA+, thanks to you know who. However you look at it, there is one heck of a bond trade setting up.
We may get our answer at 10:05 AM EST on Friday, August 25.
That’s when Jay Powell, the governor of the Federal Reserve, is due to be the keynote speaker at the meeting of global central bankers at Jackson Hole. Will this mark the bottom in bond prices and the top in yields?
Last year, Jay’s mumblings lasted only eight minutes and warned of “pain to come.” Pain we got, but for only two months. After that, it was nine months of pleasure in the form of straight-up stock prices.
Will Jay Powell Drop a Bomb Next Week?
Only Jay Powell knows for sure.
In the meantime, stocks will remain as dead as a doorknob and moribund, if not catatonic. Volatility ($VIX) will hug the $15 level, the “A” Team traders will remain at the Hamptons, and the number of new trades alerts emanating from me will remain precisely at zero.
There never is a profit trading when the Mad Hedge AI Market Timing Index vacillates around 50, as it is doing now. Sometimes you just get paid to wait, especially when 90-day T-bills are paying a healthy 5.25%.
So far in August, we are down -4.70%. My 2023 year-to-date performance is still at an eye-popping +60.80%. The S&P 500 (SPY) is up +17.10% so far in 2023. My trailing one-year return reached +92.45% versus +8.45% for the S&P 500.
That brings my 15-year total return to +657.99%. My average annualized return has fallen back to +48.15%, another new high, some 2.50 times the S&P 500 over the same period.
Some 41 of my 46 trades this year have been profitable.
My Ten-Year View
When we come out the other side of the recession, we will be perfectly poised to launch into my new American Golden Age, or the next Roaring Twenties. The economy decarbonizing and technology hyper-accelerating, creating enormous investment opportunities. The Dow Average will rise by 800% to 240,000 or more in the coming decade. The new America will be far more efficient and profitable than the old.
Dow 240,000 here we come!
On Monday, August 21, BHP (BHP) and Zoom (ZM) announce earnings.
On Tuesday, August 22 at 7:00 AM EST, Existing Homes Sales for July are released.
On Wednesday, August 23 at 2:30 PM EST, the New Homes Sales are published.
On Thursday, August 24 at 8:30 AM EST, the Weekly Jobless Claims are announced. So are US Durable Goods.
On Friday, August 25 at 7:00 AM, Fed Governor Jay Powell gives his keynote speech at the Jackson Hole Central Bankers Conference. At 2:00 PM, the Baker Hughes Rig Count is printed.
As for me, I am often told that I am the most interesting man people ever met, sometimes daily. I had the good fortune to know someone far more interesting than myself.
When I was 14, I decided to start earning merit badges if I was ever going to become an Eagle Scout. I decided to begin with an easy one, Reading Merit Badge, where you only had to read four books and write one review. I loved reading, so “Piece of cake,” I thought.
I was directed to Kent Cullers, a high school kid who had been blind since birth. During the late 1940s, the medical community thought it would be a great idea to give newborns pure oxygen. It was months before it was discovered that the procedure caused the clouding of corneas and total blindness in infants.
Kent was one of these kids.
It turned out that everyone in the troop already had Reading Merit Badge and that Kent had exhausted our supply of readers. Fresh meat was needed.
So, I rode my bicycle over to Kent’s house and started reading. It was all science fiction. America’s Space Program had ignited a science fiction boom and writers like Isaac Asimov, Jules Verne, Arthur C. Clark, and H.G. Welles were in huge demand. Star Trek came out the following year, in 1966. That was the year I became an Eagle Scout.
It only took a week for me to blow through the first four books. In the end, I read hundreds to Kent. Kent didn’t just listen to me read. He explained the implications of what I was reading (got to watch out for those non-carbon-based life forms).
Having listened to thousands of books on the subject, Kent gave me a first-class education and I credit him with moving me towards a career in science. Kent is also the reason why I got an 800 SAT score in Math.
When we got tired of reading, we played around with Kent’s radio. His dad was a physicist and had bought him a state-of-the-art high-powered short-wave radio. I always found Kent’s house from the 50-foot-tall radio antenna.
That led to another merit badge, one for Radio, where I had to transmit in Morse Code at five words a minute. Kent could do 50. On the badge below, the Morse Code says “BSA.” In those days, when you made a new contact, you traded addresses and sent each other postcards.
