“Life is too short for long-term grudges.” – Said CEO and Founder of Tesla Elon Musk
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 18, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE FUTURE IS HERE)
(NO CODE)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
January 10, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE EV DARKHORSE)
(LCID), (TSLA), (NKLA)
“Your margin is my opportunity.” – Said Founder and CEO of Amazon Jeff Bezos
“I know that you must be passionate, unreasonable, and a little bit crazy to follow your own ideas and do things differently.” – Said CEO and Founder of Salesforce Marc Benioff
MongoDB’s latest earnings’ results validate the concept open source software as a rival to the opposed closed-source software grid.
A keen rival of MongoDB’s RedHat was also acquired by IBM (IBM) a few years ago showing the vitality of the sub-sector.
Don’t sleep on these companies as another one Cloudera (CLDR) were taken private by private equity firms KKR and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice.
These are highly valuable assets and I’m not the only one shouting from the rooftops.
How did this all first start?
The first open-source projects were not really businesses, they were counter attacks against the unfair profits that closed-source software companies were reaping.
Microsoft (MSFT), Oracle (ORCL), SAP (SAP), to name a few, were enforcing monopoly-like “rents” for software that were substandard in quality.
The latest evolution of open source came when developers evolved the projects with two important elements.
The first is that the open-source software is now developed largely within the confines of businesses.
Often, more than 90% of the lines of code in these projects are written by the employees of the company that commercialized the software.
Second, these businesses offer their own software as a cloud service from inception.
In a sense, these are Open Core / Cloud service hybrid businesses that can obtain multiple pathways to monetize their product and that is exactly what MongoDB did.
By offering the products as SaaS, these businesses can interweave open-source software with commercial software so customers no longer have to worry about which license they should be taking.
MongoDB Atlas is a great example of this evolution and can become the dominant business model for software infrastructure.
This is their hottest product which is a fully-managed cloud database and Atlas handles all the complexity of deploying, managing, and healing deployments on the cloud service provider of your choice like Amazon or Google.
MongoDB changed how open-source software is licensed, and they introduced the new cloud service that required them and partners to compete with the largest cloud providers.
Looking quickly at second-quarter financial results, they generated revenue of $199 million, a 44% year-over-year increase and above the high-end of guidance. They grew subscription revenue 44% year over year.
Mongo Atlas revenue grew 83% year over year and now represents 56% of revenue, and they had another strong quarter of customer growth, ending the quarter with over 29,000 customers.
Businesses that can develop software faster are able to ultimately outgrow their competition.
MongoDB’s results are a clear indication that customers view MongoDB as a critical platform to accelerate their digital innovation agenda.
Customers of all types are choosing MongoDB because they can develop so much faster using this platform to build new applications and replatform legacy applications across a broad range of use cases to drive business forward.
Even though MongoDB open-source software is lower cost per unit, it makes up the total market size by leveraging the elasticity in the market. When something is cheaper, more people buy it. That’s why open-source companies have such massive and rapid adoption when they achieve product-market fit.
The model now is that companies are venturing as far as actually open sourcing all their software but applying a commercial license to parts of the software base. The premise being that real enterprise customers would pay whether the software is open or closed, and they are more incentivized to use commercial software if they can actually read the code.
Observing how airline JetBlue deployed MongoDB is how these new approaches and improved products manifest themselves in the topline revenue.
JetBlue came to the decision to overhaul their core e-commerce app, and JetBlue chose the MongoDB application data platform.
MongoDB's flexible data model allowed JetBlue to build a dynamic customer experience with modern ticketing applications, as well as predictive analytics in real-time.
An avalanche of firms is leveraging the tools of MongoDB tools to up their digital game.
Management has steered the narrative to include the ease of use and expanding the capabilities of the MongoDB platform to make it more compelling for customers to standardize on MongoDB.
For example, a serverless, customer can get started with MongoDB without having to pick a specific machine type or size. The application connects to Atlas, and they handle the elastic scaling of compute and storage seamlessly, whether an application scales fast or becomes popular. Customers no longer must do capacity planning or manual intervention to adjust the size of the deployment.
The verdict is in and deploying MongoDB to harness in-house developers to build unique commercial applications has been a winning formula.
Not only are they sheltered from rigid closed-source software, but customers can even integrate the code first, then pay later when it is deployed, and this licensing model has been extremely beneficial for developers who need to test out whether certain code is valuable or not.
Atlas is now the cash cow for MongoDB and forecasts predict acceleration in top-line growth.
Yes, this company is still small procuring revenue of just $166 million in 2018, but 2023 will see annual revenue surpass $1 billion which is why everyone wants to hop on MondoDB’s train.