Kent had postcards with colorful call signs from more than 100 countries plastered all over his wall. One of our regular correspondents was the president of the Palo Alto High School Radio Club, Steve Wozniak, who later went on to co-found Apple (AAPL) with Steve Jobs.
It was a sad day in 1999 when the US Navy retired Morse Code and replaced it with satellites and digital communication far faster than any human could send. However, it is still used as beacon identifiers at US airfields.
Kent’s great ambition was to become an astronomer. I asked how he would become an astronomer when he couldn’t see anything. He responded that Galileo, the inventor of the telescope, was blind in his later years.
I replied, “Good point.”
Kent went on to get a PhD in Physics from UC Berkeley, no mean accomplishment. He lobbied heavily for the creation of SETI, or the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence, once an arm of NASA. He became its first director in 1985 and worked there for 20 years.
In the 1987 movie Contact, written by Carl Sagan and starring Jodie Foster, Kent’s character is played by Matthew McConaughey. The movie was filmed at the Very Large Array in western New Mexico. The algorithms Kent developed there are still in widespread use today.
Out here in the West, aliens are a big deal, ever since that weather balloon crashed in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947. In fact, it was a spy balloon meant to overfly and photograph Russia, but it blew back on the US, thus its top secret status.
When people learn I used to work at Area 51, I am constantly asked if I have seen any spaceships. The road there, Nevada State Route 375, is called the Extra Terrestrial Highway. Who says we don’t have a sense of humor in Nevada?
After devoting his entire life to searching, Kent gave me the inside story on searching for aliens. We will never meet them but we will talk to them. That’s because the acceleration needed to get to a high enough speed to reach outer space would tear apart a human body. On the other hand, radio waves travel effortlessly at the speed of light.
Sadly, Kent passed away in 2021 at the age of 72. Kent, ever the optimist, had his body cryogenically frozen in Hawaii where he will remain until the technology evolves to wake him up. Minor planet 35056 Cullers is named in his honor.
There are no movies being made about my life…. yet. But there are a couple of scripts out there under development.
Watch this space.
Good Luck and Good Trading,
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Dr. Kent Cullers
New Mexico Very Large Array
Reading Merit Badge
Radio Merit Badge
The first thing I do when I get up every morning is to curse the oil companies as blood sucking scourges of modern civilization.
I then fall down on my knees and thank God that we have the oil companies.
This is why petroleum engineers are getting $100,000 straight out of college, while English and political science major are going straight on to food stamps.
I recommend (XOM) and other oil majors as part of any long-term portfolio. In my lifetime, the price of oil has gone up from $3 a barrel up to $149.
The reasons for the ascent keep growing, from the entry of China into the global trading system, to the rapid growth of the middle class in emerging nations.? They?re just not making the stuff anymore, and we can?t wait around for more dinosaurs to get squashed.
Big oil companies aren?t in the oil speculation business. As soon as a new supply comes on stream, they hedge off their risk through the futures markets or through long-term supply contracts. You can find the prices they hedge at in the back of any annual report.
This is why the oil crash barely caused the shares of oil majors to move. Exxon Mobil (XOM) shares are now down only 15%, while its principal product is off by an astounding 80% from its 2011 top.
When oil made its big run to $149 a few years ago, I discovered to my amazement that (XOM) had already sold most of their supplies in the $20 range. However, oil companies do make huge killings on what is already in the pipeline.
Working in the oil patch 15 years ago pioneering the ?fracking? process for natural gas, I got to know many people in the industry. I found them to be insular, God fearing people not afraid of hard work.
Perhaps this is because the black gold they are pursuing can blow up and kill them at any time. They are also great with numbers, which is why the oil majors are the best-managed companies in the world.
They are also huge gamblers. I swallow hard when I see the way these guys throw around billions in capital, keeping in mind past disasters, like Dome Petroleum, the Alaskan Pipeline oil spill, Piper Alpha, and more recently, the ill-fated Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico.
But one failure does not slow them down an iota. The ?wildcatting? origins made this a faith-based industry from day one, when praying and dousing wands were the principal determinants of where wells were sunk.
Unfortunately, the oil companies are too good at their job of supplying us with a steady and reliable source of energy. They have one of the oldest and most powerful lobbies in Washington, and as a result, the tax code is riddled with favorite treatment of the oil industry.
While Social Security and Medicare are on the chopping block, the industry basks in the glow of $53 billion a year in tax subsidies.
When I first got into the oil business and sat down with a Houston CPA, the tax breaks were so legion that I couldn?t understand why anyone was not in the oil racket.
Ever wonder why we have had three presidents from Texas over the last 50 years, and are possibly looking at a fourth (Jeb Bush, Rick Perry)?
Three words explain it all: the oil depletion allowance, whereby investors can write off the entire cost of a new well in the first year, while the income is spread over the life of the well.
This also explains why deep-water exploration in the Gulf is far less regulated than California hairdressers.
No surprise then that the industry has emerged in the cross hairs of several presidential candidates, under the ?loopholes? category. Not only do the country?s most profitable companies pay almost nothing in taxes, they are one of the largest users of private jets.
It is an old Washington nostrum that when things start heading south on the domestic front, you beat up the oil companies. It?s the industry that everyone loves to hate.
Cut off the gasoline supply to an environmentalist, and he will be the one who screams the loudest. This has generated recurring cycles of accusatory congressional investigations, windfall profits taxes, and punitive regulations, the most recent flavor we are now seeing.
But imagine what the world would look like if Exxon and its cohorts were German, Saudi, or heaven forbid, Chinese. I bet we wouldn?t have as much oil as we do today, and it wouldn?t be as cheap.
Hate them if you will, but at least these are our oil companies. Try jamming a lump of coal into the gas tank of your Prius and tell me how far you go.
Well, that?s enough ranting for today.
Love Them, Hate Them or Both?
After the market closes every night, I usually don a 60 pound backpack and climb the 2,000 foot mountain in my back yard.
To pass the time, I listen to audio books on financial and historical topics, about 200 a year (I?ve really got President Grover Cleveland nailed!). That?s if the howling packs of coyotes don?t bother me too much.
I also engage in mental calisthenics, engaging in complex mathematical calculations. How many grains of sand would you have to pile up to reach from the earth to the moon? How many matchsticks to circle the earth?
For last night?s exercise, I decided to quantify the impact of last year?s oil price crash on the global economy.
The world is currently consuming about 92 million barrels a day of Texas tea, or 33.6 billion barrels a year. In May, 2014 at the $107.50 high, that much oil cost $3.6 trillion. At today?s $32 intraday low you could buy that quantity of oil for a bargain $1 trillion.
Buy a barrel of crude, and you get three for free!
This means that $2.6 trillion has suddenly been taken out of the pockets of oil producers, and put into the pockets of oil consumers, i.e. you and me. Over the medium term, this is fantastic news for oil consumers. But for the short term, things could get very scary.
$2.6 trillion is a lot of money. If you had that amount of hundred dollar bills, it would rise to 250 million inches, 21 million feet, or 3,976 miles, or 1.2% of the way to the moon (another mental exercise). Tip this pile on its side, and you?d have a distance nearly equal to a round trip from San Francisco to New York.
The global financial system cannot move this amount of money around on short notice without causing some pretty severe disruptions. Expect a lot of bodies to float to the surface in 2016.
For a start, there is suddenly a lot less demand for dollars with which to buy oil. This has triggered short covering rallies in the long beleaguered Japanese Yen (FXY) and the Euro (FXE), which are just now backing off of long downtrends.
The fundamentals for these currencies are still dire. But the short-term trend now appears to be an upward one. The yen is tickling a one-year high against the buck as we speak.
The US Federal Reserve certainly sees the oil crash as an enormously deflationary event. The use of energy is so widespread that it feeds into the cost of everything. That firmly takes the chance of any interest rate rise off the table for the rest of 2016. The Treasury bond market (TLT) has figured this out and launched on a monster rally, as have muni bonds (MUB).
Traders are also afraid that the disinflationary disease will spread, so they have been taking down the price of virtually all other hard commodities as well, like coal (KOL), iron ore (BHP), and copper (CU). For more depth on this, see my piece on ?The End of the Commodity Super Cycle? by clicking here.
The precipitous fall in energy investments everywhere will be felt principally in the 15 US states involved in energy production (Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, North Dakota. Etc.). So, the consumers in the other 35 states should be thrilled.