I would consider any dips to deploy capital in MongoDB, I would call it a rising star of the software world, and a gem in the developers’ world.
“The computer is my favorite invention. I feel lucky to be part of the global village. I don't mean to brag, but I'm so fast with technology. People think it all seems too much, but we'll get used to it. I'm sure it all seemed too much when we were learning to walk.” – Said Japanese Singer Yoko Ono
“Failure is not an option here. If things are failing, you are not innovating enough.”- Said Founder and CEO of Tesla Elon Musk
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 16, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE CLOUD)
(AMZN), (GOOGL), (CRM)
Chinese regulators announced on our Independence Day that they were banning downloads of Uber’s China DiDi in the app stores in the country because it poses cybersecurity risks and broke privacy laws.
This was after DiDi raised $4.4 billion by listing its shares in New York.
However, unnamed sources leaked that China's cybersecurity watchdog suggested to DiDi that it delay its IPO before it happened.
Delaying a wealth generating event like the IPO is controversial.
At this point, DIDI, the Uber of China, is worth a speculative trade at $1 and that’s if the Chinese tech firm doesn’t delist before that.
No — scratch that — it’s not even worth your time at $1 if you hold currency denominated in USD or anything even half as credible.
But if you’re from somewhere like Venezuela wielding infamous bolivars then take a wild stab around $1 or double up at $0.50 for a trade.
There is a reason that I have never in the history of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter recommended buying a Chinese technology stock.
The astronomical risk isn’t justified.
The evidence is now out in public with Chinese big tech and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) airing their dirty laundry.
Most sensitive business dealings are usually dealt with in-house in the land of pan-fried dumplings and Beijing roasted duck, so things must be spiraling out of control on the inside.
No doubt that inflation spikes are causing chaos everywhere, but China is particularly vulnerable because of the high volume of Chinese living in poverty.
It’s unrelated to this IPO, but another valid reason why Chinese “growth” is weakening fast.
Stateside, cashing out is normal for tech growth companies who want to reward earlier seed investors, their own management teams, and in this case the early-stage investors were Japanese Softbank (21.5%), Silicon Valley’s Uber (12.8%), and China’s Tencent (6.8%).
This was pretty much a big middle finger to these three along with the other Chinese investors which were about to profit big.
This is on the heels of the CCP nixing the Jack Ma Alipay IPO.
Chinese big tech has gone from darlings to pariahs in a short time proving that in the U.S., you get too big to fail, but in China, you get too big to exist.
Silicon Valley tech princelings are also validated for leaving China such as Facebook (FB), Google (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN) and Netflix (NFLX).
If local Chinese tech can’t flourish in China, then forget about foreign tech in China.
It’s a non-starter.
Apple (AAPL) is the only exception because they are grandfathered in when China had no smartphone and now they provide too many local jobs to be kicked out.
There is definitely a plausible case that U.S. retail investors who were part of that $4.4 billion holdings should be refunded their capital because DiDi didn’t truthfully disclose the risk of potential Chinese regulations properly.
There is also the logic that Chinese companies should never be able to list in New York in the first place which would be sensible.
As it stands, Chinese companies don’t need to follow U.S. GAAP accounting standards and cannot be prosecuted by the U.S. legal system if they commit fraud, embezzlement, or any other financial crime and decline to leave Chinese soil.
This incentivizes Chinese companies listed in the U.S. to cheat U.S. investors with fraudulent accounting and deceitful behavior because they aren’t accountable at the end of the day.
The Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ), which tracks the performance of US-listed Chinese stocks, has lost more than one-third of its value since February.
I can tell you from close friends who call themselves frontier investors that investing in China is not worth your time and the fear of missing out (FOMO) rationale is all marketing chutzpah and nothing much else.
China’s economy hasn’t had any positive growth in the past 10 years according to Chinese insiders off record.
This FOMO narrative is often peddled by Wall Street “professionals” who are making exorbitant fees for selling retail investors Chinese junk stocks masquerading as real companies.
Out of many financial pros I have talked to, China leads in terms of horror stories from foreign investors.
The Chinese financial system is a hoax created to lure foreign capital in and for it to never leave often viewed as a free lunch for the local recipients.
And I am not only talking about Chinese tech, but this phenomenon also extends to every reach of the financial system there.
At the end of the day, China’s tech aristocracy wished they originated in the United States which is why they went public here because our markets work and theirs don’t.
They got to New York in the first place by marketing false numbers to U.S. investors and concealing regulatory issues, and U.S. investors must not fall for this trap.
If you look at the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index ($SSEC), it’s gone nowhere in the past year and rightly so.
Even Chinese investors don’t buy Chinese stocks because there is no trust in their financial system. They buy property instead or buy U.S. tech stocks.
Don’t be the next sucker.