However, the plunge in energy stocks is getting so severe, that it is dragging down everything else with it. ALL shares are effectively oil shares right now. In fact, all asset classes are now moving tic for tic with the price of oil. That effectively makes all of you oil traders.
Throw on top of that the systemic risk presented by the ongoing collapse of the Russian economy. The Ruble has now fallen a staggering 70% in 18 months, and there is panic buying of everything going on in Moscow stores.
The means that the dollar denominated debt owed by local firms has just risen by 300%. Any foreign banks holding this debt are now probably regretting ever watching the film, Dr. Zhivago.
Russian interest rates there were just skyrocketed. The Russian stock market (RSX) is the world?s worst performing bourse. How do you spell ?depression? in the Cyrillic alphabet?
And guess what the new Russian currency is?
IPhone 6.0?s, of which Apple is now totally sold out in Alexander Putin?s domain!
Thankfully, this is more of a European, than an American problem. But nobody likes systemic risks, especially going into New Year trading. It?s a classic case of being careful what you wish for.
Of the $2.6 trillion today, about $650 billion is shifting between American pockets. That amounts to a hefty 3.3% of GDP. Tell me this won?t become a big political issue in the 2016 presidential election.
Money spent on oil is burned. However, money spent by newly enriched consumers has a multiplier effect. Spend a dollar at Walmart, and the company has to hire more workers, who then have more money to spend, and so on.
So a shifting of funds of this magnitude will probably add 1.5% to U.S. economic growth this year.
Ultimately, cheap energy as far as the eye can see is a key element of my ?Golden Age? scenario for the 2020?s (click here for ?Get Ready for the Coming Golden Age?).
But you may have to get there by riding a roller coaster first.
Oil at $32?
Long-term observers of financial markets are befuddled, confused, and amazed at their complete lack of interest in the rapidly unfolding events in the Middle East.
It seems that the more horrific the atrocities, the higher stock prices want to climb.
Go figure.
ISIS is in fact accelerating the most important geopolitical event so far in this century, the rapprochement of relations between the U.S. and Iran, which have been in a deep freeze for 40 years.
A serious dialogue has not been held between these two countries since 52 hostages were seized at the American embassy in Tehran in 1979 and held for 444 days.
The Mullahs in Iran can?t help but notice last week?s U.S. air strikes to protect Shiite cities from a Sunni slaughter at the hands of ISIS. Suddenly, our natural enemy in the region has become our natural ally.
The Iranians have even offered to back up our air power with their ground forces, an offer the Obama administration has so far wisely turned down.
Don?t worry about ISIS. Their threat is being wildly overrated by the media.
There is a reason why terrorist groups have never held territory before. That makes them a big fat target for drones, smart bombs, and all the other types of fire that we rain down upon our enemies from above. This may be the first war in history entirely fought by drones on our side. That means it will be cheap, without casualties, and over quickly.
So what will the new treaty and peace between the U.S. and Iran bring us?
So far, Iran has agreed to a freeze on its nuclear enrichment program in exchange for international inspections and the unfreezing of $100 billion of their assets. Secret negotiations are being held intermittently in Geneva, Switzerland (I stopped by to say hello a few weeks ago).
This is unbelievably positive for all asset classes, except energy. This is the cause of the recent collapse of oil prices, which are now 65% off their 2014 high.
The US is now in a tremendously powerful negotiating position. If Iran dumps their nuclear program to our satisfaction, Iran then gets the carrot.
It will rejoin the world economy, unfreeze the rest of its assets and recover $100 billion a year in trade. The country?s banks will be allowed to rejoin U.S. dollar clearing, the $1 trillion a day CHIPS and SWIFT systems, their absence from which has been a deathblow to their international trade.
Its oil exports (USO) can recover from 750,000 barrels a day back to the pre crisis level of 3 million barrels. If it doesn?t then it gets the stick again in six months, resuming their economic freefall.
The geopolitical implications for the U.S. are enormous.? Iran is the last major rogue state hostile to the US in the Middle East, and it is teetering. The final domino of the Arab spring falls squarely at the gates of Tehran.
A friendly, or at least a non-hostile Iran, means we really don?t care what happens in Syria.
Remember that the first real revolution in the region was Iran?s Green Revolution in 2009. That revolt was successfully suppressed with an iron fist by fanatical and pitiless Revolutionary Guards.
The true death toll will never be known, but is thought to be well into the thousands. The antigovernment sentiments that provided the spark never went away and they continue to percolate just under the surface.
At the end of the day, the majority of the Persian population wants to join the relentless tide of globalization. They want to buy iPods and blue jeans, communicate freely through their Facebook pages and Twitter accounts, and have the jobs to pay for it all.
Since 1979, when the Shah was deposed, a succession of extremist, ultraconservative governments ruled by a religious minority, have abjectly failed to cater to these desires
If Iran doesn?t do a deal on nukes soon, it?s economy with sink deeper into the morass in which they currently find themselves. The Iranian ?street? will figure out that if they spill enough of their own blood that regime change is possible and the revolution there will reignite.
The Obama administration is now pulling out all the stops to accelerate the process.
The oil embargo former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, organized is steadily tightening the noose, with heating oil and gasoline becoming hard to obtain.
Yes, Russia and China are doing what they can to slow the process. This is what the Ukraine crisis is really all about, an attempt to keep oil prices high, Russia?s biggest earner.
But conducting international trade through the back door is expensive, and prices are rocketing. The unemployment rate is 40%.? The Iranian Rial has collapsed by 50%.
Let?s see how docile these people remain when the air conditioning quits running because of power shortages. Iran is a rotten piece of fruit ready to fall off on its own accord and go splat. The US is doing everything she can to shake the tree.
No military action of any kind is required on America?s part. No shot has been fired. That?s a big deal when the shots cost $10,000 apiece.
The geopolitical payoff of such an event for the U.S. would be almost incalculable. A successful revolution will almost certainly produce a secular, pro-Western regime whose first priority will be to rejoin the international community and use its oil wealth to rebuild an economy now in tatters.
Oil will has completely lost its risk premium, once believed by the oil industry to be $30 a barrel. A looming supply could cause prices to drop to as low as $20 a barrel.
This price drop seen so far amount to a gigantic $2.18 trillion trillion tax cut for not just the US, but the entire global economy as well (92 million barrels a day X 365 days a year X $65).
Almost all funding of terrorist organizations will immediately dry up. I might point out here that this has always been the oil industry?s worst nightmare.
ISIS is a short.
At that point, the US will be without enemies, save for North Korea, and even the Hermit Kingdom could change with a new leader in place. A long Pax Americana will settle over the planet.
The implications for the financial markets will be enormous. The US will reap a peace dividend as large, or larger, than the one we enjoyed after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1992.
As you may recall, that black swan caused the Dow Average to soar from 2,000 to 10,000 in less than eight years, also partly fueled by the technology boom.
A collapse in oil imports will cause the U.S. dollar (UUP) to rocket.? An immediate halving of our defense spending to $400 billion or less and burgeoning new tax revenues would cause the budget deficit to collapse.
With the US government gone as a major new borrower, interest rates across the yield curve will fall further. The national debt completely disappears by the 2030?s (as it almost did during the late 1990?s).
A peace dividend will also cause US GDP growth to reaccelerate from 2% to 4%. Risk assets of every description will soar to multiples of their current levels, including stocks, junk bonds, commodities, precious metals, and food.
The Dow will soar to 30,000 and the S&P 500 (SPY) to 3,500, the Euro collapses to parity, gold rockets to $2,300 an ounce, silver flies to $100 an ounce, copper leaps to $6 a pound, and corn recovers $8 a bushel.
Some 2 million of the armed forces will get dumped on the job market as our manpower requirements shrink to peacetime levels. But a strong economy should be able to soak these well-trained and motivated people right up.
We will enter a new Golden Age, not just at home, but for civilization as a whole.
Wait, you ask, what if Iran develops an atomic bomb and holds the US at bay?
Don?t worry. There is no Iranian nuclear device. There is no real Iranian nuclear program large enough to threaten the United States. The entire concept is an invention of Israeli and American intelligence agencies as a means to put pressure on the regime.
According to them, Iran has been within a month of producing a tactical nuclear weapon for the last 30 years. I'm still waiting.
The head of the miniscule effort they have was assassinated by Israeli intelligence two years ago (a magnetic bomb, placed on a moving car, by a team on a motorcycle, nice!).
If Iran had anything substantial in the works, the Israeli planes would have taken off a long time ago.
Even if Iran had one nuclear weapon, would they really want to attack a country with 6,700, the US?
There is no plan to close the Straits of Hormuz, either. The training exercises in small rubber boats we have seen are done for CNN?s benefit, and comprise no credible threat.
I am a firm believer in the wisdom of markets, and that the marketplace becomes aware of major history changing events well before we mere individual mortals do.
The Dow began a 25-year bull market the day after American forces defeated the Japanese in the Battle of Midway in May of 1942, even though the true outcome of that confrontation was kept top secret for years.
If the advent of a new, docile Iran were going to lead to a global multi-decade economic boom and the end of history, how would the stock markets behave now?
They would remain in a long-term bull market, much like we have seen for the past six years. That?s why 10% corrections have been few and far between.
The Problem is That it?s a Hollow Threat
Aim This One at the Bears
With the price of oil (USO), (XLE) hitting an eye popping $64 this morning, in the wake of the failed OPEC summit in Vienna, it is clear that something long term, structural, and epochal is going on.
But what is it?
We mere mortals are blind to it, but the financial markets haven?t the slightest doubt. Blame the wisdom of crowds. There is something big going on somewhere.
So I thought it would be a good time to check in with my friend and expert on all things international, David Hale, of David Hale Global Economics.
I have been relying on David as my global macro economist for decades, and I never miss an opportunity to get his updated views.
The challenge is in writing down David?s eye popping, out of consensus ideas fast enough, because he spits them out in such a rapid-fire succession.
Since David is an independent economic advisor to many of the world?s governments, largest banks, and investment firms, I thought his views would be of riveting interest. For my last interview with David, please click here.
On November 21, David was on Capitol Hill testifying in front of congress about the implications of a peace deal with Iran. He was kind enough to pass on to me a transcript of his talk.
The Iran nuclear negotiations broke up last week, extending the deadline for the current round by another seven months, to June 2015.
What David had to say was eye opening. If successful, a deal would have momentous implications for not just the US, but the global economy as well.
All trade with Iran ceased in the wake of the overthrow of the Shah of Iran by fundamentalist religious fanatics led by the Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979. The tortuous yearlong Iran Hostage Crisis followed, and relations with the US went into a deep freeze.
US Secretary of State John Kerry certainly has his work cut out for him today. Iran and America deeply distrust each other and philosophically couldn?t be further apart. They have been fighting proxy wars against each other for three decades, both in the analogue and digital worlds.
Remember Stuxnet?
It also doesn?t engender Iranian trust that the US has decimated a half dozen Arab countries in 30 years, and has more than the means to continue on that path, if it so desires.
Now 35 years later, America and Iran oddly find themselves on the same side of the latest Middle Eastern conflict. Sunni extremist forces lead by ISIL has launched a full-scale invasion of Iraq, capturing about one third of the country, and butchering Shiite opponents along the way in true, barbaric, 14th century fashion.
It has not gone unnoticed in Tehran that steady US air attacks against ISIL have meshed nicely with Iranian ground support to accomplish the same, although ?officially? there has been no cooperation whatsoever.
Not surprisingly, nuclear talks between the two countries, long considered a pipedream and simmering on a distant back burner have suddenly come to life.
If successful, a nuclear deal with Iran would have momentous implications, for not just the US, but the global economy as well.
First and foremost, Iran would be able to increase its oil exports by 1 million barrels a day, and then 1.5 million barrels a day over 2-3 years. The deluge could take the price of Texas tea down to $50-$60 a barrel and keep it there for a while.
Such a collapse, down 56% from the June peak, would amount to a $400 billion annual tax cut for the global economy. It would add 0.2% a year of GDP growth for every $10 price drop.
So the boost that we have seen so far amounts to an impressive 1% growth pop. That is an enormous number, increasing the world?s projected economic activity by a full third.
Major energy importers, like Europe, Japan, China, and India would benefit mightily. The US would prosper as well, as one third of its oil still comes from abroad.
It would be a disaster for high cost energy exporters, including Russia, Venezuela, Nigeria, and Canadian tar sands.
Russia, in particular, would get it right between the eyes. Oil and gas account for a whopping 68% of Russian exports and 45% of government revenues. To defend a crashing Ruble, the central bank has embarked on a series of gut wrenching interest rate hikes.
Russia is now looking into the jaws of its own Great Recession. After seeing its economy shrink this year by -0.2%, it could nosedive by at least 5% in 2015.
When they talk about self-sufficiency, they really mean starvation. This is why I have been saying all along that the Ukrainian crisis is going nowhere, except to create buying powers for equity investors.
Venezuela is a basket case, depending on oil for 90% of its exports. Expect hyperinflation, leading to a headline grabbing default on its national debt. Political instability is to follow.
Another big plus for the world economy is the reemergence of Iran as a significant consumer. This is not a small country. It has a population of 78 million and a $369 billion GDP. Sanctions have successfully crippled the economy, shrinking its GDP by -5.8% in 2012 and another -1.9% last year.
The sanctions have not been a one-way street. They have cost the US a not inconsequential $175 billion in sales over the past 17 years. A rebound would lead to a surge of exports of consumer goods (iPhones), and oil drilling equipment to facilitate a long delayed modernization of the industry there.
A major roadblock to peace has been the Revolutionary Guard. Originally an elite group of fighters during the revolution, it has evolved into a modern day Mafia.
It controls the black market, smuggling and a host of other illegal activities, earning billions in illicit profits along the way. It has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. War with America is good business for them.
Iran is now a classic case of where the government hates us, and the people love us.
I have written extensively in the past about the global implications of peace with Iran. For my latest opus, please click the titles: Here Comes the Next Peace Dividend and Why You Should Care About the Iranian Rial Collapse.
To learn more about David Hale and the extensive list of services he offers; please visit the website of David Hale Global Economics, http://www.davidhaleweb.com.
There are a lot of belles at the ball, but you can?t dance with all of them.
While a student at UCLA in the early seventies, I took a World Politics course, which required me to pick a country, analyze its economy, and make recommendations for its economic development. I chose Algeria, a country where I had spent the summer of 1968 caravanning among the Bedouins, crawling out of the desert half starved, lice ridden, and half dead.
I concluded that the North African country should immediately nationalize the oil industry, and raise prices from $3/barrel to $10.? I knew that Los Angeles based Occidental Petroleum (OXY) was interested in exploring for oil there, so I sent my paper to the company for review. They called the next day and invited me to their imposing downtown headquarters, then the tallest building in Los Angeles.
I was ushered into the office of Dr. Armand Hammer, one of the great independent oil moguls of the day, a larger than life figure who owned a spectacular impressionist art collection, and who confidently displayed a priceless Faberg? egg on his desk. He said he was impressed with my paper, and then spent two hours grilling me.
Why should oil prices go up? Who did I know there? What did I see? What was the state of their infrastructure? Roads? Bridges? Rail lines? Did I see any oil derricks? Did I see any Russians? I told him everything I knew, including the two weeks in an Algiers jail for taking pictures in the wrong places. His parting advice was to never take my eye off the oil industry, as it is the driver of everything else. I have followed that advice ever since.
When I went back to UCLA, I told a CIA friend of mine that I had just spent the afternoon with the eminent doctor (Marsha, call me!). She told me that he had been a close advisor of Vladimir Lenin after the Russian Revolution, had been a double agent for the Soviets ever since, that the FBI had known this all along, and was currently funneling illegal campaign donations to President Richard Nixon. Shocked, I kicked myself for going into an interview so ill prepared, and had missed a golden opportunity to ask some great questions. I never made that mistake again.
Some 40 years later, while trolling the markets for great buying opportunities set up by the BP oil spill, I stumbled across (OXY) once more (click here for their site). (OXY) has a minimal offshore presence, nothing in deep water, and huge operations in the Middle East and South America. It was the first US oil company to go back into Libya when the sanctions were lifted in 2005. (OXY?s) substantial California production is expected to leap to 45% to 200,000 barrels a day over the next four years. Its horizontal multistage fracturing technology will enable it to dominate California shale. The company has raised its dividend for the tenth year in a row, by 15% to 1.56%. Need I say more?
The clear message that came out of the BP oil spill is that onshore energy resources are now more valuable than offshore ones. I decided to add it to my model portfolio. Energy is one of a tiny handful of industries I am willing to put my money in these days (technology, industrials, and health care are the others).
Oh, and I got an A+ on the paper, and the following year Algeria raised the price of oil to $12.
A Faberge Egg
I can tell you exactly how the crisis in the Ukraine is going to play out. This has major implications for the global economy, financial markets and your personal portfolio, so listen up!
The key to deciphering this puzzle is oil, far and away Russia?s largest export. At 10 million barrels a day, the country is taking in $360 billion a year in revenues from oil shipments.
You can analyze Russia all day long, and come up with bullish arguments for the country, like the emerging middle class, its huge hoard of basic commodities, and substantial wheat exports. But Texas tea (Russian tea?) overwhelms everything else in its impact on the national accounts.
The bottom line is that Russia is basically a call option on oil. This is why I never buy the Market Vectors ETF Trust (RSX). Look at the charts below for oil, and it is clear that it almost trades tick for tick with the (RSX).
If I?m bullish on oil, I go straight to the end commodity, and not the intermediary, where price earnings multiples are permanently low, corruption is rampant and the rule of law is absent.
And therein lies the problem for Vladimir Putin.
Any chink in the global growth picture flows straight into the price of oil. Slower growth brings lower oil prices and therefore smaller incomes for the Russians. And guess who the principal threat to global growth is? Vladimir Putin and his attempt to take over the Ukraine by force.
So far, crude has dropped by 10% from the May peak of $107.60. That may not sound like a lot. But this is not your father?s Russian oil industry.
Back in the old days, when my friend, Occidental Petroleum?s (OXY) Dr. Armand Hammer and Fred Koch were the only Americans running around the Caucasus, oil there was incredibly cheap. There, technology was 50 years old and labor was virtually free. Slave labor is great for profit margins. If you don?t believe me, just ask Wal-Mart (WMT) and Apple (AAPL).
The fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Soviet Union brought many far-reaching, unintended consequences. A big one is that Russia?s dependence on international trade grew tremendously. The country was also able to modernize its oil industry with extensive American assistance.
Russian oil production exploded, as did the cost of production. In my lifetime, expenses have soared from $5 to $70 a barrel. So when oil dips by 10% on the international markets, Russian incomes plunge by 25%. The Russian oil industry has become a highly leveraged affair.
This is why such relatively minor price declines brought apparently desperate actions by the Russian authorities to prop up the economy. They have imposed a 3% emergency VAT, or sales tax. While I was in Europe, four Russian tour companies were driven into bankruptcy by the banking sanctions, stranding some 10,000 tourists on Mediterranean beaches.
Now there is a ban on food imports from Europe, stranding thousands of trucks at the Russian borders. Russia doesn?t grow much food, thanks to their horrendous winters and short growing seasons. Essentially, it?s just wheat and potatoes.
Everything else has to be imported. Some of the lost food can be made up with new imports from emerging, non sanctioning economies, but not much. In the meantime, some 350 McDonald?s franchises in Russia are trying to figure out how to make Big Macs purely from domestic supplies. Good luck to that!
The thing that really struck me speaking to Russians in Europe this summer was Putin?s unbelievably high 85% approval rating (our congress is at 14%!). They trotted out the most incredible conspiracy theories which painted them as the injured party. (The Ukraine was trying to assassinate Putin when it shot down Malaysian Air 17, and then blamed it on Russia).
It almost reminded me of home. The Russians are calling their opponents ?fascists.? This is a people who act like WWII ended last week.
Which leads me to believe that Putin?s popularity is peaking. The sanctions coupled with falling oil revenues are starting to have a severe impact on Russian standards of living. It is a matter of time before this feeds into poor election results for Putin. Nationalism is great, but who wants to live on canned food left over from the Soviet Union (yuck!).
Putin knows this. So to head off the riot, he is going to declare victory in the Ukraine fairly soon, and then take his troops home. This will enable the Ukraine to snuff out the separatists and return to an uneasy peace. We might even luck out and get a written treaty.
If that is a case, you can expect global financial markets to rocket. There would me a massive shift of capital out the risk spectrum, out of bonds and into stocks. This would give the green light for my scenario where S&P 500 adds 10% from last week?s low to end of 2014.
Maybe this is what stocks are trying to tell us by refusing to go down more that 5% this summer and the face of a host of geopolitical disasters.
As for the exact timing for all of this, just watch the price of oil. The lower it goes, the sooner we will get a favorable resolution. The charts are hinting that another $5-$10 break to the downside is imminent.
The last Cold War drove the Soviet Union broke and Putin definitely has no interest in repeating the exercise.
Not Until the Sanctions Are Over
